Japan’s FSA Joins Project Guardian of Singapore’s MAS to Explore Digital Asset Applications

Animoca Brands Expands Focus to Non-US MarketsHong Kong-based Web3 and blockchain unicorn, Animoca Brands, is shifting its attention to markets outside the United States following the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) classification of its $SAND token as an unregistered security.This move comes after the SEC named $SAND, along with other tokens like Solana and Polygon, in lawsuits against major exchanges Binance and Coinbase Global. The labeling of these tokens as securities by the SEC poses legal risks for companies involved in their sale.Photo by Zulian Firmansyah on UnsplashNavigating regulatory challengesAnimoca Brands, led by Co-Founder and Chairman Yat Siu, has long embraced a global approach rather than focusing solely on one territory. Siu clarified the firm’s response to the latest regulatory development to the South China Morning Post (SCMP) via email on Thursday.He emphasized that while the SEC concentrates on the US, Animoca Brands operates in more progressive jurisdictions such as Hong Kong and Japan, where $SAND is widely available and accepted. In response to the recent blockchain-hostile climate in the US, the company has proactively started emphasizing other markets, reducing its reliance on the US market and mitigating potential risks associated with regulatory actions.Exchange business impactWhile Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong has declared that his company has no intentions of delisting tokens labeled as securities by the SEC, this decision poses challenges for other exchanges less committed to selling these tokens. Dan Gallagher, Chief Legal Compliance and Corporate Affairs Officer of Robinhood Markets, expressed concerns about listing tokens due to regulatory rules and the uncertainty surrounding tokens created by organizations outside the US.These developments could have a chilling effect on exchanges, prompting crypto firms to consider moving away from the US market due to perceived uncertainty and the associated legal risks. As a demonstration of that, in a bankruptcy court hearing on Thursday, it emerged that the FTX Debtor is talking with bidders with a view to restarting the international business but restarting the US-based business is less certain.Animoca’s Middle East ventureIn a further display of its commitment to expanding outside the US, Animoca Brands announced plans in March to make significant investments, worth tens of millions of dollars, in the Middle East. This move reflects the company’s proactive strategy to tap into non-US markets and leverage the growth potential offered by progressive jurisdictions.Animoca Brands’ decision to prioritize non-US markets and reduce its reliance on the US market aligns with its global operating approach. The SEC’s classification of $SAND as a security has prompted the company to shift its attention to more progressive jurisdictions where $SAND remains widely accessible.As other firms, including Ripple, also explore growth opportunities outside the US, the global landscape of the crypto industry is evolving. By navigating regulatory challenges and expanding into promising markets, Animoca Brands aims to position itself for continued success and mitigate potential risks associated with the SEC’s actions in the US market.

Over Half of Leading Korean Conglomerates Are Venturing Into Web3 and BlockchainMore than half of South Korea’s conglomerates are ushering in the emerging era of Web3 in an attempt to seize new business opportunities presented by a decentralized internet that permits open access and sharing of resources as well as ownership of personal data.Photo by Abbe Sublett on UnsplashSurging interest among Korea’s biggest enterprisesAccording to a survey conducted by local news outlet E Today, 46 of Korea’s top 82 corporations as designated by the Fair Trade Commission (FTC) are pursuing ventures in Web3 and blockchain this year, including those related to non-fungible tokens (NFTs), security tokens, and logistics chains. The survey examined whether the corporations had issued coins, tokens, or NFTs; whether they had corporate divisions or subsidiaries dedicated to blockchain-related projects; and whether they had made investments in blockchain or digital asset-related companies as well as coin and token issuance projects. It was conducted remotely using publicly disclosed information and press releases.Of the 82 total companies, 48 are under the mutual investment restriction system, which prohibits independent corporations from investing their capital in the form of an exchange. Commercial law prohibits mutual stock holdings between parent companies and their subsidiaries in order to prevent a processive increase in company assets through mutual investments. Of those 48, the survey revealed that 32 are engaged in blockchain and Web3-related projects.Nearly 60.42% of the mutual investment restriction group and 48.78% of the total survey group were found to have become involved in the field by signing business deals with blockchain and digital asset-related companies or utilizing blockchain technology themselves.On the other hand, only seven corporations, or 8.54%, had directly issued digital assets or invested in related companies. On the other hand, 26 firms, or 31.71%, invested in NFT-related businesses.Navigating the path to Web3 adoptionHowever, although Web3 is gaining traction as the next generation of future innovation, it has not yet become the dominant trend as Web3 platforms have yet to attract a significant user base. This hindrance can be attributed to the ongoing crypto winter and strict financial regulations.Woo Jong-soo, Director of the Pohang University of Science and Technology’s (POSTECH) Blockchain Research Center and a professor at POSTECH’s Graduate School of Information and Communication, also pointed out that in order for blockchain to exert its influence as an innovative technology, it should be open to the public like Bitcoin. There will be limitations in implementing centralized private blockchains into corporate businesses, he said.But despite these challenges, major leading companies are still pushing their own Web3 and blockchain projects. “The current situation is not an ideal time for diving into Web3 and blockchain businesses, but everyone is quietly preparing while waiting for regulatory uncertainties to be resolved,” said an anonymous developer working at a major corporation.Notably, Park Hye-jin, a professor at the Seoul School of Integrated Sciences and Technologies, revealed that she had received separate Web3 business consultation requests from several teams under the same division of a particular corporation and that these teams were essentially unaware of each others’ ventures into the field. The corporation, which ostensibly announced that it had closed its business, also continues to request consultations, she claimed, highlighting the corporate world’s acknowledgment of Web3’s potential.“Individuals can now monetize and have control over their data, which big tech companies like Facebook and Instagram used to own,” Park explained. “The essence of Web3 is that it is ushering in an era where users have the ability to take initiative.”

At Hong Kong FinTech Week 2025, Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) Chief Executive Julia Leung outlined plans to link Hong Kong’s crypto market with global liquidity. She announced that licensed virtual asset trading platforms (VATPs) will be allowed to share a global order book with their overseas counterparts. According to a statement published on the SFC’s website, this step will enable local investors to access international markets more efficiently, improving price discovery and competitiveness. Leung added that more initiatives are on the way to connect local brokers directly to global liquidity networks. This latest connectivity push comes as Hong Kong considers new guardrails for crypto holding companies such as digital asset treasuries (DATs), which hold cryptocurrencies as strategic assets.Photo by Manson Yim on UnsplashSFC points to regulatory gaps for digital asset treasuriesThe state-owned newspaper Wen Wei Po reported that Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) Chairman Kelvin Wong noted the current lack of regulations governing listed companies operating as DATs and the limited understanding of such entities. Chairman Wong added that firms seeking to list in Hong Kong as DATs would need to persuade both the SFC and the Hong Kong Stock Exchange (HKEX) of their suitability. For companies already listed, he urged investors to remain alert to the potential risks involved. This regulatory concern over crypto investing companies emerges as Hong Kong simultaneously presses ahead with its ambition to become a leading hub for digital finance. City advances on e-HKD and tokenizationIn line with that ambition, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) unveiled its e-HKD Pilot Programme Phase 2 Report in an Oct. 28 press release. The report outlines the potential benefits of its central bank digital currency (CBDC), the e-HKD, and tokenized deposits, noting that public feedback on both concepts has been broadly positive. The program's second phase involved 11 pilot projects led by various consortiums. These projects explored retail use cases, emphasizing the e-HKD’s commercial viability and scalability. Key focus areas included the settlement of tokenized assets, programmability, and offline payments. Participants in the program included Aptos Labs, the Boston Consulting Group (BCG), Hang Seng Bank, Standard Chartered, and BlackRock. Based on the report's findings, the HKMA stated it would initially prioritize the e-HKD’s application in wholesale or large-value payments, leveraging its credit risk–free nature as a central bank liability. Concurrently, the authority plans to continue studying potential retail and corporate applications, aiming to lay the groundwork for broader implementation by the first half of 2026. Survey shows strong investor appetiteAmong the program’s participants, Aptos Labs, Boston Consulting Group (BCG), and Hang Seng Bank reported accelerating interest in tokenized funds. A survey they conducted found that 61% of retail investors in Hong Kong and mainland China planned to double their exposure. Held between May and June 2025 among more than 500 retail fund investors, the survey tracked sentiment and appetite for tokenized products. Mainland participants showed particularly strong demand for cross-border access. The findings also detailed differing motivations among Hong Kong investors. Active traders expect to lift tokenized fund allocations from 10% to 26%, attracted by round-the-clock trading and greater flexibility. Wealth transfer planners indicated an expected expansion from 5% to 16%, highlighting programmable fund structures for tailored trusts and transparent oversight. Long-term investors aim to raise exposure from 8% to 25%, citing instant liquidity and the ability to use tokenized assets as loan collateral. Mainland investors projected their allocations would climb from 11% to 24%, reportedly viewing tokenized funds as a practical route around capital restrictions. The survey noted that programmable features could support dynamic allocation across Hong Kong products, the onshore use of profits, and smoother cross-border transfers. BCG commented that the survey outcomes align with Hong Kong's measured advance in crypto oversight, pointing to the city’s stablecoin regime that came into force in August. The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) has signaled, however, that licensing under that regime will not begin until early next year. The ongoing development of the e-HKD and the prospective regulation of digital-asset treasuries point to Hong Kong’s broader strategy of integrating digital finance into its mainstream economy. Together, these initiatives underscore a cautious yet steady effort to position the city as a global center for digital finance.