Superblock Rolls Out Crypto Wallet, Garnering Over 680K Pre-Registrants

Korea Exchange sets the stage for security token tradingStarting next year, South Koreans may have the opportunity to trade security tokens, as the Korea Exchange (KRX), the sole securities exchange operator in the country, has officially begun preparations to establish a security token market. The Busan Digital Asset Exchange (BDX), slated for launch next year, is expected to play a pivotal role in spearheading the growth and development of this emerging security token market.Photo by Tierra Mallorca on UnsplashSeeking approval from financial regulatorsAs reported by local news outlet Busan Ilbo, KRX applied to the FSC last month for registration as an innovative financial service under the financial regulatory sandbox scheme. On Nov. 19, the FSC approved the creation of pilot markets for investment contract securities and non-cash trust beneficial certificates. KRX’s recent initiative is a follow-up to this development. The financial regulator is set to make a final decision after holding a main committee meeting to review KRX’s application.Investment contract securities and non-cash trust beneficial certificates represent two distinct types of security tokens. Investment contract securities provide a means for fractional investments in real-world assets (RWAs). This can include a diverse range of assets such as artworks, music copyrights, beef and carbon credits, allowing investors to own a portion of these assets. On the other hand, non-cash trust beneficial certificates function as secondary investment instruments. These certificates enable individuals to invest in financial products that themselves have invested in security tokens, offering an indirect pathway to participate in the security token market.Fractional investments on the horizonVarious industries are poised to benefit from the emerging digital market, especially platforms focused on fractional investment in artworks. Companies like Yeolmae Company, Art Together and Seoul Auction Blue are keen on this opportunity and have applied to the FSS for permission to register security tokens. Upon receiving regulatory approval, these platforms plan to accept subscription requests, enabling investors to participate in the art market in a more accessible way.The development of security token markets is expected to positively impact BDX, which is currently seeking an operator. Initially, when BDX’s operation plan was unveiled in September, it excluded security tokens due to regulatory constraints. However, with KRX now involved, it’s more probable that the Busan exchange will feature security tokens as major trading assets. Experts believe the success of these token exchanges will largely depend on the quality and appeal of the underlying assets.A local securities industry official emphasized the significant role of the security token market in enhancing the stature of Busan as a blockchain hub. The growth of this market is seen as pivotal in boosting the value and utility of BDX. The official noted that BDX’s appeal to investors would increase if it offered a diverse range of underlying assets or unique security tokens. This development could mark a significant turning point for Busan in the blockchain industry.

JPEX Exchange Scandal Sees Crypto Regulation Under Scrutiny in Hong KongWhile Hong Kong has been developing steadily as a crypto sector hub, the focus in the Chinese autonomous territory has turned towards regulation after a recent scandal involving an unlicensed cryptocurrency exchange.Photo by Ihor Saveliev on UnsplashOngoing investigationYesterday we reported on some arrests relative to problems experienced at crypto exchange JPEX. The fallout continues on Tuesday, with the Hong Kong police now understood to have arrested eight individuals, including social media influencers who promoted the exchange and JPEX employees, on allegations of fraud. This illicit activity in and around the JPEX exchange has affected over 1,600 investors, implicating more than $150 million in assets.JPEX, in response to mounting pressure, announced the suspension of trading on its platform. In a statement, the exchange mentioned ongoing negotiations with third-party market makers to address liquidity shortages. However, JPEX also accused an unidentified third-party market maker of maliciously freezing funds, further complicating the situation.Politicians and regulators speak outResponding to the incident via a press conference on Tuesday, Hong Kong’s Chief Executive, John Lee, emphasized the significance of investing in virtual assets through licensed platforms. Lee stated:“This incident highlights the importance that when investors want to invest in virtual assets, then they must invest on platforms that are licensed.” He also pledged that the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) would closely monitor the situation to ensure investor protection.Elizabeth Wong, the Head of the SFC’s fintech unit, revealed that an investigation was underway to determine whether JPEX had violated anti-money laundering laws. The SFC had already declared JPEX unlicensed, prompting numerous complaints from investors who were unable to withdraw their virtual assets or experienced unexplained reductions in their balances.Assets frozenHong Kong authorities have taken decisive action against those involved in the scandal. They have frozen bank accounts valued at 15 million Hong Kong dollars ($1 million) and seized three properties valued at 44 million Hong Kong dollars. The police have reported receiving 1,641 complaints related to JPEX, involving a staggering $1.2 billion Hong Kong dollars. By last Wednesday, the SFC had received in excess of 1,000 complaints and at that point, they notified the general public.The JPEX scandal has drawn attention to the need for stronger cryptocurrency regulations in Hong Kong, a region that has become attractive to cryptocurrency firms since mainland China banned cryptocurrency transactions in 2021. In mainland China, trading cryptocurrencies on foreign exchanges from within the country remains illegal.Hong Kong’s response to cryptocurrency regulation has evolved. Beginning on June 1, the SFC started accepting applications from cryptocurrency exchanges, allowing licensed operators to serve retail investors, provided they understand the associated risks. Previously, only professional investors had access to such exchanges. Currently, only two exchanges in Hong Kong, OSL Exchange and Hashkey Exchange, have received approval to operate.As Hong Kong reevaluates its approach to cryptocurrency regulation, the crypto sector will hope that it strikes a balance between fostering innovation and protecting investors from fraud and market manipulation.

Korean Lawmakers Complete First Rough Draft of Virtual Asset User Protection BillKorean lawmakers have completed the first rough draft of the virtual asset user protection bill at a National Policy Committee meeting held later last month.©Pexels/Matthias ZomerAgreeing on term usage ‘virtual assets’So far, 18 bills have been proposed to regulate cryptocurrencies, and the lawmakers and the Financial Services Commission (FSC) agreed to use the term “virtual assets” to encompass similar terms such as digital assets and crypto assets.Phased enactment of billsThe bills are likely to be reviewed under the title “Virtual Asset User Protection Act.” The bipartisan group agreed to enact the bills in phases, introducing the user protection bill in the first phase and the virtual asset listing and issuance bill in the second phase.Meanwhile, there were mixed opinions on the content of the bills. In particular, there was debate over whether the bills should stipulate that the central bank digital currency (CBDC) is excluded from virtual assets, and whether the bills should include a standard for determining if a virtual asset is a security.Debate over stipulating CBDC’s statusThe stipulation of excluding CBDC from virtual assets was the most divisive topic since it would lead to defining the conditions for other assets such as non-fungible tokens. Moreover, the Act on Reporting and Using Specified Financial Transaction Information, which currently regulates virtual asset service providers (VASPs), does not contain any stipulation on CBDC. Some raised concerns that such discrepancies could later cause confusion. In the end, assembly members decided to discuss the matter again in April after consulting with the Bank of Korea and the Ministry of Government Legislation.Criteria for classifying virtual assets as securitiesRegarding whether to include criteria for classifying virtual assets as securities, the lawmakers and financial regulators took different sides.Lee Yong-woo, a member of the Democratic Party of Korea, underlined that a clear statement of the relationship between the issuer and the recipient of virtual assets in a whitepaper can determine their security status. He added that such provisions should be included in the bills.Park Min-woo, an FSC official, on the other hand, commented on a cautious note that in case virtual assets fall under the category of securities, they may not be applicable to the virtual asset act. He explained that VASPs might deal with both securities and virtual assets, and in such cases, there could be a misunderstanding that VASPs are not subject to the virtual asset act simply because they trade securities.