Blockchain Firm NEOPLY Rebrands as Neowiz Partners to Focus on Investment

Further Setback for Luno With Loss of Top ExecGlobal crypto exchange Luno has been challenged of late, with job cuts, the closure of its presence in Singapore and now the loss of a key executive from the company.According to a report published by CNBC on Tuesday, the embattled crypto firm is losing Vijay Ayyar, its Vice President of Corporate Development and International. The setback follows an announcement last month by the company to withdraw its presence from the Singaporean market.Photo by Marten Bjork on UnsplashUnrelated to Singapore closureAyyar made the following comment via WhatsApp message: “I’ll be leaving Luno after 7 years at the company. Given the time I’d spent at Luno, it just seemed like it was time for another challenge.” It’s understood that Ayyar has confirmed that Luno’s move to exit Singapore (where he was based) was not related to his own decision to move on. Instead the top executive has said that he will be joining another company within the crypto and over-arching Web3 space.Luno management had previously outlined that its decision to exit Singapore formed part of an overall “evaluation of [its] global strategy and presence.” As part of its retreat from that South East Asian market, it withdrew its licensing application from consideration by the local regulator, the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS).At the time of that announcement, the company stated: “ It’s not a decision we’ve taken lightly. It’s always been our mission to put the power of crypto in everyone’s hands. This is still true.”Organizational changesThe company is clearly going through a period of adjustment from a staffing and resourcing perspective. Last month, Luno announced that its co-founder, Marcus Swanepoel, would be stepping down as CEO. Filling his boots in that role will be Luno’s Chief Operating Officer (COO), James Lanigan.This organizational upheaval follows a further setback in January, when the company announced a 35% cut in headcount. The decision for those job cuts was taken as a knock on reaction to what had been a very challenging trading environment for Luno and crypto companies generally during a year long crypto bear market in 2022.A troubled parent companyLuno’s difficulties have been further compounded given that it is a portfolio company of crypto industry conglomerate, Digital Currency Group (DCG). DCG had acquired the company in 2020. DCG also owns digital assets-focused financial services firm Genesis which filed for bankruptcy in January. It owes $575 million to Genesis in a scenario that places DCG itself in default risk.Genesis and DCG have recently entered into a 30 day mediation process in order to reach a resolution relative to creditors who participated in the Gemini Earn programme associated with the Gemini cryptocurrency business run by Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss.As yet DCG has not sought to sell off any of its portfolio companies which includes Grayscale, CoinDesk and Foundry. However, it’s understood that Luno has hired investment bank Canaccord Genuity in an effort to garner suitors who would be interested in investing in the company. This may be part of a plan to unburden the troubled DCG parent company.

Illiquid Token Sinks OPNX’s $30 Million Hodlnaut BidThe interim judicial managers overseeing the restructuring process of troubled Singaporean crypto lender Hodlnaut have firmly opposed the takeover offer presented by OPNX, the Dubai-based crypto bankruptcy claims trading platform associated with the founders of the now-defunct hedge fund, Three Arrows Capital.Photo by Image Hunter on PexelsSpeculative token valueIn a report published on Tuesday, Bloomberg referred to a recent court filing in which the administrators of Hodlnaut had characterized OPNX’s $30 million bid in FLEX digital tokens as “illiquid” and bearing “speculative value.” Additionally, a significant portion of Hodlnaut Group’s creditors, representing 60% of the total debt, had also voiced their dissent towards the proposed OPNX deal.Hodlnaut, headquartered in Singapore with operations in Hong Kong, found itself among the casualties of the $1.5 trillion crypto market downturn last year. OPNX had expressed its interest in taking control of Hodlnaut last month.Among the concerns raised by managers were the absence of a cash injection or assets with readily available liquidity, such as Bitcoin or Ether. Furthermore, there was no clear timeline provided for the repayment of creditors’ debts, and the proposal lacked detailed information regarding payments, which are limited to just 30% of liabilities, according to the court-appointed supervisors of Hodlnaut’s restructuring.FLEX token offeringThe FLEX token, associated with the CoinFLEX exchange, whose founders Mark Lamb and Sudhu Arumugam launched OPNX earlier this year, is at the center of the proposal. Currently, it holds a market value of approximately $54.4 million. However, its trading volume remains low. Moreover, its unit value stands at $0.55, marking a substantial 95% decrease from a month ago when the offer was first submitted to the Singapore court, as per data from CoinGecko.The deal would have meant OPNX taking a 75% stake in the business. Previously, Hodlnaut’s founders Simon Lee and Zhu Juntao had put forward a proposal of a business sale rather than liquidating the company as the preferred option.Su Zhu and Kyle Davies, co-founders of Singapore’s Three Arrows Capital, played instrumental roles in the inception of OPNX, joining with the CoinFLEX founders in establishing the bankruptcy claims trading platform. Despite their initial contributions, it’s worth noting that Zhu has previously clarified that neither he nor Davies are involved in the day-to-day management of the exchange.Regulatory sanctionsIn recent developments, Zhu and Davies were sanctioned with a nine-year ban by the Monetary Authority of Singapore due to violations connected to their collapsed hedge fund firm, which operated out of Singapore. Furthermore, in August, authorities in Dubai levied fines against Zhu, Davies, Mark Lamb, OPNX CEO Leslie Lamb, and Arumugam for operating and promoting OPNX without the required local license.The rejection of OPNX’s bid by Hodlnaut’s bankruptcy administrators underscores the challenges implicated by illiquid tokens. The fate of Hodlnaut remains uncertain, pending further developments in the ongoing legal proceedings, and will depend upon its management’s efforts in finding a new buyer for the business.

Rising Cryptocurrency Arbitrage Transactions Raise Concerns in South KoreaThe number of arbitrage transactions between South Korean and foreign cryptocurrency exchanges has been experiencing a notable uptick, according to a report by local media outlet Maeil Business Newspaper.In recent developments, foreign actors engaging in price manipulation have been transferring substantial amounts of cryptocurrency assets to Korean exchanges, driving up prices. Subsequently, they transfer these tokens from Korean exchanges back to overseas platforms, capitalizing on the price discrepancies to generate profits.Photo by Maxim Hopman on UnsplashBithumb’s case in H1According to documents submitted to Kim Hee-gon, a member of the ruling political party People Power Party, on Monday, KRW 3.4 trillion ($2.6 billion) worth of tokens were moved from Bithumb, a leading Korean cryptocurrency exchange, to foreign trading platforms during the first half of this year. Although this figure marks a 40% decrease compared to H1 2022’s KRW 5.7 trillion, primarily due to the significant decline in token prices across the cryptocurrency market, it’s noteworthy that the number of transactions has seen a significant increase.Other exchangesGopax, another major exchange in the nation, recorded token outflows totaling KRW 12.3 billion. On the other hand, Upbit, Coinone, and Korbit, which are also prominent exchanges, declined to provide data due to reasons like confidentiality concerns. However, given that Upbit holds an 82.0% share of the Korean crypto market, nearly four times larger than Bithumb’s share (14.2%), it is suspected that the volume of tokens transferred from Upbit to foreign platforms would likely have followed a similar proportion.While the value of tokens sent from Bithumb to overseas operators saw a year-over-year decrease, the number of transactions surged to 231,302, nearly doubling the figure of H1 2022’s 124,048 transactions. The average transaction size was KRW 14.7 million.Even though the overall enthusiasm for cryptocurrencies might have cooled off since last year, the spike in the number of transactions suggests that there’s been a surge in arbitrage trading between Korea and foreign markets.Kimchi premiumEarlier this month, a significant transaction caught the eye of cryptocurrency market observers in South Korea. On September 1, crypto data analytics firm Arkham identified that 170,000 CyberConnect (CYBER) tokens were transferred to Bithumb from a crypto wallet thought to be owned by DWF Labs, a firm specializing in cryptocurrency trading and investment. The timing of the transaction coincides with a period during which the Kimchi premium for CYBER exceeded 100%. The Kimchi premium refers to the crypto price gap between Korean exchanges and their foreign counterparts.The complicating factor here is that DWF Labs is a foreign entity that is managed by a foreign team.The use of corporate accounts is virtually prohibited in the Korean crypto market. The Travel Rule mandates that any transfers of tokens between Korean and international exchanges must go through accounts that have been verified under Know Your Customer (KYC) guidelines. Given these regulations, there are growing suspicions within the crypto community that foreign venture capitalists may have used accounts in borrowed names to conduct sales on Korean exchanges, which are restricted to Korean citizens. However, it’s worth noting that there is currently no legal basis for taking punitive action even if borrowed-name accounts were indeed used.Lawmaker Kim commented on the limitations of current financial regulations aimed at preventing money laundering in the cryptocurrency market. Despite efforts by financial authorities, including the introduction of the Travel Rule, Kim stated that these measures have not been very effective. He emphasized the urgency of enhancing the regulatory framework to curb potential illicit activities involving cryptocurrencies, such as those exploiting market arbitrage opportunities.