Top

BitMEX CEO Calls for an End to Internal Market Makers

Web3 & Enterprise·June 23, 2023, 12:30 AM

In a recent interview, Stephan Lutz, the acting CEO and group CFO of 100x Group, the parent company of Seychelles-headquartered global crypto exchange BitMEX, expressed his belief that crypto exchanges should phase out their internal market-making teams.

Photo by Joe Roberts on Unsplash

 

Prop trading desks unnecessary

Speaking with The Block, Lutz argued that with the growth of institutional liquidity providers and high-frequency traders (HFTs) in the market, proprietary trading desks are becoming unnecessary.

Lutz stated: “You have enough HFTs out there and prop shops that can perform that function.” He was referring to the role of liquidity providers in filling gaps in the market. He made these comments in response to the emergence of information earlier this week that raised questions about internal trading practices at Crypto.com, a Singapore-based exchange.

BitMEX, once the world’s largest crypto derivatives exchange, also used to employ internal traders who acted as market makers. However, Lutz explained that BitMEX’s internal trading team, named Arrakis Capital, now functions primarily as a “treasury desk.” He sees this transition as a natural evolution for crypto exchanges in a market that has matured and attracted more institutional liquidity providers.

Arrakis Capital currently performs limited functions, including converting commission fees earned in Bitcoin into fiat currency for operational purposes, hedging BitMEX’s exposure to tokens held as inventory, and making markets for BitMEX’s token $BMEX. Lutz clarified that Arrakis’s market-making activities are limited because external market makers find the token’s liquidity insufficient.

Regarding profitability, Lutz stated that Arrakis earns “very minor returns” of up to $100,000 per month from holding T-Bills, but it incurred losses last year. He noted that Arrakis used to play a more significant market-making role when BitMEX dominated the crypto futures market. However, he assured that the trading desk was always segregated, despite accusations in the past.

 

Fee structures

Lutz acknowledged that exchanges with internal trading teams have faced increased scrutiny since the controversies surrounding Alameda Research and FTX. To differentiate between benign internal trading teams and hedge fund-like operations, Lutz highlighted several factors, including the separation of client funds and house funds, access to sensitive data, and the ability to move markets on their own exchange. Fee structures also play a role, with low or no transaction fees potentially signaling a market-making motive rather than serving as a counterparty.

Lutz’s perspective suggests that crypto exchanges should rely on external liquidity providers and HFTs rather than maintaining internal market-making teams. He argues that the market has evolved. At this point he feels that these teams are no longer necessary, due to the presence of established players within the digital assets space.

As regulatory scrutiny grows, ensuring transparency and avoiding conflicts of interest become crucial for maintaining trust within the crypto exchange ecosystem. The digital assets industry is far from arriving at a mature stage in its development. While many in the industry have found the stance taken by regulators to be unhelpful, the industry itself must also demonstrate its ability to iteratively move towards best practice, without that being a knee-jerk response to regulatory enforcement.

More to Read
View All
Policy & Regulation·

May 24, 2024

Hong Kong privacy watchdog halts Worldcoin operations

Hong Kong's Office of the Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data (PCPD) has issued a directive for the Worldcoin Foundation to cease its operations within the region, citing violations of local privacy laws. The decision comes after the PCPD found that Worldcoin had improperly collected facial and iris data from approximately 8,302 individuals. The agency’s investigation included ten covert visits to six different Worldcoin locations between December 2023 and January 2024. According to the PCPD, the extent of data collection by Worldcoin was deemed "unnecessary and excessive" failing to adhere to the Data Protection Principles.Photo by Claudio Schwarz on UnsplashConcerns over data retentionThe privacy watchdog criticized Worldcoin for its intention to retain personal data for up to 10 years. This retention period was intended for training AI models for user verification processes but was judged by the PCPD to be excessively long, amounting to prolonged retention of personal data. Following the findings, the PCPD has issued an enforcement notice to Worldcoin, mandating the cessation of all its activities in Hong Kong. Privacy Commissioner Ada Chung has called on the public to report any ongoing operations by Worldcoin in the city. In response to growing international scrutiny, Worldcoin announced in March that it would halt the collection of personal data and is planning to introduce a new feature titled "Personal Custody," which would purportedly allow users to store their data on their devices. This change comes as Worldcoin faces additional challenges in other jurisdictions, including Spain and Portugal, which have also expressed concerns over the project's data collection practices. The project was also scrutinized in South Korea but it recently resumed services. As of now, Worldcoin has not provided comments regarding the recent regulatory actions. 

news
Web3 & Enterprise·

May 15, 2023

LG Goes Further Down the Web3 Rabbit Hole with NFT Patent

LG Goes Further Down the Web3 Rabbit Hole with NFT PatentSouth Korean consumer electronics behemoth LG has delved deeper into the Web3 world, this time with a patent filing that would make NFTs more available to TV viewers.Enabling NFTs for the mass marketAccording to the filing, which was made with the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), the electronics giant is seeking to acquire intellectual property protection on a capability to have a smart TV connect with an NFT market server.That ability would allow the user to then send, receive and display digital artwork. Furthermore, the consumer could complete purchases using an associated digital wallet, relative to NFT-based artwork that they would have the ability to browse through on their LG smart TV.While crypto and Web3 continue to garner a lot of attention, it can still seem sometimes that it exists in a bubble all of its own. Moves like this one from an organization as professional as LG are encouraging, as they demonstrate that LG believes that NFTs are going to be a part of the future, and most importantly, that they’re going to enable mass market participation and adoption.Blade WalletThis is not LG’s first venture into the world of NFTs. Last year, the corporation launched its very own NFT marketplace. Known as “LG Art Labs”, it enables users of US LG TVs that run the WebOS 5.0 operating system, to trade digital collectibles.Earlier this year, the firm launched the Blade Wallet, a third party audited, self-custody digital wallet which runs on the Hedera public ledger. That development has come out of a partnership that LG has developed with the Hedera Hashgraph platform much earlier in 2020. Just as with the Blade Wallet, the LG Art Labs NFT marketplace also runs on Hedera. To support these early stage products, LG itself has been a node operator on the Hedera network since 2020.This recent patent filing references an NFT marketplace and a digital wallet. As we’ve established, the corporation has already launched both of them already. All of that points to the electronics giant executing on a well thought through plan which will bring NFTs to the mass market.Broader interestLG isn’t going to have it all to itself. Samsung, yet another South Korean consumer electronics giant, has also dipped its toe in the water where NFTs are concerned. In January 2022, the company released an NFT marketplace on three of its TV models. That initiative was enabled due to its partnership with leading curated NFT marketplace, Nifty Gateway.Neither will the South Koreans have the consumer electronics-enabled NFT market all to themselves. Japanese consumer electronics conglomerate Sony filed a patent in March that will allow players of Sony products to access interactive Web3 gameplay. That application will be centered upon the use of NFTs also.Sony’s attempts to delve into the Web3 arena have been more recent. In February of this year, Sony Network Communications, its internet provider division, partnered with the project team behind the Astar blockchain in order to create an incubation program for companies who are working on NFT-based innovation and decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs).Photo by Shubham Dhage on Unsplash

news
Policy & Regulation·

Aug 19, 2023

SEC Seeks to Question Co-Founder of Singapore’s Terraform Labs

SEC Seeks to Question Co-Founder of Singapore’s Terraform LabsThe United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has taken a step forward in its ongoing case against Singapore’s Terraform Labs by seeking to question Daniel Shin, the Co-Founder of the company.The SEC's intention is to gather evidence related to Chai Corporation, a payments company associated with Terraform and the Terra blockchain. District Judge Jed Rakoff granted the SEC’s request earlier this week, which is part of the regulatory body’s efforts to build a case against Terraform Labs and its Co-Founder, Do Kwon. The decision was based upon a motion originally filed in July.Photo by Bermix Studio on UnsplashRequesting South Korean assistanceThe motion, which was granted on Tuesday, allows the SEC to reach out to South Korea for assistance in questioning Shin and obtaining documents related to Chai Corporation. The regulatory body aims to gain insights into Kwon’s role at Chai, the utilization of the Terra blockchain by Chai, and the disclosures made by Chai regarding its relationship with Terraform.Additionally, the SEC is interested in understanding the reasons behind Chai’s separation from Terraform, as the two companies shared offices and staff until their split in 2020.No opposition filedOn a previous occasion, Kwon unsuccessfully challenged the SEC's attempt to access company records on the basis of a lack of jurisdiction given that Terraform is a Singapore-domiciled company. In June, both Terraform and Kwon attempted unsuccessfully to have the entire action thrown out.On this occasion neither Terraform Labs nor Kwon have opposed the SEC’s motion. In fact, they have even included their own set of questions and document requests. Both the Singaporean firm and its Co-Founder have denied the SEC’s allegations, which were filed earlier this year.The SEC’s lawsuit claims that Terraform’s cryptocurrencies, specifically Terra Luna Classic (LUNC) and Terra ClassicUSD (USTC), were involved in fraudulent activities. The US regulatory body further alleges that Kwon and Terraform falsely promoted the use of the Terra blockchain by Chai for processing and settling transactions.The SEC’s lawsuit also accuses Terraform and Kwon of fabricating transactions involving TerraKRW (KRT), a Korean won-pegged stablecoin, to give the impression that Chai was actively utilizing the Terra blockchain.Collapse falloutTerra, an interconnected crypto ecosystem, faced a collapse in May 2022, resulting in the loss of approximately $40 billion in value and impacting the wider cryptocurrency market. The aftermath of this collapse led to legal actions against individuals associated with Terraform Labs. South Korean prosecutors, for instance, charged Shin with multiple fraud offenses in April, alleging that he had concealed the risks of investing in Terraform’s cryptocurrencies.Kwon’s legal situation is equally complex. He is currently serving a prison sentence in Montenegro for attempting to leave the country using a fake passport. He faces criminal charges in both the United States and South Korea, and both countries have requested his extradition.The ongoing investigation sheds light on the intricate relationships within the Terra ecosystem, having an impact across different jurisdictions. As legal proceedings unfold, the outcome will likely have implications for the regulation and oversight of cryptocurrency and blockchain projects internationally.

news
Loading