Hodlnaut to proceed to liquidation

Incheon City to leverage blockchain for construction transparencyIn response to growing concerns among Koreans over recent apartment complexes built with missing reinforcing bars and unauthorized materials, the city of Incheon is turning to blockchain technology to tackle these issues.Incheon City revealed on Thursday (local time) that it has submitted proposals for public sector blockchain projects offered by the Ministry of Science and ICT. This move aligns with the city’s goal of establishing itself as a blockchain hub. By partnering with both the public and private sectors, the city aims to provide beneficial services for its citizens.This year, the Ministry of Science and ICT will gauge interest across government agencies, municipalities and public institutions for six projects, with a combined budget of KRW 10 billion ($7.5 million). In 2024, they plan to select project implementers through a bidding process. The goal is to identify public service projects where the application of blockchain technology can offer significant benefits.Photo by C Dustin on UnsplashBlockchain-driven construction oversightIn October, Incheon submitted proposals for two blockchain projects. First, it introduced a “safety certification” service to promote transparency at construction sites. This service will harness blockchain-driven integrated control technology to transparently manage apartment complex constructions. It will utilize technologies like closed-circuit television (CCTV), Internet of Things (IoT) sensors and artificial intelligence (AI) to oversee the presence of authorized personnel and track the use of approved materials.The city felt the need for this service after observing the prevalent issues with missing reinforcing bars in newly constructed flat-plate structure apartment complexes and incidents of forgery and counterfeiting of material certificates.Blockchain and eco-friendly membershipAnother project Incheon has proposed is an integrated membership service centered on eco-friendly practices, with the goal of encouraging resource recycling.Incheon City currently runs recycling shops and automated recycling machines across its counties and districts to foster recycling habits. However, with different locations necessitating different apps, the city is aiming to consolidate these into a single platform. Additionally, it intends to leverage blockchain technology to enable citizens to verify their environmental contributions.Lee Nam-joo, Head of Incheon’s Future Industry Bureau, said that how technology should be used is self-evident. He emphasized the city’s dedication to introducing tangible services that address societal challenges and enhance public safety and convenience through the application of digital technology in public services and industrial sites.

Hong Kong’s SFC Issues Warning Against Unlicensed Crypto PlatformsIn a move to safeguard its financial ecosystem, the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) issued a stern warning recently, cautioning against the activities of unlicensed cryptocurrency exchanges involved in what it termed “improper practices.”In a statement published to its website on Monday, the regulatory authority underscored the gravity of engaging in unlicensed operations within the crypto trading sphere, categorizing such activities as a “criminal offense” under Hong Kong jurisdiction.Photo by Chi Hung Wong on UnsplashDeceptive tacticsFurthermore, the SFC exposed the deceptive tactics employed by certain unlicensed crypto trading platforms, which misleadingly assert that they have submitted license applications to the commission. The reality, however, is quite the opposite, as these platforms remain unregulated.The warning coincides with the SFC's ongoing establishment of a novel regulatory framework for overseeing retail crypto trading. Notably, the SFC made it clear that applicants who fail to adhere to pertinent regulations might find themselves ineligible for licensing under the newly instituted regime.This initiative from the SFC aligns with the broader efforts undertaken by Hong Kong authorities to instill effective oversight and regulation within the cryptocurrency market. The primary objective remains the protection of investors’ interests and the preservation of the integrity of the overall financial system.Platforms must demonstrate ability to complyThe SFC emphasized, “VATPs (Virtual Asset Trading Platforms) which consider themselves eligible for deeming under the transitional arrangements are reminded that the SFC may decide that deeming is inapplicable if it does not see a reasonable prospect for the VATPs to successfully show that they are capable of complying with the applicable legal and regulatory requirements.”This development follows closely on the heels of Hong Kong’s recent announcement outlining plans to grant licensed cryptocurrency platforms the permission to cater to retail investors within the new regulatory framework.These comprehensive guidelines encompass critical facets such as cybersecurity protocols, asset custody safety standards, and the segregation of client assets. This regulatory evolution commenced on June 1, synchronizing with the launch of the novel licensing regime for virtual asset platforms.Drawing attention to the growing influence of the sector, it’s worth noting that in April, cryptocurrency exchange OKX registered an astonishing surge of over 10,000 new user sign-ups within a mere month of launching its operations in Hong Kong.Web3 implementationIn a recent tweet, Chris Lee, former CEO of both the Huobi and OKX crypto exchanges, said that “if Hong Kong wants to implement Web3 well, it still needs to complete the basic requirements, such as Web3 foundation laws and bills.” Lee added that “Hong Kong’s competitors will always be itself, not New York or Singapore.”The Hong Kong SFC’s warning to unlicensed crypto platforms is another step in creating the right foundation for Web3 in the city. It underscores the concerted effort to maintain a regulated and secure environment for cryptocurrency transactions within the Chinese autonomous territory.As the regulatory landscape continues to evolve, industry participants are gradually being compelled to adhere to the stipulated legal and compliance requirements in an effort to foster a robust crypto ecosystem.

Crypto Winter Halves Korean Bank Fee ProfitsLast year, Korean banks collected only half the amount in fees from crypto exchanges compared to the previous year, according to Korean news agency News1.©Pexels/PixabayDeclining bank fee profitsFiles submitted by the Korean Financial Services Commission to Yun Chang-hyun, a member of the ruling People Power Party, revealed that the five major Korean crypto exchanges paid 20.4 billion KRW (~$15.6 million) in fees to banks last year, which is a 49.4% decrease from the previous year’s 40.3 billion KRW (~$30.7 million). These exchanges (Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone, Korbit, and Gopax) have established agreements with banks to hold real-name bank accounts, which is a legal requirement for exchanges that wish to conduct trades in Korean won.Banks that have provided real-name accounts to crypto exchanges saw an increase in fee profits from 2019 to 2021. However, due to a decline in market sentiment last year, trade volume decreased, resulting in a reduction of bank fees. Last year’s crypto winter is attributable to various factors, including uncertainties in the global economy and collapses of crypto enterprises such as Terraform Labs and FTX.Fees by exchangesIn terms of fees paid to banks by exchanges last year, the largest exchange, Upbit, paid 13.9 billion KRW (~$10.6 million) in fees to Kbank, a mobile banking service provider. Bithumb and Coinone paid 4.9 billion KRW (~$3.7 million) and 989 million KRW (~$750,000) in fees to NH Bank, respectively. It is worth noting that Coinone switched its bank from NH Bank to Kakao Bank last November, paying 72 million KRW (~$55,000) to Kakao Bank in the fourth quarter. Korbit paid 486 million KRW (~$370,000) and 19 million KRW (~$14,500) to Shinhan Bank and Jeonbuk Bank, respectively. Gopax partnered with Jeonbuk Bank to obtain its real-name accounts in April last year.Lawmaker Yun said it was apparent that partnerships were being forged between only a handful of banks and crypto enterprises. Current regulations have to be reviewed to encourage more banks to participate in various blockchain businesses, he added.