Matrixport forecasts SEC bitcoin ETF rejection

GameFi-Oriented MARBLEX Decides to Burn 670M MBX TokensMARBLEX, the blockchain subsidiary of South Korean gaming company Netmarble, is going to burn 670 million of its native token MBX on July 19, according to a press release. This move is part of MARBLEX’s plan to overhaul the MBX tokenomics, which was announced last month.This token burn event involves the elimination of 67% of the total distribution of 1 billion MBX tokens. The tokens earmarked for burning have no designated purpose.Photo by Cullan Smith on Unsplash99% support for burning tokensTo determine the fate of these tokens, MARBLEX conducted a voting process from July 4 to 10, allowing Marbleship NFT holders and MBX token holders to participate. The outcome of the vote revealed that 99% of the participants supported burning the tokens.In preparation for the token burn, MARBLEX plans to share information about the event on cryptocurrency data tracking websites CoinMarketCap and Xangle.Moving forward, MARBLEX intends to introduce an improved token burn policy in the second half of this year. The revision of its tokenomics will enhance the utility of the MBX token, contributing to the establishment of a sustainable and trustworthy ecosystem.MBX token usesAccording to CoinMarketCap, the MBX token is traded on centralized exchanges Bithumb, Huobi, Bybit, Gate.io, MEXC, and Indodax, as well as on the decentralized exchange KLAYswap. Token holders can use MBX to buy items in marketplaces, trade MBX for in-game tokens, and exchange MBX with other game players. Notable MBX games include A3: Still Alive, a battle royale MMORPG; Ni no Kuni: Cross Worlds, a fantasy MMORPG; The King of Fighters ARENA, a fighting game; and Meta World: My City, a Web3 property management game.

Mosca, a cash-to-crypto exchange headquartered at the Moscow International Business Center, was subject to a raid carried out by the Russian authorities on April 23. The raid occurred in the immediate aftermath of a call from a member of the commission of the Public Chamber (OP) of the Russian Federation to ban crypto exchanges from facilitating the purchase of cryptocurrencies using cash.Photo by Egor Filin on UnsplashInvestigating fraudWhile attending the Blockchain Life 2025 event in Moscow, Mosca’s Head of Development, Dmitry Titarenko, confirmed to Cointelegraph that the rationale provided for the raid was that it was in connection with fraud perpetrated by one of its platform users. Titarenko added: “Law enforcement agencies have carried out a standard procedure of checking our customer data.” The raid occurred during the company’s attendance at the Blockchain Life conference. Mosca was a key conference participant, having established two stands at the event and winning an award for the best crypto exchange service. Reporting on the raid, local media outlet Baza said that it had been carried out in relation to fraud perpetrated against the former head of the Samara Region Development Corporation, Olga Serova. It explained that Serova had been conned into handing over 350 million rubles ($4.24 million) and $800,000 to the scammers.  Seven arrestsShe withdrew these funds from her bank at the end of last year, despite bank officials having tried to persuade her against the withdrawal for this purpose. The news outlet added that to date, seven people have been arrested in connection with the alleged fraud. The Mosca exchange service may be proving to be attractive to scammers as the platform allows users to buy up to 100,000 USDT per day using cash. Titarenko couldn’t confirm that the raid was carried out in connection with the Serova fraud case. He said that “maybe it was [in relation to] another client.”The exchange executive also confirmed that the company had been in the process of putting in place more resources to carry out anti-money laundering (AML) and know-your-customer (KYC) checks, together with a blacklisting system related to suspicious platform users. Cash-to-crypto ban proposalThe raid occurred within 24 hours of Yevgeny Masharov, a member of the commission of the Public Chamber (OP) of the Russian Federation, putting forward a proposal to ban crypto exchanges from receiving cash, making services like Mosca’s cash-to-crypto exchange illegal. According to state-owned Russian news agency TASS, Masharov said that such a move would “cause a large-scale blow to scammers, because it’s no secret that telephone scammers use crypto exchangers to withdraw cash.”Sergey Mendeleev, a well-known figure within crypto circles in Russia, told attendees at the Blockchain Life conference that such a cash-to-crypto ban would be an unwelcome development for the sector. If such a ban were to materialize, Mendeleev suggested that it would be an indication that the Russian authorities were turning away from the greater development of cryptocurrency in Russia. Last week, it emerged that Russia’s Ministry of Finance, in collaboration with the country’s central bank, plans to launch a crypto exchange for qualified investors. The central bank also confirmed plans to launch a digital ruble payment network in 2026.

India’s judiciary turns down plea to formulate a crypto regulatory frameworkThe Indian courts have declined a consideration targeting the establishment of a regulatory framework for cryptocurrency trading, following a plea which had been brought to court by a petitioner.Photo by Naveed Ahmed on UnsplashBeyond the court’s purviewIndia’s Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice Chandrachud, recently confronted a petition urging the establishment of a regulatory framework for cryptocurrency trading. According to a local media report, the bench, which included Justices JD Pardiwala and Manoj Misra, dismissed the plea, emphasizing that the demands presented were legislative and thus beyond the court’s direct action purview. This decision points to the judiciary’s recognition of its constraints in crafting laws, particularly in intricate domains like cryptocurrency.The petitioner, Manu Prashant Wig, a former director at Blue Fox Motion Picture Limited currently in custody due to allegations of cryptocurrency fraud, sought relief through a public interest litigation (PIL) for crypto trading regulations in India.The Economic Offence Wing (EOW) of the Delhi Police accused Wig in 2020 of deceiving investors with promises of high returns from crypto investments, involving 133 reported victims of the scheme. Despite this, during the hearing, the Supreme Court advised Wig to pursue legal remedies through appropriate channels, specifically for bail, underlining its inability to issue directives under Article 32 of the Constitution for legislative matters.Judiciary criticize governmentWhile the judiciary has found that it cannot act itself in putting in place a crypto regulatory framework, the Supreme Court has been critical of the government’s inaction on the matter. In July, India’s highest court criticized the Indian government for its failure to establish clear cryptocurrency regulations.Interestingly, while the government hasn’t acted locally, it has been making efforts to drive regulation at an international level instead. The status of cryptocurrency trading in India remains uncertain, with the country developing a regulatory framework influenced by recommendations from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the Financial Stability Board (FSB), potentially leading to legal legislation within the next several months.Prime Minister Modi called on authorities internationally to establish a worldwide regulatory framework. At the recent G20 summit, it appears that member states did reach agreement on such a framework.The Supreme Court’s dismissal of the PIL marks a clear distinction between judicial and legislative responsibilities. As India moves closer to formulating a comprehensive crypto regulatory framework, this decision reinforces the imperative for legislative action to address mounting concerns and interests in the crypto market.Awaiting legislative actionThe outcome of these developments is keenly awaited by investors, legal experts and the crypto community, poised to shape the future landscape of cryptocurrency trading in India. The decision signifies the judiciary’s acknowledgment of its limitations and highlights the necessity for a legislative approach to effectively navigate the intricate landscape of cryptocurrency regulation.In this evolving scenario, the verdict amplifies the importance of a well-defined regulatory framework. As the world’s most populous country grapples with the delicate task of balancing innovation and investor protection, the Supreme Court’s decision places the ball firmly in the legislative court.