Hong Kong Lawmaker Explores Digital Asset Links With Mainland

SBI and Saudi Aramco to explore digital asset business partnershipsJapanese financial services conglomerate SBI and Saudi Arabia’s state-controlled energy giant Saudi Aramco have jointly announced their exploration of potential collaboration in the realms of digital assets and semiconductors.Photo by Chris Liverani on UnsplashDigital asset portfolio co-investingThe partnership, which was publicly disclosed last week, aims to delve into co-investing in each other’s digital asset portfolios. Such an arrangement will leverage SBI’s substantial holdings and the formidable position of Aramco as the world’s second-largest company by revenue, boasting a staggering $604 billion figure. The partnership will mark a strategic alliance that goes beyond geographical boundaries, underscoring the global impact of digital asset investments.The collaboration between SBI and Aramco extends beyond mere investment, with SBI actively seeking to identify Japanese digital asset startups keen on expanding their operations into Saudi Arabia. The joint effort aims to provide comprehensive support to these startups, facilitating their integration into the Saudi market and contributing to the growth of the digital economy.SBI Middle EastIn addition to this venture, SBI is set to establish “SBI Middle East” in Riyadh, serving as a central hub for its operations in the Middle East. This move aligns with SBI’s recent announcement of a $100 million joint fund with Standard Chartered, based in Dubai, solidifying its commitment to fostering financial partnerships in the region.When contemplating cryptocurrency activities in the Middle East, Saudi Arabia might not be the first destination that comes to mind, given Turkey’s significant crypto adoption rate and the UAE’s well-established crypto regulatory authorities, such as Dubai’s VARA and Abu Dhabi’s ADGM.However, Chainalysis data reveals that Saudi crypto activity is steadily gaining ground, experiencing the most significant year-on-year growth (12%) to June 2023. Additionally, the country’s Vision 2030 initiative involves efforts to diversify its economy. With that, blockchain and Web3 are being embraced.TokenizationWhile lacking a formal crypto regulatory regime, recent reports suggest that Saudi regulators are warming up to the idea, indicating a shift in approach. A recent collaboration has emerged between the central banks of Saudi Arabia and Hong Kong which will explore tokenization and payments infrastructure.It is noteworthy that both SBI and Aramco explicitly referred to “digital assets” in their collaboration, avoiding the mention of cryptocurrencies. This emphasis raises the possibility that the focus might extend to tokenization, an area where SBI has a robust presence, notably through the establishment of the Osaka Digital Exchange (ODX), set to commence trading tokenized securities later this month.As part of its digital asset investments, Saudi Aramco has previously engaged in blockchain initiatives, including investments in VAKT, a post-trade solution for the oil sector. Additionally last year Aramco invested in blockchain startup Data Gumbo, which utilizes blockchain in order to bring about operational efficiencies. The collaboration extends to the approval of electronic bill of lading (eBL) providers like TradeGo.In February, Aramco signed an agreement with droppGroup to build out a range of Web3 technologies. Furthermore, Aramco’s investments in companies like Red Date Technologies and IR4LAB underscore its interest in developing blockchain-based services, including document and supply chain solutions.

Binance Takes P2P Service Measures in Response to Sanctioned Russian BanksGlobal crypto exchange Binance has removed the option for users to conduct transactions via sanctioned Russian banks on its peer-to-peer (P2P) platform, a decision that comes on the heels of a Wall Street Journal exposé published earlier this week, shedding light on the platform’s involvement in facilitating the movement of funds for Russian users.Previously, Binance’s peer-to-peer service featured five Russian banks under sanctions as a method for ruble transfers between users. However, the company swiftly acted to address potential compliance concerns. Fittingly, this latest news was also broken by the Wall Street Journal on Friday.Dmitry Sidorov on PexelsSailing too close to the windWhen approached regarding the omission of these banks, a Binance spokesperson stated: “We regularly update our systems to ensure compliance with local and global regulatory standards. When gaps are pointed out to us, we seek to address and remediate them as soon as possible.”The Wall Street Journal’s article outlined how Binance’s peer-to-peer platform facilitated ruble-to-crypto trades that frequently involved the sanctioned Russian banks, with Rosbank and Tinkoff Bank being prominent examples.These trades often utilized layers of intermediaries to convert funds from these banks into Binance balances, as detailed by various company resources, user screenshots, and messages in official chat groups. Despite these revelations, Binance’s exchange had continued to handle significant volumes of ruble trading, according to data compiled by digital asset research firm CCData.US DoJ probeBinance’s activities in Russia could potentially contribute to its ongoing legal challenges in the United States. The US Justice Department (DoJ) has been probing the company’s actions for potential violations of American sanctions on Russia. In response to such concerns, the Binance spokesperson emphasized:“Binance aims to diligently comply with the global sanctions rules and enforces sanctions on people, organizations, entities, and countries that have been blacklisted by the international community, denying such actors access to the Binance platform.”WorkaroundsTraders, however, had reportedly found workarounds to the bank removals, as observed in the official Telegram chat group for Russian clients. Many shared that they could still engage with sanctioned banks by selecting alternative payment methods and then manually inputting their Rosbank or Tinkoff bank details.Earlier this year, an investigative report by CNBC alleged that employees of the company had told it that Binance staff regularly helped Chinese customers to bypass Know Your Customer (KYC) controls in order to access the platform. More recently, another report, once again by the Wall Street Journal, found that business in China was booming, which surprised many given that China banned crypto trading within the country in 2021.It’s apparent that the company is reacting to regulatory and legal pressures in taking the decision to make these changes to its P2P service. Perennial crypto critic US Senator Elizabeth Warren took to X (formerly Twitter) on Friday, stating:“I rang the alarm about sanctions evasion by Russia using the crypto platform Binance — and urged [the DoJ] to investigate potentially false statements it made to Congress. We need stronger crypto regulations to rein in illicit finance.“

Zipmex proposes creditor repayments of 3 cents on the dollarBeleaguered Singaporean crypto exchange Zipmex has unveiled a restructuring proposal aimed at repaying creditors. According to a report published by Bloomberg on Wednesday, the initial offer stands at 3.35 cents for every dollar of the creditors’ claims.Photo by Alexander Grey on UnsplashRestructuring challengesThis restructuring proposal unfolds against the backdrop of a challenging period for Zipmex, triggered by the aftermath of last year’s crypto price downturn. The crypto exchange, which operates in Thailand, Indonesia, Australia and Singapore, is currently undergoing a court-supervised restructuring process based in Singapore.In its efforts to restructure the business, Zipmex is grappling with a debt of $97.1 million. That total debt level is contingent upon the eventual recovery of assets. Bloomberg cited sources familiar with the matter, suggesting that depending on the success of these recovery efforts, the repayment figure could potentially surge to 29.35 cents per dollar.Creditor dissatisfactionHowever, not all major creditors are on board with Zipmex’s proposed plan. Expressing reservations, they are pushing for an independent review to scrutinize recent changes in the company’s assets and liabilities, as outlined in an Oct. 4 court document. This external examination is deemed crucial to ensuring transparency and fairness throughout the restructuring process.In response to these developments, Marcus Lim, the Group Chief Executive Officer of Zipmex, refrained from providing detailed comments due to the confidentiality of the ongoing arrangement. While acknowledging inaccuracies in information sourced from external outlets, he chose not to elaborate on them further.Investor deal failureA previous attempt to sell Zipmex to V Ventures, a subsidiary of Thoresen Thai Agencies, fell through. To add to the struggling company’s woes, it emerged earlier this week that Thailand’s securities regulator, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) recently instructed Zipmex to halt operations in the country due to insufficient net capital.The company had been fined 11 million baht ($315,000) by the SEC earlier this year. The SEC cited the co-mingling of corporate and customer funds as one regulatory breach. Furthermore, the Thai regulator claimed that between May and July 2022, Zipmex “did not have in place a system to effectively prevent conflicts of interest in such matters and the business operation does not have an adequate risk control system.”In response to this recent regulatory directive, Zipmex Limited issued a statement to its customers, expressing its commitment to ensuring proper and compliant business operations in line with the criteria set by the Thai SEC. Consequently, the temporary suspension of digital asset trading and deposit of all types was deemed necessary.The intricacies of Zipmex’s financial restructuring will be closely watched by market observers, especially considering the volatility in the crypto market and the regulatory challenges faced by the company in multiple jurisdictions. The success of the proposed repayment plan, contingent upon asset recovery, remains uncertain, leaving creditors and industry stakeholders on edge.As Zipmex grapples with these multifaceted challenges, its future trajectory hinges on navigating both the demands of the bankruptcy process alongside regulatory requirements.