Hong Kong’s SFC appeals to digital asset investors to verify licenses

Acquisition by SBI Subsidiary Part of European ExpansionB2C2, a cryptocurrency liquidity provider catering to institutional clients and a subsidiary company of Japanese financial services conglomerate SBI Holdings, has solidified its foothold in the digital assets market by completing the acquisition of Woorton, a prominent European market maker and over-the-counter (OTC) transaction specialist.Photo by Christian Lue on UnsplashMarket expansionIn a press release published to its website on Thursday, UK-based B2C2 outlined further details relative to the acquisition. The move represents an effort by B2C2 to broaden its client base and expand within the European market, ahead of the forthcoming regulations under the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA).The acquisition opens doors for B2C2 to extend its services within the European Union (EU) jurisdiction. Additionally, it allows B2C2 to tap into growth opportunities beyond its existing strongholds in the United Kingdom, Asia-Pacific (APAC), and the United States.Licensing accessOne of the prime advantages of this acquisition is B2C2’s access to Woorton’s prestataires de services sur actifs numériques (PSAN) license, which is regulated by the Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF), the French financial regulatory authority. This license empowers B2C2 to operate seamlessly within the EU, positioning the company for a strategic advantage in the evolving regulatory landscape.As the UK is no longer part of the EU, this acquisition makes for a much easier entry point for the company into the broader European market.Founded in 2017, Woorton boasts an active clientele of nearly 250 entities engaged in trading 96 different cryptocurrencies. The company distinguishes itself by offering round-the-clock liquidity provision, ensuring uninterrupted trading opportunities for its clients.Woorton’s engagement with regulatory bodies is a key highlight, and the firm is a co-founding member of the Association for the Development of Crypto-Assets (ADAN). Through ADAN, Woorton actively contributes to shaping regulatory frameworks governing digital assets in France, bridging the gap between the industry and policymakers.Additionally, the company played a crucial role in establishing Paris Blockchain Week, an internationally recognized event that brings together thousands of attendees and speakers to discuss blockchain and digital asset trends.Charlie Meraud, CEO of Woorton, expressed excitement about the acquisition, emphasizing the complementary strengths of the two firms. Meraud highlighted the enhanced liquidity pool and improved market presence that the combined platform would offer to customers, ultimately leading to a superior liquidity and trading experience.B2C2’s CEO, Nicola White, described the acquisition as a significant milestone in the company’s growth journey. White expressed enthusiasm about the potential the acquisition unlocks for B2C2 and its EU-based clients, reaffirming the importance of regulatory standing and a robust client base.London baseEstablished in 2015 and primarily owned by SBI, B2C2 operates from its main headquarters in the UK, with operational offices in the US and Japan. Its UK-registered company B2C2 Ltd serves as the parent entity within the B2C2 group of companies.B2C2’s acquisition of Woorton not only enhances its presence within the European Union but also serves to demonstrate its intent in terms of regulatory compliance and industry leadership. This strategic move positions the company to navigate the evolving crypto market, likely leading to greater opportunities for its clients.

Korea’s Legislative Research Body Suggests Expanding Blind Trust System to Include CryptoThe National Assembly Research Service (NARS) of South Korea last Friday issued a report emphasizing the need to broaden the scope of the country’s blind trust system for public officials. Currently, this system primarily covers traditional stocks, but the report highlights the necessity of extending its coverage to include cryptocurrencies.Photo by O-seop Sim on PexelsPublic Service Ethics ActUnder the existing Public Service Ethics Act, public officials holding a rank of 4 or higher within the finance department of the Ministry of Economy and Finance and the Financial Services Commission are mandated to either divest themselves of stocks linked to their official duties and responsibilities or transfer them into a blind trust if the total value of these stocks exceeds KRW 30 million (about $23,000).Blind trustA blind trust is a mechanism through which a public official transfers their stock holdings to a trustee. Subsequently, the trustee handles these entrusted stocks by exchanging them for other assets and overseeing their management, administration, and disposition. Importantly, the original owner of the stock, who is the public official, is barred from participating in these aspects of the trust and is also kept uninformed about the trust property’s status or details.Debate over expansionThe current policy confines the blind trust framework exclusively to stocks. Nevertheless, there is an ongoing debate advocating for the inclusion of other assets, such as virtual assets and real estate, within its scope. The rationale behind this argument is that these types of assets can also potentially give rise to conflicts of interest. However, counterarguments have been raised, expressing concerns that extending the blind trust to these assets could excessively limit the property rights of public officials. Consequently, as of now, this broader application has not been implemented.Comparison with the USThe Korean blind trust system was inspired by the United States’ Ethics in Government Act of 1978, which does not limit the types of assets that can be included in a blind trust. In the US, a blind trust can encompass not only stocks but also bonds, mutual funds, virtual assets, and real estate. In light of this, the report recommends the expansion of the blind trust system to encompass virtual assets and real estate. This step is proposed to prevent conflicts of interest among public officials pertaining to a wider array of asset types.Enhancing trustee discretionMeanwhile, NARS also argued for broadening the trustee’s discretion in trust management to render the system more reasonable. This stems from the concern that the existing uniform property sale approach could lead public servants to incur losses. NARS has proposed potential solutions, such as extending the time limit for property sales or mandating the sale of only a portion of the assets, as viable options to address this issue.

In Mumbai, users of cryptocurrency exchanges are increasingly being asked to prove they are real people—by moving their eyes or turning their heads in front of a camera—before they can open an account. In Tokyo, meanwhile, exchange operators are collecting a different kind of identity marker: each customer’s country of tax residence, recorded for reporting to authorities at home and abroad. Governments across Asia are tightening oversight of the crypto sector, with India and Japan pursuing parallel efforts to boost compliance, strengthen tax enforcement, and curb financial anonymity. Together, these measures are pushing digital assets closer to conventional financial standards.Photo by Rowan Heuvel on UnsplashIndia mandates biometric-style checksAccording to the Times of India, India’s Financial Intelligence Unit has required crypto exchanges to adopt more stringent know-your-customer (KYC) and anti-money-laundering (AML) procedures, including liveness checks designed to prevent accounts from being created using deepfakes. Under the guidelines, platforms must also record information such as geolocation data, IP addresses, and timestamps during onboarding, and link users to bank accounts through verification steps that include test transactions and government-issued identification like passports or voter IDs. The measures come as tax authorities continue to face obstacles in monitoring crypto activity. India taxes crypto profits at a flat rate of 30% and applies a 1% tax deducted at source (TDS) on transfers. According to a separate report by the Times of India, the Income Tax Department (ITD) told lawmakers that the pseudonymous and cross-border nature of crypto transactions can complicate compliance—particularly when funds move through offshore exchanges, private wallets, or decentralized finance platforms. Despite international information-sharing efforts, officials say tracing crypto holdings across jurisdictions remains challenging when transactions bypass regulated intermediaries. India’s central bank has also continued to argue in favor of central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) over privately issued stablecoins. In its December financial stability report, the Reserve Bank of India said CBDCs can offer efficiency and programmability within a sovereign framework, while warning that stablecoins may introduce risks during periods of market stress. Japan implements OECD crypto tax rulesJapan, meanwhile, has moved to formalize international data exchange. On Jan. 1, 2026, it implemented the Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework (CARF), a standard developed by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) to address cross-border tax evasion by automating the exchange of crypto transaction data between tax authorities. Under the new rules, users of Japanese crypto exchanges must declare their country—or countries—of tax residence. Exchange operators are required to collect and submit data to Japan’s tax authorities by April 30 of the following year, including transaction volumes, consideration received from purchases and sales, and asset-type breakdowns covering cryptocurrencies as well as security tokens and non-fungible tokens (NFTs). Information related to non-resident users is also intended to be shared with relevant foreign tax authorities under existing tax cooperation arrangements. While both nations pursue stricter oversight and transparency, their broader policy trajectories differ. In India, regulatory tightening reinforces a restrictive environment focused on risk containment. In Japan, by contrast, the new compliance frameworks appear to be laying the groundwork for a broader economic embrace of digital assets. Japanese Finance Minister Satsuki Katayama, speaking at the Tokyo Stock Exchange last week, framed 2026 as the “inaugural year of digital.” Unlike her Indian counterparts, who remain wary of private crypto assets, Katayama argued that established market infrastructure should play a larger role in adoption. Pointing to the U.S. market, she suggested Japan could move toward exchange-traded funds (ETFs) and integration with stock and commodity exchanges to capture the benefits of blockchain-based assets. This pro-growth shift is reinforced by the prospect of fiscal relief. Tokyo is considering an overhaul that would reclassify crypto gains—currently taxed as miscellaneous income at rates of up to 55%—to a flat 20%, aligning them with stocks. The changes, however, are not expected to take effect until 2028, given the extent of the required legal and regulatory revisions. India, meanwhile, has indicated that it plans to adopt CARF by 2027, suggesting that its current emphasis on domestic controls may eventually be supplemented by deeper international cooperation—bringing offshore crypto activity more firmly into the view of tax authorities.