Korea to Ban Virtual Asset Deposit Services from Next July

HashKey Report Outlines Risks of Liquid StakingLiquid staking derivatives (LSD) are not without their potential pitfalls according to a report published by Hong Kong’s HashKey Capital.Photo by Shubham Dhage on UnsplashLiquid staking exceeds $22 billionThe report, which was published by the digital asset manager and finance house in July, emphasizes the pressing need for enhanced decentralization to counteract the risks associated with this growing trend of liquid staking.The figures themselves are impressive. This year, the total value locked in the liquid staking derivatives market has surged past the $22 billion mark. Correspondingly, the market capitalization of LSD projects has skyrocketed to $18 billion, indicating a substantial influx of interest and investment.However, the growth that these protocols are witnessing also presents a dual-edged conundrum for the Ethereum ecosystem. HashKey Capital’s report underscores that despite the advantages these protocols might offer their respective communities and token-holders, they could potentially destabilize the Ethereum ecosystem in multifaceted ways.Centralization riskAs evident in HashKey Capital’s overview, several LSD protocols heavily rely on a limited number of node operators, effectively centralizing a significant portion of validator nodes. This centralization trend, as highlighted by the report, is a cause for concern. The concentration of node operators raises red flags, as it contradicts the fundamental tenets of decentralization that underpin blockchain technology.The report articulates the adverse effects of centralization in the realm of liquid staking. It points to the dangers of reduced competition and a heightened risk of censorship.The report raises an important caution: “There is a heightened possibility of censorship with centralized staking players, as they may be subject to incentives or regulatory pressure to censor transactions. This can potentially result in a disruption of the trust within the network.”Security threatsCentralization also ushers in security threats. The dominance of major staking players makes the Ethereum ecosystem more susceptible to 51% attacks. Furthermore, the potential for collusion among centralized stakers looms large, leading to actions that counteract the very essence of decentralization, such as front running and malicious maximal extractable value (MEV) susceptibility.However, amidst these centralization risks, HashKey Capital acknowledges that most protocols are in their nascent stages. Many of them have devised strategies to incorporate distributed validator technology into their protocols, a proactive step towards fostering greater decentralization and resilience.HashKey Exchange awarded retail services licenseIn an unrelated development, HashKey Exchange received approval on Wednesday to upgrade type 1 and type 7 licenses, allowing it to cater to retail investors in Hong Kong. This accomplishment comes a mere two months after the city introduced its Virtual Asset Service Provider (VASP) licensing framework on June 1.In this evolving landscape, HashKey Capital and OSL were among the pioneer licensed exchanges under the city’s earlier voluntary program. Now, the new regulations stipulate that crypto trading platforms must obtain a license to serve retail investors, further solidifying Hong Kong’s commitment to cultivating a thriving crypto ecosystem.As the HashKey Capital report and recent developments in Hong Kong demonstrate, there’s a lot in play relative to both crypto regulation, protocol design and new product innovation. The challenges posed by centralization in liquid staking underscore the importance of vigilance and corrective action. Meanwhile, Hong Kong’s aspirations to become a crypto stronghold offer a beacon of hope in an ever-evolving regulatory landscape.

Major Korean Crypto Exchanges Strengthen on NFT Projects Despite Crypto WinterDespite crypto winter, major Korean cryptocurrency exchanges Upbit and Bithumb strengthened on staff and included new non-fungible token (NFT) projects.US Tightening Policy Effects on Crypto MarketAccording to the electronic disclosure system operated by the Financial Supervisory Service, Upbit’s operator Dunamu saw a net income of 130.8 billion won last year, down by 94% from 2.21 trillion won. Bithumb also experienced a decline of 85% from 648.4 billion won to 95.4 billion won. This downturn is reportedly attributed to the tightening monetary policy by the US and weaker market sentiment on risky assets.Insights on Korean NFT MarketBoth exchanges, Upbit and Bithumb, having seen meager profitability in crypto trading, recruited more talent to embark on NFT projects. However, the picture is not so rosy for these new endeavors, considering the tepid NFT trade volume. According to The Block, the NFT trade volume last month reached $983.4 billion, which is lower than $1.4 trillion, the previous month’s record.The NFT trade volume on Upbit last month also experienced year-on-year and month-on-month decreases of 48.6% and 14.5%, respectively.Last week, Dunamu CEO Sirgoo Lee said in a shareholders’ meeting that its NFT projects are underachieving and that he is reconsidering the new projects from scratch. He added that Dunamu will build a solid foundation in Korea while promoting global businesses starting from the US through Levvels, a blockchain-based platform jointly established by Dunamu and the entertainment company HYBE.Outlook on the Korean MarketBithumb, on the other hand, will bolster new projects through Bithumb Meta and Rotonda. Bithumb Meta recently launched the beta service of its original metaverse Naemo Market where users can use NFTs to decorate their own personal digital space. Rotonda released Burrito Wallet last February to allow waller holders to store NFTs, cryptocurrencies, and fiat currencies.Meanwhile, there was a mixed outlook on the Korean crypto market. One person said in an interview with Hankooki that greater workforces in the country’s leading crypto exchanges could suggest the market’s growth, but also pointed out that their bigger sizes might hinder them from maneuvering when faced with other unexpected risks.

Hong Kong–listed companies are stepping up digital-asset bets as the city sets out a clearer rulebook, a sign that tighter oversight and new market rails are starting to unlock institutional demand.Photo by Ruslan Bardash on UnsplashCorporate moves signal rising appetiteBoyaa Interactive International has been adding Bitcoin (BTC) to its treasury, with the latest acquisition of 411 BTC bringing its total holdings to 4,091 BTC. The gaming company has said it will direct 90% of a planned $56.3 million rights issue into Bitcoin. Yunfeng Financial raised HKD 1.17 billion, or about $150 million, through a new share issuance and plans to use part of the proceeds to launch cryptocurrency trading and investment management services. The firm is associated with Yunfeng Capital, which was co-founded by Alibaba founder Jack Ma, and has previously outlined plans to accumulate BTC, Ethereum (ETH), and Solana (SOL). These moves land alongside a policy reset from the top. In his annual address on Sept. 17, Chief Executive John Lee reaffirmed Hong Kong’s goal of cementing its position as an international hub in finance, including digital assets, while pairing that ambition with stronger investor safeguards. Tokenization and blockchain testbedThe centerpiece is Project Ensemble, run by the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA). The initiative is building infrastructure for a tokenized market and operates a sandbox where institutions can test blockchain systems in live business settings. Priorities include tokenized bank deposits, settlement of tokenized assets such as money market funds, and standardized issuance of government tokenized bonds. Regulation is advancing in parallel. The government is preparing legislation for a licensing regime that covers stablecoin issuers as well as digital-asset dealing and custody providers. The Securities and Futures Commission is studying an expansion of products for professional investors, with tougher protections baked in. The regulator plans to use automated reporting and data surveillance to curb misconduct. Authorities also intend to deepen cross-border cooperation to combat tax evasion. Banking rules are set to shift as well. The HKMA has circulated draft guidance that would ease capital requirements for certain crypto exposures in line with Basel standards through a new policy module called CRP-1. Under the proposal, assets issued on permissionless blockchains could qualify for lower capital charges when issuers demonstrate effective risk management. Hong Kong aims to implement the international rules by early 2026.Publicly traded BTC treasury firms in China Source: BitcoinTreasuries.NETAdoption amid constraintsNot every institution will join the build-out. Mainland policies may constrain participation, according to Caixin. Chinese digital platforms, state-owned enterprises (SOEs), and financial entities operating in Hong Kong could face limits on stablecoin and other crypto activity. Branches of several SOEs and Chinese banks are also unlikely to seek a Hong Kong stablecoin license. Corporate adoption remains broad despite those headwinds. Publicly traded Bitcoin treasury companies in China and Hong Kong hold a combined 19,280 BTC, according to BitcoinTreasuries.net. Several appear among the top 50 public corporate holders worldwide, including Next Technology Holding (16th), Cango (18th), Boyaa (24th), Nano Labs (48th), and Ming Shing Group (50th). The tally points to rising regional interest in digital assets. Publicly traded BTC treasury firms in Hong Kong Source: BitcoinTreasuries.NET