Ripple expands in UAE with new partners Zand Bank and Mamo

Newly founded bankruptcy claim trading platform OPNX has provided further details about the entities backing the fledgling startup. Taking to Twitter on Friday, Open Exchange CEO Leslie Lamb outlined a number of venture capital backers, with a mixture of international and Asia-centric firms among them. Global backersLamb’s tweet via the firm’s official Twitter account, together with a similar announcement published to the firm’s website, outlined AppWorks, a leading Taiwanese venture capital firm and startup accelerator, as an investor in the company. Other Asian backers include Hong Kong-based crypto fund, Token Bay Capital and the Hong Kong-based arm of one of China’s largest banks, China Merchant Bank International.With the firm based in Dubai, Middle-Eastern interest is represented through the involvement of Saudi digital asset fund, Tuwaiq Limited. Otherwise, the company lists a number of other international backers, including US equity options exchange MIAX Group, DeFi-focused venture and trading firm Nascent, top tier global venture capital firm Susquehanna and the investment arm of market maker and early stage investor, DRW. Questionable founding teamOnly hours after the disclosure by Open Exchange, DRW reached out to CoinDesk to confirm that it is not an investor in the bankruptcy claims exchange. Nascent and Susquehanna also denied that they are involved. The companies are still being listed by OPNX as backers of the project on its website.The launch of OPNX has been mired in controversy from the outset as its founding team includes the founders of the former crypto hedge fund Three Arrows Capital (3AC) which failed spectacularly in 2022. Su Zhu and Kyle Davies, the founders of 3AC are now the founders behind OPNX. Before their involvement, OPNX was preceded by Seychelles-based crypto yield platform CoinFLEX. That business also failed during the 2022 crypto bear market. It entered into a restructuring process with the consent of the courts in the Seychelles. Emerging from it is OPNX with the 3AC duo of Zhu and Davies having gotten involved at that point. Industry push-backMany in the crypto space have been highly critical of the development of OPNX on the basis of the involvement of both Zhu and Davies. The duo are being blamed for the collapse of the crypto hedge fund due to mismanagement and the knock on effects the firm’s demise had on other entities within crypto. Many of the series of crypto lenders who failed at a later stage in 2022 had major exposure to the wayward hedge fund.There had been some speculation as to who was backing the new project. Earlier this month, BitMEX co-founder and former CEO Arthur Hayes claimed that the 3AC duo had received substantial funding from Bahrain’s sovereign wealth fund to establish the project. In February, Hayes suggested that the crypto bull market must be starting based on news of Zhu and Davies wanting to launch the OPNX platform.Crypto-focused venture capitalist Michael Arrington also spoke out around that time, stating on Twitter, that 3AC founders successfully raising capital for their latest venture was “the saddest bulls**t I’ve heard in a long time.”Upon its launch earlier this month, industry commentators quickly declared the project a flop citing a trading volume of $13.64 on its first day of trading. Five days in, OPNX made light of the situation, declaring a win on the basis that it had progressed to $12,398 in trading volume, representing a 90,000% increase in trading.Dubai’s Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA) issued an investor and marketplace alert on April 12 stating that while OPNX may be Dubai-based, it is not regulated by VARA and instead operates on an unregulated basis. It warned investors against using any unregulated crypto entity.

Leading cryptocurrency exchange platform Bybit has joined a growing list of competing platforms by applying for a Virtual Asset Trading Platform Operator (VATP) license with the Hong Kong Securities and Exchange Commission (SFC). The application, submitted through the Bybit affiliate business entity Spark Fintech Limited on Jan. 31, is currently under review along with 13 similar VATP applications.Photo by Simon Zhu on UnsplashStrategic licensing playIn the dynamic landscape of cryptocurrency regulations, obtaining a VATP license in Hong Kong is a strategic move. Currently, only two crypto exchanges, OSL and HashKey Exchange, are licensed by the SFC in Hong Kong. OSL secured its license on Dec. 15, 2020, while HashKey Exchange was licensed on Nov. 9, 2022. Under a partnership agreement with OSL, Interactive Brokers has been enabled in its ability to commence trading in Hong Kong. Exchanges who have followed through on the license application process include OKX, Gate.io, and KuCoin, among others. It’s not something that is being taken on without these platforms weighing up the long term potential due to the cost implications. It emerged last year that companies were spending up to $25 million in their efforts to obtain licensing in Hong Kong. VATP vs. VASP licensingThe VATP license holds significance as it allows Hong Kong-based firms to cater to retail customers in contrast to the Virtual Asset Service Provider (VASP) license, which restricts companies to serving professional investors. In Hong Kong, investors must have portfolios valued at a minimum of eight million Hong Kong dollars ($1.03 million) to qualify for professional investor status. Hong Kong has positioned itself as a leading destination for crypto companies, particularly in 2023, owing to its favorable regulatory approach compared to mainland China's stringent crackdown on digital assets. The SFC has introduced crypto-oriented regulations, opening doors for both institutional and retail investors to participate in the crypto market. This regulatory environment has contributed to the city-state's emergence as a hub for crypto activities. Dubai-headquartered Bybit's move to seek a VATP license aligns with the growing trend of crypto companies finding a home in Hong Kong. In a statement, Ben Zhou, the founder and CEO of Bybit, emphasized the city's strategic location and established financial infrastructure as ideal for their operations and serving institutional clients across the Asia Pacific region. Institutional offeringAs part of its strategy to grow its institutional customer base, the company revamped its institutional market offering last October. With that institutional business in mind, it has also formed strategic partnerships, including collaborating with Talos, an institutional digital asset trading technology provider, and joining forces with Copper to offer custodial and settlement services for institutional clients through Copper's ClearLoop service. Bybit, launched in 2018 by Zhou, boasts a substantial user base, serving over 22 million registered users in 160 countries globally. Claiming a daily trading volume of $16.53 billion, Bybit holds the fifth-highest score among spot exchanges worldwide and is the second-ranked derivatives exchange, trailing only behind Binance, according to CoinMarketCap data. The exchange has consistently ranked in the top positions for futures and perpetuals trading throughout the last calendar year.   

Abu Dhabi Puts Forward Legal Framework for Decentralized TechAuthorities in Abu Dhabi, the capital of the United Arab Emirates (UAE) as well as an individual emirate within it, have published a proposed legislative framework for distributed ledger technology.©Pexels/redouan khoulassiThe consultation paper, titled “Proposal for a legislative framework for distributed technology foundations” was published earlier this month by the Abu Dhabi Global Market’s (ADGM) Registration Authority.Promoting investor protectionThe document covers a broad spectrum of aspects relative to digital assets and crypto entities, including corporate governance, insolvency and restructuring considerations, and data protection. The ADGM’s objective with the proposed policy is to advance investor protection, improve market integrity and efficiency, and build towards a comprehensive regulatory framework.Specific proposalsMore specifically, the policy would implicate an enhancement in the protection of whistle-blowers who report misconduct relative to ADGM-regulated companies. Under the proposal, new rules would be introduced to ensure that digital asset platforms operate in a fair and transparent manner. A requirement would be placed on regulated companies to disclose detailed information in relation to beneficial ownership and control structures. Furthermore, the policy seeks to bring about an improved dispute resolution process between the stakeholders involved in ADGM-regulated transactions.Building upon an existing frameworkThe Abu Dhabi regulator’s current legal framework is built upon English common law. It has its own financial services regulator, the Financial Services Regulatory Authority (FSRA) which operates independently and is responsible for supervising and licensing financial institutions and market participants. The FSRA takes a principles-based approach, regulating those market actors attempting to maintain financial stability and integrity, promote market competition and innovation and ensure customer protection.ADGM has sought to act on an international basis by signing agreements with regulatory bodies in the UK, Hong Kong and Singapore, in an effort to enable information sharing and cross-border cooperation.Regulatory activityAt a national level, earlier this year the UAE enacted a digital assets regulatory framework. Earlier this week, the UAE also revealed a federal licensing system for crypto companies. In February, work began on a $2 billion initiative to nurture blockchain and Web3 startups via Hub71, the emirate’s tech ecosystem. The initiative provides startups with access to a broad range of support services as well as potential collaborations with government and investment partners.According to the document, “this Consultation Paper is of interest to any persons operating or planning DLT projects, persons engaging in digital asset-related activities and their legal advisors, as well as DLT participants, associations, and stakeholders.”With that, the ADGM is inviting comments and feedback from members of the public on the proposed changes contained within the consultation paper. To aid public comment, the policy document includes a number of questions that it invites stakeholders to consider as they work towards submitting their feedback.Those interested have until May 12 to take the opportunity to submit their comments and views relative to the Abu Dhabi regulator’s proposed framework.