Thailand makes crypto trading VAT-free to boost digital economy

Japanese Banking Giant Joins Tech Firms to Build Cross-Chain Stablecoin InfrastructureA major Japanese banking group has initiated a collaboration with technology companies to develop cross-chain infrastructure, according to a press release. The purpose of establishing a cross-chain system is to facilitate the trading of stablecoins across various public blockchains.Photo by Takashi Miyazaki on UnsplashThree companies team upIn this collaborative partnership, the Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group (MUFG), the key developer of the stablecoin issuance management platform Progmat Coin, will join forces with Datachain, a cross-chain technology firm, and TOKI FZCO, which has global plans for providing cross-chain bridges. Together, they will work towards constructing infrastructure that enables cross-chain transactions involving stablecoins on different blockchain networks.Japan’s new regulatory boostWith the implementation of the revised Payment Services Act in Japan this year, companies completing the license registration process will gain the ability to issue and distribute various stablecoins on Progmat Coin. Furthermore, it is expected that stablecoins will be issued across different blockchains, including Ethereum.TOKI is currently in the process of developing a cross-chain bridge with the aim of introducing it this year. The cross-chain bridge developed by TOKI leverages blockchain intercommunication technologies such as the Inter-Blockchain Communication Protocol (IBC) or Datachain’s Light Client Proxy (LCP). These technologies ensure a high level of security and scalability for cross-chain transactions. Additionally, TOKI’s bridge boasts a highly efficient liquidity mechanism.The three companies strive to cooperate on this infrastructure project with an aim to launch it in the second quarter of next year.Government supportA couple of days ago, the Tokyo Metropolitan Government took a proactive step to support security token businesses based in Tokyo by offering subsidies. Given that both MUFG and Datachain are Tokyo-based companies, it appears that the Japanese government’s initiatives are beginning to yield positive results.

Legislation geared towards regulating stablecoins has reached the Legislative Council stage in the Chinese autonomous territory of Hong Kong.  The bill, which extends to a 285 page document, has been formulated following “extensive consultations” with industry stakeholders, according to Eddie Yue, CEO of the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA).  This latest development moves the Chinese autonomous territory one step closer to having a comprehensive regulatory framework in place for stablecoins. The bill’s arrival at the Legislative Council follows its publication on Dec. 6 in Hong Kong’s Gazette. Subsequently, on Dec. 18, it made its preliminary entry at the Legislative Council by way of a first reading. The legislation will deem a digital asset a stablecoin if it is operated on a distributed ledger, is expressed as a unit of account and maintains an equivalent value relative to another asset that it references. Digital assets issued by governments or central banks will be excluded from that stablecoin definition.Photo by Laurentiu Morariu on UnsplashThree readings requiredBefore the bill can be enacted into law, it is required to go through a series of three readings. Allied to that process is a requirement for a series of debates, with the bill coming under the scrutiny of lawmakers. Depending upon the issues raised, this process may also require the introduction of amendments to the proposed legislation. If passed following the third reading, it will then be forwarded to the autonomous territory’s chief executive, John Lee Ka-chiu, to be signed into law. Once signed into law, stablecoin issuers in Hong Kong will then be required to obtain a license from the city's central bank, HKMA. That licensing process would implicate the HKMA scrutinizing the applicant with an emphasis on the evaluation of the issuer, its resources, the use of reserve assets and the means through which the stablecoin’s value will be rendered stable. Stablecoin optimismThis latest milestone has provoked a cause for optimism among some commentators. Sean Lee, co-founder of Hong Kong-based Web3 firm IDA, told the South China Morning Post (SCMP) that “the applications of stablecoin will be numerous.” Lee outlined that stablecoins can be used for payments, settlements, payrolls and financing, while adding that “new products will spring up, and transactions will be faster, instant, 24/7 – and at a lower cost.” Dominic Maffei, Standard Chartered’s head of digital asset and fintech for Hong Kong, is similarly encouraged. Maffei stated: “As of today, we think that stablecoins are the best available tool for connecting traditional finance and Web3 markets and have proven use cases and business models to support that belief.” Once enacted, the bill is likely to have a significant impact on the stablecoin market in Hong Kong. In Europe, the application of the Markets in Crypto Assets (MiCA) regulation is having such an impact. It has led to a growth in Euro-denominated stablecoin trading while leading U.S. dollar stablecoin Tether (USDT) is being delisted by many platforms due to its non-compliance with these regulations.

Bhutan Quietly Mining Bitcoin Since $5,000The tiny nation of Bhutan continues to be full of surprises recently where crypto is concerned, with the latest report suggesting that the kingdom has been mining bitcoin for a number of years already.© Pexels/Pema GyamtshoAccording to a recent report in The Bhutanese, a Bhutan-based publication led by investigative journalist, Tenzing Lamsing, the landlocked nation had been mining bitcoin over the course of a “few years” already, in an effort to diversify its sovereign portfolio.Long-term investment strategyUjjwal Deep Dahal, CEO of Druk Holding and Investments (DHI), told the publication that the venture was part of a long-term investment strategy. DHI is the commercial arm of the Royal Government of Bhutan. It was formed pursuant to a Royal Charter in 2007 with the mandate of making investments on behalf of Bhutan while optimizing usage of resources.The mining activity had centered on Bitcoin although there was a small provision for Ethereum-based mining when Ethereum was a mineable proof-of-work (PoW)-based blockchain network. It’s unclear of the precise timeline but the report outlines that DHI has engaged in the mining space over a number of years, and at a time in which the Bitcoin unit price was as low as $5,000.Exploiting cheap hydroNestled in the Himalayas, Bhutan has considerable hydroelectric resources. Bitcoin mining is ordinarily an expensive exercise but in scenarios where there are plentiful energy resources with a marginally cheaper cost of production than the average, it can be an attractive and profitable enterprise. Dahal outlined that these conditions enabled DHI to reinvest profits back into additional mining equipment.The precise time-frame of DHIs entry into Bitcoin mining is open to speculation. However, we do know that the Bitcoin unit price was last below $5,000 at the onset of the pandemic in March 2020. Prior to that, Bitcoin had risen above $5,000 in April 2019 following an acute bear market in 2018.Crypto lender entanglementsBhutan and DHI hit the crypto radar last month when it was revealed that the kingdom had made significant investments into and out of failed crypto lenders Celsius and BlockFi. Dahal has said that the royal charter-mandated firm had taken out loans with both crypto lenders and had fully repaid those loans. However, that may have been something that happened later than anticipated. The Bhutanese company had a $30 million loan from BlockFi. BlockFi liquidated the Bitcoin collateral associated with that loan in 2022 but it left a shortfall of $800,000. The failed lender subsequently sued DHI. As of an April 13 court filing, BlockFi submitted a voluntary dismissal of the lawsuit to the courts, presumably because the shortfall was subsequently paid by DHI.In the case of Celsius, DHI had withdrawn $65 million from the lending platform prior to it declaring bankruptcy. Consequently, the matter has been the subject of speculation relative to the potential for the Celsius bankruptcy estate to pursue DHI for a clawback of the withdrawn funds.