HashKey & Bosera launch world’s first tokenized money market ETFs

China’s Jiangsu Province Integrates Digital Yuan Into Education SystemChina has taken a raft of measures to try to build momentum in its digital currency, the digital yuan or e-CNY, with the latest step being an expansion into the education system in Jiangsu Province.Photo by Kimberly Farmer on UnsplashChina’s digital yuan is a legal tender fully backed by the People’s Bank of China (PBOC) and pegged to the renminbi. Unlike most cryptocurrencies, it is not decentralized or anonymous but is monitored by the PBOC. While adoption has been slow, China has been first off the blocks in developing a central bank digital currency (CBDC) to the point of some level of active use by comparison with its international peers.Enforcing a payments use caseJiangsu Province will attempt to establish the use of the digital yuan in its education system by the end of 2025, according to the Jiangsu Education Department. By the end of the year, students studying within the province are likely to be paying tuition fees using the digital currency. The pilot plan that Jiangsu administrators within the province’s Education Department have put together also aims to establish a means through which examination registration fees will be paid in digital yuan, while scholarships will be received in the digital currency.Zhou Maohua, a researcher with Beijing-headquartered Everbright Bank, told China Daily that it is imperative that more users are registered and go on to actively use the digital yuan to further its development.“The establishment of infrastructure for the digital yuan should be further accelerated,” said Maohua. “Its software and hardware must be upgraded to improve user experience. The security and reliability of the system must also be strengthened,” he added.Over the course of the past three months, four million digital yuan accounts have been opened by ordinary citizens within Jiangsu Province. Total e-CNY transactions have reached a level in excess of 200 billion yuan ($29 billion).Multiple initiativesIn April, the administrators of the city of Changshu, which is situated within Jiangsu Province, announced that it was gearing up to commence paying state employees within the city in digital yuan. Around the same time, officials within the city of Xuzhou, also located within Jiangsu Province, announced that they were in the process of publishing a pilot scheme which will set out a means for promoting China’s e-CNY digital currency.If that was enough in proving Jiangsu’s commitment to furthering the development of the e-CNY, another Jiangsu Province city, Suzhou, was one of the first locations in China to run a digital yuan pilot scheme in April 2020.Earlier this month, it was revealed that the French international banking group, BNP Paribas, had partnered with the BOC in enabling an initiative to promote the use of the digital yuan among its corporate clients.China is working with other countries on a Multiple CBDC Bridge project to explore the feasibility of cross-border fund transfers among different currencies. Launching its own CBDC for cross-border transfers may allow China to reduce its reliance on the US dollar and increase its influence over global trade and monetary policy.

Kbank’s Upbit Customer Deposits Total $2.2BKbank, an internet-only bank in South Korea, is facing criticism due to its relatively high proportion of cryptocurrency customer deposits compared to other banks. Kbank reportedly manages approximately KRW 3 trillion (equivalent to $2.2 billion) in deposits from customers of cryptocurrency exchange Upbit, which accounts for about 18% of its total customer deposits.This percentage stands out, being notably higher than other banks that provide accounts to the other four crypto-to-fiat exchanges in Korea. That is according to a report by Maeil Business Newspaper, which obtained documents submitted to lawmaker Kim Hee-gon by the Financial Services Commission (FSC).According to Korean law, crypto exchanges must secure real-name bank accounts from banks to offer crypto trading services against the Korean won. Kbank offers its accounts to Upbit, the dominant player in the Korean crypto market.Photo by David McBee on PexelsNotable exposure to crypto exchangeThe FSC documents showed that Kbank’s Upbit customer deposits totaled KRW 3.09 trillion, making up 18% of its total deposits, which amount to KRW 17.2 trillion.In a striking contrast, Nonghyup Bank had 0.2% of its deposits, equivalent to KRW 557.8 billion, in Bithumb, which is the nation’s second-largest cryptocurrency exchange. Kakaobank, another internet-only bank, had 0.3% (KRW 112.2 billion) of its deposits in Coinone. Shinhan Bank held 0.01% (KRW 43 billion) in Korbit, and Jeonbuk Bank had a similarly small 0.02% (KRW 4.2 billion) in Gopax.Lawmaker Kim pointed out that Kbank has become a bank dedicated to crypto trading. Kim proposed that financial authorities take proactive measures to assess the potential risks that may emerge when Kbank utilizes Upbit customer deposits as a basis for offering credit loans. Such risky financial practices could potentially result in higher loan defaults and the emergence of a greater number of individuals with poor credit histories, which could ultimately jeopardize the stability of the financial market.Regulatory gapThe current Financial Transaction Reporting Act mandates that virtual asset service providers (VASPs) segregate customer deposits from their own assets as a measure to combat money laundering. However, it has been noted that there are regulatory gaps stemming from the absence of specific guidelines for the custody of these deposits.According to the Financial Supervisory Service (FSS), Nonghyup and Kakaobank store deposits in separate accounts within the bank. On the other hand, Kbank and Jeonbuk Bank keep deposits in corporate accounts under their respective exchange partners’ names.When deposits are stored in separate accounts within the bank, only the bank has access to those funds, and they are essentially operated in a manner similar to a trust, preventing the bank from using the funds arbitrarily. In contrast, funds held in corporate accounts can be used by the bank as a source for lending. Lawmaker Kim warned that in scenarios such as exchange bankruptcies or similar situations, banks holding customer funds in corporate accounts could face difficulties in ensuring customer protection.Each of these banks receives reserve funds from crypto exchanges in anticipation of potential compensation requirements in the event of unforeseen losses. The FSS states that as of the end of last month, the reserve amounts held by each bank were as follows: Kbank had KRW 200 billion, Nonghyup Bank had KRW 100 billion, Kakao Bank had KRW 73 billion, and both Shinhan Bank and Jeonbuk Bank had KRW 30 billion.Kbank’s Upbit customer deposits are approximately 72 times larger than Shinhan Bank’s Korbit customer deposits. However, the reserve amounts held by Kbank are only 6.7 times greater than those held by Shinhan. Lawmaker Kim emphasized the importance of banks maintaining reserve funds that are proportional to the customer deposits held in their partner crypto exchanges.Signs of recoveryMeanwhile, the Korean cryptocurrency industry, which faced a downturn in the latter half of last year due to events like the Terra collapse and FTX’s bankruptcy, has exhibited signs of recovery in the first half of this year.The Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) of the FSC recently reported that the cryptocurrency market cap in South Korea has reached KRW 28.4 trillion as of the end of June this year. This reflects a 46% increase compared to the end of last year when it stood at KRW 19.4 trillion. Additionally, the total operating profit of domestic exchanges surged by 82% to KRW 227.3 billion over the past six months, compared to the previous figure of KRW 124.9 billion.The total market’s max drawdown (MDD) was 62%. MDD assesses the extent to which an asset has declined in value from its highest point to its lowest point within a specific time frame, before experiencing a recovery. The FIU considers this MDD to be high, urging investor caution.

The crypto space continues to suffer a disproportionate share of hacks and scams that were further exacerbated on Wednesday, with Malaysian crypto data aggregator the latest to succumb to a security breach. Serving as yet another stark reminder of the persistent threats plaguing the sector, a phishing scam targeted CoinGecko's X account, leading to a brief compromise that raised concerns about the safety of user information.Photo by GuerrillaBuzz on UnsplashPhishing scamDuring this incident, hackers posted a phishing link on CoinGecko's X account, falsely advertising a token airdrop for a cryptocurrency named GCKO. The deceptive post claimed that GCKO could be used for API services, including the cryptocurrency ANKR. Swift action by CoinGecko involved the removal of the fraudulent post and a public warning urging users to avoid interacting with any suspicious links or content. In an X post, CoinGecko wrote:”Our Twitter accounts @CoinGecko and @GeckoTerminal have been compromised. We're taking immediate steps to investigate the situation and secure our accounts. Please DO NOT click on any links or engage with suspicious content. Your security is our top priority.” Employee errorThe firm followed up with an update on Thursday, attributing the breach to a team member inadvertently clicking on a fraudulent Calendly link, granting unauthorized access to the hacker. Despite having two-factor authentication (2FA) enabled and employing robust security measures, CoinGecko emphasized that the inadvertent click allowed unauthorized access. The compromised accounts were then exploited to disseminate misleading information and potentially engage in malicious activities. CoinGecko expressed sincere apologies for any confusion or inconvenience caused by the incident. The company reiterated its commitment to platform security and continuous improvement of internal controls, assuring users that corrective measures were promptly implemented. SEC incompetenceCoinGecko's security incident occurred within 24 hours of a similar occurrence involving the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The SEC's X account was compromised, with scammers posting a false message from Chair Gary Gensler about the approval of spot bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs). While CoinGecko identified a vulnerability in its security regimen, the SEC later confirmed that the breach in its case was far more basic. It was not due to infrastructure attacks but rather the lack of 2-factor authentication (2FA) tied to the SEC's account, the most basic form of operations security. Gensler and the SEC have come in for major criticism from the crypto community in the U.S. due to a policy of regulation by enforcement that has been pursued. With that, the Commission came in for swift and harsh criticism in the immediate aftermath of its X account hack. Many pointed out the irony of Gensler advising consumers to secure their accounts back in October when the SEC itself had failed to do so. Others queried who would be responsible for what some interpreted as an episode of market manipulation, something that the SEC has perennially associated the crypto markets with. During the time that the account was compromised, millions of dollars of value were liquidated in short and long trading positions. CoinGecko's quick response serves as a valuable lesson in the importance of vigilance and proactive security measures amid the growing threats facing the cryptocurrency community.