Klaytn and Incheon City’s NFT Project Set to Bring Blockchain to the Public

Japan mulls unrealized crypto gains tax exemptionJapanese lawmakers are currently in discussions about a proposal that could exempt companies from paying taxes on unrealized cryptocurrency gains.Photo by Joshua Tan on UnsplashReforming aggressive crypto tax policyThe plan is anticipated to be incorporated into the fiscal 2024 tax reform agenda, according to a report published by Nikkei Asia on Wednesday.Up until now, Japan has had some of the most aggressive tax rates where cryptocurrencies are concerned when compared internationally. At the moment, corporations have to pay a 30% tax on crypto holdings regardless of whether they’ve sold those digital assets or not. The policy has been criticized broadly by crypto sector participants in Japan. It is seen as inequitable, considering that Japan taxes profits from stocks at a flat 20%.Corporate tax exemptionThe proposal, currently under deliberation by Japan’s ruling coalition, specifically targets Japanese companies holding digital assets for purposes other than short-term trading. If approved, these firms may be granted an exemption from corporate tax, contingent on mark-to-market valuations at the close of the fiscal year.Mark-to-market valuations involve assessing the fair values of assets with periodic fluctuations, such as cryptocurrencies. This exemption is expected to benefit various entities, including venture capital (VC) firms, non-fungible token (NFT) businesses and other blockchain companies holding cryptocurrencies for payment purposes. Additionally, crypto issuers, who are also crypto holders, would not be subjected to these taxes.Policymakers from the Liberal Democratic Party and the ruling coalition partner Komeito engaged in discussions on Tuesday regarding these potential tax exemptions.Bringing clarity to crypto taxationThis move is part of Japan’s ongoing efforts to bring clarity to crypto taxation. In June, the National Tax Agency clarified that crypto issuers in the country would not be liable to pay capital gains taxes on unrealized gains, fostering a more conducive environment for crypto-related businesses.Japan has been actively reviewing its crypto tax policies since last year, aiming to incentivize companies to stay in the country. This initiative follows the departure of several startups due to heavy tax burdens.Industry reactionWith news of this potential Japanese crypto tax reform breaking, crypto community members haven’t wasted any time in providing their thoughts. Taking to the X social media platform, Sota Watanabe, the founder of the Astar Network multichain dApp hub, wrote:”Good move. This is what I requested multiple times to the government over years. Once this issue is solved this year, all companies, especially big enterprises, can hodl crypto like ASTR much easier. Japan weighs ending tax on some corporate crypto holdings.”Former Goldman Sachs Portfolio Manager and Web3 investor, Steve Lee, said that this is “another big move in Japan that would help enterprises push their crypto business.”The Financial Services Agency (FSA), Japan’s top financial regulator, recently submitted legislation-change requests to the government, seeking alterations to the taxation of domestic crypto firms. Critics argue that the existing rule has impeded innovation in the crypto-asset and blockchain sectors, placing an undue burden on companies.On Oct. 16, major businesses in Japan, through the Japan Association of New Economy (JANE), urged the government to implement crypto tax reforms in 2024. Their appeal emphasizes the potential for reduced tax rates to stimulate growth and increase tax revenue.

India’s judiciary turns down plea to formulate a crypto regulatory frameworkThe Indian courts have declined a consideration targeting the establishment of a regulatory framework for cryptocurrency trading, following a plea which had been brought to court by a petitioner.Photo by Naveed Ahmed on UnsplashBeyond the court’s purviewIndia’s Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice Chandrachud, recently confronted a petition urging the establishment of a regulatory framework for cryptocurrency trading. According to a local media report, the bench, which included Justices JD Pardiwala and Manoj Misra, dismissed the plea, emphasizing that the demands presented were legislative and thus beyond the court’s direct action purview. This decision points to the judiciary’s recognition of its constraints in crafting laws, particularly in intricate domains like cryptocurrency.The petitioner, Manu Prashant Wig, a former director at Blue Fox Motion Picture Limited currently in custody due to allegations of cryptocurrency fraud, sought relief through a public interest litigation (PIL) for crypto trading regulations in India.The Economic Offence Wing (EOW) of the Delhi Police accused Wig in 2020 of deceiving investors with promises of high returns from crypto investments, involving 133 reported victims of the scheme. Despite this, during the hearing, the Supreme Court advised Wig to pursue legal remedies through appropriate channels, specifically for bail, underlining its inability to issue directives under Article 32 of the Constitution for legislative matters.Judiciary criticize governmentWhile the judiciary has found that it cannot act itself in putting in place a crypto regulatory framework, the Supreme Court has been critical of the government’s inaction on the matter. In July, India’s highest court criticized the Indian government for its failure to establish clear cryptocurrency regulations.Interestingly, while the government hasn’t acted locally, it has been making efforts to drive regulation at an international level instead. The status of cryptocurrency trading in India remains uncertain, with the country developing a regulatory framework influenced by recommendations from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the Financial Stability Board (FSB), potentially leading to legal legislation within the next several months.Prime Minister Modi called on authorities internationally to establish a worldwide regulatory framework. At the recent G20 summit, it appears that member states did reach agreement on such a framework.The Supreme Court’s dismissal of the PIL marks a clear distinction between judicial and legislative responsibilities. As India moves closer to formulating a comprehensive crypto regulatory framework, this decision reinforces the imperative for legislative action to address mounting concerns and interests in the crypto market.Awaiting legislative actionThe outcome of these developments is keenly awaited by investors, legal experts and the crypto community, poised to shape the future landscape of cryptocurrency trading in India. The decision signifies the judiciary’s acknowledgment of its limitations and highlights the necessity for a legislative approach to effectively navigate the intricate landscape of cryptocurrency regulation.In this evolving scenario, the verdict amplifies the importance of a well-defined regulatory framework. As the world’s most populous country grapples with the delicate task of balancing innovation and investor protection, the Supreme Court’s decision places the ball firmly in the legislative court.

Sam Altman’s iris-scanning project Worldcoin (WLD) has resumed its service in South Korea following two months of suspended operation, according to Digital Today. The project utilizes a device dubbed “Orbs” to collect personal biometric data from users who agreed to have their iris scanned by the machine.  The service was suspended after a number of complaints were filed against Worldcoin in February for its data collection practices. In the following development, Korea’s Personal Information Protection Committee (PIPC) launched an investigation into Worldcoin to examine if any local privacy law has been violated by Worldcoin. This led to suspension of six Orbs installed in several areas in Seoul, including Yeouido and Yeoksam areas.  While these Orbs have resumed operations, the investigation is still underway. The South Korean regulators are yet to decide what legal measures to take regarding Worldcoin, according to the press. Photo by Amanda Dalbjörn on UnsplashProof of personhood: Crypto tokens for simply being human Meanwhile, Worldcoin argues that it is impossible to identify an individual person by solely relying on the iris bio-data. It claims that the data will be only used in providing “proof of personhood” to distinguish humans from artificial intelligence (AI). The project aims to offer its WLD token to users “simply for being human” as universal basic income, whose jobs will be potentially replaced by artificial general intelligence (AGI) in the future.  A Worldcoin official added that the project has addressed potential privacy concerns by eliminating data custody processes and allowing users to remove their sensitive data at will. However, major countries including France and Spain have issued orders to suspend Worldcoin’s operation within their jurisdictions, citing risks involving personal data tracking and breaches.  A PIPC official stated that the government authority will continue the investigation and take further action in line with the Personal Information Protection Act.