Kazakhstan Launches NPC With CBDC Implementation by 2025

Pakistan Implements Ban on CryptocurrencyPakistan has moved to ban cryptocurrency once more, with the country’s Minister of State for Finance and Revenue, Aisha Ghaus Pasha disclosing the move last week.According to multiple local media reports within Pakistan, on May 16 Ghaus Pasha stated at a session of the Senate Standing Committee on Finance and Revenue, that cryptocurrencies are banned and “will never be legalized in Pakistan.”Photo by Hamid Roshaan on UnsplashFATF Grey ListGhaus Pasha supported this position by outlining that the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) had set the banning of crypto as a condition for Pakistan’s removal from its “Grey List.”FATF is an initiative of the G7 group of countries, first established in 1989. Its mandate is to develop policies geared towards combating money laundering, and most especially, terrorist financing. The FATF grey list includes those jurisdictions who are deemed to require increased monitoring relative to their efforts to keep money laundering and terrorist financing to an absolute minimum.Pakistan had found itself on the FATF grey list over the course of a number of years. That meant reputational damage on an international basis, together with loss of investor confidence. It also signals the likelihood of weaknesses in a country’s financial system and in its financial controls. The categorization would have had an impact on the country’s ability to access international finance, impacted trade relations, and involved increased compliance costs.Against that background, there may be a certain logic to the Finance Minister’s stance, despite it naturally being distasteful to those of us that support the development of decentralized systems, blockchain, and cryptocurrency. After an extended period on that Grey List, Pakistan was only removed from it in October of last year.Currency devaluationNotwithstanding that, governments in the developing world may have added incentives in banning cryptocurrencies. Their currencies are oftentimes unstable, and the Pakistani rupee is no exception. Cryptocurrencies like bitcoin find their greatest use case in countries that have their currencies devalued or economies that fall into the trap of hyperinflation relative to the sovereign currency.In Pakistan’s case, the rupee plummeted to a record low against the US dollar in January. Naturally, that hurts ordinary citizens and provides the conditions under which people are more likely to investigate decentralized cryptocurrencies. On that basis, we shouldn’t be surprised to learn that the Pakistani government’s decision to ban crypto was publicly supported by Sohail Jawad, Director of the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP).Pakistani banks are naturally following the government and the central bank’s lead, in implementing the ban. One circular obtained by CoinDesk stated: “As per regulatory instructions from the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP), any remittance of foreign exchange directly/indirectly outside Pakistan to overseas foreign exchange trading, margin trading, and CFD trading apps/websites/platforms through any payment channel is not allowed/permitted by SBP and such payments are inherently risky and illegal.”Community reactionNaturally enough, the crypto community internationally and locally, is not enamored by the move. However, people who have been in the space over the last few years are accustomed to ever-changing stances taken by governments as a reaction to a technology that they simply don’t know how to deal with.Waqar Zaka, a Pakistani who works within the Web3 space commented previously on a ban that was implemented in Pakistan in 2017, only later to be found to be unconstitutional. Another Pakistani community member took to Twitter in taking a stand against the decision. Others still immediately considered how they could circumvent the ban.Crypto has always benefited from jurisdictional arbitrage, and while bans are not in any way helpful, in the longer run, they will never stop the roll out and further development of this innovation.

Crypto exchange platform Crypto.com and Triple-A, a company that enables businesses to pay and get paid in digital currencies, both Singapore-headquartered entities, have entered into a partnership to enable direct crypto payments. Simplifying crypto paymentsCrypto.com set out details of the partnership in a press release published to its website on Nov. 21. The firm stated that its partnership with Triple-A will give its global customer base “access to a diverse range of new global merchants.” The duo have set out to simplify crypto payments for both merchants and users alike. Crypto.com users will shortly be enabled in making purchases from a range of e-commerce brands directly, using crypto held in their Crypto.com wallets. Through Triple-A’s input, Crypto.com users will be spared the need to manually convert digital assets to fiat currency before making purchases. Furthermore, users won’t incur a fee for any conversion that takes place behind the scenes.Photo by David McBee on PexelsCashback rewardsOnce launched, with the service initially planned to launch in Singapore before further rollout elsewhere, Crypto.com users will also be in a position to benefit from rewards. Eric Anziani, the company’s president and chief operating officer (COO), spoke to this element of the offering, stating: “Partnering with Triple-A enables us to do this by expanding crypto payments to a range of popular brands, creating a seamless shopping experience and providing an opportunity to earn cashback rewards to make spending crypto even more rewarding.” Volatility protectionAs part of the solution that has been put in place, Triple-A will ensure that merchants aren’t exposed to cryptocurrency volatility in accepting crypto as a payment method. The payments they receive from customers are instantly converted to their local fiat currency, with settlement occurring one day following the transaction. This approach also means that merchants don’t have added difficulties in terms of the tax treatment of cryptocurrencies, their management or related reporting requirements. With that in mind, Eric Barbier, CEO at Triple-A, said that the approach “allows merchants to provide Crypto.com users with an optimized digital currency payment user journey.” Anziani said that Crypto.com is trying to “push boundaries when it comes to integrating crypto payments into real-world scenarios and enhance shopping experiences for [its] users.”  In recent weeks, Crypto.com has been active in pursuing a number of initiatives in order to expand its reach. Earlier this week, the company launched a visa card in Latin America, enabling users within the region to earn rewards on purchases made via the card. On Nov. 14, it emerged that the company had acquired Australia-regulated brokerage firm Fintek Securities. It’s understood the acquisition was made in order to expand the range of financial products that Crypto.com can offer to its customer base. At the end of October, Watchdog Capital, a U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)-registered broker-dealer, was acquired by the company.  Like many high profile crypto firms, Crypto.com has had its difficulties with regulators. Following the receipt of a Wells notice from the SEC earlier this year, the company responded by filing a lawsuit against the commission, alleging that the SEC had engaged in regulatory overreach in classifying crypto assets as securities. 

The Philippines Forging Crypto Reg. Path US Could Learn FromThe Philippines has demonstrated best practice in operating a sensible regulatory framework relative to cryptocurrency while the United States has erred by engaging in regulation via enforcement while responding after the horse has bolted in relation to a string of crypto company collapses. That’s according to Robert De Guzman, Head of Legal Compliance at Philippines-based cryptocurrency exchange Coins.ph.©Unsplash/C BuezaIn an opinion piece published in Forkcast News on Tuesday, De Guzman lays out his view as to what’s required in terms of regulation, while drawing comparisons between the application of regulation relative to crypto in both jurisdictions.The need for “sensible” regulationDe Guzman believes that the crypto industry’s recent failures are a wake-up call for the whole sector. Losses of billions of dollars affected Celsius Network, BlockFi, Voyager Digital, Genesis, and FTX, and led to Silvergate, Silicon Valley Bank (SVB), and Signature banks’ collapse in a week. To maintain consumers’ trust, he believes that sensible regulation is necessary for the crypto exchanges dealing with digital assets.The legal compliance expert cites the FTX collapse. FTX’s Sam Bankman-Fried’s empire was among the largest collapses. FTX pretended to support regulation, but its true nature was an offshore exchange for global clients. Nonetheless, some businesses act on their regulation support by acquiring licenses and complying with central bank audits in the countries of operation.State-level and industry-level regulationThe crypto industry being open to self regulation is one element of the solution, he says. Regulators must proactively protect their consumers from scams and business failures, not just clean up the mess after millions of people have been harmed.Regulatory failuresDe Guzman points the finger at reactionary regulatory action. Regulators filed charges against crypto industry founders after their collapse. Previously, they missed the problems of the largest companies. FTX, based in the Bahamas, was mismanaged, and American regulators only responded after customer issues. Regulations by enforcement, preferred in several countries, wait for failure to happen before taking action. Over-regulation through enforcement pushes platforms offshore, where Wild West-type environments thrive, with clear consequences.Regulators in some countries focus on surface-level questions, like which tokens should be considered securities, while others, like in the Philippines, prioritize execution-level details to protect consumers. Anti-money laundering measures and custody are core issues, with the G-7’s Financial Action Task Force’s Travel Rule likely to be more strictly applied. Active regulation and audits are needed to ensure financial platforms act responsibly with customer deposits. Basic rules need to be put in place through a licensing regime, followed by regulation of market practices like commingling of assets, self-dealing, and trading against customers.The Philippines sensible approach to regulationThe Coins.ph legal guru holds out his home country as exemplary in terms of its approach to regulation. The Philippines’ regulatory regime requires a virtual asset service provider (VASP) license to operate a crypto exchange, as well as additional licenses for other services. The country’s central bank, BSP, directly regulates all crypto exchanges and expands its crypto regulations to adapt to market needs. KYC processes in the Philippines require recognition of valid ID documents from across 82 provinces.Additionally, the BSP expects the industry to cooperate in quarterly audits where they share balance sheet information and disclose digital assets in hot and cold wallets. Regulators in the Philippines are proactive and knowledgeable about the crypto space, which sets a sensible framework based on customer protection.