Wiziin Earmarks $500K Pre-Seed Funding for Blockchain Investment

Korea to Ban Virtual Asset Deposit Services from Next JulyDuring a recent criminal law seminar held at the Supreme Prosecutors’ Office, Park Min-woo, Director of the Capital Markets Bureau at the South Korean Financial Services Commission (FSC), underscored that starting next year, virtual asset service providers (VASPs) will no longer be permitted to offer deposit and management services for virtual assets. That’s according to a report by local crypto news outlet Digital Asset.This is seen as a response to the suspension of virtual asset deposits and withdrawals carried out by virtual asset yield platforms Haru Invest and Delio a few months ago.Photo by Mathew Schwartz on UnsplashLegal backgroundDirector Park referred to Article 7, Paragraph 2 of the Virtual Asset User Protection Act, clarifying that the intention behind this provision is to ensure that VASPs have the ability to fulfill asset withdrawal requests, even in the scenario where all their customers make such requests. This Act is scheduled to go into effect in July of next year, and Article 7 prohibits VASPs from entrusting customer assets to third parties.Deposit service providers receive cryptocurrency deposits and then distribute the resulting yields to their customers. In a bull market, these entities can manage yields on their own. However, in a flat or bear market, these asset managers may face challenges in paying yields unless they can generate profits by handing over customer assets to external custodians.Signs of giving upIn fact, centralized finance (CeFi) company HeyBit made an announcement last month, stating that it will discontinue its virtual asset deposit service starting from October 2. They cited this specific provision as the reason for their decision.Fraud chargesBoth Haru and Delio have been indicted by the Seoul Southern District Prosecutors’ Office on fraud charges.As an unregistered VASP, Haru suspended its deposit and withdrawal services on multiple occasions in June, causing substantial financial losses to numerous investors. This suspension was triggered by significant losses incurred at B&S Holdings, another unregistered entity to which Haru had entrusted virtual assets.Similarly, Delio, although registered, entrusted a considerable amount of virtual assets to Haru and Traum Info Tech but was unable to recover them.

HTX and Heco Chain exploited with $115 million lossSeychelles-incorporated cryptocurrency exchange HTX, linked to digital-asset entrepreneur Justin Sun, has fallen victim to a significant hack, only a few months after having suffered another hack in September.Photo by Markus Spiske on UnsplashSecond HTX hack in recent monthsThe last hack, involving a loss of digital assets to the value of $8 million, was resolved when the hacker agreed to return funds in October in return for a goodwill payment of around $400,000.This latest unfortunate incident follows another hack on Poloniex, also associated with Sun, just weeks ago. Sun acknowledged the HTX hack in a tweet, announcing the temporary suspension of deposits and withdrawals without specifying the exact amount pilfered.Separate Heco Chain hackIt is understood that approximately $30 million worth of cryptocurrencies was siphoned from the exchange wallet. The platform is actively investigating the breach, aiming to uncover the specifics surrounding the attack. Simultaneously, the HECO Bridge, which was established by HTX for cost-effective fund transfers across different blockchains, experienced a separate hack.This breach resulted in losses exceeding $85 million, including ETH, US dollar stablecoin Tether (USDT) and various other tokens. Although initially launched by HTX, HECO operates independently from the HTX exchange.Crypto community concernThese security breaches cast a shadow over Sun’s crypto ventures, especially considering the recent hack on Poloniex, which saw losses surpassing $100 million in various cryptocurrencies. A spokesperson for crypto security firm Hacken told Cointelegraph that these hacks could be the work of an insider.“We can see that all these attacks have the same target: Justin Sun’s projects,” the spokesperson stated. These related incidents are the cause of significant speculation within the crypto space, with some concern expressed about the financial health of HTX, given that the firm is currently offering unsustainable interest rates of up to 100% APY on a selection of digital assets.In response to the HTX hack, Justin Sun assured the community in a post on X (formerly Twitter) that HTX would fully compensate for the losses incurred in its hot wallet. The exchange has temporarily halted deposits and withdrawals as the investigation unfolds. Sun emphasized the commitment to resume services once the investigation concludes and the cause of the breach is identified.These incidents raise questions about the security infrastructure of platforms associated with Justin Sun. The crypto community awaits further details on the investigation’s outcomes and preventive measures that will be implemented to fortify these exchanges against future attacks.Such recent security breaches have not just affected Justin Sun-related enterprises. Earlier this month, decentralized exchange (DEX) KyberSwap was exploited to the tune of $46.5 million. Earlier this week, Kronos Research — a Taipei-based crypto trading, market making and venture capital platform — experienced a $25.6 million loss. The past twenty days have seen five major hacks resulting in an aggregate loss of a staggering $290 million.As the crypto industry grapples with increasing security challenges, the importance of robust protective measures cannot be overstated. These developments underscore the need for a cautious and diligent approach in safeguarding digital assets within the rapidly evolving cryptocurrency landscape.

North Korea Using DeFi for Money LaunderingThe United States Treasury issued a warning on Thursday where it identifies North Korea as a user of DeFi services for money laundering. According to the Treasury, both North Korea and criminal organizations have been using DeFi platforms to launder dirty money.©Pexels/PixabayWhile DeFi has been praised for its potential to democratize finance and provide greater financial freedom to users, it has also been criticized for its lack of regulatory oversight. According to the Treasury, this lack of oversight has made DeFi platforms an attractive target for money launderers and other criminal organizations.In its warning, the Treasury noted that North Korea has been using DeFi platforms to launder money and evade international sanctions. The country is believed to have developed a sophisticated system for laundering money through cryptocurrency exchanges, and it is now turning its attention to DeFi platforms.Illicit money movementCriminal organizations are also using DeFi services for money laundering, according to the Treasury. These groups are said to be using DeFi platforms to move money around the world, in order to avoid detection and to launder the proceeds of their illicit activities.The use of DeFi for money laundering poses a significant challenge for law enforcement agencies, as these platforms operate outside of the traditional banking system and are often difficult to track. The Treasury has urged DeFi platforms to implement strong anti-money laundering (AML) and know-your-customer (KYC) policies, in order to prevent their services from being used for criminal activities.The warning from the Treasury comes at a time when DeFi is becoming increasingly popular among investors and users. According to data from DeFi Pulse, the total value locked in DeFi protocols recently surpassed $100 billion, indicating a significant level of interest and investment in the sector.Calls for greater regulationHowever, the lack of regulatory oversight and the potential for DeFi to be used for money laundering and other criminal activities have raised concerns among regulators and policymakers. Some have called for greater regulation of the sector, in order to prevent its abuse by criminal organizations.Despite these concerns, many proponents of DeFi argue that the sector has the potential to transform the financial industry and provide greater financial freedom to users. They point to the benefits of decentralized systems, such as greater transparency, lower fees, and faster transaction times.The use of DeFi for money laundering is a complex issue that requires a multifaceted approach. While regulators and policymakers must work to implement strong AML and KYC policies, users and investors must also take responsibility for ensuring that they are using DeFi platforms in a responsible and legal manner.Ultimately, the future of DeFi will depend on how the sector is able to balance innovation and regulation. While DeFi has the potential to transform the financial industry, it must also be subject to appropriate oversight and accountability in order to prevent its abuse by criminal organizations.By working together, regulators, policymakers, and industry stakeholders can help to ensure that DeFi is used for its intended purpose — to provide greater financial freedom and empowerment to users around the world.