Animoca Brands Holding $3.4B in Cash and Reserves

As is the case in the rest of the world, South Korea is also experiencing a bullish cryptocurrency market these days. However, local blockchain companies that started their business between 2017 and 2018 – those considered the first-generation blockchain firms – are trying to distance themselves from the label “blockchain,” removing words such as “block,” “chain” or “coin” from their names to rebrand themselves.  This is largely due to local regulations that stifle blockchain businesses and widespread negative perspectives towards the crypto industry among the public, the local media outlet News1 reported. Photo by Robert Stump on UnsplashMediBloc rebrands itself to WeavrCare: The two-track strategy Among the first-generation blockchain firms that changed its name is MediBloc. Founded in April 2017 as a blockchain-based digital health company, MediBloc rebranded its Korean branch last month to WeavrCare, combining the words "weave" and "care" to highlight its commitment to connecting patients and hospitals onchain.  WeavrCare offers a blockchain healthcare data platform named Panacea, where patients can directly manage their own medical data. It also provides a blockchain-based medical data and insurance claim platform Medipass. MediBloc's native token MED is currently listed on prominent local crypto exchanges such as Upbit and Bithumb.  The company is known to have well weathered the crypto winter between 2022 and 2023 by pitching a cloud electronic medical record (EMR) solution, Dr. Palette, which enables medical staff to easily check medical charts and manage patients' data.  Following its rebranding, WeavrCare has demonstrated its intention to pursue a two-track strategy, with the company’s Gibraltar branch focusing on blockchain business under the original corporate name MediBloc. In contrast, WeavrCare in Korea will focus on expanding new businesses including Dr. Palette.  Meanwhile, WeavrCare has reportedly embarked on investor relations (IR) activities to secure a Series B investment.  Chain Partners rebrands itself to AI3: Merging Web3 with AIChain Partners, a blockchain firm focused on crypto exchanges and the over-the-counter (OTC) markets, has also recently rebranded itself to AI3, a new name that the company expects will illustrate its aim of focusing more on AI businesses. The name reflects the company's dedication to exploring both Web3 and generative AI technology.  Following its rebranding, AI3 has embarked on developing an AI service equipped with a prompt response system. AI3 had already launched a personal AI assistant dubbed Wrks last year, which aims to improve workflows. A company official said AI3 is currently preparing for IR to qualify for a Series A investment.  CPLABS and Parameta: Earlier pioneers of blockchain Meanwhile, other blockchain firms that launched their businesses earlier than the above two companies have already completed their rebranding last year. CoinPlug changed its name to CPLABS, and Iconloop to Parameta.  

At Hong Kong FinTech Week 2025, Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) Chief Executive Julia Leung outlined plans to link Hong Kong’s crypto market with global liquidity. She announced that licensed virtual asset trading platforms (VATPs) will be allowed to share a global order book with their overseas counterparts. According to a statement published on the SFC’s website, this step will enable local investors to access international markets more efficiently, improving price discovery and competitiveness. Leung added that more initiatives are on the way to connect local brokers directly to global liquidity networks. This latest connectivity push comes as Hong Kong considers new guardrails for crypto holding companies such as digital asset treasuries (DATs), which hold cryptocurrencies as strategic assets.Photo by Manson Yim on UnsplashSFC points to regulatory gaps for digital asset treasuriesThe state-owned newspaper Wen Wei Po reported that Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) Chairman Kelvin Wong noted the current lack of regulations governing listed companies operating as DATs and the limited understanding of such entities. Chairman Wong added that firms seeking to list in Hong Kong as DATs would need to persuade both the SFC and the Hong Kong Stock Exchange (HKEX) of their suitability. For companies already listed, he urged investors to remain alert to the potential risks involved. This regulatory concern over crypto investing companies emerges as Hong Kong simultaneously presses ahead with its ambition to become a leading hub for digital finance. City advances on e-HKD and tokenizationIn line with that ambition, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) unveiled its e-HKD Pilot Programme Phase 2 Report in an Oct. 28 press release. The report outlines the potential benefits of its central bank digital currency (CBDC), the e-HKD, and tokenized deposits, noting that public feedback on both concepts has been broadly positive. The program's second phase involved 11 pilot projects led by various consortiums. These projects explored retail use cases, emphasizing the e-HKD’s commercial viability and scalability. Key focus areas included the settlement of tokenized assets, programmability, and offline payments. Participants in the program included Aptos Labs, the Boston Consulting Group (BCG), Hang Seng Bank, Standard Chartered, and BlackRock. Based on the report's findings, the HKMA stated it would initially prioritize the e-HKD’s application in wholesale or large-value payments, leveraging its credit risk–free nature as a central bank liability. Concurrently, the authority plans to continue studying potential retail and corporate applications, aiming to lay the groundwork for broader implementation by the first half of 2026. Survey shows strong investor appetiteAmong the program’s participants, Aptos Labs, Boston Consulting Group (BCG), and Hang Seng Bank reported accelerating interest in tokenized funds. A survey they conducted found that 61% of retail investors in Hong Kong and mainland China planned to double their exposure. Held between May and June 2025 among more than 500 retail fund investors, the survey tracked sentiment and appetite for tokenized products. Mainland participants showed particularly strong demand for cross-border access. The findings also detailed differing motivations among Hong Kong investors. Active traders expect to lift tokenized fund allocations from 10% to 26%, attracted by round-the-clock trading and greater flexibility. Wealth transfer planners indicated an expected expansion from 5% to 16%, highlighting programmable fund structures for tailored trusts and transparent oversight. Long-term investors aim to raise exposure from 8% to 25%, citing instant liquidity and the ability to use tokenized assets as loan collateral. Mainland investors projected their allocations would climb from 11% to 24%, reportedly viewing tokenized funds as a practical route around capital restrictions. The survey noted that programmable features could support dynamic allocation across Hong Kong products, the onshore use of profits, and smoother cross-border transfers. BCG commented that the survey outcomes align with Hong Kong's measured advance in crypto oversight, pointing to the city’s stablecoin regime that came into force in August. The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) has signaled, however, that licensing under that regime will not begin until early next year. The ongoing development of the e-HKD and the prospective regulation of digital-asset treasuries point to Hong Kong’s broader strategy of integrating digital finance into its mainstream economy. Together, these initiatives underscore a cautious yet steady effort to position the city as a global center for digital finance. 

U.S. regulator, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), has fined Seychelles-headquartered crypto prime brokerage Falcon Labs as part of an overall settlement with the company.  The CFTC had found that the company had operated as an unregistered futures commission merchant (FCM) and furthermore, that it had enabled access to digital asset exchanges without the requisite registration.Photo by Joshua Hoehne on UnsplashSettlement termsIn a press release published to its website on May 13, the CFTC set out the nature of its settlement with Falcon Labs. The parties have agreed that Falcon Labs must discontinue its activities in acting as an unregistered FCM, with particular emphasis on it having provided U.S. individuals with access to digital asset derivatives trading.  Furthermore a fine of $1,179,008 has been applied in disgorgement and in addition, Falcon will have to pay a civil monetary penalty of $589,504. These penalties have been significantly reduced by comparison with the CFTCs original ask, on the basis that Falcon Labs cooperated fully with the CFTC’s Division of Enforcement over the course of the regulator’s investigative process into the activities of the company. In its statement the regulator set out its intent relative to enforcement going forward. Ian McGinley, the CFTC’s Director of Enforcement, stated:”The CFTC is taking the fight one step further by, for the first time, charging an intermediary that inappropriately facilitated access to those exchanges. Today’s action highlights that the CFTC will not hesitate to charge any entities—exchanges or intermediaries—who are providing customers access to digital asset products and services that require registration but have failed to appropriately register.” McGinley added that “the CFTC’s enforcement program has made clear it will not tolerate digital asset exchanges that fail to register with the CFTC or comply with the agency’s rules that maintain integrity in the derivatives markets.” No admission of guiltIn responding to the CFTCs original complaint, Falcon Labs tried to up the ante in terms of compliance. It moved to improve customer identification controls. As a consequence of its market position as a trading intermediary Falcon Labs enabled customer trading on a number of digital asset exchange platforms.  That activity included facilitating U.S.-based institutional customers relative to crypto derivatives trading. It allowed its own account with various digital asset trading platforms to be used, through a system of sub-accounts, by its customers, oftentimes without adequate customer information having been sought. In reaching this settlement with the CFTC Falcon Labs has not made any admission of guilt relative to the regulator’s findings. Alongside paying the agreed upon fines, it will voluntarily agree to adhere to the implementation of improved controls and to withhold its services from user groups that are deemed to be restricted, including all U.S. nationals. Taking to the X social media platform to comment on the matter, Mike Sellig, a partner at New York-based law firm Willkie Farr & Gallagher, claimed that the settlement demonstrated that the CFTC was following in the footsteps of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), establishing “a body of widely applicable precedent.”