Bithumb META Unveils Naemo World: A Sneak Peek into Immersive Metaverse Project

Taiwan to review crypto ETFs amid developments overseasThe Financial Supervisory Commission (FSC) in Taiwan has disclosed its close examination of foreign cryptocurrency futures products and exchange-traded funds (ETFs), signaling a potential shift in its regulatory approach.According to a report in Chinese-language financial newspaper, Taiwan’s Commercial Times, the FSC aims to gradually ease restrictions, aligning its stance with global market conditions.Photo by bordercollie 1712 on UnsplashResponding to crypto ETF activity internationallyThe Taiwanese regulator is carrying out this exploration against the backdrop of significant global developments. The possibility of the Federal Reserve cutting interest rates and the upcoming review by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) of the spot bitcoin ETF in January next year are key factors influencing the FSC’s considerations.The anticipation surrounding the Bitcoin halving in April, combined with speculation that a spot bitcoin ETF approval is imminent in the U.S., have contributed to a 145% surge this year in Bitcoin’s unit price, adding momentum to that regulatory contemplation in Taiwan. There has been speculation that BlackRock, the world’s largest fund manager, is already preparing for the approval of its iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF.Recognizing the potential impact of a Bitcoin index stock fund, contingent on SEC approval and subsequent public investment permission, the FSC is closely monitoring global trends.Closer to home, it emerged last month that Hong Kong’s Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) is actively exploring the possibility of permitting retail participation in a spot crypto ETF. Domestic investment banks in Taiwan, attuned to these developments, have expressed longstanding interest in introducing similar crypto products.The FSC draws parallels with global counterparts, citing the proliferation of cryptocurrency futures products and ETFs in various markets.Cautious regulatory reviewAdopting a phased approach, the FSC emphasizes self-discipline and standards in relaxing regulations around crypto ETFs. This cautious strategy aligns with Taiwan’s historical prudence, previously observed in the delayed approval of cryptocurrency ETFs and blockchain ETFs due to concerns over volatility and speculative nature.As Taiwan contemplates a significant move into the cryptocurrency ETF domain, industry players remain cautiously optimistic. While some had considered private placements for overseas cryptocurrency ETFs, challenges such as tightened regulatory supervision and concerns over errors and price lags prompted a reevaluation.Earlier this month, ETF issuer ProShares launched its short Ether-linked ETF product on the New York Stock Exchange’s Arca, using the ticker symbol SETH. Spot bitcoin ETFs have been launched in Canada, Germany, Australia and Brazil. The products have also been made available via tax havens such as the Cayman Islands, Jersey, Liechtenstein and Guernsey.The regulator in Taiwan hints at a potential strategy involving “cryptocurrency concept ETFs.” These funds could invest in cryptocurrency-related software and hardware vendors, offering investors exposure to the industry without direct linkage to cryptocurrency price fluctuations.

SC Ventures and Deutsche Bank Execute Stablecoin Payments via UDPNSC Ventures, the Singaporean disruptive technology investment subsidiary of UK banking conglomerate Standard Chartered, has partnered with Deutsche Bank in completing the first successful proof of concept (PoC) for the Universal Digital Payments Network (UDPN).Photo by Conny Schneider on UnsplashConnecting blockchain networks with CBDCsThe UDPN is a brainchild of Hong Kong’s Red Date Technology, which in turn is a co-founder of the Chinese Blockchain-Based Service Network (BSN). The PoC was aimed at facilitating seamless connections between central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) and various blockchain networks through message-based transactions.News of the successful PoC emerged via a report by India’s English-language business newspaper Financial Express earlier this week. In conventional finance and international payments, the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication (SWIFT) is the foremost, dominant financial messaging service. Notably, UDPN distinguishes itself from SWIFT as it operates on a permissioned blockchain, ensuring heightened security and regulatory compliance.As part of the PoC, several real-time transfers and swaps of synthetic USDC and EURS (Stasis Euro stablecoin) were executed between the two banks. While SC Ventures utilized code that leveraged UDPN software development kits (SDKs) and APIs, Deutsche Bank employed a graphical user interface. Rafael Otero, CTO and CPO of Deutsche Bank’s Corporate Bank division, emphasized the significance of this trial, stating that it provides an opportunity to explore how clients can actively engage in the decentralized global economy. Otero sees this as the logical next step in the evolution of financial transactions.Overcoming digital currency adoption challengesUDPN has been under development in collaboration with consultancy firm GFT Technologies and DLA Piper’s Hong Kong-based digital asset creation platform, TOKO, with further governance provided by the UDPN Alliance.The primary goal of UDPN is to overcome the hurdles that hinder the broader adoption of digital currencies, especially in the face of the surging number of CBDCs, stablecoins, and deposit tokens. The lack of interoperability among these digital assets necessitates innovative solutions.Currently, interoperability among stablecoins primarily relies on centralized cryptocurrency exchanges. However, due to the absence of proper oversight and regulatory framework in these exchanges, this method is not a sustainable solution for achieving interoperability between CBDCs and deposit tokens.UDPN takes a unique approach by providing a decentralized identity infrastructure. The actual currency transactions occur on their respective native blockchains or infrastructures. This means that UDPN enables users to seamlessly swap a USDC stablecoin on one network for a Euro stablecoin on another or even a bank deposit token.Improving upon financial messaging systemsAs UDPN incorporates an element of financial messaging for digital currencies, this hybrid approach streamlines transactions, eliminates the need for reconciliations, and enables atomic settlement. Therefore, UDPN ensures that either both sides of a transaction succeed or both fail. In contrast, purely messaging-based systems can result in one side of the transaction failing.SWIFT recently experimented with a messaging solution to connect CBDCs, and other conventional integration methods are being explored, involving APIs and routing networks, such as finP2P. It has collaborated with the central banks of Hong Kong and Kazakhstan recently in testing CBDC connectors.A report by Nikkei Asia last week suggested that Standard Chartered is venturing further into the world of digital currencies, particularly so in Asia, via SC Ventures.

Bitget withdraws from Hong Kong crypto marketSeychelles-incorporated cryptocurrency derivatives platform Bitget has made a decision to permanently exit the Hong Kong market, discontinuing its efforts to obtain a virtual asset trading platform (VATP) license.Photo by SHUJA OFFICIAL on UnsplashBitgetX platform shutdownThe decision comes only months after it had introduced its BitgetX platform to comply with local regulations. The company, which bases its operations out of Singapore, is a well-known entity in the crypto space, renowned as the operator of the 12th-largest cryptocurrency exchange globally in terms of 24-hour trading volume. It made this revelation on Monday, citing what it referred to as “business and market-related considerations.”In a published statement, the company said:”With a heavy heart, we regret to inform you that due to business and market related considerations, we have decided not to pursue a Virtual Asset Trading Platform (VATP) license in Hong Kong. As a result of this decision, the BitgetX website (www.BitgetX.hk) will cease its operations effective December 13, 2023. At the same time, Bitgetx.hk will permanently exit the Hong Kong market.”While outlining that BitgetX will close its doors, the firm urged users to withdraw their assets beforehand. Bitget is among a handful of exchanges that had publicly expressed their intent to secure a license following Hong Kong’s proactive push over the course of the past year to embrace the virtual asset sector.Broader challengesThe decision to abandon the pursuit of a VATP license echoes the broader challenges faced by the cryptocurrency industry in Hong Kong. Despite the city’s recent enthusiastic regulatory embrace of the virtual asset sector, a number of stumbling blocks remain.High compliance costs and the lingering aftermath of the JPEX financial scandal have hindered Hong Kong’s aspirations to establish itself as a leading crypto hub. A report back in June identified the major cost implications of acquiring a license in Hong Kong. At the time, it was estimated that the required spend to obtain a VATP license could range from $2.55 million to $25.5 million.Banking crypto companies has also become a major bottleneck. In June, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) urged banks such as HSBC, Standard Chartered and the Bank of China to bank the crypto sector, having identified a reluctance amongst them to do so.Limited interestThe forthcoming closure of BitgetX adds to a growing trend of limited interest in Hong Kong’s new licensing scheme. Only five companies, all local, have submitted applications for virtual asset licenses to the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC). This list began publication in response to the JPEX scandal, which significantly damaged public trust in virtual assets.The challenges faced by the industry go beyond regulatory hurdles. The damaged public trust, coupled with the high-profile exit of JPEX, has contributed to the hesitancy of international crypto platforms in pursuing licenses in Hong Kong. The abrupt withdrawal of Bitget raises questions about the viability of Hong Kong as a central player in the cryptocurrency industry and underscores the complexities faced by exchanges navigating the evolving landscape of the digital asset sector.