BitGo CEO Emphasizes Separation of Trading and Custody to Prevent Crypto Bankruptcies

Hong Kong's debut of Bitcoin and Ether exchange-traded funds (ETFs) faced a tough start on their first day of trading, with volumes falling far below the record-breaking figures seen in the United States earlier in January 2024. Tough act to followThe launch of six spot Bitcoin and Ether ETFs, managed by prominent firms including China Asset Management, Harvest Global, Bosera and HashKey, marked a significant milestone for Hong Kong's cryptocurrency market. However, initial trading volumes indicated a notable contrast with the groundbreaking volumes witnessed during the debut of spot Bitcoin ETFs in the United States. On their inaugural day, the total trading volume of the six new crypto ETFs in Hong Kong amounted to 87.58 million Hong Kong dollars ($12 million). This figure, while significant, paled in comparison to the $4.6 billion trading volume recorded for U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs on their first day, making the U.S. investment funds a tough act to follow. Despite the disparity, industry experts like Justin d'Anethan, head of APAC business development at crypto market maker Keyrock, viewed the Hong Kong ETFs' performance positively within the local market context.Photo by Simon Zhu on UnsplashAbsence of stakingD'Anethan told The Block that while the trading volume in Hong Kong didn't match the U.S. debut, it reflected a noteworthy level of investor interest, particularly considering the market dynamics in Hong Kong, which lacks access to mainland China investors. Bloomberg ETF Analyst Eric Balchunas suggested on X that people expected too much and that in reality, it was a good first day’s trading. In an interview with Bloomberg, China Asset Management CEO Yimei Li stated that the products open the door “for a lot of RMB holders.” They didn’t show up on day one as d’Anethan pointed out, and he further noted that the absence of staking rewards for Hong Kong's spot Ether ETFs was a notable factor affecting investor decisions. Data from the Hong Kong Stock Exchange (HKEX) cited by Cointelegraph illustrated the relatively subdued performance of the newly launched ETFs. Among them, the Bosera HashKey Bitcoin ETF and Ether ETF recorded modest trading volumes, while the China Asset Management (CAM) Bitcoin ETF demonstrated stronger traction, attracting significant trading volume by the closing bell. Prior to trading, CAM's subscription size for its spot Bitcoin and Ether ETFs drew substantial interest, totaling $140 million during the initial offering period. This heightened anticipation was further fueled by the success of HKEX's cryptocurrency futures ETFs, which garnered $529 million in net inflows in the first quarter of 2024. Fee exemptionsIn an effort to stimulate investor participation, local fund managers and brokerages in Hong Kong offered fee exemptions for the new crypto ETFs. Harvest waived its management fee for six months, while Bosera extended a fee waiver period of four months. Despite the optimism surrounding the launch, potential access to the ETFs by mainland Chinese investors remains uncertain, subject to Know Your Customer (KYC) policies. Meanwhile, the Securities and Exchange Commission's (SEC) stance on Ether ETFs in the U.S. complicates the prospects of listing such products in the near future. While Hong Kong's debut of Bitcoin and Ether ETFs faced challenges in matching the fervor witnessed in the U.S., it nevertheless represents a significant step forward for the region's cryptocurrency market, signaling growing interest and participation in digital asset investments.

Fingerlabs teams up with Metaclub to gather users for Web3 membership platformFingerlabs, a subsidiary of South Korean digital marketing company FSN, has decided to collaborate with reward points app Metaclub to expand user engagement for its Web3 membership platform Bling, according to an official press release on Wednesday (KST).Photo by NordWood Themes on UnsplashInnovating rewards systems and digital marketingMetaclub is a lifestyle platform that allows users to accumulate and spend reward points that can be used at various brands and websites. It currently boasts 80,000 members and hit a cumulative transaction value of KRW 30 billion (approximately $22.7 million) within a year after its launch. On the other hand, Bling is a marketing solution that allows businesses to create and manage NFTs that offer membership benefits to their customers. Users can create customizable characters on Favorlet, Fingerlabs’ NFT wallet and customer management service, using clothing or accessories called “parts.” These parts are linked to various benefits offered by Fingerlabs’ partner firms.Unique membership experienceThrough this collaboration, Bling and Metaclub are holding a promotional event where users who fill their Metaclub account with more than KRW 200,000 and collect Metaclub parts NFTs on their Bling account will be eligible to receive 3% in reward points.“By working with Metaclub, which has a high number of users in their 20s and 30s, we believe that Bling can quickly establish itself as a next-generation Web3 membership service,” said Kim Dong-hoon, CEO of Fingerlabs. “We have a clear understanding of the features and capabilities of both platforms, so we will be able to build our membership base through various collaborative projects.”

Strengthened KYC Spurs More Suspicious Transaction Reports from Korean Crypto ExchangesIn South Korea this year, there has been a significant surge in the number of suspicious transaction reports (STRs) related to cryptocurrencies, according to local news agency Yonhap.This increase is primarily attributed to cryptocurrency exchanges fortifying their Know Your Customer (KYC) procedures. This proactive response follows the controversy surrounding lawmaker Kim Nam-kuk’s significant virtual asset holdings, which were unveiled in May. His scandal came to light when a substantial amount of WEMIX tokens, valued in billions of Korean won, were transferred from the Bithumb exchange to the Upbit exchange. Upbit, deeming it a suspicious transaction, promptly reported the matter to the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) of the Financial Services Commission (FSC).Photo by ron dyar on UnsplashGrowing number of suspicious transaction reportsAs the scandal continued to gain traction, the political realm reached a consensus to conduct investigations into the cryptocurrency holdings of all lawmakers. Additionally, the National Human Rights Commission of Korea initiated the tracking of all lawmakers’ cryptocurrency holdings last month, a process set to span 90 days.Data received by lawmaker Yoon Young-deok on October 30 from the FIU reveals that the number of STRs originating from virtual asset service providers (VASPs) has reached 11,646 in the first nine months of this year. This figure has already exceeded last year’s total of 10,797 STRs.Under the current Act on Reporting and Using Specified Financial Transaction Information, commonly referred to as the Financial Transaction Reporting Act, VASPs are mandated to report to the FIU if they have reasonable grounds to suspect that a customer’s financial transactions are connected to illicit property, money laundering, or terrorist financing. The Act has been in full effect since October 2021.In 2021, a total of 199 reports were submitted under this Act. The number of reports surged to over 10,000 the following year, and in the current year, it continues to grow at an even faster rate. The FIU reviews and analyzes these STRs in accordance with Article 10 of the Financial Transaction Reporting Act. It forwards the relevant information to law enforcement agencies only when it is deemed necessary for the investigation of a specific criminal case.Enhanced but varied approaches by exchangesCrypto exchanges have bolstered their customer verification requirements, especially for customers deemed to have a high risk of involvement in money laundering, in accordance with the Financial Transaction Reporting Act. This entails the need for additional scrutiny of the source of funds and the purpose behind transactions. Notably, if customer verification appears suspicious, exchanges are mandated to confirm the authenticity of the information using reliable documents.However, it’s important to note that the enforcement decree accompanying this Act grants exchanges the flexibility to verify documents based on their own business guidelines. This autonomy has been provided to assist exchanges in effectively mitigating money laundering risks by taking into account their individual business rights and characteristics.For instance, Upbit, South Korea’s largest cryptocurrency exchange, has implemented a fraud detection system (FDS) powered by artificial intelligence to continuously monitor and identify fraudulent transactions. This initiative has earned Upbit recognition from the FIU as an outstanding organization for reporting suspicious transactions during the first half of this year.On the contrary, Bithumb has devised and applies internal guidelines dedicated to anti-money laundering (AML) measures. The exchange has instituted a streamlined customer verification process for customers who are assessed as having a low likelihood of being engaged in money laundering activities. However, this simplified process is not extended to individuals from countries that have not adopted the recommendations of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF).Korbit monitors information related to customer verification through a dedicated department. It declines transactions for customers who have not undergone sufficient verification and validation procedures.Coinone’s AML department examines customer transactions comprehensively. It maintains ongoing reviews of customer information, business operations, risk assessments, and the source of funds. If any of these aspects are found to be suspicious or inadequate, the AML department proceeds with additional customer verification, including the disclosure of the source of funds.Some raise concerns about the inconsistency in customer verification standards for AML and STRs across different exchanges. When one exchange flags a transaction as suspicious, another might see it as routine. Such discrepancies highlight the need for uniform guidelines. Addressing this, the Digital Asset eXchange Association (DAXA), consisting of Korea’s five leading currency exchanges — Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone, Korbit, and Gopax — has set up an AML division to devise standardized rules for STRs.