Top

HKMA Issues Warning Against Crypto Firm Misrepresentation

Policy & Regulation·September 19, 2023, 1:02 AM

The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA), the central bank for the Chinese autonomous territory, has taken a stand against cryptocurrency businesses that falsely present themselves as “banks” and market their products as “deposits,” issuing a public advisory to raise awareness about the issue.

Photo by Marcel Eberle on Unsplash

 

Banking ordinance violations

In a press release published to its website on Friday, the HKMA said that instances had arisen where crypto firms had labeled themselves as “crypto banks,” “crypto asset banks,” and “digital trading banks.” The regulatory authority underscored that such misrepresentations could be in violation of the Banking Ordinance in Hong Kong.

In addition to adopting misleading bank-related titles, these crypto firms have been advertising “savings plans” as “low risk” with “high return,” potentially misleading the public into believing that these entities are authorized banks in Hong Kong, where they can securely deposit their funds.

The HKMA stressed that only entities such as licensed banks, restricted license banks, and deposit-taking companies, collectively referred to as “authorized institutions” and holding a license granted by the HKMA, are legally permitted to engage in banking or deposit-taking activities in Hong Kong.

Furthermore, funds held on crypto exchanges are not covered by Hong Kong’s Deposit Protection Scheme. “Under the Banking Ordinance, only licensed banks, restricted license banks and deposit-taking companies, which have been granted a license by the HKMA can carry out banking or deposit-taking business in Hong Kong,” the HKMA stated.

 

Misuse of banking terms

Any entity using the term “bank” in its business name or implying that it offers banking services in Hong Kong is committing an offense, according to the central bank. The same rule applies to any entity engaging in deposit-taking activities in Hong Kong or soliciting the public to make deposits.

It’s important to note that crypto firms not officially recognized as banks in Hong Kong are not subject to the oversight of the HKMA.

The HKMA advised the public to exercise caution. In cases of uncertainty regarding an entity claiming to be a bank or soliciting deposits in Hong Kong, individuals are encouraged to consult the register of authorized institutions on the HKMA’s website, and if doubts persist, it suggests that they should contact the authority via its Public Enquiry Service hotline.

According to section 97 of the Banking Ordinance, only a bank or a central bank can use the term “bank” or its derivatives in its business name in Hong Kong without the written consent of the HKMA.

Additionally, sections 11 and 12 of the Banking Ordinance stipulate that only entities possessing a valid banking license or recognized as authorized institutions are permitted to engage in banking or deposit-taking activities in Hong Kong. As per section 92 of the Banking Ordinance, only an authorized institution is authorized to issue advertisements inviting the public to make deposits, with certain exceptions.

The HKMA’s advisory serves as a stern reminder to the crypto industry that regulatory compliance and transparency are essential, particularly when using terms associated with traditional banking, to protect the interests of the public.

More to Read
View All
Policy & Regulation·

Sep 16, 2023

Remitano Struck by $2.7M Alleged Hack

Remitano Struck by $2.7M Alleged HackHacks have been an unfortunate constant in the crypto and DeFi space with that reality having been compounded by news that Seychelles-based crypto exchange Remitano is believed to have been the victim of a $2.7 million heist.Photo by Growtika on UnsplashSuspicious transactionsIt’s understood that the firm encountered highly suspicious transactions, with the $2.7 million having seemingly vanished from its wallet, all at the hands of a single account. The incident unfolded on Thursday and has left blockchain analysts speculating about a potential security breach.The Remitano hot wallet initiated transfers to an address devoid of any prior transaction history. These transfers amounted to approximately $1.4 million in Tether (USDT), $208,000 in USD Coin (USDC), and 104,000 ANKR tokens (valued at $2,000 at the time). Those transfers raised concerns about the security of the platform.Israeli blockchain analytics platform Cyvers promptly sounded the alarm, notifying the crypto community about these suspicious transactions that had drained significant sums from Remitano’s coffers. This sudden event raised concern within the crypto space and naturally among Remitano customers.Tether freezes wallet addressAmid the growing apprehension, Tether, the issuer of USD stablecoin USDT, took decisive action by freezing the address associated with the alleged attacker. This swift intervention effectively halted any further movement of $1.4 million worth of drained cryptocurrency. Tether’s proactive response could potentially have prevented additional loss, preserving customers’ assets from further depletion.Remitano had remained notably silent initially in the wake of this incident, declining to issue any formal statement regarding the breach. It has since acted, as on Friday, it published a statement relative to the issue on its website. The absence of communication from the exchange had only fueled greater speculation surrounding the incident. However, the statement outlined:”On September 14, 2023, our Security Management team discovered a data breach from a third-party source that had compromised some of our sensitive information. As a result, a small amount of funds from the exchange’s hot wallets were transferred to suspicious wallet addresses through unauthorized withdrawal transactions.”Remitano, recognized as a peer-to-peer cryptocurrency exchange and payment processor, primarily caters to users in emerging markets across several countries, including Pakistan, Ghana, Venezuela, Cambodia, Kenya, Malaysia, India, South Africa, Vietnam, and Nigeria.The firm sought to reassure its customers:”As of now, Remitano ensures that users’ assets have NOT been and will NOT be affected by this incident. We are working tirelessly to uphold our commitment to ensuring the security and protection of your crypto assets.”Remitano was established in 2015; it is operated by Babylon Solutions Limited, which is headquartered in the Seychelles.Unfortunately, this episode adds to the troubling trend of cryptocurrency exchange hacks witnessed in 2023. Authorities in the United States have attributed these attacks to the Lazarus Group, a notorious cyber-crime organization allegedly linked to the North Korean government which has wreaked havoc globally although disproportionately so within the Asian region.

news
Web3 & Enterprise·

Jan 10, 2024

RIGO and BYFFIN host joint RIGO token airdrop event

RIGO, a public blockchain catered to private blockchain-based digital assets, is ringing in the new year with a joint airdrop event with BYFFIN, a South Korean private blockchain-based digital asset management service, according to an official announcement on RIGO’s website. Photo by GuerrillaBuzz on Unsplash"This RIGO X BYFFIN airdrop event with BYFFIN is designed to provide an easy and convenient experience for many users to use RIGO tokens," RIGO said. "We will strive to provide various experiences and benefits to users who participate in the RIGO blockchain ecosystem." Event detailsFive RIGO tokens will be airdropped to each of the first 3,000 participants on a first-come, first-served basis until Jan. 23 (KST). Participants are required to download the mobile BYFFIN Wallet app and create a personal wallet to be eligible to receive the rewards. This is the first promotional event held by RIGO and BYFFIN, and the two organizations plan to further expand their collaborative ventures in the future. RIGO’s wide-ranging servicesRIGO offers a variety of services, including RIGO Core, which provides custodial services of digital assets and manages data storage; RIGO Bridge, which supports hyperledger-based private blockchains; and RIGO Scan, a public real-time blockchain status dashboard.

news
Web3 & Enterprise·

May 17, 2023

Sun Flags Unjust Token Profits of Huobi Founder’s Brother

Sun Flags Unjust Token Profits of Huobi Founder’s BrotherJustin Sun, Founder of the Tron blockchain and stakeholder in Seychelles-based global crypto exchange Huobi, has stated that the younger brother of the founder of the exchange, Li Wei, has received millions of Huobi tokens ($HT) when he shouldn’t have.Taking to Twitter, Sun wrote:“Li Lin’s younger brother Li Wei has repeatedly acquired a large amount of zero-cost HT through abnormal means. He has sold it on the Huobi platform many times in history, and has withdrawn huge amounts of cash”.Negotiating a refund and token burnSun went on to outline the action that he is in favor of taking in unison with decisions taken by the Huobi Global Advisory Committee (HGAC). “In order to protect people’s interests, the [HGAC] and the HT DAO community decided to recover and destroy the HT obtained by Li Wei at zero cost,” he wrote. “The HT destruction will be announced in the HT community. Such behavior will not be condoned,” he added.Sun complained that not only were the tokens wrongly allocated to Li Wei, he had been dumping the tokens on the market, selling them off for fiat money. In addition to the tokens being burnt, Sun says that he alongside the HGAC will “negotiate a refund” by engaging directly with Li Wei relative to the fiat money that he has already extracted through selling off the token.The Tron founder added that he doesn’t think it equitable that Wei should benefit from the token allocation as he hasn’t made any contribution to the Huobi community, stating that “fairness and the importance of rewarding those who genuinely contribute to the growth and development of HT DAO” are important.Double standardsSome in the crypto community would call double standards on Sun’s claims of a lack of fairness. At the time of the collapse of the FTX exchange in November of last year, Sun offered to help, collaborating with FTX’s Sam Bankman Fried to allow assets related to Sun’s crypto projects (TRX, BTT, JST, SUN, and HT) held by FTX customers on the exchange to be traded out of the exchange into external wallets.Trading in these assets recommenced for a time, with the price within the exchange being exorbitant relative to the regular market price outside of FTX. Many FTX customers ended up buying these tokens at excessive prices, without being able to extract them from the exchange like Sun had promised. To cap it off, those customers then had the newly installed FTX Debtor under the guidance of John J. Ray III, record their loss at the time the exchange officially went bankrupt at the normal market price for these tokens.Although originally a China-based exchange, Huobi moved out of the Chinese market due to adverse regulation, re-establishing itself in the Seychelles. The firm maintains offices in South Korea, the United States, Japan, and Hong Kong, where it has had a listing on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange since 2018.The $HT token has proven to be very volatile both in intraday trading on Tuesday and over the course of the past seven days. In both instances, it has hit high points in excess of $3.00 and low points of $2.70. At the time of publication, the token was trading at $2.90.Photo by Ant Rozetsky on Unsplash

news
Loading