GRVT snags license to become world’s first regulated DEX

South Korea’s central bank, the Bank of Korea (BOK), plans to begin testing peer-to-peer (P2P) transactions with its central bank digital currency (CBDC) in October, according to the Seoul Economic Daily. This will mark the second phase of its ongoing CBDC pilot, Project Hangang, which currently allows 100,000 citizens to use digital tokens for payments at both online and offline stores. In the fourth quarter, the pilot will also introduce voucher programs enabling local governments to distribute welfare benefits.Photo by Mathew Schwartz on UnsplashSandbox deadline pressureThe BOK originally planned to gather feedback from participants in the first phase and refine the system before proceeding. However, the central bank decided to speed up the timeline, as the broader project is operating under a regulatory sandbox program that provides two years of regulatory flexibility. A BOK official noted, “Since the current test ends in June, we can’t wait too long to move forward. Also, the fourth quarter timeline is still tentative.” While the BOK focuses on its CBDC, Korean commercial banks are accelerating efforts to develop stablecoin infrastructure and launch related pilot projects, Edaily reported. These initiatives reflect growing expectations that stablecoins will become a key tool for cross-border payments. Banks see this as an opportunity to attract new customers and earn fees from crypto exchanges by facilitating stablecoin transfers through their own networks. One example is Project Pax, a joint initiative involving Shinhan Bank, Nonghyup Bank and Kbank, which is testing stablecoin transfers between South Korea and Japan. Led by Japan’s digital asset platform Progmat, along with Korea’s Fair Square Lab and Korea Digital Asset Custody, the project enables Korean banks to send won-based stablecoins to Japanese financial institutions and receive yen-pegged stablecoins in return. Rising stablecoin useAn executive at a local bank expressed concern that South Korea is falling behind in stablecoin adoption. He predicted faster uptake, noting that consumers can save time and money by avoiding traditional foreign exchange processes. He also cautioned that, without action, the private sector could take the lead in building cross-border payment networks, bypassing the traditional SWIFT system. Another banker urged financial authorities to establish clear regulations for stablecoins, stressing the need for oversight as stablecoins are increasingly used to move foreign currencies out of Korea. Contrasting perspectivesHowever, BOK Governor Rhee Chang-yong remains skeptical of stablecoins, arguing that CBDCs offer far greater transparency. He pointed to the volatility of unregulated stablecoins and warned that their widespread use—especially if issued by private financial institutions—could undermine the central bank’s role as the sole issuer of legal tender. That said, financial authorities appear to be exploring a regulatory framework where CBDCs and stablecoins can coexist. Sharing his personal view, one official noted that while the future of stablecoins is uncertain, it’s important to remain open to various possibilities. He added that agencies are also reviewing recent changes in U.S. federal law, along with regulations in Japan and the EU. 

While cryptocurrencies may be banned in China, crypto trading activity continues in some corners, nonetheless, sometimes through accessing overseas exchanges. With that, authorities recently uncovered a massive underground banking operation that exploited crypto trading platforms to evade local forex regulations.Photo by Manuel Joseph on Pexels$2.2 billion laundering operationOn Sunday, an account on popular Chinese social media platform WeChat run by China’s State Administration of Foreign Exchange (SAFE) published details of the $2.2 billion laundering operation bust. Xu Xiao, the Inspector at the Qingdao Branch of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, revealed that the scheme involved underground banks who purchased virtual currencies and then sold the virtual currencies through overseas trading platforms to obtain the foreign currency they needed. This process, he explained, completes the conversion of yuan and foreign currencies, constituting the illegal act of buying and selling foreign exchange. Stringent capital controlsChina enforces stringent rules on money transfers outside the country. Citizens are limited to exchanging up to $50,000 in foreign currency and require a permit for transactions beyond that limit. Any transaction exceeding the limit without a permit is considered money laundering. During a recent investigation, authorities seized cryptocurrencies valued at approximately $28,000 in Tether, Litecoin and other digital currencies. However, the operation is estimated to have facilitated the movement of over $2.2 billion, involving more than a thousand bank accounts across 17 provinces and municipalities. Monetary control loopholesChina, once the largest cryptocurrency market, imposed a comprehensive ban on crypto exchanges in September 2017 and subsequently expanded its restrictions to include crypto mining and trading. Despite these measures, reports have surfaced about underground crypto exchange operations. Earlier this year, an investigative report by the Wall Street Journal found that global exchange Binance continues to do thriving business with Chinese customers. Global crypto exchanges are reportedly still onboarding Chinese clients indirectly. The South China Morning Post (SCMP) recently accused Binance of facilitating Chinese crypto trading accounts by falsely claiming they are from Taiwan. While mainland China adopts a hostile stance towards cryptocurrencies, the special administrative region of Hong Kong remains progressive in the sector. Hong Kong’s regulatory authorities have introduced specific rules for cryptocurrencies and are licensing crypto exchanges operating within the jurisdiction. Arthur Hayes, the co-founder of the BitMEX crypto derivatives platform, recently described Hong Kong as the gateway for mainland China to global capital markets. Hayes asserted that wealthy Chinese individuals all bank in Hong Kong and with that, they all have access to crypto exchanges and brokers. In Cambodia, it is understood that illicit Chinese-linked activities oftentimes implicate the use of U.S. dollar stablecoin Tether (USDT) to move funds in and out of China even though Tether is banned in Cambodia. The latest crackdown in China underscores the ongoing challenges faced by authorities in controlling crypto-related activities, highlighting the dynamic nature of such activity within and adjacent to mainland China. As regulatory scrutiny intensifies, the contrast between mainland China’s approach and Hong Kong’s more open stance toward cryptocurrencies becomes increasingly evident. 

Korea’s FSS to Collect Public Comments on Financial Statement Guidelines for Virtual Asset EntitiesThe South Korean Financial Supervisory Service (FSS) has revealed a set of exemplary financial statements aimed at clarifying the disclosure requirements of virtual asset-related entities. These guidelines have been designed to align with the Korean version of International Financial Reporting Standards (K-IFRS), which was established by the Korea Accounting Institute (KAI).It was reported earlier this month that the Financial Services Commission (FSC) brought forward these regulations to tackle accounting uncertainties within the blockchain industry.The main goal of these exemplary guidelines is to help entities provide financial statement readers with essential information regarding virtual assets. This includes details about the reserve amount held by virtual asset issuers and information about the virtual assets held by virtual asset service providers (VASPs).Photo by Kelly Sikkema on UnsplashPresentation sessionsTo ensure effective dissemination and understanding of these guidelines, the FSS, KAI, and the Korean Institute of Certified Public Accountants (KICPA) have planned presentation sessions. These sessions will take place from July 26 to August 11, which will involve visits to VASPs, listed companies, and accounting firms. Valuable feedback and suggestions from these stakeholders are anticipated, as the events encourage open two-way communication and welcome participation from anyone interested.Discussion meetingsTo further refine the ideas put forward during the presentation sessions, two separate discussion meetings with experts are scheduled for September and October. The recommendations gathered from the industry will undergo a careful review by experts and be thoughtfully incorporated into the guidelines.The FSS will finalize the guidelines in cooperation with the FSC, and the Securities and Futures Commission under the FSC will review them and give approval for their implementation. This is expected to take place between October and November.The FSC has stated that these exemplary guidelines are currently in their preliminary stage and open to potential changes during the public comment period. Additionally, companies have the flexibility to make necessary adjustments to these practice guidelines to suit their specific needs and requirements.Issuers, holders, exchangesThe exemplary practice guidelines are specifically targeted at three types of entities: virtual asset issuers, virtual asset holders, and virtual asset trading exchanges.For virtual asset issuers, providing essential information about their virtual assets is a key requirement. This information should encompass their business models, accounting policies, obligations (e.g. whitepapers), and the current status of their projects. Such details should be disclosed in the annotations of their financial statements. Furthermore, revenue generated from the sales of virtual assets must be recognized, and any changes to their obligations should be duly noted. Moreover, disclosure of the reserved amount of issued virtual assets and their intended usage plan is mandatory.Companies holding virtual assets must provide information regarding accounting policies, the total value of assets held, the reasons behind their holdings, and any gains or losses incurred. Additionally, holders are obligated to disclose risks associated with virtual assets and their potential impact.Virtual asset trading platforms, such as exchanges, are mandated to disclose not only their own virtual asset holdings but also those held on behalf of their customers. This disclosure should encompass detailed information about their accounting policies, the total value of assets under their custody, associated risks, and the involvement of third-party custodians. In particular, the platforms must indicate whether they treat customer assets under their custody as assets or liabilities and provide a clear rationale for such classification in the annotations of their financial statements.