Wemade Leverages Blockchain to Host Professional Women’s Golf Tournament in Busan

Thailand’s KBank Furthers Crypto Business Through Satang AcquisitionKasikornbank (KBank), Thailand’s second largest bank, is expanding its involvement in the digital assets sector through the acquisition of a majority stake in the local crypto exchange Satang.Photo by Lisheng Chang on UnsplashTradFi embracing cryptoThe acquisition, involving a purchase of 97% of Satang’s shares, is a significant move in the context of an ongoing trend of traditional financial institutions embracing digital assets. The deal was officially announced on Monday, as disclosed on KBank’s official website.KBank executed the acquisition through its newly established subsidiary, Unita Capital, whose registered capital is valued at 3.7 billion Thai baht (approximately $103 million). Unita Capital specializes in investments within the digital asset sector. This move underlines the bank’s commitment to stay ahead in the dynamic world of digital finance.Subsidiary formationIn light of the acquisition, Satang Corporation is set to undergo a name change and will soon be known as Orbix Trade Company Limited. Unita Capital has established a number of other subsidiary companies as a consequence of the buy-out.KBank’s cryptocurrency venture will be structured into three distinct divisions. Orbix Custodian has been formed, focusing on secure digital asset storage and management. There is a growing demand for reliable digital asset custody services. KBank will use Orbix Custodian as a vehicle to capitalize on that growth opportunity.Orbix Invest has been established to act as the venture arm of the business relative to the digital assets space. It will focus on fund management in meeting the needs of clients looking for exposure to the digital assets sector. Lastly, Orbix Technology has been established to concentrate on blockchain technology development.Satang, a prominent player in the Thai cryptocurrency scene, operates a cryptocurrency exchange alongside a range of digital asset services. Notably, Poramin Insom, the founder of Satang, is recognized for his role in launching Firo (formerly Zcoin), a privacy-centric cryptocurrency. Insom confirmed the acquisition via a Facebook post on Monday, acknowledging the evolution of Satang as it transitions under KBank’s ownership.Insom stated: “I’ve been at Satang since 2017 until now, six years have passed. Currently, Satang on the trading board has already exited according to the news. And there should be an official announcement soon.” He also highlighted Satang’s diversified ventures, including Satang Technology, a blockchain service platform, and Satang Space, focusing on space-related endeavors.This strategic move by KBank follows its recent launch of a $100 million fund, introduced in September, targeting investments in Web3, fintech, and artificial intelligence (AI). In 2022, KBank launched Bigfin, a digital asset investment analysis platform. Bigfin has since been integrated with the Binance platform.Last year the bank backed Thai digital asset and blockchain startup Forward, a project that is working on developing a decentralized derivative platform.KBank is recognized as the second largest lender in Thailand based on assets, trailing behind Bangkok Bank. Thai NVDR Company Limited is the largest shareholder of KBank, as per data from the Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET), with the SET itself owning 99.9% of NVDR’s shares.

South Korea is ramping up its scrutiny on cryptocurrency exchanges, with the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) of the Financial Services Commission (FSC) announcing its intention yesterday to remove platforms that lack the necessary qualifications, according to the Korea Economic Daily.Unqualified exchangesIn its announcement yesterday, the FIU revealed its aim to block unqualified virtual asset service providers (VASPs) from facilitating trades in Korean won, the currency of the country. Those currently providing Korean won trading services will be eliminated from the market unless they can demonstrate they meet the required standards. With many exchanges set to renew their registrations in the latter half of this year, the FIU is gearing up for thorough evaluations through June to identify and remove unqualified VASPs. The FIU's assessments will focus on determining whether VASPs have adequate measures in place for user protection and are safeguarded against risks of money laundering. To bolster its efforts in preventing money laundering risks, the FIU intends to establish a framework where lawyers and accountants participate in crypto oversight activities.Photo by Andrea Piacquadio on PexelsExamining majority shareholder of VASPThe financial watchdog is also looking to propose amendments to the Financial Transaction Reports Act, aiming to raise the standards for VASP registration by introducing more stringent requirements. Beyond the current assessments of a VASP operator and its executives, the new regulations will involve close examination of its majority shareholder. This additional layer of scrutiny will evaluate the credibility of the major parties related to the VASP, taking into account factors such as their history of loan defaults. The FIU is set to create a system for analyzing cryptocurrency transactions and will strengthen its communication channels, not just with financial institutions but also with prosecutors and police forces. Furthermore, the agency is reviewing the Financial Action Task Force's (FATF) recommendation for freezing transactions in cases of suspicious activities. Once implemented, this will enable the FIU to temporarily halt suspicious transactions before bringing the issue to prosecutors.

Singaporean Researchers Devise More Effective DAO VotingResearchers at the Singapore University of Social Sciences have come up with a more efficient governance model for decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs).Photo by Shubham Dhage on UnsplashDAO governance reviewThe scientists presented their work via a paper titled “Voting Schemes in DAO Governance,” which was published earlier this week. The paper is due to appear in the Annual Review of Fintech in due course.The research paper initially sets out with a review of the different forms of voting currently used to affect DAO governance in the various early stage projects that are already up and running. Having taken a deep dive into existing approaches, the research team of Qinxu Ding, Weibiao Xu, Zhiguo Wang and David Kuo Chuen Lee decided that they could go one better themselves.Their review encompassed eight current approaches including the following: token-based quorum voting, knowledge-extractable voting, conviction voting and reputation-based voting. Each voting scheme was then evaluated based on the following factors:Efficiency: An assessment of the speed at which proposals are selected and approved.Fairness: Each voter should have equal rights to vote.Scalability: The degree to which storage, computation and communication needs can be adjusted relative to the number of voters.Robustness: An assessment of the relative resistance of the voting scheme to attacks and collusion.Incentive Schemes: The extent to which DAO members are motivated to vote.Following on from that analysis, the scientists put forward a hypothetical voting mechanism with design considerations relative to fully decentralized and permissionless DAO governance. When it came to ratings, the holographic consensus approach scored highest, with a “high” rating in the categories of efficiency, fairness and robustness, dropping down to medium when it came to scalability. None of the other approaches came close.In trying to go one better, the team took the holographic consensus approach and set out to create their own hypothetical voting mechanism based on this model. As evidenced from the paper, they tried to effect improvements to this approach:“We know that the downside of the conviction voting mechanism is that it takes time to approve an urgent proposal. To address this concern, we introduce a blind betting mechanism: each member could choose whether to bet on any proposals with a certain number of their tokens.”The researcher’s hypothetical model allows stakeholders to gamble their tokens on the likelihood of a proposal passing or failing. The logic with this approach, they claim, is that it would speed up the governance process, while making it more robust at the same time.In concluding remarks, the researchers acknowledged that all approaches were not without their pros and cons. They point out that the further development of DAOs shouldn’t be confined to a static organizational future. While they believe that their own hypothetical scheme is in theory superior, they acknowledge that it too has flaws. With that, the realities of implementing it in the real world may be a challenge.