CrossAngle undergoes rebranding, shifting focus to ERP solution

OSL Parent Company Denies Sale PlansBC Technology Group, a Hong Kong-based investment holding company, has firmly denied recent reports suggesting it is exploring the sale of its licensed digital asset business, OSL, for up to HK$1 billion (US$137.3 million).Photo by Nextvoyage on PexelsCompany stock plummetsThis comes in response to a report that emerged via Bloomberg on Monday. The news of the possible sale had a significant impact on the company’s stock, which plummeted by over 22% to HK$3.35 the following day.BC Technology Group, which has been listed on the Hong Kong stock exchange since 2012, is the parent company of OSL. The reports hinted at the possibility of selling off parts of the business, citing undisclosed sources.In response to these rumors, BC Technology Group issued a formal statement to clarify the situation, deeming the article “factually inaccurate and highly misleading.” It vehemently refuted any intention to sell OSL, a key player in the cryptocurrency exchange sector.First licensed exchangeOSL was the first cryptocurrency exchange to be licensed by the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) in Hong Kong in 2020, initially operated under a voluntary scheme and was limited to serving professional investors. However, the recent licensing requirement broadened its scope, allowing it to cater to retail investors as well, including popular cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum.Both OSL and HashKey had their licenses upgraded this year, enabling them to serve retail investors as per the new policy. However, the reception to this new regulatory framework has been somewhat lukewarm, with only five local exchanges applying for the new virtual asset trading platform (VATP) license. The SFC had to publish a list of applicants following a financial scandal involving the JPEX crypto exchange, which led to over 2,500 complaints and losses totaling approximately HK$1.5 billion.The backdrop of this unfolding situation is Hong Kong’s efforts to establish itself as a significant virtual asset hub. The city announced its ambition to transform into a hub for digital assets a year ago, drawing considerable attention from cryptocurrency exchanges. These efforts included implementing new regulations in June that mandated licensing for cryptocurrency exchanges.Several companies with connections to Hong Kong and mainland China have expressed their intent to obtain a license, potentially taking advantage of Hong Kong’s favorable stance toward virtual assets when compared to mainland China’s strict regulations.High compliance costsNonetheless, high compliance costs in Hong Kong continue to pose a barrier, potentially preventing the city from becoming the primary base of operations for crypto businesses. Industry insiders estimate that the cost of compliance from start to finish can be as high as HK$60 million for a company. Firms have reported that obtaining a trading license in Hong Kong can involve an outlay of between HK$20 million and HK$200 million.As per BC Technology Group’s mid-year report, the company reported a net loss of HK$94.7 million in the first half of 2023. This marked a notable improvement compared to the HK$312.1 million in losses during the same period the previous year. OSL remains a significant source of income for the company.

South Korea’s financial regulator is preparing a second major cryptocurrency bill that would expand investor protections, strengthen stablecoin safeguards, and potentially impose governance changes at the country’s largest exchanges, as domestic token projects warn that regulatory uncertainty is curbing growth. The Financial Services Commission (FSC) is drafting the Digital Asset Basic Act, a so-called “phase two” bill that follows an earlier virtual asset user protection regime which took effect in July 2024. According to Yonhap News, the bill is expected to address stablecoin risks by requiring issuers to hold reserve assets in instruments such as bank deposits and government bonds, and to deposit or place in trust at least 100% of outstanding issuance with banks or other designated custodians. It would also extend existing financial-sector rules to crypto firms in areas including disclosures, terms and conditions, and advertising. In addition, the proposal could impose no-fault liability on virtual asset service providers for losses stemming from hacks or system failures, in line with standards under Korea’s Electronic Financial Transactions Act, which governs traditional financial institutions and payment services.Photo by Timothy Ries on UnsplashGovernance dominance at exchangesA separate report by KBS said the draft bill includes measures to overhaul governance at South Korea’s four major crypto exchanges—Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone, and Korbit—which together serve about 11 million users. The FSC has raised concerns about concentrated control by founders and major shareholders, and is considering a governance framework similar to that applied to alternative trading systems (ATS) under Korea’s Capital Markets Act. That could include limits designed to prevent any single shareholder from holding too much control, capping controlling stakes at around 15% to 20%. Under Korea’s current Capital Markets Act, an ATS is generally barred from holding more than 15% of voting shares, including those held by related parties, with limited exceptions allowing stakes of up to 30%. If similar limits were applied to crypto exchanges, the changes could affect Dunamu, the operator of Upbit. Dunamu Chairman Song Chi-hyung holds a stake in the mid-20% range and, under the proposal as described, could face pressure to sell roughly 10% of his holdings. The proposal could have implications for the deal, as Dunamu is pursuing a merger with Naver Financial through a comprehensive stock swap. While the bill’s broad outlines are taking shape, regulators are still working to narrow differences over stablecoin rules, and the final proposal is expected to be submitted to the National Assembly next year. Key unresolved issues include eligibility requirements for stablecoin issuers, whether to establish an interagency consultative body during the licensing process, initial capital thresholds, and whether a single entity should be allowed to both issue and distribute stablecoins. The core dispute centers on who should be allowed to issue stablecoins. The Bank of Korea is said to favor limiting issuance to consortia in which banks hold at least a 51% stake, while the FSC is believed to oppose writing a mandatory bank ownership threshold into law, arguing that such a requirement could limit broader participation by technology firms. ‘Kimchi coin’ listings stall amid cautionEven as policymakers push ahead, regulatory uncertainty is curbing growth among South Korean blockchain projects. News1 reported that Upbit listed only one token from a domestic project in 2025, out of 54 tokens added for trading since the start of the year—the native token of Story, a peer-to-peer intellectual property network powered by blockchain and co-founded by Korean entrepreneur Lee Seung-yoon. Upbit also removed 10 tokens during the period, seven of which were so-called “kimchi coins,” a colloquial term for tokens originating in South Korea or developed by Korean teams. Industry participants attribute the removals to increasingly risk-averse behavior by exchanges amid regulatory uncertainty, which can complicate promotional efforts and trust-building while constraining early-stage liquidity. TradFi players seek crypto integrationsWhile local token projects face headwinds, interest from traditional financial institutions appears to be picking up. Chosun Biz reported that Mirae Asset Financial Group is considering an acquisition of Korbit, with its non-financial affiliate Mirae Asset Consulting seen as a potential buyer of shares from major shareholders NXC and SK Planet. Industry analysts estimate the deal could be worth up to 140 billion won ($97 million). The group’s founder, Park Hyeon-joo, has said he is developing a strategy to bridge traditional and digital assets, arguing that it is time to prepare for the next wave of financial innovation. In payments, EBN Industrial News reported that BC Card has signed a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with U.S.-based crypto exchange Coinbase to test USDC payments in South Korea. The pilot would integrate BC Card’s QR payment system with wallets on Coinbase’s Base blockchain to assess whether USDC can function as a viable payment method at local merchants. 

Global crypto exchange Binance has carried out a survey which reveals that the security habits of Asian platform users are evolving positively.Photo by Vadim Artyukhin on UnsplashUsers responding to more sophisticated scamsIn a blog post published by the crypto exchange platform on May 6, Binance revealed that it had carried out a survey of nearly 30,000 platform users across Asia. The company’s takeaway following analysis of the survey data is that “scams are evolving — and so are crypto users.” The firm suggested that users are “stepping up their security game,” with exchanges facing growing demand from their users for real-time protection and smarter security tools. Increasing use of 2FAThe exchange platform found that 80.5% of survey respondents now use Binance two-factor authentication (2FA). While the use of 2FA is definitely a move in the right direction, it doesn’t guarantee the safety of a user’s digital assets.  In an article published by Forbes last month Forbes Contributor Davey Winder warned that infostealer malware can compromise 2FA codes in as little as 10 seconds. In June of last year, an OKX user lost $2 million in crypto to a hacker who utilized AI despite the victim having used Google’s 2FA. Double-checking transfersThe survey found that 73.3% of users double-check transfers before sending digital assets. Due to the nature of decentralized cryptocurrency, crypto transactions are not easily reversed and are usually irreversible. That puts a greater responsibility on crypto users to ensure that they are sending funds to the appropriate wallet address. Double-checking transfer addresses is not only necessary due to human error. Malware is also used by hackers to spoof such addresses, tricking the sender into sending the digital assets to their address rather than the one that was originally intended. It emerged in May 2024 that a Bitcoin trader had lost more than $70 million in Bitcoin in an “address poisoning” scam. Binance itself had warned users last September that “clipper malware,” which intercepts clipboard data on a user’s phone or desktop, replacing copied wallet addresses with alternative addresses under the hacker’s control, is increasingly being employed in hacking attempts. While the survey has revealed a positive evolution in the security habits of Asian platform users, there’s still room for further improvement. Just 17.6% of survey respondents utilize address whitelisting, a measure that restricts account user access to a safe list of pre-defined trusted addresses. Only 21.5% of survey respondents use anti-phishing codes as a security mechanism. The objective of phishing is to steal data, install malware on a user’s device or otherwise gain account access. An anti-phishing code aids the user in verifying the authenticity of emails and texts from a specific service. Security remains a major issue within crypto. Last month, hackers employed social engineering tactics to steal $330 million in Bitcoin from an elderly American victim. Exchange platforms themselves continue to struggle to safeguard user funds. Earlier this year, Binance competitor, Dubai-headquartered Bybit, suffered a $1.5 billion hack believed to have been perpetrated by North Korea’s Lazarus Group. Lazarus is also thought to have been behind a $235 million crypto theft at Indian crypto exchange WazirX in July 2024.