HashKey Report Outlines Risks of Liquid Staking

Key appointment sees Turkey’s central bank enhance crypto expertiseTurkey’s President, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, has taken a step in integrating blockchain and cryptocurrency expertise into the nation’s monetary policy by appointing Professor Fatma Ozkul to the central bank’s rate-setting committee.Photo by Engin Yapici on UnsplashIncorporating digital financial knowledgeThis decision, which became effective on Saturday, marks a significant move towards incorporating digital financial knowledge within the economic framework of Turkey.As part of Turkey’s economic strategy, President Erdogan has been restructuring the economic management team since his victory in the May general election. This reshuffling included the appointment of ex-Goldman Sachs banker Hafize Gaye Erkan as the central bank’s governor in June.That appointment led to a series of policy rate increases, totaling 3,400 basis points, bringing the rate to 42.5%. Further changes in the Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) occurred in July, reinforcing the trajectory of monetary tightening.Crypto credentialsProfessor Fatma Ozkul, a lecturer at Istanbul’s Marmara University, joins the MPC with a primary focus on accounting, finance and auditing. Notably, she brings expertise in blockchain technology and crypto assets, having conducted courses on these subjects. Her recent work has delved into the implications of blockchain and crypto assets on finance, culminating in the publication of a book on crypto asset accounting in 2022.While Ozkul’s appointment may not immediately alter the current monetary policy direction, it reflects an understanding of the need to incorporate digital financial tools when formulating economic and monetary policy. Her extensive knowledge in digital finance is expected to contribute significantly to the process of setting benchmark interest rates, a critical instrument in controlling inflation within Turkey.President Erdogan’s emphasis on digital banking aligns with Turkey’s proactive steps in this direction. The central bank introduced a digital Turkish lira collaboration platform in 2021 and successfully tested digital lira transactions in late 2022. Additionally, the government is anticipated to submit a draft law regulating crypto assets in the coming year.Crypto adoptionThe political and economic climate in Turkey has shown a growing interest in cryptocurrencies, particularly Bitcoin. Chainalysis, a blockchain analytics company, reports that Turkey recorded nearly $170 billion worth of cryptocurrency transactions between July 2022 and June 2023, ranking fourth globally in terms of raw transaction volumes.A report by KuCoin earlier this year identified a noteworthy increase in the overall number of crypto investors in Turkey over the course of the past 18 months. That growth in adoption was found to be youth-driven. The importance of the Turkish market within the crypto sector is further evidenced by the recent revelation that the Turkish Lira is the most dominant fiat trading pair on leading global crypto exchange Binance.In response to this surge, the Turkish government has been working on cryptocurrency regulations, focusing on licensing and taxes. This regulatory move aims to remove Turkey’s name from the Financial Action Task Force’s “gray list” and align the country with global financial norms.As Professor Ozkul assumes her role, her expertise and input may well play a pivotal part in shaping Turkey’s evolving position and approach where digital assets, blockchain and cryptocurrencies are concerned.

SEC seeks summary judgment against Terraform LabsThe U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is making a strong push for a summary judgment in its ongoing legal battle against Singapore’s Terraform Labs and its co-founder Do Kwon. Such an outcome would spare the need for a protracted trial.According to a motion filed by the SEC on Thursday, the record shows that there is “no genuine dispute as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”Photo by Caleb Fisher on UnsplashRelying on the Howey TestThe SEC’s filing underscores its central argument that Kwon and Terraform Labs were involved in the sale of securities. The document categorically states:“There is no dispute that purchasers made an investment of money, either through fiat currency or crypto assets, for each crypto asset — LUNA, wLUNA, MIR, and UST, thereby satisfying the first prong of Howey.” The Howey Test refers back to a U.S. Supreme Court case — SEC v. Howey — which took place in 1946. The case set a precedent and has subsequently become the cornerstone of determining what is or is not a security in the United States.This argument hinges on the idea that funds were pooled in a common enterprise with the expectation of profits primarily derived from the efforts of the promoters.Citing fraud as well as unregistered securitiesThe SEC’s assertion is two-fold, contending that not only did Terraform and Kwon engage in selling securities, but they also engaged in fraudulent activities and disseminated misleading information. The SEC reiterates these claims in its filing, emphasizing that the defendants committed fraud by duping investors about the stability of UST.They allegedly falsely attributed the algorithm for price stabilization while orchestrating clandestine third-party interventions. This purported deception made their claims regarding the algorithm’s effectiveness deceptive and involved the omission of crucial information. The fallout from Terra’s collapse in May of the previous year resulted in the destruction of substantial investor wealth, totaling billions of dollars.Similar defense team filingThe SEC’s move to seek summary judgment comes in the wake of a similar filing by Kwon’s defense team last Friday. Kwon is currently serving a sentence for document forgery in Montenegro, a situation stemming from his arrest at an airport with forged passports.Notably, Terraform’s co-founder, Daniel Shin, who is currently on trial in South Korea, has attributed the collapse of Terraform Labs to Kwon’s mismanagement. Shin has claimed his separation from the company and its activities occurred two years before its eventual collapse.In this legal battle that holds significant implications for the cryptocurrency and blockchain space, the SEC continues to emphasize its position, asserting that Kwon and Terraform Labs engaged in the sale of securities through deceptive means. The outcome of this case could have far-reaching consequences, setting precedents for future regulatory actions in the industry.

Hong Kong and Israel Collaborate to Expand CBDC Access Beyond BanksIn a collaborative effort, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA), the Bank of Israel (BoI), and the Bank of International Settlements (BIS) Innovation Hub have jointly released a comprehensive report on Project Sela, a central bank digital currency (CBDC) initiative.Photo by POURIA 🦋 on UnsplashBroadening the role of intermediariesThe report was published to the BIS website on Tuesday. In keeping with the trend of many CBDC projects, Project Sela is characterized by a robust public-private partnership. However, its particular focus lies in broadening the spectrum of intermediaries, aiming to offer retail CBDC services through a more diverse array of service providers, thereby reducing dependency on traditional banks and major payment providers.Andrew Abir, Deputy Governor of the Bank of Israel, emphasized the importance of fostering a dynamic and open ecosystem with a wide variety of service providers. He stated:“Competition and innovation require a flourishing and open ecosystem with many different types of service providers. This was our initial goal in Project Sela as a proof-of-concept, and the project proved the feasibility of the model we had in mind.”Involving retail banksIn a previous model explored through Hong Kong’s Project Aurum, retail banks were entrusted with customer-facing tasks while maintaining the central bank’s operation of the wholesale ledger for the eHKD. In contrast, Project Sela introduces a novel approach where the central bank operates the retail ledger — a model akin to Israel’s digital shekel.The primary actors in Project Sela, known as Access Enablers (AEs), notably do not have control over CBDC balances, distinguishing them from conventional payment providers. Moreover, AEs are not required to maintain liquidity to support CBDC services. Their role encompasses facilitating user onboarding and CBDC access, fulfilling know-your-customer (KYC) and compliance obligations, and routing payments. The role of banks and other “funding institutions” primarily revolves around enabling the conversion of cash and deposits into CBDC.The rationale behind this approach is rooted in the emergence of technological advancements in open banking and DeFi, which have demonstrated the potential to disentangle financial services by granting users greater access to their financial data and control over their own funds.Enabling participation among the unbankedProject Sela envisions the unbanked population utilizing ATMs to convert cash into CBDC. A similar approach has recently been taken by the Chinese authorities. In the resort city of Sanya, authorities have introduced e-CNY ATMs in order to enable e-CNY access for foreign tourists.However, it is noteworthy that in many countries, the primary function of ATMs is to dispense cash rather than accept it. Consequently, the inclusion of AEs could pose challenges to traditional banking institutions, as CBDC adoption could potentially impact bank deposits.Privacy and cybersecurity considerations are implicated within Project Sela. As the central bank operates the retail ledger, ensuring the confidentiality of personal information becomes imperative. To safeguard privacy, AEs employ a hashing mechanism to obfuscate personal identifiers, although the report does not delve into the subject in detail.While Bank of Israel Governor Amir Yaron admitted that a CBDC can never be anonymous, he claimed that “if we choose to issue a digital cash shekel, it will provide at least as much privacy as other digital means of payment.”