CertiLife Secures Funding for Blockchain-Based Medical Device Warranties

Binance Set For Japanese Market Re-Entry With 34 Token ListingsBinance, the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchange, is gearing up to re-enter the Japanese market with a bang on August 14. According to a report published by local crypto media outlet Coinpost, Binance Japan is set to immediately list an impressive 34 tokens.The move will put Binance ahead of its domestic rivals, as the offering will be the most extensive in terms of the selection of tokens made available to Japanese customers.Photo by David Edelstein on UnsplashBNB token offeringIn addition to that, Binance intends to make its native token, BNB, available in Japan for the first time. Exchange tokens have proven to be controversial in recent times. In November 2022, FTX’s reliance on their native token FTT caused a run on the exchange which Binance started once it started to sell off the token. Similar concerns have been expressed ever since about a similar reliance within Binance relative to its BNB token.The expansion into Japan will likely prove a tonic for Binance, given the difficulties it has experienced in other markets recently. Regulatory pushback has forced Binance out of markets such as Germany, Belgium, the Netherlands, and Cyprus over the course of the past three months.The company has been actively working to comply with Japan’s regulatory environment. In a Twitter video posted in July, Changpeng Zhao (CZ), Binance’s Founder and CEO, expressed his excitement about re-entering the Japanese market. He praised Japan’s clear and progressive approach to crypto regulations, citing the well-established framework that dates back to 2017, as well as recent developments, including the opening up of crypto listing frameworks and the passing of stablecoin regulations in June.Roadmap to market re-entryBinance’s journey back into Japan started in November 2022 when it acquired 100% ownership of Sakura Exchange BitCoin (SEBC). The acquisition paved the way for Binance to be regulated by the Japan Financial Services Agency (JFSA). As part of this move, SEBC underwent a name change, rebranding itself as Binance Japan Inc. The company then announced in May its plans to re-enter the Japanese market.The re-entry comes after the JFSA had previously issued warnings in 2021 against Binance for operating in the country without proper registration. Now, with the acquisition of SEBC and its regulatory compliance, Binance has gained a foothold in the Japanese market once again.Binance Japan aims to provide a comprehensive suite of services to its Japanese customers. New users can access spot trading, Earn products, and the NFT marketplace, while existing customers can migrate to the local subsidiary starting August 14. The token offerings include a diverse range of assets, and the addition of BNB presents exciting opportunities for traders and investors in Japan.Rival exchanges such as Coinbase and Kraken have decided to halt their operations in the country as they struggled to adjust to Japanese market conditions. The move by Binance to re-enter Japan’s market will be closely watched to see if it can succeed where others have failed.

Korea’s FSC Opposes Other Agencies’ Involvement in Virtual Asset BillAhead of the National Assembly’s passage of the virtual asset bill, the Korean Financial Services Commission (FSC) has repeatedly opposed the involvement of the Bank of Korea (BOK) and the Financial Supervisory Service (FSS) in regulating cryptocurrencies, according to the Korean newspaper Kukmin Ilbo.©Pexels/LukasFSC’s oppositionIn a document submitted to the National Assembly’s National Policy Committee, the FSC opposed stipulating the BOK’s right to request documents in the virtual asset bill. The agency argued that the bill is indirectly related to the BOK’s monetary and credit policy and that explicitly mentioning monetary and credit policy in the bill could lead to the misinterpretation of virtual assets as possessing the characteristics of currencies.The FSC also objected to stipulating the FSS’s right to inspect crypto enterprises. According to law, the purpose of the FSC is to inspect and supervise financial institutions. Explicitly stating the FSS’s right to inspect crypto enterprises could cause confusion to the public that they are financial entities.However, there are growing concerns about the FSC’s perceived intention to dominate virtual asset jurisdiction.At a small meeting held under the National Policy Committee last month, Lawmaker Yoon Han-hong of the ruling People Power Party expressed the view that the FSC should consider incorporating the BOK and the FSS in the virtual asset bill for crypto regulations. During the meeting, the FSC objected to the inclusion of a stipulation that excludes central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) from the definition of virtual assets. Meanwhile, the BOK agreed to include such a stipulation.Allowing class action suitsAccording to an internal document obtained by Kukmin Ilbo, the FSC also intends to allow class action suits for crypto investors. It seeks to add cryptocurrencies to a bill proposed for class action suits, which also deal with securities. Class action suits provide a means for victims to receive redress in cases where a representative is successful in winning the lawsuit against the offender.The FSC stated that it will follow the majority on the issue of whether the purpose of the virtual asset bill should include the phrase “to contribute to the development of the nation’s economy,” although it left a cautionary note that some might raise objections to this, considering the speculative nature of virtual assets.

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) approved the spot bitcoin exchange-traded fund (ETF) last Tuesday, prompting South Korean investors to flock to cryptocurrency exchanges to make transactions. However, the revenues recorded by these exchanges showed a mixed performance in response to this development due to their differing transaction fee policies, according to local news outlet DealSite on Monday.Photo by Maxim Hopman on UnsplashTrading volumes surge and retreatAccording to crypto analytics platform CoinGecko, as of 9 a.m. on Jan. 12 (KST), Upbit's trading volume on Dec. 11 and 12 was approximately $5.1 billion and $6.1 billion, respectively, for a total of about $11 billion. During the same period, Bithumb recorded $2.6 billion and $2.4 billion, respectively, totaling nearly $5 billion. However, as of this writing at 11 a.m. on Jan. 15, Upbit’s 24-hour trading volume has dropped back down to $2.1 billion and Bithumb to $874 million. "After the SEC's approval, crypto exchanges were simultaneously flooded with transactions," an anonymous industry employee commented. "Bitcoin and Ethereum were mainly traded." Fee divergenceAlthough the ETF approval caused a general uptick in trading volumes, the amount of revenue that the exchanges earned from transaction fees varied. Upbit charges a fee of 0.05% for both buying and selling crypto, meaning the exchange made an estimated KRW 14.8 billion in revenue from the fees from Dec. 11 to 12. Bithumb, on the other hand, hasn't earned any revenue from trading fees since its zero-fee policy was implemented in October last year.  Bithumb had previously charged 0.25% for transactions and 0.04% with coupons. By implementing the former, the exchange lost about KRW 15.8 billion ($12 million) in revenue, and with the latter, it lost about KRW 2.5 billion. For crypto investors, Bithumb's zero-fee policy has made investing more accessible, but the exchange is unlikely to reap its own rewards. Significant investor interestMoreover, with trading for the spot bitcoin ETF beginning on the 11th, the influx of funds is expected to boost trading. "All told there were 700,000 individual trades today in and out of the 11 spot ETFs," Bloomberg ETF analyst Eric Balchunas told X (formerly Twitter). "For context, that is double the number of trades for $QQQ." $QQQ refers to the Invesco QQQ ETF. According to an image that accompanied Balchunas’ post, the total trading volume across all 11 spot ETFs was reportedly $4.3 billion. Grayscale's GBTC had the highest volume at $2.1 billion, followed by BlackRock’s IBIT at $1 billion and Fidelity’s FBTC at $673 million.