North Korea Using DeFi for Money Laundering

SEC Lawsuit Stalls Binance’s Gopax Acquisition Deal in South KoreaNothing exists in a vacuum, and on that basis, it appears that ripples emanating from the recent lawsuit filed by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in the United States against global crypto exchange Binance have resulted in the company struggling to complete the acquisition of South Korea’s Gopax.Photo by Daniel Bernard on UnsplashSuspended pending reviewThe acquisition deal between Binance and South Korean crypto trading platform Gopax has hit a roadblock as a direct consequence of the lawsuit. The Financial Services Commission (FSC), the financial watchdog in South Korea, has put the acquisition on hold as it reviews the situation.Binance had acquired a majority stake in Gopax in February, with plans to re-enter the South Korean crypto market after a two-year absence. Gopax is a top five cryptocurrency exchange in South Korea, alongside Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone, and Korbit. However, according to a report by local news media, the FSC has suspended Gopax’s executive change report filed on Tuesday in light of the SEC lawsuit. The report outlined the nomination of three Binance members, including Leon Singh Poong, as inside directors of Gopax.The FSC cited the allegations of securities law violations against Binance and the SEC’s request to freeze Binance.US assets as the reasons for its cautious approach.Gopax revivalThe significance of Binance’s acquisition of Gopax goes beyond its re-entry into the South Korean market. It also aimed to revive the struggling local crypto trading platform. In November 2022, Gopax faced challenges when it suspended withdrawals of principal and interest payments from its decentralized finance service, GoFi, following the collapse of the Bahamas-based FTX crypto exchange and the bankruptcy of Genesis, a US digital assets financial services firm.Digital Currency Group, the parent company of Genesis, was reportedly the second-largest shareholder of Gopax and a key business partner providing the GoFi product. Binance’s acquisition deal intended to inject new capital into Gopax to facilitate customer withdrawals and interest payments for GoFi.The SEC lawsuit against Binance alleges the exchange’s commingling of customers’ funds and violations of various securities laws. The SEC has filed 13 charges against Binance, its subsidiaries, and its CEO, Changpeng Zhao.Acquisition strategyBinance appears to have been pursuing an acquisition strategy in attempting to carve out a greater market share in Asian markets. Binance entered the Japanese market via acquisition in November 2022 when it purchased local crypto platform, Sakura Exchange BitCoin. At the end of last month, Binance announced that it was rebranding the business as Binance Japan and launching it as a stand alone bespoke platform dedicated to the Japanese market.In Thailand, the global crypto exchange has varied its approach, entering into a joint venture rather than a full acquisition. It has partnered with Gulf Innova, with the new entity, Gulf Binance, recently having been awarded a trading license by the Thai regulator.The outcome of the SEC lawsuit and its impact on Binance’s operations in South Korea remains uncertain. The FSC’s review process will consider the allegations against Binance and the implications of the SEC’s actions before making a decision on the Gopax acquisition. The crypto industry will closely monitor the developments as they unfold, as no doubt the saga will have broader implications for Binance and its expansion plans.

Henan Province Establishes Metaverse FundAn administrative body within China’s Henan Province has established a 150 million yuan ($21.7 million) private equity investment fund which will be centered on financing metaverse-related projects.In a social media post on Thursday, the Assets Supervision and Administration Commission of Henan, a state-owned body, said that the fund had been created last month. The objective of the fund is to promote the development of the virtual reality and metaverse sectors. Specifically, the agency wants to bring about the development of “internationally competitive digital industrial clusters.”Photo by Jéan Béller on UnsplashA metaverse strategyLast year, Henan province administrators released a plan, setting out the objective of achieving a local metaverse industry reaching a level of 30 billion yuan by 2025. The plan was titled “Henan’s metaverse industry development plan for the years 2022 to 2025.” Its authors set out the objective of creating an industrial metaverse, an energy metaverse, an education metaverse and a virtual human metaverse.Henan is one of a number of regions vying to capture the upside in terms of the promise of the development of innovation relative to the metaverse. Earlier in 2022 local government in Shanghai set out to establish an industry fund of 10 billion yuan (approximately $1.4 billion) in assets, focused purely upon metaverse-centric development and innovation.Earlier this year, a delegate attending one of the city’s most influential yearly political meetings called for efforts to be made to provide for adequate regulation to enable further metaverse development and effective supervision of the space.The Beijing-based and state-backed China Computer Industry Association (CCIA) also took an interest last year, forming a metaverse committee to draft industry standards. It too planned to establish a 1 billion yuan fund, while aspiring to help other regional authorities establish a blueprint to progress the industry.Not to be outdone, Hubei province’s Wuhan and Anhui administrative areas made a pledge to boost metaverse development over the course of the next five years. Within the Wuhan administrative area, city officials are said to be aiming to integrate the metaverse, cloud computing and blockchain into the conventional, real economy.Opposing viewsIt’s curious to note that when it comes to decentralized blockchain and cryptocurrency, China has been vehemently opposed to their development within its borders. In September 2021, the country banned cryptocurrency transactions. Prior to that, it had implemented a ban on cryptocurrency mining activity, forcing the large miners that had long since established there to move overseas.It’s difficult to see how it can be positive relative to the metaverse when a metaverse depends on the use of blockchain technology. To confuse matters further, over the course of the past six months, it seems to have given a mandate to the autonomous territory of Hong Kong to open its doors in facilitating the crypto and blockchain sector in total contrast to the stance taken within mainland China.Recently compiled industry and market research suggests that the metaverse industry in China is expected to grow by 39.5% in 2023, with the space having experienced significant growth in the country over the course of Q3 and Q4, 2022.

FTX, the failed cryptocurrency exchange founded by Sam Bankman-Fried, has taken legal action by filing a lawsuit against four former employees of Salameda, a Hong Kong-based affiliate closely linked to the exchange’s former CEO.According to a Delaware bankruptcy court filing in the United States on Thursday, the lawsuit alleges that five individuals exploited their personal connections to prioritize their asset withdrawals from FTX during a period of uncertainty regarding the exchange’s stability. The defendants in question are Salameda’s former employees — Michael Burgess, Matthew Burgess, Kevin Nguyen, and Darren Wong — as well as Michael and Matthew’s mother, Lesley Burgess, and two companies: 3Twelve Ventures and BDK Consulting.Photo by Bermix Studio on Unsplash Preference period clawbackThe critical withdrawals occurred within the 90-day period leading up to FTX’s bankruptcy filing on November 11, commonly referred to as the “Preference Period.” Under US law, customers who withdrew their crypto assets during this timeframe could potentially face lawsuits from the exchange’s creditors seeking to recover these funds, a process known as a “clawback” under bankruptcy regulations.The total value of these suspicious transfers is estimated at $157.3 million, with more than $123 million of that sum withdrawn after November 7, 2022. Michael Burgess is alleged to have received around $73 million of these illicit withdrawals.The lawsuit claims that the individuals leveraged their connections within FTX Group to ensure preferential treatment over other customers. In a specific accusation, Matthew Burgess is said to have engaged other FTX Group employees to expedite certain withdrawal requests from his FTX US exchange accounts while falsely representing the accounts as his own. 11th hour withdrawalsIn this way, Burgess and the other four defendants managed to get funds out when most other FTX customers couldn’t. The final withdrawals were executed only hours before FTX.com suspended all withdrawals on November 8, 2022, according to the lawsuit. As one commentator on X put it, “FTX employees were manually reviewing large withdrawals & pushing some ahead.”The legal filing also delves into the significant profits the defendants reportedly accrued from trading cryptocurrencies in the months leading up to FTX’s collapse. Even after their apparent departure from the FTX Group, Michael Burgess, Nguyen, and Wong actively traded through entities such as 3Twelve and BDK, with monthly trading volumes ranging from $100 million to $400 million.A noteworthy aspect of this activity is that their trading capital was allegedly derived from the FTX Group. The court filing goes on to claim that “Burgess, Nguyen and Wong received substantial transfers of digital assets and fiat currency from exchange accounts associated with FTX Group entities, including approximately 13.1 million FTT sent to Darren Wong, more than 1 million SOL sent to Michael Burgess, and nearly $4 million USD for ‘bonuses’ between Michael Burgess, Nguyen and Wong.” Retail clawback riskThis legal battle and the allegations against the former Salameda employees are being watched closely by other FTX bankruptcy stakeholders. The FTX Debtor has suggested that it will pursue clawbacks vigorously. That has concerned former retail customers who managed to withdraw assets in the final days before the platform collapsed. Equally, it is a worry for current FTX creditors who may have withdrawn some but not all of their assets before the exchange was shuttered.