Klaytn Foundation Denies Embezzlement Allegations Involving KLAY

A crypto wallet reportedly tied to the multinational banking giant DBS Bank holds over 170,000 Ether, valued at nearly $650 million. Reporting on the matter subsequently prompted DBS to make a denial of any links to the wallet.Photo by Kanchanara on UnsplashClaim asserted, claim deniedOn May 30, blockchain analysis firm Nansen caused some excitement when it took to X, flagging a particular wallet address, identifying it as belonging to an Ethereum whale, taking matters a step further in asserting that the wallet belonged to Singaporean bank, DBS Bank. The submission of securities reports to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) recently by many large corporates led to disclosures from some within traditional finance in the United States of Bitcoin holdings via the spot Bitcoin exchange-traded fund (ETF) products which had been approved earlier this year. A substantial holding of ETH by Singapore’s biggest bank would have been a significant boost for proponents of Ethereum. However, DBS Bank promptly refuted these claims. A spokesperson for the bank subsequently issued a statement to Cointelegraph and Decrypt, stating: "In relation to the post, DBS does not have this position on our books."  Claim not retractedFor its part, Nansen has not retracted its claim. In response to Decrypt, Nansen analyst Edward Wilson stated:"We have it under good authority, via several independent sources, that DBS owns the private key of this wallet and these assets are most likely a part of their custody solution." Wilson told Cointelegraph that it had obtained this information from “a good source,” going on to state: “This is similar to how we see institutions, both crypto-native like exchanges such as Binance or Coinbase custody funds on behalf of their users and non-crypto-native custody funds. The institution is the custodian and is responsible for managing the security of the funds.” The Nansen analyst expressed even more confidence in the claim in response to CryptoSlate. Wilson stated:“Nansen is 100% sure this belongs to DBS – DBS owns the private key of this wallet and these assets are most likely a part of their custody solution.” DBS’s foray into crypto servicesIn 2020, DBS Bank unveiled a crypto trading and custody service, including a platform for conducting security token offerings. At that time, DBS Exchange clarified that while the exchange itself would not hold any assets, it would provide custody services to investors. Since launching its crypto division, DBS Bank has seen significant success. In 2023, DBS reported an 80% growth in Bitcoin trading volume, attributing this surge to the crypto market turmoil of 2022. In February of this year, the Singaporean bank moved to integrate its digital asset exchange business into a new global financial markets unit. In April 2023, DBS opened a branch of the bank on the metaverse. It demonstrated its Web3 credentials further in August 2023 by introducing a metaverse game to tackle the issue of global food waste.

In an effort to fortify the cryptocurrency market and safeguard investors' funds, the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) has introduced a minimum insurance requirement of 50% for licensed cryptocurrency exchanges handling customers' assets.Photo by Simon Zhu on UnsplashGuarding against insolvency riskThe move came to light through a statement published recently by OSL, one of Hong Kong’s licensed virtual asset trading platforms. It’s aimed at enhancing security measures, protecting users from potential security breaches or insolvency. As part of that disclosure, OSL announced a two-year partnership with Canopius, an underwriter syndicate associated with Lloyd's of London. Under this collaboration, OSL will provide insurance coverage for an impressive 95% of its users' assets, surpassing the mandated 50%. OSL emphasized its commitment to safeguarding regulated assets under custody, irrespective of the regulatory guidelines permitting virtual asset service providers (VASPs) to reduce insurance coverage to 50%. Response to recent failuresThis decision is grounded in the acknowledgment of the volatile market conditions and the series of cryptocurrency firm collapses witnessed in recent years. 2022 saw a number of high-profile crypto platform collapses, such as the demise of FTX. HashKey Exchange, another licensed crypto exchange in Hong Kong, has also proactively secured its users' assets by entering into a crypto insurance agreement with Hong Kong headquartered fintech firm OneDegree back in September. The insurer entered the digital assets space last July, expanding into the Middle East last month. OneDegree’s arrangement with HashKey offers coverage ranging from $50 million to $400 million, extending beyond standard security breaches and insolvency to include server downtime, data back-up and load management incidents, ensuring comprehensive protection. Broader regulatory effortsThe minimum insurance requirement is part of the SFC's larger strategy to regulate the cryptocurrency industry in Hong Kong. While the Chinese autonomous territory enabled cryptocurrency trading for retail investors in August, only OSL and HashKey have obtained virtual asset trading licenses. Thirteen other entities are currently in the application process, undergoing rigorous due diligence checks, including comprehensive financial audits exceeding the scope beyond proof-of-reserve systems. This insurance mandate represents a significant step toward enhancing investor confidence in the cryptocurrency market. As digital assets gain popularity, ensuring the security of customers' funds has become paramount. The SFC's proactive approach seeks to strike a balance between fostering innovation and safeguarding investors. Products are also emerging that crypto users themselves can access. UK-based CryptoShield offers insurance protection directly to users that covers potential loss of funds on crypto platforms. The cryptocurrency landscape in Hong Kong is evolving rapidly, with the SFC playing a pivotal role in shaping the regulatory environment. Regulators aim to establish a robust framework addressing potential risks and protecting market participants while embracing digital innovation. As the regulatory landscape matures, more licensed crypto exchanges in Hong Kong may be required to meet the 50% minimum insurance requirement, further strengthening security measures and making the market a safer place for investors.  

A Cambodia-headquartered financial group recently cut off from the U.S. financial system is suspected of having operated in South Korea, raising fresh questions about cross-border crypto and currency flows tied to the group. According to the Dong-A Ilbo, which cited data from the Korea Customs Service (KCS), Huione Group—now sanctioned by the U.S. Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN)—appears to have run a currency exchange in Seoul from 2018 to July 2024. The outlet reported that a banner on the premises displayed a logo identical to Huione’s, prompting suspicions about its ownership and control.Photo by Aleksandar Pasaric on PexelsTies to North Korean hackersThe exchange reported conducting roughly $20,000 in annual currency conversions during that period, excluding cryptocurrency transactions. The timeline overlaps with a period in which Huione Group reportedly received $150,000 in cryptocurrency from the North Korean hacking group Lazarus.  Connections also extend to Cambodia. Panda Bank—a local lender that shares a building with Huione subsidiaries—supports USDT transactions originating from South Korea. Panda Bank director He Yanming is listed as the owner of Huione Crypto, a virtual asset service provider (VASP), suggesting potential links between operations in Seoul and Phnom Penh. These developments come against the backdrop of a U.S. investigation disclosed in May, in which FinCEN said Huione’s business networks, including payments arm Huione Pay, collectively laundered at least $4 billion in illicit proceeds between August 2021 and January 2025. Crypto used in $2.6B illegal conversionsMeanwhile, recent KCS data also shows a rise in illegal currency conversions involving cryptocurrency by foreign nationals. The Korea Economic Daily reported conversions totaling 432 billion won ($302 million) in 2021, climbing to 836 billion won ($584.5 million) in 2023 and 956 billion won ($668.4 million) last year. Over the past eight years, the total amount involved in such cases reached 3.7 trillion won ($2.59 billion) across 28 instances. By value, Chinese nationals accounted for 84.1% of the total, followed by Australians (11.1%), Vietnamese (3.2%), and Russians (1.6%). The growing prevalence of cryptocurrency in illicit activity parallels a broader surge in crypto investment within the country. Many South Koreans have turned to digital assets, often with home ownership as a long-term goal. Trading on local exchanges, Bloomberg reported, is heavily skewed toward more volatile altcoins, which make up more than 80% of total volume.  That stands in contrast to global markets, where investors largely focus on Bitcoin and Ethereum, which together make up more than half of overall trading. The momentum in local crypto investment intensified after Donald Trump’s U.S. presidential victory, with crypto trading in Korea reaching $27 billion in December 2024, about 80% of turnover on the KOSPI stock index. The investigation underscores the growing challenge for regulators in tracking and containing cross-border financial networks that rely on cryptocurrency and informal money transfers. As crypto adoption deepens in South Korea and scrutiny widens abroad, authorities find themselves navigating an increasingly intricate intersection of financial opportunity, enforcement, and risk.