Moomoo adds more cowbell with MAS license approval

Full operating license approval for Hex Trust in DubaiIn yet another instance of progress for the cryptocurrency sector, Hex Trust MENA FZE, the Dubai-incorporated subsidiary of Hong Kong-headquartered institutional-grade crypto custodian Hex Trust, has successfully secured an operating license from the Dubai regulator, the Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA).Photo by Mohammed Nasim on UnsplashExtending regional presenceThis regulatory milestone, acknowledged by the firm in a statement it made public on Wednesday, not only solidifies Hex Trust’s presence in the Middle East but also marks a strategic move to extend its crypto custodial services to institutional clients and sophisticated investors in Dubai. While based in Hong Kong, Hex Trust has offices in Dubai, Singapore, Vietnam and Italy.This full operating license signifies the successful conclusion of the approval process within VARA’s regulatory framework for crypto service providers, which came into effect earlier this year. Initially granted a minimum viable product (MVP) operational license in February, Hex Trust’s latest achievement grants it the official authorization to continue its operations in the region, marking a pivotal moment in the company’s expansion strategy.With an increased footprint in Dubai, Hex Trust is now poised to deliver comprehensive crypto custodial services to both institutional clients and sophisticated investors. This strategic move is in line with the company’s aspiration to meet the escalating demand for secure and regulated digital asset storage solutions in the Middle East.Filippo Buzzi, Hex Trust’s MENA regional director, underscored the company’s dedication to expanding its reach in the Middle East, stating:“Hex Trust is fully committed to expanding into the Middle East and sees enormous potential for digital asset growth given the progressive regulations, welcoming governments, and thriving crypto ecosystem in the region.”This statement not only highlights the favorable regulatory environment but also emphasizes the increasing interest in cryptocurrencies within the Middle Eastern market.$88 million funding roundHex Trust’s recent success in Dubai comes on the heels of its $88 million Series B funding round last year, showcasing the company’s proactive approach to securing regulatory approvals on a global scale.In August, the firm received regulatory clearance in France, enabling it to offer a spectrum of services, including digital asset custody, purchasing, selling and trading. These regulatory triumphs position Hex Trust as a reputable and compliant entity in the competitive crypto custodial space.Series of approvalsWhile Hex Trust has demonstrated its adept navigation through regulatory processes in Dubai, it’s one of many companies to obtain licensing in the emirate in recent weeks.It emerged yesterday that CRO DAX Middle East, the Dubai-registered subsidiary company of Singapore-headquartered Crypto.com, received a trading license from VARA.Last week, Korean Web3 company CarrieVerse clarified that it had joined the Dubai Multi Commodities Center (DMCC) as a metaverse service provider. The DMCC is a United Arab Emirates (UAE) government agency which has developed into a hub for investors and Web3 startups. CarrieVerse and the DMCC have not as yet revealed details regarding the roadmap for the partnership.At the start of this month, VARA awarded Singapore’s WadzPay, a business-to-business (B2B) technology firm that focuses on enabling digital asset-based transaction processing and settlement, a license to trade within the emirate. Meanwhile, on Nov. 1, it emerged that crypto wallet project Backpack had received a license from the Dubai regulator.

Taiwan has built a prototype platform that potentially could provide for a central bank digital currency (CBDC). In light of that development, there are plans afoot to hold a number of hearings and forums in 2025 relative to CBDC development. In a report cited by local news media, Taiwanese Central Bank Governor Yang Chin-long stated that the development of a CBDC is not an international competition. Yang is not motivated by a desire to be the first to launch a CBDC on the basis that such a thing doesn’t ensure a successful outcome.  At the outset, Taiwan intends to introduce a non-interest bearing CBDC although this may be revised as further development and rollout progress. The system may encompass the use of both anonymous and registered digital wallets, the report suggests.Photo by Timo Volz on UnsplashWholesale CBDCReports last year had disclosed that the retail CBDC prototype supports 20,000 transactions per second. The central bank also plans to develop a wholesale CBDC (wCBDC) proof of concept to support three sets of functionality which it plans to test via a unified ledger, developed with the assistance of Taiwan’s commercial banks.  According to feedback from the office of the Taiwanese parliament’s finance committee provided to The Block, Yang is due to present the report on the current state of progress relative to a CBDC on July 10 at the Legislative Yuan, Taiwan’s parliament. While no projected timeline has been provided for CBDC issuance, Yang emphasized that Taiwan’s CBDC project is a long-term affair. He disclosed that the Central Bank of the Republic of China (Taiwan) will take a three pronged approach to the new digital currency. In the first instance, the wCBDC will be used for for the purpose of interbank settlement relative to tokenized deposits.  In practice, this will mean that when a payee transfers a tokenized deposit to another party, the other party will receive the money instantly. However, in the background, the payee’s bank will need to transfer funds to the second party’s bank. Taiwan’s central bank also plans to trial the settlement of tokenized asset transactions. Settlement of securities in this way is seen as an opportunity to minimize risk when compared with commercially issued stablecoins. Such tests will be similar in nature to the wholesale digital ledger technology (DLT) trials carried out in recent times by the European Union (EU).  Purpose bound money trialLastly, the Republic of China plans to trial purpose bound money (PBM), a concept which covers the middle ground between programmable payments and programmable money. PBM was introduced in a whitepaper in 2023 by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS). It enables the sender to specify certain conditions relative to the digital currency being sent. This may include a validity period and further specification as to how the money can be spent. This development represents the latest installment in an ongoing pipeline of announcements from various central banks with regard to CBDC project milestones. Last month, Qatar’s central bank announced the launch of the first phase of its CBDC project.

India’s judiciary turns down plea to formulate a crypto regulatory frameworkThe Indian courts have declined a consideration targeting the establishment of a regulatory framework for cryptocurrency trading, following a plea which had been brought to court by a petitioner.Photo by Naveed Ahmed on UnsplashBeyond the court’s purviewIndia’s Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice Chandrachud, recently confronted a petition urging the establishment of a regulatory framework for cryptocurrency trading. According to a local media report, the bench, which included Justices JD Pardiwala and Manoj Misra, dismissed the plea, emphasizing that the demands presented were legislative and thus beyond the court’s direct action purview. This decision points to the judiciary’s recognition of its constraints in crafting laws, particularly in intricate domains like cryptocurrency.The petitioner, Manu Prashant Wig, a former director at Blue Fox Motion Picture Limited currently in custody due to allegations of cryptocurrency fraud, sought relief through a public interest litigation (PIL) for crypto trading regulations in India.The Economic Offence Wing (EOW) of the Delhi Police accused Wig in 2020 of deceiving investors with promises of high returns from crypto investments, involving 133 reported victims of the scheme. Despite this, during the hearing, the Supreme Court advised Wig to pursue legal remedies through appropriate channels, specifically for bail, underlining its inability to issue directives under Article 32 of the Constitution for legislative matters.Judiciary criticize governmentWhile the judiciary has found that it cannot act itself in putting in place a crypto regulatory framework, the Supreme Court has been critical of the government’s inaction on the matter. In July, India’s highest court criticized the Indian government for its failure to establish clear cryptocurrency regulations.Interestingly, while the government hasn’t acted locally, it has been making efforts to drive regulation at an international level instead. The status of cryptocurrency trading in India remains uncertain, with the country developing a regulatory framework influenced by recommendations from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the Financial Stability Board (FSB), potentially leading to legal legislation within the next several months.Prime Minister Modi called on authorities internationally to establish a worldwide regulatory framework. At the recent G20 summit, it appears that member states did reach agreement on such a framework.The Supreme Court’s dismissal of the PIL marks a clear distinction between judicial and legislative responsibilities. As India moves closer to formulating a comprehensive crypto regulatory framework, this decision reinforces the imperative for legislative action to address mounting concerns and interests in the crypto market.Awaiting legislative actionThe outcome of these developments is keenly awaited by investors, legal experts and the crypto community, poised to shape the future landscape of cryptocurrency trading in India. The decision signifies the judiciary’s acknowledgment of its limitations and highlights the necessity for a legislative approach to effectively navigate the intricate landscape of cryptocurrency regulation.In this evolving scenario, the verdict amplifies the importance of a well-defined regulatory framework. As the world’s most populous country grapples with the delicate task of balancing innovation and investor protection, the Supreme Court’s decision places the ball firmly in the legislative court.