X-TICKET teams up with Catalyze Research for XRPL expansion

Japan’s Financial Services Agency (FSA) has moved recently to address concerns related to peer-to-peer (P2P) transactions while in a separate development, the country’s GameFi community is calling for regulatory change to enable greater liquidity. The two distinct developments both relate to getting the balance right in terms of crypto regulation from the perspectives of regulators and lawmakers and crypto sector entrepreneurs and participants.Photo by Manuel Cosentino on UnsplashAddressing concernsIt emerged last week that the FSA had proposed a number of measures to safeguard users against “unlawful transactions,” causing alarm that any such moves would inhibit the P2P transactions market. Responding to a query from Cointelegraph, the FSA elaborated that its recommendation does not encompass "transactions from one individual to another." Instead, it aims to bolster measures against illicit money transfers, particularly instances where an individual deposits cash from their bank account into an account belonging to a crypto asset exchange service provider. The regulator clarified that under the new recommendations, banks would intercept suspicious transactions where the sender seeks to alter their name for the purpose of depositing funds into the crypto platform. The FSA outlined that this situation arises where a fraudster convinces an innocent exchange user to effect the name change, so that exchange rules can be circumvented and the fraudster can receive funds from the scam victim. According to the FSA, numerous financial institutions have already implemented these measures, although the agency has not received any reports of specific cases raising concerns regarding crypto asset markets. Notably, the FSA emphasizes that its recommendations are not universally mandated for all financial institutions, with banks expected to devise and implement measures tailored to their specific circumstances. Solving crypto market liquidity issuesWith that clarification, it appears that the measures won’t have the negative impact on P2P crypto markets as many market participants originally feared. Meanwhile, in a distinct development, Japan's blockchain gaming community has approached the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) to seek assistance in bolstering liquidity within Japan's crypto asset market. Taking to the X social media platform on Wednesday, Ryo Matsubara, director of Oasys, a GameFi blockchain, outlined that he had visited the LDP's digital society promotion headquarters on behalf of Japanese blockchain gaming projects to raise concerns about stringent regulations impeding liquidity in Japan, which directly impedes the growth of the GameFi ecosystem. Matsubara advocates for regulations that incentivize safe cryptocurrency investment, positing that increased liquidity, marked by a surge in buyers and sellers, could result from such measures. Oasys intends to continue collaborating with the government to enhance Japan's global competitiveness in the Web3 market, with Matsubara expressing confidence in Japan's potential to reclaim its illustrious gaming legacy on Web3. While Japan initially harbored skepticism toward crypto adoption, its stance has softened in recent times. Matsubara acknowledged the positive impact of a recent crypto-related tax reform which was enacted in December. In September 2023, the Japanese government commenced planning to permit startups to raise public funds through crypto asset issuance. That bill was approved last week and now goes forward to the Japanese parliament for further deliberation. These recent developments demonstrate that Japan is navigating regulatory complexities as it seeks to balance innovation with consumer protection in the burgeoning crypto space.

Huobi Co-Founder Acquires 10 Million CRV TokensJun Du, Chinese Co-Founder of Seychelles-headquartered global crypto exchange Huobi, has recently completed the purchase of 10 million curve tokens (CRV) from Curve founder Michael Egorov.Photo by Growtika on UnsplashCurve protocol loan exposureThe transaction amounted to $4 million and is part of Egorov’s ongoing efforts to mitigate his at-risk loan exposure, a further consequence of last week’s $52 million hack of the Curve DeFi protocol.Initially, Du expressed his interest in acquiring 10 million CRV tokens at the prevailing rate of $0.40. This price aligned with multiple over-the-counter (OTC) agreements between Egorov and various cryptocurrency individuals. According to a report by The Block, Du later confirmed the purchase through a Twitter direct message, revealing that he had chosen to lock up the acquired tokens as veCRV. This lock-up mechanism grants voting rights within the Curve platform while requiring the tokens to remain locked for a specified duration.“I intend to uphold this lock-up for at least a year, with optimism for continuous improvements within the Curve ecosystem,” Du stated, highlighting his commitment to the project’s long-term growth.On his Twitter account, Du emphasized his unwavering support for Curve, drawing parallels to his past backing of BendDAO during a liquidity crisis. He clarified: “Challenges faced now are transient, and collective support will foster a stronger industry.”Alongside being a Co-Founder at Huobi, Du holds the positions of CEO at New Huo Tech, a digital asset service platform, and Co-Founder and General Partner (GP) at the Web3 fund ABCDE.Ongoing token sell-offIn actively managing liquidation risk, Egorov is persistently offloading CRV tokens to bolster his loan position, given his significant exposure. He has utilized multiple DeFi lending platforms to secure loans, predominantly employing CRV tokens as collateral to borrow stablecoins. His borrowing activity on platforms like Aave alone has involved $56 million in stablecoins against $149 million worth of CRV collateral.Egorov’s health ratings on these platforms have improved recently, hovering around 1.67 or higher. Nonetheless, there remains a lingering risk associated with potential liquidation of his positions if CRV’s price were to dip substantially. This could potentially lead to bad debt scenarios for the platforms, particularly due to the substantial proportion of CRV supply involved.Sales of 72 million CRVEgorov’s token sales have amounted to 72 million CRV, according to Nansen analyst Sandra Leow. Notable recipients of these tokens include Tron Founder Justin Sun, crypto trader “DCFGod,” and Andrew Kang, Co-Founder of Mechanism Capital.Aave Chan Initiative, an entity tied to the Aave protocol, has proposed that the Aave treasury allocate funds to purchase up to $2 million worth of CRV tokens. The intention is to lock up these tokens as veCRV for an extended period, potentially up to four years. This move is aimed at further reinforcing the stability of CRV’s market dynamics.

BitMEX CEO Calls for an End to Internal Market MakersIn a recent interview, Stephan Lutz, the acting CEO and group CFO of 100x Group, the parent company of Seychelles-headquartered global crypto exchange BitMEX, expressed his belief that crypto exchanges should phase out their internal market-making teams.Photo by Joe Roberts on UnsplashProp trading desks unnecessarySpeaking with The Block, Lutz argued that with the growth of institutional liquidity providers and high-frequency traders (HFTs) in the market, proprietary trading desks are becoming unnecessary.Lutz stated: “You have enough HFTs out there and prop shops that can perform that function.” He was referring to the role of liquidity providers in filling gaps in the market. He made these comments in response to the emergence of information earlier this week that raised questions about internal trading practices at Crypto.com, a Singapore-based exchange.BitMEX, once the world’s largest crypto derivatives exchange, also used to employ internal traders who acted as market makers. However, Lutz explained that BitMEX’s internal trading team, named Arrakis Capital, now functions primarily as a “treasury desk.” He sees this transition as a natural evolution for crypto exchanges in a market that has matured and attracted more institutional liquidity providers.Arrakis Capital currently performs limited functions, including converting commission fees earned in Bitcoin into fiat currency for operational purposes, hedging BitMEX’s exposure to tokens held as inventory, and making markets for BitMEX’s token $BMEX. Lutz clarified that Arrakis’s market-making activities are limited because external market makers find the token’s liquidity insufficient.Regarding profitability, Lutz stated that Arrakis earns “very minor returns” of up to $100,000 per month from holding T-Bills, but it incurred losses last year. He noted that Arrakis used to play a more significant market-making role when BitMEX dominated the crypto futures market. However, he assured that the trading desk was always segregated, despite accusations in the past.Fee structuresLutz acknowledged that exchanges with internal trading teams have faced increased scrutiny since the controversies surrounding Alameda Research and FTX. To differentiate between benign internal trading teams and hedge fund-like operations, Lutz highlighted several factors, including the separation of client funds and house funds, access to sensitive data, and the ability to move markets on their own exchange. Fee structures also play a role, with low or no transaction fees potentially signaling a market-making motive rather than serving as a counterparty.Lutz’s perspective suggests that crypto exchanges should rely on external liquidity providers and HFTs rather than maintaining internal market-making teams. He argues that the market has evolved. At this point he feels that these teams are no longer necessary, due to the presence of established players within the digital assets space.As regulatory scrutiny grows, ensuring transparency and avoiding conflicts of interest become crucial for maintaining trust within the crypto exchange ecosystem. The digital assets industry is far from arriving at a mature stage in its development. While many in the industry have found the stance taken by regulators to be unhelpful, the industry itself must also demonstrate its ability to iteratively move towards best practice, without that being a knee-jerk response to regulatory enforcement.