KICA partners with PiLab and CODE for Web3 authentication services

Bitget Launches $100M Crypto Ecosystem FundSeychelles-based crypto exchange Bitget has launched its EmpowerX Fund, a $100 million initiative unveiled during Bitget’s fifth-anniversary summit in Singapore on Tuesday.Photo by micheile henderson on UnsplashStrategic investmentThe firm expanded on the finer details of the fund at the summit event and also by way of a press release published to PR Newswire. The primary goal of the initiative is to enrich the platform’s ecosystem by strategically investing in various sectors, including regional exchanges, data analytics firms, and media organizations.Bitget’s approach via this new fund is grounded in diversification to meet the ever-evolving needs of its 20 million global customers. The exchange envisions creating a comprehensive trading ecosystem that encompasses trading, investment, research, DeFi, and media.Gracy Chen, the Managing Director of Bitget, emphasized that the cryptocurrency exchange sector is in a constant state of evolution and with that, the firm has a forward-looking vision that extends beyond the present. Chen stated:“The CEX landscape is continually evolving amid influences of tightened regulations, rapid growth of Layer 2 and DeFi technologies, and we are expecting that more investment, meager [sic] and acquisition will happen in the following months. Our vision goes beyond the present.”She added: “With the launch of the Bitget EmpowerX Fund, we take another major step in our mission to develop Bitget into a truly comprehensive platform for all needs. Through strategic, targeted investments that foster long-term growth, we aim to continually expand our ecosystem of services to better serve the evolving needs of users. We also want to empower other people in our industry, because a rising tide lifts all boats.”Broader investment trendBitget’s EmpowerX Fund is part of a broader trend of strategic investments and expansion. In April, the exchange introduced the $100 million Web3 Fund, which focuses on supporting projects based in Asia and partnering with global venture capital firms, including Foresight Ventures, SevenX Ventures, and Gitcoin Fund.As part of that initiative, the firm invested $20 million in Sei Labs, the developers of the layer one Sei blockchain. The strategic direction being taken by Bitget extends beyond digital assets, as Bitget allocated $30 million to invest in the BitKeep multi-chain wallet, which subsequently underwent a rebranding as Bitget Wallet. This investment marked a significant milestone in Bitget’s journey toward embracing decentralized strategies.Diversifying service offeringTo better cater to the evolving needs of its users, Bitget has diversified its service offerings. In addition to traditional trading, the platform has ventured into the realm of crypto loans, a bold move given the difficulties experienced in 2022 by crypto lending firms like Celsius, BlockFi, Hodlnaut, Vauld, and Voyager Digital, who all ended up in bankruptcy.The company has taken a further step towards diversification on Tuesday, announcing the launch of its Bitget Wealth Management product. The firm claims that the product is targeted to meet the needs of high-net-worth individuals and institutions, offering to assist them in optimizing their financial portfolios.Bitget has also adapted to a changing regulatory landscape recently, stepping up its compliance in terms of Know Your Customer (KYC) measures.

Hong Kong Lawmaker Explores Digital Asset Links With MainlandIn a move aimed at bolstering its position as a rising global Web3 hub, Hong Kong Legislative Council member Johnny Ng has expressed his aspiration to foster greater collaboration between digital asset platforms in Hong Kong and a Shanghai-based exchange.Photo by Simon Zhu on UnsplashDigital asset exchange interconnectivityAs Hong Kong continues to position itself as a key player in the emerging Web3 landscape, Ng envisions a future where licensed virtual asset exchanges in Hong Kong could be interconnected with their counterparts in Shanghai.Ng’s remarks came during an interview with Chinese media outlet The Paper. Drawing a parallel with the established Shanghai-Hong Kong Stock Connect program that seamlessly connects the stock markets of both cities, Ng raised the question of whether a similar connection could be established for licensed digital asset exchanges. Ng’s idea hinges on the potential to bridge appropriate platforms in Shanghai with those licensed in Hong Kong for virtual asset trading.Interconnected talent poolThe lawmaker’s enthusiasm for interconnectivity also extends to the talent pool. He expressed his desire for more Web3 talent exchanges between Hong Kong and the mainland, recognizing Shanghai’s status as a financial hub boasting numerous exceptional financial enterprises.Hong Kong’s approach to the Web3 landscape stands in contrast to mainland China’s stringent cryptocurrency regulations. While China banned cryptocurrency transactions in 2021, Hong Kong has embraced crypto firms, even encouraging partnerships between these firms and local banks.This year, Hong Kong authorities unveiled a series of cryptocurrency-related policy statements, aimed at fortifying its stature as a global financial center. A significant step followed in December, when the Hong Kong Legislative Council passed an amendment introducing a comprehensive licensing framework for virtual asset service providers (VASPs).In a recent development underscoring Hong Kong’s pro-crypto stance, HashKey and OSL have become the pioneering recipients of licenses for retail trading under the new regulatory regime, which commenced on June 1.Differing policy approachesPeople following developments in crypto and Web3 in China and East Asia have been speculating if the strategic positive shift in Hong Kong towards developing as a regional hub relative to the sector is indicative of a softening in the approach of mainland China towards the industry. It appears that Hong Kong’s pursuit of crypto business has been sanctioned by Beijing.Commentators have been monitoring the emergence of further encouraging signals. In May, Chinese state television featured a segment that covered cryptocurrency and in particular Bitcoin. Binance CEO Changpeng Zhao (CZ) was sufficiently encouraged by the development to suggest that it was “a big deal,” although the clip was later removed from the broadcaster’s website.Ng’s proposal aligns with the broader narrative of Hong Kong’s ambitious push into the Web3 landscape, capitalizing on its favorable regulatory environment to attract crypto-related ventures. As discussions evolve around the potential interconnectivity between Hong Kong and Shanghai’s digital asset exchanges, the global cryptocurrency community watches with interest to see if there are any emerging signs that Beijing will reciprocate positively.

A Chinese creditor of failed crypto exchange FTX has filed an objection on his own behalf and that of 300 others, with a U.S. bankruptcy court against a motion lodged with a view towards excluding payouts to creditors resident in China, Russia and 47 other foreign jurisdictions.Photo by Mariia Shalabaieva on UnsplashPotential distribution forfeitureThe FTX Recovery Trust, an entity formed in January to oversee the FTX bankruptcy estate following the adoption of a plan of reorganization, filed a motion last week seeking the approval of the Delaware Bankruptcy Court in the United States to adhere to new parameters related to the claims of creditors residing in restricted overseas jurisdictions. Besides China and Russia, the list of restricted jurisdictions also includes many within the Asian region, including  Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq, Macau, Myanmar (Burma), Nepal, North Korea, Pakistan, Qatar, Bangladesh and Cambodia. The FTX estate claims that these jurisdictions have regulations and laws restricting cryptocurrency transactions. In such cases, the FTX Recovery Trust claims that it cannot break local laws.  The difficulty for creditors resident in these countries is that if it's deemed illegal to reimburse them, they won’t qualify for the next scheduled distribution from the estate. In that instance, distribution forfeiture will be triggered. Taking to X on July 7, FTXcreditor.com, an entity that has been buying up bankruptcy claims from FTX creditors over the course of the FTX bankruptcy process, highlighted the peril that creditors residing in these restricted countries may face. It stated: “Distribution forfeiture is triggered at every distribution record date. The first record date already passed, if your claim is still tied to a local KYC when the stamp drops, that tranche is potentially gone.” Short timeframe for objectionsMr. Purple, a pseudonymous distressed assets bankruptcy professional who has been advocating for FTX creditors since the collapse of the business in November 2022, concurred with this view in a subsequent post on X. He pointed out that an extremely short timeframe has been given to affected creditors to respond. The motion was filed on July 2 and objections are due by July 15. $500 million in claims are at stake which accounts for 5% of all creditor claims. Of this, 82% of these claims belong to Chinese creditors. In a series of follow-up posts, the bankruptcy professional describes several procedural issues that he believes will result in it being incredibly difficult for affected creditors to have their funds reimbursed.Mr. Purple concludes:”The incentives are designed to be extremely risk averse in finding [a legal opinion] that paying creditors is legal! [The estate’s lawyers will] take the fees and say its not legal.” In his court filing, the Chinese creditor, who is resident in Singapore, stated: “My family holds four KYC-verified accounts with aggregate claims exceeding $15 million USD.” . . . “We have fully complied with every procedural requirement under the Plan. The proposed motion now jeopardizes our right to distribution in an arbitrary and inequitable manner.” On X, he asserted that the FTX Recovery Trust’s motion “constitutes an impermissible and material modification of the Plan.” Aside from legal action, the only other potential solution for creditors residing in restricted countries is to sell their claims. However, claims buyers are pricing in greater risk with lower rates and less favorable terms.