Japan’s Mt.Gox to commence creditor repayments shortly

A Korean Lawmaker’s Crypto Holdings Worth $4.5M Spark ControversySouth Korean lawmaker Kim Nam-kuk, a member of the opposition party Democratic Party of Korea (DPK), has recently come under scrutiny due to his reported possession of 800,000 WEMIX tokens from January to February last year, as reported by the Maeil Business Newspaper. These tokens were worth approximately 6 billion KRW or $4.5 million at the time. While Korean lawmakers are obligated to disclose their wealth, virtual assets are an exception. The disclosure of Kim’s ownership of these tokens has ignited controversy, as it unveiled a wealth magnitude significantly greater than previously understood.Photo by Karolina Grabowska on PexelsTravel Rule regulationA central issue in the unfolding dispute is the source of Kim’s investment in the WEMIX tokens. It has been reported that he purchased a significant amount of these tokens between January and February last year and withdrew the entire sum between February and March before the crypto exchange implemented measures to comply with the Travel Rule regulation. This rule requires that financial authorities be informed of transactions over 10 million KRW ($7,500). After the crypto exchange reported the transactions to the Financial Intelligence Unit of the Financial Services Commission, the government agency requested a warrant to search Kim’s account due to the transactions’ abnormality. However, the court dismissed the request.Jeonse deposit to LG Display sharesIn response to the controversy, Kim took to a YouTube channel on Tuesday to explain his WEMIX token investments. He stated that he had retrieved 600 million KRW ($450,000) after his jeonse contract expired and used the money to purchase LG Display shares. Jeonse a housing rental system in Korea where tenants put up a lump-sum refundable deposit on a rental space for a two-year stay. Kim claims that these LG Display shares later rose in value to 985.7 million KRW ($744,000) in January 2021 and that he used this sum to purchase the tokens.Account balance and WEMIX tokensDespite his explanation, there are still questions surrounding Kim’s sudden increase in his bank account balance. His account balance reportedly increased from 100 million KRW ($76,000) at the end of 2020 to 1.12 billion KRW ($850,000) by the end of 2021, which raised suspicions. If Kim had directed all the money withdrawn from the LG Display shares to WEMIX tokens, it is unclear where the additional $774,000 in his account came from. Kim has reportedly explained to his party’s leadership that he retrieved the principal amount of his investment due to the increase in the WEMIX token price. However, this explanation has not satisfied some critics.Insufficient explanationIn an attempt to address these concerns, Kim shared part of his bank transaction records on Monday. However, this disclosure has fallen short of addressing all the questions that have been raised, such as the precise amount invested in the tokens and their purchase prices. There is still significant public scrutiny and skepticism surrounding Kim’s explanation for his crypto holdings, and it remains to be seen if further disclosures will be made.Kim apologized to the Korean public via Facebook for any disappointment caused, especially amid challenging economic conditions. However, he denied accusations of using undisclosed information or unlawfully acquiring wealth. Kim maintained that all transactions were transparently made using only his own wallets through his real-name bank accounts.Potential insider trading and conflict of interestNevertheless, the public’s acceptance of his explanation is yet to be seen, as questions about his $4.5 million virtual assets persist, particularly given his reported total wealth of around $1.1 million. There are concerns surrounding the possibility of insider trading. Furthermore, Kim’s participation in proposing a bill to defer tax implementation on digital assets has triggered suspicions of a potential conflict of interest.Call for an impartial third partyRecent updates indicate that the prosecution is considering requesting a warrant against Kim in relation to the controversy surrounding his crypto holdings. The Anti-Corruption and Civil Rights Commission is also examining if his participation in proposing the bill constitutes a conflict of interest. It is evident that an impartial third party will need to investigate and analyze all relevant information to resolve this dispute. Until a thorough and unbiased investigation takes place, the public’s concerns and questions are likely to continue.

Bybit Overhauls Institutional Trading Platform Bybit InstitutionalDubai-headquartered crypto exchange Bybit has announced the launch of its newly revamped institutional trading platform, Bybit Institutional.Bybit outlined details of the refreshed product offering which the company hopes will provide institutional clients with an elevated trading experience, via a blog post published to its website on Wednesday.The revamped Bybit Institutional platform claims to have introduced a host of new features that it hopes will distinguish it from competitor offerings:Photo by Gerd Altmann on PixabayLiquidityThe platform claims to be one of the largest in terms of open interest for crypto derivatives trading. This position allows for high trading volumes, creating frequent opportunities for clients to enter and exit positions. This heightened trading activity allows clients to execute orders without causing significant market price fluctuations.Asset safetyFollowing the spectacular failure of a number of crypto platforms in 2022, a lot of emphasis is being placed on client asset safety in 2023. Proof of reserve audits has been adopted by some platforms as a direct response to these failures. Bybit Institutional is offering that fail-safe in an effort to demonstrate that it maintains cryptocurrency reserves to cover all client holdings.Between routine audits, the use of robust security frameworks, multi-factor authentication, encryption, and other measures, the platform feels that it is prioritizing the security of client assets. Moreover, clients are also offered the option to utilize third-party custodial services for off-exchange settlement of trades and long-term asset storage.Fee structure optimizationThe platform is offering a fee structure that it claims to have tailored to maximize cost-efficiency for institutional traders. A customized fee schedule has been incorporated, based on trading volumes and strategies, and aimed at supporting institutions’ objectives of reducing trading costs while optimizing their returns.Eugene Cheung, Vice President and Head of Bybit Institutional, expressed his enthusiasm for the platform’s refreshed product offering, stating:“We are thrilled to introduce the new Bybit Institutional page, designed to cater specifically to the needs of our institutional clients. With our deep liquidity, commitment to asset safety, and cost-efficient fee structure, we aim to provide a seamless trading experience for institutions of all sizes.”Bybit Institutional has partnered with significant players within the industry in bringing its offering to market, such as Fireblocks, Copper, and Circle.Blockchain LifeThe United Arab Emirates-based exchange is also a participant in next week’s Blockchain Life 2023 event in Dubai, the 11th international forum on cryptocurrencies, blockchain, and mining. Cheung will participate as one of the panelists at the event on October 24. Titled “Crypto Market Outlook: Insights and Forecasts From Top Crypto Exchanges,” the panel of industry experts will delve into the current crypto landscape, emerging trends, and future forecasts.Bybit’s launch of the enhanced Bybit Institutional trading platform is indicative of the interest that exists between a range of market participants in cornering institutional business. UK bank Standard Chartered, through its Singapore-based subsidiary Standard Chartered Ventures and portfolio companies Zodia Custody and Zodia Markets, is also making a concerted effort to muscle in on this market segment.

True Potential of Asian Crypto ETFs Yet to Be RealizedA recently published report by Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Ltd. (HKEX), the Hong Kong stock exchange, has found that crypto exchange traded funds (ETFs) have the potential to play a significant part in unlocking the next phase of digital asset expansion in Asia.©Pexels/Burak The WeekenderThe report, titled “Crypto ETF: Key to unlocking the next phase of digital asset growth in Asia,” highlights how crypto ETFs could attract more institutional investors and lead to increased liquidity in the digital asset market. Furthermore, HKEX claims that the ETF investment mechanism can play its part in offering a more regulated and safe manner through which investors can gain exposure to digital assets.Regulatory progressWhile the report cites an Asian regulatory environment that is becoming increasingly more supportive of digital assets of late, it still identifies a need for further progress to be made to improve the level of regulatory clarity and to provide a truly standardized approach to digital assets. That, it says, will result in crypto ETFs becoming more accessible, offering a diversified way in which the investor can access and gain exposure to digital assets in Asia.Nonetheless, HKEX applauds the work done thus far by regulatory authorities in Hong Kong and Singapore, where regulatory frameworks relative to crypto ETFs have been implemented. Those are measures that the Hong Kong stock exchange believes will increase investor confidence, and in turn, bring about further adoption of digital assets.Modest daily trading volumeBetween December 16 and February 7 the two Bitcoin ETFs and one Ether ETF listed on the Hong Kong stock exchange achieved a daily trading volume of $1.19 million. That’s rather underwhelming when compared with the $3 billion in daily volume being achieved by the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME) relative to its Bitcoin and Ether futures ETF in the United States. On the New York stock exchange ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF achieves a daily average trading volume of $196 million.These findings are a bit counter-intuitive given the contrasting regulatory approaches in the two territories. In the US, regulators have failed to approve a physically settled Bitcoin ETF. Furthermore, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has denied the attempts of Grayscale Bitcoin Investment Trust (GBTC) to convert the Bitcoin fund into an ETF. Meanwhile, Hong Kong has much more regulatory clarity but yet trading volume in crypto-related ETFs remains minuscule by comparison with the United States.Despite that, the report remains upbeat with regard to what can be achieved in the market with crypto-related ETFs. It makes a case for crypto ETFs as a means for traditional financial institutions to enter the digital assets market with relative ease. Similarly, it sees a role for global stock exchanges in facilitating future growth of crypto-related ETFs and in developing new ETF products that could unlock access to specific digital assets or bespoke investment strategies.