KISA to establish blockchain trust framework for public services

Binance Behind New Hong Kong Crypto Exchange Pursuing LicenseThe launch of a crypto exchange named HKVAEX in Hong Kong has raised eyebrows as it appears to be closely connected to the global cryptocurrency giant, Binance.Photo by Florian Wehde on UnsplashResource sharingWhile the two entities do not officially acknowledge any affiliation, they share resources and have some commonalities that suggest a deeper connection, according to a report published by the South China Morning Post (SCMP) on Wednesday.HKVAEX was established in Hong Kong as an independent entity under BX Services Limited. Despite the absence of shared names, official affiliations, or public statements, several clues point to a connection. The logos of Binance and HKVAEX bear a resemblance, and Binance’s official accounts, as well as CEO Changpeng Zhao (CZ), are among HKVAEX’s followers on social media platform X (formerly Twitter).Gaining a foothold in Hong KongIt’s worth noting that Binance’s services are not available in Hong Kong, which raises questions about the motivation behind establishing an independent entity within the city. While HKVAEX appears to be actively pursuing a virtual asset license in Hong Kong, Binance has been relatively silent about its own licensing plans within the Chinese autonomous territory. This move could potentially provide Binance with a strategic foothold in a market that is becoming increasingly significant for digital asset entities.Hong Kong has recently introduced a licensing scheme for digital asset entities, and this development has spurred enthusiasm among such entities to establish operations in the region. Alvin Kan, the Head of Asia at Sei Labs, has noted that Asia is poised to become a major expansion zone for the Web3 sector, with regulatory developments in the US creating opportunities for expansion beyond American borders.Stanley Fung, who currently heads up HKVAEX, previously served as the chief of Huobi’s Hong Kong operations until November 2022, according to his LinkedIn profile. His departure from Huobi coincided with the entrance of crypto entrepreneur Justin Sun into Huobi’s management.In a company-managed Telegram group, HKVAEX has emphasized its status as an “independent crypto exchange” in Hong Kong, separate from Binance. However, it also revealed that it sources liquidity from Binance. Despite asserting its independence and having its own technical team, there have been instances of collaboration between the two entities in Hong Kong, such as a promotional campaign where Binance was referred to as a “partner” in incentivizing the opening of an HKVAEX account.Changing strategyBinance has faced a series of regulatory challenges in recent times. In May, Binance exited the Canadian market due to new regulations related to stablecoins and restrictions on crypto exchanges. In the US, the two leading regulators have filed lawsuits against Binance, CZ, and related entities, leading to the departure of several top officials from the company.The leading global exchange appears to be pursuing a different strategy more recently. It has entered the Japanese and Thai markets through the acquisition of a local entity and a joint venture with a local company. While forced out of the Netherlands, its Dutch customers were moved to rival Coinmerce, which connects to the Binance trading engine and order books.The evolving regulatory landscape is reshaping the cryptocurrency industry, and the relationship between Binance and HKVAEX highlights the complexities and strategies adopted by major players in this evolving space.

Polymarket activity under scrutiny in Taiwan due to election contractsTaiwanese law enforcement is currently delving into the activities of online influencers and community members promoting Polymarket contracts related to the upcoming presidential election which is due to be held on Jan. 13.Polymarket is a New York-based Ethereum-centric prediction market. The platform runs on the Ethereum layer-2 scaling solution network Polygon. The project invites platform users to bet on the outcomes of a broad spectrum of events, ranging from politics to entertainment.Users deposit USDC stablecoin, choose an event to bet on and purchase “outcome shares” through USDC. The user has the ability to trade those shares anytime before the resolution of the contract.Photo by Ethan Lin on UnsplashPossible election law violationsThe Taiwanese investigation came to light in a report by Taiwan-based crypto publication BlockTempo, which was published last week. The investigation comes as concerns arose about potential violations of Taiwan’s Presidential and Vice Presidential Election and Recall Act, which explicitly prohibits gambling on election outcomes.Multiple influencers and crypto community members have reportedly been subpoenaed for their involvement in Polymarket contracts, allowing users to place bets on the January election. At present, the betting pool for the election holds over $300,000, with a market prediction favoring the Democratic Progressive Party’s Lai Ching-te, also known as William Lai, with a 78% chance of winning.However, the legality of such betting activities is in question under Article 88–1 of Taiwan’s election law. It stipulates that anyone gambling on the outcome of an election or recall in a public place or a place open to the public may face imprisonment, short-term detention or a fine of up to NT$100,000 ($3,196.85).Sherman Lin, an attorney at Taipei-based Lin & Partners, emphasized the seriousness with which law enforcement views gambling activities related to presidential elections in Taiwan. He explained that broad legal interpretations under the Presidential Election and Recall Act have led to investigations and convictions of gambling website operators targeting Taiwanese gamblers. Lin stated:“Law enforcement agencies in Taiwan are vigilant in investigating any gambling activities related to presidential elections.”“Broad legal interpretations have been applied to gambling crimes under the Presidential Election and Recall Act, leading to investigations and convictions of gambling website operators in Taiwan targeting Taiwanese gamblers,” he added.Prohibited in United StatesComparing the situation to the United States, where gambling on election outcomes is illegal in most states, Lin noted that enforcing such regulations often falls under the jurisdiction of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). Polymarket’s Terms of Use explicitly prohibit usage by U.S. persons.Despite potential legal consequences for gambling activities in Taiwan, including participation, promotion and platform hosting for betting pools like Polymarket, Lin pointed out that enforcing actions against overseas entities poses jurisdictional challenges. Taiwan’s legal reach is primarily limited to domestic actors, creating complexities in addressing decentralized platforms like Polymarket.Lin suggested that law enforcement may focus on online influencers who promoted the Polymarket contract, as seen in previous cases involving the collapse of the unlicensed crypto exchange JPEX in Hong Kong.Moreover, while there are legal precedents for pursuing centralized entities organizing election gambling, Lin highlighted that no established legal precedent in Taiwan currently exists for decentralized platforms organizing election betting.

Meme coin project Floki Inu has implemented restrictions on users in Hong Kong from accessing its staking programs following a warning from the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (SFC). Last week, the regulatory body labeled Floki's staking initiatives as "suspicious investment products'' and urged caution among investors. On Jan. 26, it specifically cautioned Hong Kong users about the Floki and TokenFi staking programs, emphasizing the promised annualized returns ranging from 30% to over 100%. The Commission expressed concern over investment products that make claims of returns deemed "too good to be true."Photo by Jie Yeu Teoh on UnsplashStaking program access block in Hong KongResponding to the SFC's warning, Floki Inu took proactive steps to prevent users in Hong Kong from participating in its staking programs. In an official blog post which was published on Tuesday, the project's team announced the implementation of "practical measures" to block Hong Kong-based users from joining the staking programs. Additionally, prominent warnings have been placed on the Floki and TokenFi staking websites, clearly stating the ineligibility of Hong Kong users to participate. The SFC emphasized that neither of the mentioned investment products holds authorization in Hong Kong, warning that unauthorized schemes provide limited to no protection under its Securities and Futures Ordinance (SFO). Investors engaging in such unauthorized schemes may face the risk of losing their entire investments. Addressing regulatory concernsFloki Inu's team has responded to the regulatory concerns by actively collaborating with legal advisers to address potential regulatory issues associated with the staking project. The team committed to responsible community practices, while affirming its dedication to implementing measures to prevent Hong Kong users from participating in the staking program until regulatory concerns are resolved. As of Jan. 29, there is no record of Hong Kong users joining the staking programs, according to the Floki team. Furthermore, the team revealed that offline marketing activities in Hong Kong had already been halted before the project's launch in December 2023. Clarifying high yieldAddressing the SFC's primary concern regarding the high annual percentage yield (APY), the Floki team provided explanations. They clarified that the rewards are subject to volatility influenced by market dynamics and the value of staking rewards may fluctuate based on the market valuation of the token rewards. The team attributed the high APY for its staking programs to the allocation of the majority of TokenFi's token supply to token stakers, highlighting that the project had not raised venture capital funds or conducted a presale. They noted that market forces beyond their control had significantly increased the TokenFi price from its initial market cap at launch. In response to potential user confusion, the Floki team emphasized the complete decentralization of the staking programs for Floki and TokenFi, assuring users of a clear understanding of how the programs operate. They concluded by expressing their commitment to ongoing collaboration with regulatory bodies to ensure compliance and foster a responsible and transparent environment for users. Community response has been largely positive with one crypto influencer claiming: “You will not find a more legit team in #Crypto than $FLOKI. I’ve known about them for years and everyday they continue to handle themselves in the most informative, structured, and professional way.”