Intella X and CARV Team Up to Revolutionize Web3 Gaming

With reports of American exchange platform Coinbase having been in talks with regulators to re-enter the Indian market emerging last month, the firm has made further progress with those efforts, registering with the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU). In a blog post published to the Coinbase website on March 11, the company confirmed that it had successfully registered with the FIU, a national agency which is responsible for gathering, processing, analyzing and circulating data related to suspicious financial transactions.Photo by Big G Media on UnsplashOffering retail services in 2025As a consequence of this registration, the company intends to commence trading activity in India once more, with plans to offer retail services to Indian investors later this year. Commenting on the development, John O'Loghlen, Regional Managing Director for the Asia-Pacific (APAC) region at Coinbase, stated that the company is committed to building its business in markets where potential exists for crypto and on-chain innovation. He added: “India represents one of the most exciting market opportunities in the world today, and we’re proud to deepen our investment here in full compliance with local regulations.” News of this development has been interpreted as a positive for the crypto sector. Taking to X, Suraj Chawla, founder and CEO of GPU.net, a decentralized network of GPUs, suggested that the registration was indicative of a softening in the regulatory approach taken to crypto in India. He believes that the Trump administration in the U.S., which is pro-crypto, is collaborating with India’s government, led by Prime Minister Narendra Modi. He added: “This is extremely positive news with countries like UAE, IND, RUS, USA adopting mainstream crypto and working on critical infra like exchanges, ETF and stablecoins.” Taking this development as a sign of a crypto awakening in India, Chawla suggested that we could see major Indian corporations like Reliance, Tata and Adani going into mainstream crypto infrastructure. ‘Informal pressure’Coinbase was forced to disable UPI payments on its platform in India back in 2022 due to what Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong described at the time as “informal pressure” from India’s central bank, the Royal Bank of India (RBI). Armstrong offered the following take on the status of crypto in India at that time:“India is a unique market in the sense that the Supreme Court has ruled that they can't ban crypto, but there are elements in the government there, including at the Reserve Bank of India, who don't seem to be as positive on it.” In 2023 the company disabled new user sign-ups on its platform.  India’s central bank has leaned against crypto over the last few years. In January of last year, RBI Governor Shaktikanta Das, said that there was no place in India for “crypto mania,” following the approval of spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds in the U.S. He said at that time that "the way we look at crypto remains unchanged, irrespective of who does what."  While taking what has been at best an ambiguous approach to cryptocurrencies, the RBI has advocated for the adoption of blockchain technology by India’s banks.

3AC Co-Founder Disputes US Jurisdiction Citing Singaporean CitizenshipKyle Davies, the Co-Founder of the failed Singaporean crypto hedge fund Three Arrows Capital (3AC), has asserted that he is solely a citizen of Singapore and not of the United States.Photo by Towfiqu barbhuiya on PexelsEvading pursuit of damagesThe assertion may have relevance as it may mean that Davies can evade actions taken against him in a US court on the basis of a lack of jurisdiction. In a recent filing with the US Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York (SDNY), Davies presented documents demonstrating that he had renounced his US citizenship in December 2020. He emphasized that he obtained citizenship in Singapore after being issued a passport in early 2021 and that he does not subject himself to the jurisdiction of US courts.$3.5 billion owedIn June it emerged that liquidators appointed for 3AC were seeking to recover $1.3 billion from the fund’s co-founders, Davies and Su Zhu. The firm reportedly owes creditors a staggering $3.5 billion.In the midst of public criticism surrounding the events leading to 3AC’s collapse, Zhu and Davies launched a platform called Open Exchange (OPNX), allowing trading claims against bankrupt crypto firms. Despite a deficit of goodwill for the duo in the crypto sector, they have been putting all their energies into the new venture.Last month, they outlined that they would donate future earnings from OPNX to 3AC creditors. It’s difficult to reconcile that claim when with this action, Davies is trying to evade contributing to creditors via the 3AC bankruptcy process and this legal action taken by the liquidator.Renounced citizenshipAccording to court documents, Davies officially renounced his US citizenship at the US Embassy in Singapore, citing his decision to reside in the country on a long-term basis. He revealed that he got married to a Singaporean national in 2017 and subsequently gained permanent residency in Singapore. Because Singapore does not permit dual nationality, Davies chose to renounce his US citizenship to establish himself fully as a Singaporean citizen.The submission of these documents came after 3AC’s liquidators requested a subpoena to gather information on the crypto hedge fund’s collapse. Both Kyle Davies and Zhu, were subpoenaed on Twitter, as their whereabouts were unknown. However, while Zhu, being a Singaporean national, might not be subject to the subpoena while residing outside the United States, Davies’ refusal to comply with the order led to discussions about holding him in contempt of court.In response to the subpoena controversy, Davies’ legal representatives claimed that he cannot be validly served with process as a non-party in the case, as he has not been a US citizen or resident since well before the case was initiated. They stated that the court lacks personal jurisdiction over him due to his renunciation of US citizenship. Accordingly, they requested that the Service Order and Compel Order, which were based on the assumption that Davies was a US citizen, be vacated.

South Korea’s Financial Services Commission (FSC) is set to exclude stablecoins from the list of digital assets corporations will be permitted to trade under forthcoming corporate crypto trading guidelines, according to a report by Herald Business.Photo by DrawKit Illustrations on UnsplashThe guidelines will outline the conditions under which listed companies and registered professional investment firms can buy and sell digital assets for investment or treasury management purposes. As regulators move to prevent speculative or indiscriminate investment in the early stages of opening the market to corporations, they have opted to limit the scope of permitted assets. Consequently, U.S. dollar-pegged stablecoins such as USDT and USDC are expected to be excluded from the approved list. Authorities plan to release the trading guidelines after the Digital Asset Basic Act is finalized. This move partly reflects regulatory constraints: stablecoins are not currently classified as cross-border payment instruments under South Korea’s Foreign Exchange Transactions Act. The law requires payments and receipts involving such instruments to be processed through authorized foreign exchange banks, leaving stablecoins outside the regulated framework. Companies seek stablecoins for FX hedgingThis exclusion, however, does not entirely prevent companies from trading stablecoins. Firms can still access them through overseas channels, including external wallets like MetaMask or over-the-counter platforms operated by exchanges such as Coinbase. Currently, South Korean companies cannot open corporate crypto accounts domestically, making it difficult to use digital assets for formal trade settlement. Nevertheless, payments in stablecoins are sometimes still handled through individual or offshore accounts. Given these workarounds, some listed companies with large international trade exposure have petitioned regulators to allow stablecoins under the proposed corporate investment guidelines, according to people familiar with the matter. Advocates argue that stablecoins like USDC can be easily traded on exchanges and track the U.S. dollar in real time, making them a highly effective tool for managing foreign-exchange risk. As the industry awaits this regulatory clarity, the impact is already rippling into the traditional financial sector. Kbank—the banking partner of Upbit, Korea’s largest crypto exchange—recently debuted on the KOSPI benchmark index after two previously failed attempts to go public. According to Bridgenews, Korea Investment & Securities initiated coverage on March 6 with a “neutral” rating, noting that regulatory uncertainty and rising lending competition could limit the bank's near-term growth. However, the brokerage added that the lender’s valuation could improve if it successfully expands its crypto business alongside clearer regulations. Baek Doo-san, an analyst at Korea Investment & Securities, noted that Kbank’s valuation could see re-ratings if the Digital Asset Basic Act and policies promoting the stablecoin industry are implemented quickly. He said that despite potential overhang risks, faster policy progress could drive multiple expansion, adding that the bank could then be valued in line with its peers’ price-to-book ratios. Survey shows persistent market fearThese shifting regulatory sands come at a time when the broader crypto market remains under pressure. According to a weekly survey of South Korean investors conducted by CoinNess and Cratos last week, 24% of respondents expect Bitcoin to rise or surge this week, up from 10.3% in the previous survey. Another 28.1% expect the market to move sideways, compared with 25.5% a week earlier, while 47.9% predict a decline or sharp drop, down from 64.2%. Although bullish sentiment has ticked upward from the previous week, bearish expectations still dominate the overall landscape. When asked about broader market sentiment, 43.4% of respondents said they felt fearful or extremely fearful. About 35.4% described sentiment as neutral, and only 21.2% reported feeling optimistic or extremely optimistic. With safe-haven markets facing renewed uncertainty amid geopolitical tensions between the U.S. and Iran, the survey also explored how a potential correction in South Korea’s stock market might affect cryptocurrencies. The largest share of respondents, 39.7%, believed it would be negative for crypto. Meanwhile, 23.6% said it would benefit Bitcoin exclusively, 23.4% felt it would be positive for the broader crypto market, and 13.3% expected it to have no impact.