Shinhan Bank and SCB TechX Succeed in Stablecoin Remittance Pilot

South Korea's Democratic Party of Korea (DPK) plans to introduce a bill this week aimed at establishing a legal framework for digital assets, according to Edaily. The move is part of the party's ongoing efforts to advance its crypto policy agenda ahead of the upcoming presidential election. The proposed law would define the legal status of digital assets and set rules for their issuance, distribution and listing. The bill is expected to keep the requirement for Korean won-pegged stablecoin issuers to obtain authorization with a minimum reserve of 5 billion won ($3.58 million), a key point of debate.Photo by Brady Bellini on UnsplashA DPK official stated that the bill has been drafted and is set to be introduced to the National Assembly this week, following feedback from internal subcommittees. Most of the provisions remain consistent with last month’s draft, but final comments are still being collected on stablecoin reserve requirements, which have been a major point of discussion. Defining digital assetsThe bill defines digital assets as "electronic records with economic value based on blockchain technology" and establishes a regulatory framework for issuers, exchanges and custodians. Key provisions include permitting initial coin offerings (ICOs) and creating a digital asset committee under the Financial Services Commission (FSC). This committee would oversee legal framework design, market monitoring, and policy promotion. Additionally, an industry association will establish a separate committee to oversee token listing practices, ensuring consistent listing standards across exchanges. The most contentious part of the draft has been the regulations for won-based stablecoins. It classifies stablecoins as digital assets akin to fiat currency, requiring a minimum reserve of 5 billion won and authorization from the FSC. It also mandates real-time reserve disclosures, secure asset custody and quarterly reporting. Divide over stablecoin reserve requirementOpinions on the reserve requirement are divided. Some industry insiders argue that the 5 billion won threshold is too high, creating a barrier for startups. Others believe a minimum capital requirement is necessary due to stablecoins' role in payments and their potential as currency substitutes. Lee Jung-yup, president of the Blockchain Law Society, stressed that stablecoins must maintain a basic level of trust, warning that those failing to meet the 5 billion won threshold could become prone to insolvency or fraud. However, Lee acknowledged concerns about the centralized regulatory approach led by financial authorities and the potential for market dominance by large corporations. He suggested exploring the creation of an independent regulatory body for cryptocurrencies, warning that overly strict regulations could stifle domestic digital finance innovation amid growing global competition. Crime surges with market growthWhile regulations continue to evolve, crypto crimes are also rising sharply amid the expanding digital asset market. According to Segye Ilbo, South Korean police arrested about 2,100 individuals for crypto-related offenses last year—17 times more than in 2017, when data collection began. The total losses from such crimes now exceed 1 trillion won ($714 million) annually. Since the election of U.S. President Donald Trump, known for his crypto-friendly stance, Korea's crypto market has experienced rapid growth. This surge has raised concerns about an increase in fraud targeting investors chasing quick profits. 

Dubai Regulator Issues Reprimand to OPNX FoundersThe Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA), the regulator that concerns itself with the digital assets market in the Emirate of Dubai, has formally reprimanded the founders of digital asset exchange OPNX.Photo by Kai Pilger on UnsplashVARA issued an investor and marketplace alert on April 12 to inform investors that OPNX was not a licensed entity regulated by VARA and with that, it urged investors to be cautious. The regulator has now gone one further, this time formally writing to OPNX’s founders to reprimand them.The statement cites the following rationale for the issuance of the reprimand:”Carrying out VA (Virtual Asset) Exchange Services on an unregulated basis in and from the Emirate of Dubai; and Marketing, promoting and/or advertising OPNX services and its native token [FLEX] without the necessary permits from VARA.”Contextual backgroundThe statement goes on to provide the context for the regulator’s most recent action. VARA became aware of OPNX soliciting the public to use the exchange in February of this year. It noted that the business was actively marketing through various social media channels “without establishing warranted restrictions for residents of Dubai/UAE.” VARA went on to explain that OPNX commenced trading in April without having secured a regulatory license despite the activity warranting such a license.Cease and desistOn February 27, VARA issued OPNX with a cease and desist order, relative to the foundation of the business and the marketing and promotion of services. Thereafter, the exchange applied certain restrictions but the regulator deemed the measures to not have been applied comprehensively across all OPNX communication channels, prompting it to issue a further cease and desist order the following month.The investor and marketplace alert followed in April as OPNX proceeded to launch its exchange. The written reprimand was then issued on April 18, “to address historical and ongoing activity conducted on an unregulated basis.” The recipients included the OPNX founders, (Mark Lamb, Sudhu Arumugam, Kyle Davies and Su Zhu) and the firm’s CEO Leslie Lamb.Given what the regulator deems to have been “a continued lack of satisfactory remedial action [taken] by the responsible parties,” it is continuing to actively monitor the situation. VARA stated that it will further investigate OPNX’s activity to assess further corrective measures that may be required to protect the market.Lack of industry supportThe digital assets industry is in no way enamored with founders Davies and Zhu. Their record has been badly blemished by the unceremonious collapse of their crypto hedge fund, Three Arrows Capital, in 2022. That failure wreaked major damage on the overarching crypto space, directly leading to the failure of other crypto businesses later that year.Prominent crypto venture capitalist Michael Arrington said of their capital raise for OPNX that it was “the saddest bulls**t I’ve heard in a long time.” It later transpired that two of the investment firms that OPNX suggested were backing the start-up refuted the claim.In response to this latest development, OPNX’s CEO Leslie Lamb told Blockworks that the business was initially launched in Hong Kong. “To confirm, we have no Dubai or UAE customers and do full KYC on all users,” she stated.

The Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA), the regulatory body which oversees the digital assets market within the emirate of Dubai in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), has taken corrective action against seven unlicensed crypto entities. Fines issuedAccording to an enforcement notice, published to the VARA website on October 8, the agency issued fines relative to a number of firms that it found were engaging in unlicensed virtual asset-related trading activity. The fines ranged from between 50,000 to 100,000 UAE dirhams (AED), equivalent to between $13,600 and $27,200 in U.S. dollars. The agency outlined that it was taking this corrective action in order to continue its enforcement efforts so as to safeguard Dubai’s virtual asset ecosystem. In its enforcement notice, the regulator did not disclose the names of the entities that have been sanctioned. The agency said that its investigations are ongoing, in partnership with local law enforcement.  A statement from the Regulatory Affairs and Enforcement division within VARA was provided, stating: “VARA will not tolerate any attempts to operate without appropriate licenses, nor will we allow unauthorized marketing of virtual asset activities. Our marketing regulations further emphasize Dubai’s commitment to ensuring transparency and always protecting stakeholder interests.”Photo by Alex Block on UnsplashCease and desist ordersIn addition to fines, VARA also issued the seven firms with cease and desist orders for breaching marketing regulations. Marketing by crypto firms is an area the regulator has been focusing on recently. Last month, VARA published a press release, outlining that it had updated its crypto regulations to specifically deal with marketing-related matters. Alongside that update, it issued a guidance document, clarifying the responsibilities of virtual asset service providers (VASPs) relative to marketing practices. A schedule of fines was provided in the case of a breach of the regulations, while the update set out a need for a mandatory disclaimer on marketing material to indicate that virtual assets are volatile and may lose their value, fully or partially. The Dubai regulator is not the first to home in on the marketing activities of crypto businesses. In the UK, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) enforced additional rules related to crypto marketing in late 2023. Some crypto businesses found the requirements too arduous and left the UK market as a direct consequence. Public warningIn its enforcement notice, the Dubai regulator also had a message for the trading and investing public, stating: “This public warning is VARA’s market notice to all to avoid engaging with any unlicensed firms.” The regulator added that interacting with unlicensed entities exposes both individual investors and institutions to both financial and reputational risk.  Furthermore, it warned of “potential legal consequences” for regulatory violations. “Only firms licensed by VARA are authorised to provide virtual asset services in/from Dubai, and the Authority remains steadfast in its commitment to protect consumers and investors, and to preserve market integrity,” the regulator further asserted.