Intella X Explores Ways to Integrate YGG’s Soulbound Reputation Tokens into Its Wallet

NEOPIN and MEVerse Join Hands to Expand Blockchain EcosystemCentralized decentralized finance (CeDeFi) protocol provider NEOPIN said Tuesday that it has teamed up with MEVerse, the blockchain mainnet operated by gaming company ME2ON Group, to expand the global blockchain ecosystem and optimize the accessibility and functionality of their respective platforms.Photo by Gerd Altmann on PixabayPromoting blockchain worldwideBoth parties have agreed to collaborate on integrating their platforms to build a global user base consisting of those who have completed necessary verification procedures like Know Your Customer (KYC) and Anti-Money Laundering (AML). They will also support each other’s global partner networks, contributing to service enhancement and ecosystem expansion. NEOPIN has also vowed to introduce MEVerse to its global user community.“Initiating the integration of NEOPIN and MEVerse platforms, we are poised to play an active role in fostering the growth and widespread adoption of the blockchain ecosystem. This includes the enduring fusion of blockchain technology with Korean content.” said Ethan Kim, CEO of NEOPIN.Collaborative synergyMEVerse possesses various blockchain infrastructures, including the Web3 P2E casual game portal MEVerse GameZ, non-fungible token (NFT) marketplace MEVerse DEX, blockchain explorer MEVerse Scan, and more. The platform said that it is currently in the process of establishing a borderless Web3 ecosystem by boosting compatibility with its mainnet ecosystem and leveraging cross-chain technology.“MEVerse’s strengths lie in its possession of a wide range of blockchain platforms and content, from its blockchain mainnet to the Web3 gaming ecosystem and Korean content,” Kim commented.Meanwhile, NEOPIN has accumulated knowledge and expertise on blockchain operations during its time as a node validator for various blockchain networks such as Ethereum and Cardano since 2017. Last year, the platform launched its CeDeFi protocol, providing a secure and user-friendly DeFi platform.“We are thrilled to partner with NEOPIN, a pioneer in the DeFi sector. Through tangible integration examples, we look forward to facilitating user engagement and cultivating an expanded Web3 ecosystem,” said Jong-ho Hong, CEO of MEVerse.

Hong Kong-based game software company Animoca Brands has announced its foray into the Bitcoin industry by endorsing the Opal Foundation, a novel Bitcoin ecosystem protocol. The move involves the Opal Protocol and BLIF token, initiated by Animoca Brands and Darewise, a metaverse technology platform. On April 30, Animoca Brands disclosed its plans to become the "largest Web3 ecosystem" for gaming, education and culture built on Bitcoin. The company aims to establish the Opal Protocol and BLIF token as key components of this ecosystem.Photo by Kanchanara on UnsplashBLIF token and Opal ProtocolThe BLIF token, also known as the Opal Protocol Runes token, is hailed by Animoca as a means to enable a "true digital life" on Bitcoin. According to Animoca's executive chairman and co-founder Yat Siu, Bitcoin is now primed for Web3, transitioning from a mere store of value to a store of culture for the Web3 age. Six of Animoca Brands' portfolio companies have already joined as Genesis members, signaling a strong start for the Opal Protocol. Additionally, all future Bitcoin-based projects from Animoca Brands will collaborate with the Opal Foundation. Launched in 2024, the Opal protocol positions itself as a decentralized ecosystem protocol on Bitcoin, powered by BLIF. Its litepaper describes it as a seamless blend of virtual and real-life experiences, offering digital extensions of reality across various domains such as banking, entertainment, education and social interactions. The launch date of the Opal protocol and BLIF airdrop is yet to be announced, but Opal's Telegram group has hinted at its impending arrival. Despite not being operational, Opal's X profile already boasts over 270,000 subscribers. Strategic partnershipAnimoca Brands is hailed as the first strategic launch partner for the Opal Foundation. The company's collaboration aims to integrate its vision into the open Opal protocol on Bitcoin and ordinals. Animoca's venture into Bitcoin coincides with the recent trading debut of spot Bitcoin and Ether exchange-traded funds (ETF) in Hong Kong. However, the initial trading volumes of these ETFs were relatively modest compared to spot Bitcoin ETFs launched in the United States in January 2024. 

The Need to Distinguish Between Security and Non-Security Virtual AssetsWith the recent enactment of the Virtual Asset User Protection Bill in South Korea, there is a need to lay out criteria for determining whether virtual assets qualify as securities, says Kim Ja-bong, a senior research fellow at the Korea Institute of Finance, in his report titled “The Implications of Determining Which Virtual Assets Constitute Securities and Investor Protection” released on Saturday.Photo by Shubham Dhage on UnsplashThe implications of the Virtual Asset User Protection ActThe Virtual Asset User Protection Act — which will take effect in July of next year — aims to protect customer assets, establish regulations against unfair trading practices, and enforce penalties. Notably, it will target virtual assets that are not securities, deeming it necessary for regulators to determine if virtual assets qualify as securities or not in order to enforce the bill. Assets with characteristics of securities will fall under the jurisdiction of the Capital Markets Act.Therefore, if the Virtual Asset User Protection Act does not provide sufficient investor protection, issuers may be incentivized to issue non-security assets rather than security assets to avoid the regulations of the Capital Markets Act. This further necessitates the act of distinguishing between virtual assets that are securities versus those that are not.Determining if a virtual asset is a security or notThere are two approaches to do this, according to Kim: the passive approach, which avoids considering a virtual asset as a security whenever possible, and the active approach, which treats a virtual asset as a security whenever applicable.He argues that it is better to focus on whether an investment contract qualifies as a security if it is considered an investment contract, rather than simply selecting a specific approach.Furthermore, the nature of virtual assets renders them unbound by national borders, so it is necessary to establish assessment criteria that correspond with international standards, such as those used in the US and Europe.This is especially important because if the criteria differ from international standards, there is a risk of domestic investors suffering damages due to an issuer’s pursuit of regulatory arbitrage between countries.Equitable recognition and potential for security tokensAccording to Kim, the importance of determining whether virtual assets are securities lies in ensuring that security tokens receive the same recognition and trading treatment as traditional securities such as stocks. With such a measure, security token offerings can serve as an efficient and reliable method for raising funds. Although there may be concerns that such a regulation may hinder the development of virtual assets, it may well be an opportunity for security tokens to be qualified and trusted as high-quality financial instruments just like existing securities, Kim claims.Even for virtual assets that are not considered securities, there are many types of assets that are financial in nature, such as e-money tokens — therefore, it is necessary to actively protect investors in non-security virtual assets through financial regulations such as reinforcing disclosure obligations, which is being done in the EU through the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA).Empowering regulators for enhanced investor protection and market integrityKim underscored that investor protection and healthy growth of the virtual asset market are made possible mainly through expanding regulators’ authority to protect economic interests and prevent damages. The author also suggested institutional reforms that grant regulators substantial authority, which would enhance their ability to protect investors effectively and provide compensation for damages.He added that regulators should also have the authority to enforce liability for damages or impose civil penalties for unfair trading practices conducted using classified information.