Top

Binance survey reveals evolving security habits of Asian platform users

Markets·May 09, 2025, 6:21 AM

Global crypto exchange Binance has carried out a survey which reveals that the security habits of Asian platform users are evolving positively.

https://asset.coinness.com/en/news/260ca4e27d6072376b88fad1d462b0ec.webp
Photo by Vadim Artyukhin on Unsplash

Users responding to more sophisticated scams

In a blog post published by the crypto exchange platform on May 6, Binance revealed that it had carried out a survey of nearly 30,000 platform users across Asia. The company’s takeaway following analysis of the survey data is that “scams are evolving — and so are crypto users.”

 

The firm suggested that users are “stepping up their security game,” with exchanges facing growing demand from their users for real-time protection and smarter security tools.

 

Increasing use of 2FA

The exchange platform found that 80.5% of survey respondents now use Binance two-factor authentication (2FA). While the use of 2FA is definitely a move in the right direction, it doesn’t guarantee the safety of a user’s digital assets. 

 

In an article published by Forbes last month Forbes Contributor Davey Winder warned that infostealer malware can compromise 2FA codes in as little as 10 seconds. In June of last year, an OKX user lost $2 million in crypto to a hacker who utilized AI despite the victim having used Google’s 2FA.

 

Double-checking transfers

The survey found that 73.3% of users double-check transfers before sending digital assets. Due to the nature of decentralized cryptocurrency, crypto transactions are not easily reversed and are usually irreversible. That puts a greater responsibility on crypto users to ensure that they are sending funds to the appropriate wallet address.

 

Double-checking transfer addresses is not only necessary due to human error. Malware is also used by hackers to spoof such addresses, tricking the sender into sending the digital assets to their address rather than the one that was originally intended.

 

It emerged in May 2024 that a Bitcoin trader had lost more than $70 million in Bitcoin in an “address poisoning” scam. Binance itself had warned users last September that “clipper malware,” which intercepts clipboard data on a user’s phone or desktop, replacing copied wallet addresses with alternative addresses under the hacker’s control, is increasingly being employed in hacking attempts.

 

While the survey has revealed a positive evolution in the security habits of Asian platform users, there’s still room for further improvement. Just 17.6% of survey respondents utilize address whitelisting, a measure that restricts account user access to a safe list of pre-defined trusted addresses.

 

Only 21.5% of survey respondents use anti-phishing codes as a security mechanism. The objective of phishing is to steal data, install malware on a user’s device or otherwise gain account access. An anti-phishing code aids the user in verifying the authenticity of emails and texts from a specific service.

 

Security remains a major issue within crypto. Last month, hackers employed social engineering tactics to steal $330 million in Bitcoin from an elderly American victim.

Exchange platforms themselves continue to struggle to safeguard user funds. Earlier this year, Binance competitor, Dubai-headquartered Bybit, suffered a $1.5 billion hack believed to have been perpetrated by North Korea’s Lazarus Group. Lazarus is also thought to have been behind a $235 million crypto theft at Indian crypto exchange WazirX in July 2024.

More to Read
View All
Web3 & Enterprise·

Nov 14, 2023

Upbit D Conference participants share insights on Web3 and blockchain

Upbit D Conference participants share insights on Web3 and blockchainBlockchain specialists from 29 countries gathered on Monday (local time) at Upbit D Conference (UDC) 2023 in Seoul to explore capital markets in the forthcoming Web3 era. This era is characterized by user-controlled, communal data management, a notable shift from the Web2 space where major tech corporations held dominant control over data.Organized by Dunamu, the operator of South Korea’s Upbit cryptocurrency exchange, the conference featured 39 experts, focusing on the transformative potential of blockchain technology in this new internet phase.Photo by Shubham Dhage on UnsplashAsset tokenization and investment opportunitiesAccording to a report by the Asia Business Daily, one of the key speakers at the conference, Wally Yu, a Solutions Architect at San Francisco-based Chainlink Labs, delved into how cross-chain solutions and asset tokenization could add to the financial industry. He explained that Chainlink’s Cross-Chain Interoperability Protocol (CCIP), designed to connect various blockchains, is only beginning to reveal its capabilities in integrating with traditional financial markets. Yu pointed out the growing interest from banks in tokenizing their conventional assets and transferring them to the blockchain. This move, he suggested, could lead to increased liquidity and open up new investment opportunities.Yu also compared the current DeFi market to traditional sectors like stock, real estate, and derivatives, noting DeFi’s relatively smaller scale. However, he underlined blockchain’s transparency as a key advantage over traditional markets, where transparency is often lacking. According to Yu, the adoption of blockchain by traditional financial firms could address longstanding issues more effectively.Looking ahead to the Web3 era, Yu envisioned a scenario where different tokens are interconnected, potentially bringing an estimated $900 trillion worth of assets onto the blockchain. This, he believes, would significantly enhance liquidity in the financial markets.From Web2 to Web3During the conference, Korean mobile network provider SK Telecom’s (SKT) Vice President, Oh Se-hyun, outlined the company’s forward-looking strategy to transition its 30 million subscribers from Web2 to Web3. She highlighted SKT’s search for high-value markets to expand its business scope, underscoring the company’s active efforts in constructing Web3 infrastructure. This strategic pivot aligns with their vision for the upcoming Web3 era.SKT, which established its Web3 division in 2017, initially engaged in developing a private mainnet. However, the company has since shifted its focus towards services aimed at boosting customer engagement, such as custody, web and app services. Oh emphasized the need for Web3 wallets to support a diverse range of assets and decentralized applications (dApps), but she stressed that ease of use is paramount. She views that these wallets will serve as gateways for customers entering the blockchain space.SKT has developed and is improving its own Web3 wallet, dubbed Wallet T. Oh shared her belief that the future of financial business models will pivot from traditional and big-tech banks to those based on public chains. In preparation for this shift, SKT is contemplating strategies to embrace blockchain-based Web3 services.Crypto regulationThe conference also touched on the potential integration of virtual assets within regulatory frameworks. There’s growing anticipation in the market for the approval of spot bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, especially following the inclusion of asset manager BlackRock’s proposed spot bitcoin ETF in the Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation’s (DTCC) clearing-house eligibility file.Emily Parker, Executive Director at CoinDesk, mentioned that a spot bitcoin ETF is on the horizon in the U.S. She anticipated that such a development would not only boost cryptocurrency prices but also positively impact the market for non-fungible tokens (NFTs). Echoing this sentiment, Oh Se-hyun from SKT predicted that the approval of a spot bitcoin ETF could unlock access to a $30 trillion market.SKT’s Oh also addressed the complexities surrounding the regulatory landscape for cryptocurrencies. She acknowledged the challenge facing authorities in developing these regulations all at once, highlighting the gradual progress in this area. She cited the outcome of Ripple’s lawsuit in the U.S., which resulted in Ripple’s XRP tokens being classified differently for different investors: as a security for institutional investors but not for retail investors. Additionally, Oh pointed to the upcoming Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) in the European Union, slated for implementation in December 2024. She emphasized that the establishment of such regulatory guidelines brings clarity and reduces uncertainty, which can be reassuring for businesses operating in the crypto space.Providing further insights into this matter, Kim Gap-rae, a senior researcher at the Korea Capital Market Institute (KCMI), spoke about the importance of regulatory clarity in the cryptocurrency sector. He pointed out that it’s more crucial for governments to have clear regulations rather than focusing on the extent of regulation. Understanding new regulatory or legislative trends is essential for governments as they look to develop new infrastructures.According to Kim, a potential spot bitcoin ETF approval in the U.S. could prompt South Korea to consider a similar approval. However, he noted that Korea currently lacks a regulatory framework for Bitcoin custody, which could lead to a competitive environment among crypto companies in the country. Kim believes that a deeper understanding of custodian regulations will enable better adaptation to new types of ETFs and foster their growth in Korea.

news
Markets·

Apr 12, 2023

NVT Ratio Signals Overvalued BTC

NVT Ratio Signals Overvalued BTCThe network value to transaction (NVT) ratio of Bitcoin, which has been staying at a high level since the beginning of the year, has signaled its overvaluation, according to Yonhap Infomax.However, some argue that this will not necessarily lead to a crypto winter, considering that the nature of Bitcoin as an asset has changed and there is no sign of overheating in other indicators.©Pexels/PixabayPrice and NVT ratio correlationYonhap Infomax found out that the correlation between the NVT ratio and the price of Bitcoin over the past six years is -0.35. A value of 1 represents a completely positive correlation, while a value of -1 represents a completely negative correlation.Extending this period to 2010 makes the correlation close to 0, but during the early years, NVT ratios showed high volatility, shooting up to four digits. Such a high volatility doesn’t suggest much correlation. Until 2021, there was a high correlation of up to -0.44.The NVT ratio is calculated by dividing the market cap by the transacted volume. Conceptually, it is similar to the price-to-earnings ratio for the stock market.In 2017, when the crypto market was bullish, the average Bitcoin NVT ratio was 7.3. This number became 8.7 in 2021 when the market experienced a similar pattern. In retrospect, single-digit NVT ratios usually hint at bullish markets.This year so far, Bitcoin has been relatively overvalued, given that the average NVT ratio is 23.6.BTC price recoveryWhen the crypto market sentiment lost its confidence due to the FTX bankruptcy last year, the price of Bitcoin went down to $15,000. It later recovered to the near $30,000 level. The Bitcoin price once had reached an all-time high in 2021, surpassing $65,000.The years that manifested similar patterns as this year were 2018 and 2019. In those years, the Bitcoin NVT ratio plateaued around 20.Uncertain outlookThe NVT ratio itself could point to a possible crypto winter, but researchers say it’s hard to say.Jang Kyung-pil, a research analyst at crypto data platform Xangle, said that people now consider Bitcoin as a store of value rather than a means of transactions, pointing out that BTC’s market value to realized value (MVRV) ratio has hit the bottom at 0.84 and now reached 1.4. According to Jang, MVRV values under 1 indicate undervaluation and those above 3 indicate overvaluation.Jung Seok-moon, head of the research center at crypto exchange Korbit, said that the current NVT ratio signals BTC overvaluation. He added that the Fed is likely to turn dovish in its monetary policy, which would prompt a strong BTC uptrend.

news
Web3 & Enterprise·

Nov 25, 2023

CoinFLEX founder: creditors not to interfere with OPNX

CoinFLEX founder: creditors not to interfere with OPNXMark Lamb, the co-founder of failed crypto derivatives and yield platform CoinFLEX, has asserted that creditors of the company cannot interfere with OPNX, a Seychelles-incorporated company that Lamb has co-founded with Kyle Davies and Su Zhu, the founders of failed Singaporean crypto hedge fund, Three Arrows Capital (3AC).Photo by Chapman Chow on UnsplashFallout following writIt emerged in October that a group of CoinFLEX creditors had filed a writ of summons in the High Court of Hong Kong, claiming that OPNX, a new crypto bankruptcy claims trading platform linked to CoinFLEX, was established using CoinFLEX assets without their consent. While incorporated in the Seychelles, CoinFLEX ran its operations from Hong Kong.The writ alleges that Mark Lamb misappropriated assets, diverted clients and business opportunities and engaged in actions harmful to creditors during his tenure.The creditors argue that Lamb, while serving as CoinFLEX’s CEO, simultaneously devoted time and effort to setting up OPNX, contrary to his responsibilities. The allegations include diverting assets, falsely representing OPNX’s association with CoinFLEX creditors, disclosing confidential trade secrets and soliciting employees to move to OPNX.The legal action — filed by two companies, Liquidity Technologies and Liquidity Technologies Software — claims that OPNX’s formation was unauthorized and harmful to CoinFLEX creditors. Despite CoinFLEX’s terms of service requiring dispute resolution through arbitration in Hong Kong, the allegations have not been proven in the High Court of Hong Kong.Lamb addresses ‘Twitter FUD’In response to these creditor actions, earlier this week, Lamb took to X (formerly Twitter) to address what he termed as “Twitter FUD.” Lamb wrote:“The Hong Kong court ruled that the few CoinFLEX creditors behind recent ‘FUD’ must not disrupt or interfere with OPNX in any way — and their legal counsel has subsequently stopped representing them.”Lamb added that he hoped that CoinFLEX’s 4,800 creditors would choose the path that he has proposed on the basis that it “maximizes value.”OPNX has defended its position, emphasizing that it provided an opportunity for creditors to sell their claims on the exchange for quick cash, benefiting them. Davies and Zhu have pledged to donate their share of the profit to 3AC creditors.In February, OPNX CEO Leslie Lamb, Mark Lamb’s wife, announced the rebranding of CoinFLEX to Open Exchange (OPNX). However, the writ of summons claims that OPNX is a separate entity not authorized by CoinFLEX creditors. Leslie Lamb followed up in April by claiming backing from well-known entities in crypto venture capital, only for many of those mentioned to immediately refute such claims.The dispute has also implicated Roger Ver, a well-known character in the crypto space otherwise referred to as “Bitcoin Jesus.” Ver, a significant individual customer, was accused of defaulting by CoinFLEX. Ver denied defaulting and claimed that CoinFLEX used his trading positions against him, leading to a court-ordered arbitration.OPNX, since its launch in April, has obtained a Lithuanian license for spot trading in the EU and currently processes substantial daily trading volumes. Criminal and civil proceedings against OPNX co-founders Davies and Zhu are ongoing. The situation remains fluid as the legal dispute unfolds.

news
Loading