NEOPIN and MEVerse Join Hands to Expand Blockchain Ecosystem

The European Union (EU) introduced its Markets in Crypto Assets (MiCA) regulation in June of last year, refining the EU bloc’s stance relative to digital assets. However, one crypto sector entrepreneur believes that the regulatory framework may force crypto startups to relocate to the Middle East. In an interview with Cointelegraph, Anastasija Plotnikova, co-founder and CEO of Fideum, a blockchain infrastructure company geared towards institutions, outlined that the application of this regulatory framework by EU member states may have some unintended consequences.Photo by Christian Lue on UnsplashCentralization concernsWhile Plotnikova welcomes the legitimization of crypto through regulation as a net positive for the sector, she warns that this particular regulatory framework could lead to consolidation among crypto firms. That would mean a reduction in the overall number of Web3 enterprises in Europe and as a consequence, increased risk of centralization in an industry that is supposed to be all about decentralization. Whilst the regulatory framework was introduced last year, it's not due to go into full effect until Dec. 30, 2024. Plotnikova believes that the framework doesn’t give crypto startups the wriggle room to scale whereas in the case of larger entities with much more assets under management, they will find it much easier to scale. French multinational financial services company Societe Generale, an entity with around $160 billion worth of assets under management and 126,000 employees, stands out as an example. It recently announced that SG Forge, a subsidiary company, would partner with Austrian crypto exchange Bitpanda to issue and list its EUR ConVertible (EURCV) euro-denominated stablecoin. Another European TradFi behemoth, Landesbank, Germany’s largest federal bank, announced earlier this year that it will launch crypto custody services. Global competitionSpeaking to the publication on the margins of the European Blockchain Convention in Barcelona earlier this week, Plotnikova stated: “I'm afraid it will lead to consolidation between European and American companies, and they will just move somewhere to the Middle East. The European Union had has done amazing things in harmonising legislation, but enforcement comes down to local and national authorities and they vary greatly.” There’s no doubt that various world centers and regions have been competing to varying extents to become innovative hubs relative to the development of blockchain-based enterprises. Plotnikova alluded to Europe losing out to the Middle East in this instance and principal among those nations in the region vying for a share of the business has been the United Arab Emirates (UAE).  The UAE itself, together with individual emirates such as Abu Dhabi and Dubai, has been putting in place a regulatory framework relative to crypto that has been broadly praised by the crypto sector. As recently as earlier last week, the Dubai regulator continues to fine tune its regulatory framework, tightening up requirements related to the marketing of crypto products and services. A recent report by Chainalysis found that the Middle East region accounted for 7.5% of global crypto trading volume, with the UAE and Saudi Arabia having been found to demonstrate a strong interest in decentralized platforms. 

A recent survey by Turkish crypto exchange Paribu reveals that 99% of Turkish investors are now familiar with digital assets, a significant rise from just 16% in 2020. Digital assets have emerged as the third most popular investment choice in Turkey, overtaking traditional options like real estate. Investors are now nearly twice as likely to consider digital assets over stocks or mutual funds, a trend seen across other Asian nations, where younger investors are favoring crypto over more conventional investments. In Indonesia, for example, digital asset investors reached 20 million this year, far surpassing the 12 million who trade on the country’s stock exchange. In the U.S., a recent Bank of America survey reported a similar trend, with younger investors increasingly gravitating toward digital assets.Photo by Burak Karaduman on PexelsHigh returns and future potential drive interest in digital assetsThe survey shows that Turkish investors are primarily attracted to digital assets for their high return potential, while some view them as the future of finance. Other motivations include fast transaction capabilities, as well as benefits like censorship resistance. According to Paribu’s spokesperson, Nergis Nurcan Karababa, crypto assets may experience higher adoption rates than traditional financial products, as more individuals anticipate mainstream usage of digital assets in the near future. Security a top priority for Turkish investorsSecurity remains a paramount concern for Turkish investors, particularly given the history of hacks and fraud targeting local exchanges. Paribu’s survey, which polled over 2,000 residents and 541 active traders, found that most Turkish investors demand a strong security system from their trading platforms. In recent years, Turkish exchanges have been targeted by hackers, with high-profile breaches impacting investor confidence. In June, an attack on BtcTurk, the country’s largest exchange, reportedly led to a $55 million loss from multiple hot wallets. An earlier collapse of the Thodex exchange in 2021 saw the disappearance of investor funds valued by Chainalysis at $2.6 billion, although local prosecutors cited a lower figure. Thodex’s founder was sentenced to over 11,000 years in prison, underscoring the severity of crypto-related financial crimes in Turkey. Rise in preference for local exchangesDespite security incidents, Turkish investors increasingly favor local exchanges, with 78% indicating a preference for Turkey-based platforms in 2024, up from 63% last year. This trend aligns with a global shift towards domestic exchanges as investors seek platforms regulated by local authorities, providing easier avenues for legal recourse. The collapse of international platforms like FTX has accelerated this trend, and countries such as Nigeria, India and Indonesia have issued new licenses exclusively for local exchanges, restricting foreign entities from operating within their borders. Turkey’s leading position in the MENA crypto marketTurkey ranks as the largest digital asset market in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region and is 11th globally in terms of adoption, according to Chainalysis. Between June 2023 and June 2024, Turkey received $137 billion in digital assets, placing it seventh worldwide for total transaction volume. This growing market highlights Turkey’s role as a key player in the global crypto landscape, as well as the increasing integration of digital assets into mainstream financial activities among Turkish investors. 

The Dubai Court of First Instance in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) has notched up another milestone relative to the continuing rollout of the use of and legal status of cryptocurrency by recognizing crypto as a legitimate means of payment where salaries are concerned. The groundbreaking decision, which was revealed in the court via case number 1739 of 2024, gives confirmed legal recognition to the validity of crypto as a means of payment for salaries, which may be stipulated in an employment contract.Photo by David Rodrigo on UnsplashRuling reflecting a progressive approach to cryptoThe outcome hit the radar of a number of crypto-centric UAE-based lawyers, with Web3 lawyer Irina Heaver, a partner at NeosLegal, pointing out that the decision marks a shift from previous relevant case law in the UAE in 2023 when a similar set of circumstances led to crypto not being recognized for the purposes of salary payment. Commenting on the ruling of that previous case, she stated: “This decision reflected a traditional viewpoint, emphasizing the need for concrete evidence when dealing with unconventional payment forms.” Ecowatt (EWT) tokensIn this latest case, the circumstances revolved around a dispute whereby an employee claimed for unpaid salary, termination compensation and further benefits. The employee’s contract of employment outlined a payment in both fiat currency, alongside 5,250 Ecowatt (EWT) tokens.  Ecowatt is a renewable energy blockchain project which claims to serve a purpose in reducing carbon impact on a global basis through the tokenization of green energy. It was the failure of the employer to pay out the tokenized portion of the employee’s salary that led to the dispute and the subsequent lawsuit. The court ultimately sided with the employee, agreeing that the employer must fulfill its contractual obligation and pay out the remainder of the employee’s salary and benefits in Ecowatt tokens. The judgement stated: “As the respondent did not provide evidence of payment in EcoWatt tokens, the court orders the respondent to pay the claimant the value of her wages in EcoWatt tokens.” In weighing up this latest adjudication, Heaver concludes that the move is congruent with the progressive approach that is being taken to digital assets within the UAE. “This decision reflects a broader acceptance of cryptocurrency in employment contracts and highlights the court’s recognition of the evolving nature of financial transactions within the Web3 economy,” she stated. Mahmoud Abuwasel, partner at Wasel & Wasel, an international firm with a presence in Abu Dhabi, also noted the relevance of the ruling, posting on the matter on legal update database, Lexology.  Greater legal clarityLittle by little, greater clarity is emerging in jurisdictions worldwide with regard to the status of cryptocurrency and digital assets within the context of international legal systems. In 2023, a Chinese court recognized virtual assets as legal property, affirming the legal status of virtual assets as protected property under Chinese law.Earlier in 2023, the courts in the Chinese autonomous territory of Hong Kong determined cryptocurrency to be property “capable of being held in trust.” Not all decisions have been positive however, with a Singaporean court determining in April 2023 that crypto is not money, albeit that the judge did acknowledge that the matter would require a more detailed examination of evidence in another court.