Top

SEC Opposes Motion to Dismiss Terraform Labs Lawsuit

Policy & Regulation·June 16, 2023, 11:38 PM

Lawyers representing the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) have responded to a motion to dismiss the lawsuit filed by Dentons, the lawyers representing Singapore-based Terraform Labs and its Founder Do Kwon.

Photo by Miguel Á. Padriñán on Pexels

 

Court filing

According to its arguments, set out in a court filing lodged to the District Court of the Southern District of New York on Thursday, the SEC’s counsel claims that the additional documents provided by Dentons lack sufficient grounds for dismissing the case.

It claims that the internal SEC emails presented by Dentons are irrelevant to the current lawsuit. The SEC asserts that the parameters of an “investment contract” are clearly defined by the Howey test and argue that TerraUSD ($UST) should be classified as a security.

The reliance by US regulators on the Howey test, a legal test case that implicated citrus grove contracts that date back to 1946, has proven to be controversial. Naturally, there could have been no consideration of the digital innovation that digital assets present today almost eighty years ago. Notwithstanding that, the SEC maintains that the principle factors of what constitutes an investment contract are covered by the case regardless.

During the court hearing held on June 15, Dentons submitted supplementary documents to strengthen their motion to dismiss the lawsuit. The primary focus of the hearing was to determine whether the digital assets developed by Terraform Labs should be categorized as securities based on the criteria of an “investment contract.”

Dentons maintains that the algorithmic stablecoin, $UST, should not be considered a security and emphasizes its practical purpose rather than its classification as an investment contract. To support their motion, Dentons included additional documents such as the US House Financial Services Committee hearing on digital asset regulation and stablecoin issuance, the SEC’s request for a restraining order against Binance.US, and the Hinman emails from the SEC vs. Ripple lawsuit.

 

Judge to decide

The defense lawyers highlighted what they perceive as a “regulatory gap” in classifying crypto assets as securities, particularly as the US Congress engages in discussions about regulatory frameworks for digital assets and stablecoin issuance. Furthermore, they argued that the SEC is exceeding the scope of securities laws and relying on internal emails related to “investment contracts” to determine the security status.

A decision on the motion to dismiss will be arrived at by July 14. Judge Jed Rakoff, who is presiding over the case, will be responsible for that, once he’s weighed up the merits of the arguments presented by both parties.

It is noteworthy that Dentons has previously represented Kwon in challenging the US SEC’s subpoena during the investigation of the Mirror Protocol in 2021, as well as in a class-action lawsuit in the Singapore High Court in 2022. The law firm also provides representation to Terraform Labs in other legal matters.

In a separate development, the Basic Court in Podgorica, Montenegro, has granted bail for Kwon and former Terra Chief Technology Officer Han Chang-joon. However, Kwon has recently been taken into custody for extradition in Montenegro while the court deliberates on South Korea’s extradition request for the Terra founder.

As the legal proceedings continue, the outcome of the motion to dismiss will have significant implications for the ongoing dispute between Terraform Labs, Do Kwon, and the SEC.

More to Read
View All
Web3 & Enterprise·

Nov 15, 2023

Bitget withdraws from Hong Kong crypto market

Bitget withdraws from Hong Kong crypto marketSeychelles-incorporated cryptocurrency derivatives platform Bitget has made a decision to permanently exit the Hong Kong market, discontinuing its efforts to obtain a virtual asset trading platform (VATP) license.Photo by SHUJA OFFICIAL on UnsplashBitgetX platform shutdownThe decision comes only months after it had introduced its BitgetX platform to comply with local regulations. The company, which bases its operations out of Singapore, is a well-known entity in the crypto space, renowned as the operator of the 12th-largest cryptocurrency exchange globally in terms of 24-hour trading volume. It made this revelation on Monday, citing what it referred to as “business and market-related considerations.”In a published statement, the company said:”With a heavy heart, we regret to inform you that due to business and market related considerations, we have decided not to pursue a Virtual Asset Trading Platform (VATP) license in Hong Kong. As a result of this decision, the BitgetX website (www.BitgetX.hk) will cease its operations effective December 13, 2023. At the same time, Bitgetx.hk will permanently exit the Hong Kong market.”While outlining that BitgetX will close its doors, the firm urged users to withdraw their assets beforehand. Bitget is among a handful of exchanges that had publicly expressed their intent to secure a license following Hong Kong’s proactive push over the course of the past year to embrace the virtual asset sector.Broader challengesThe decision to abandon the pursuit of a VATP license echoes the broader challenges faced by the cryptocurrency industry in Hong Kong. Despite the city’s recent enthusiastic regulatory embrace of the virtual asset sector, a number of stumbling blocks remain.High compliance costs and the lingering aftermath of the JPEX financial scandal have hindered Hong Kong’s aspirations to establish itself as a leading crypto hub. A report back in June identified the major cost implications of acquiring a license in Hong Kong. At the time, it was estimated that the required spend to obtain a VATP license could range from $2.55 million to $25.5 million.Banking crypto companies has also become a major bottleneck. In June, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) urged banks such as HSBC, Standard Chartered and the Bank of China to bank the crypto sector, having identified a reluctance amongst them to do so.Limited interestThe forthcoming closure of BitgetX adds to a growing trend of limited interest in Hong Kong’s new licensing scheme. Only five companies, all local, have submitted applications for virtual asset licenses to the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC). This list began publication in response to the JPEX scandal, which significantly damaged public trust in virtual assets.The challenges faced by the industry go beyond regulatory hurdles. The damaged public trust, coupled with the high-profile exit of JPEX, has contributed to the hesitancy of international crypto platforms in pursuing licenses in Hong Kong. The abrupt withdrawal of Bitget raises questions about the viability of Hong Kong as a central player in the cryptocurrency industry and underscores the complexities faced by exchanges navigating the evolving landscape of the digital asset sector.

news
Policy & Regulation·

May 27, 2023

Gulf Binance Secures Thai Digital Asset License

Gulf Binance Secures Thai Digital Asset LicenseBinance, one of the world’s leading cryptocurrency exchanges, has secured a digital asset operator license in Thailand, paving the way for the launch of a new crypto exchange and broker. The license, granted by the Ministry of Finance of Thailand and overseen by the Southeast Asian country’s Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), ensures that the upcoming platform will operate in compliance with regulatory requirements.Photo by Markus Winkler on UnsplashLicense awardThe license was awarded to Gulf Binance, a joint venture between Binance and Gulf Innova Co., Ltd., a subsidiary of Gulf Energy Development PCL. It marks a significant milestone in Binance’s expansion efforts. The partnership was initiated through a memorandum of understanding signed in January 2022, as both parties recognized the potential of establishing a digital asset exchange in Thailand.Richard Teng, the head of Asia, Europe, and MENA at Binance commented on the development: “By harnessing Binance’s expertise together with Gulf’s established local presence and network, Gulf Binance aims to showcase the full potential of blockchain technology to meet the needs of Thai users. Local users can expect access to a trusted and regulated service that prioritizes user security alongside compliance with local regulations.”Combined expertiseGulf Innova, as a prominent player in the Thai business landscape, brings extensive expertise and experience in the digital asset trading sector to the joint venture. The conglomerate, headed by billionaire Sarath Ratanavadi, operates in various industries, including energy production, telecommunications, and digital businesses.By combining Binance’s unparalleled growth and expertise in the digital asset space with Gulf’s established presence and knowledge in Thailand, the partnership aims to create a powerful synergy that drives innovation, fosters growth, and provides exceptional value to users in the digital asset ecosystem.Q4 launchThe new crypto exchange is expected to commence operations in the fourth quarter of 2023, although further details about the platform will be disclosed closer to the launch.Often criticized for its opaque structure, Binance is showing renewed commitment to transparency and regulatory compliance. As regulatory frameworks are put in place in varying jurisdictions, global crypto businesses are having to change corporate structures in order to meet these changing requirements. That’s evidenced by Binance’s Thai joint venture, its launch of a separate corporate entity in the form of Binance Japan and a similar move by crypto exchange BitMEX in Hong Kong.Thailand has emerged as a significant cryptocurrency hub in Southeast Asia, with its capital city, Bangkok, ranked 10th globally in The Crypto Readiness Index published by Recap, a cryptocurrency tax software company. Despite the ban on cryptocurrencies as a payment method, Thailand continues to flourish as a hub for trading and investment activities in the crypto space.That ban on cryptocurrency payments, implemented by the SEC in April 2022, aimed to safeguard the stability of the financial system and mitigate potential risks to the economy. The SEC identified price volatility, cyber theft, and personal data leakage as concerns associated with cryptocurrencies. However, the regulatory measures did not impede trading or investment activities, allowing the crypto industry to thrive.Chainalysis, a leading blockchain analysis company, ranked Thailand 8th in its Global Crypto Adoption Index for 2022, surpassing countries like Russia, China, Nigeria, Turkey, Argentina, and the UK. This recognition highlights Thailand’s progressive stance toward digital assets and its growing adoption within the country.

news
Policy & Regulation·

Dec 05, 2024

Indian government claims Binance isn’t tax compliant

According to India’s Finance Ministry, Binance and a number of other virtual asset service providers (VASPs) are not tax-compliant in India. Cases of tax evasion detectedNews of this matter emerged via written answers, published on Dec. 2, provided in response to parliamentary questions which had been put to India’s Finance Minister, Pankaj Chaudhary. The minister confirmed that a “few cases of evasion of Goods and Services Tax (GST) by cryptocurrency exchanges and investors” had been detected. The document goes on to list 17 crypto entities who are currently being investigated on that basis, with Binance being the most well-known among them. Notable Indian exchanges listed include WazirX, CoinDCX and CoinSwitch. Chaudhary included details of cases booked against these exchanges. In Binance’s case, it was required to pay 722 crore Indian rupees, which amounts to around $85.2 million. While Binance doesn’t appear to have incurred penalties, in the case of WazirX, the exchange had an assessed tax shortfall of 40.51 crore Indian rupees ($4.78 million), but after fees and interest, it was provided with a demand for 49.19 crore Indian rupees ($5.8 million). CoinDCX and CoinSwitch were also assessed with a demand for 20.86 crore Indian rupees ($2.46 million) and 19.38 crore Indian rupees ($2.28 million), inclusive of penalties and interest. In the case of WazirX, CoinDCX and CoinSwitch, the exchanges have had to pay an additional 21%, 24% and 37% respectively in fees and interest over and above their original tax liabilities.Photo by Naveed Ahmed on UnsplashPrevious tax and regulatory issuesTo date, the Finance Ministry has recovered 122.3 crore rupees ($14.4 million) as part of these investigations. Binance has as yet not paid the funds demanded by the authorities. It emerged in August that India’s Directorate General of Goods and Services Tax Intelligence (DGGI) had imposed an $86 million tax demand on the company, with Binance contesting the assessment. The global crypto exchange platform had previously paid a $2.5 million fine for having engaged with Indian customers despite not having been approved by the authorities to trade within the country. After a number of months during which it didn’t trade within the Indian market, in August Binance regularized its standing and gained approval to trade. In a request for comment on the matter from Cointelegraph, a Binance representative stated: “We continue to work closely with regulatory authorities and attend necessary hearings to address any concerns and questions. Binance remains responsive and cooperative and is committed to addressing all necessary tax inquiries.” The company recently hired UK-based accounting and business advisory firm Grant Thornton to assist with accounting, tax and audit preparedness. In the case of WazirX, a spokesperson said that “GST law on cryptocurrencies was not clear in India,” and that on this basis, the company found itself being assessed for non-payment of the applicable taxes.

news
Loading