Japan’s GMO Coin Announces Special SGB Airdrop for XRP Holders

Korean Prosecutors Say Do Kwon and His Colleagues Knew Terra Was Unviable from the BeginningKorean prosecutors claimed that Terraform Labs founder Do Kwon and the key members behind the Terra-LUNA crash were aware of the project’s unviability from the beginning, according to a file issued by the Seoul Southern District Court.©Terraform LabsTerraform Labs founders misleading Korean investorsTerraform Labs founders Do Kwon and Daniel Shin attracted 280,000 investors in Korea alone, claiming that the Terra stablecoin is a means of transaction, even though the company leaders had been notified by the financial authority that Terra-accepting businesses were impermissible. It is reported that during a search and seizure of the company, Korean prosecutors collected evidence that its employees shared such knowledge on their internal messaging system.Terra’s cross trading on crypto exchangesKnowing their cryptocurrency’s unviability, Terra executives registered its sister token LUNA for listing on major Korean crypto exchanges in May 2019. According to the Korean prosecution, they used a bot to create a trade volume of more than 800 million won in three domestic crypto exchanges by cross trading between 2019 and early last year.Cross trading is illegal in the stock market, as it is considered as an act of price manipulation, but LUNA was traded in crypto exchanges and it hasn’t been determined whether their token is a security or not. Under current Korean law, the court has to accept it as a security to punish those behind the Terra collapse.Shin’s denial of allegationsMeanwhile, Daniel Shin denied the prosecution’s allegations and argued that they had never received such a notice from the financial regulator.

Japan is taking steps to approve exchange-traded funds (ETFs) tracking spot cryptocurrency prices, a regulatory shift that could take effect as early as 2028, according to a CoinPost report citing a Jan. 25 article by Nikkei.Photo by Jezael Melgoza on UnsplashThe timeline reflects the legislative steps required before retail investors can access digital assets through traditional brokerage accounts. Japan’s financial regulator, the Financial Services Agency (FSA), plans to amend investment regulations to permit cryptocurrencies as eligible assets for investment trusts. SBI, Nomura prepare crypto productsAccording to the report, major financial heavyweights, including SBI Holdings and Nomura Holdings, are already developing products in anticipation of regulatory approval. If cleared by the Tokyo Stock Exchange, the listings would allow Japanese investors to trade Bitcoin products alongside standard stock or gold ETFs. Institutional interest appears robust. A Nikkei survey conducted in November identified six major firms weighing the development of crypto investment trusts: Nomura Asset Management, SBI Global Asset Management, Daiwa, Asset Management One, Amova, and Mitsubishi UFJ. These companies are reportedly exploring products tailored for both retail and institutional clients. However, the 2028 target is largely dictated by the pace of tax reform. Government plans call for crypto profits to be taxed at a uniform 20%, replacing the current progressive system and putting digital assets on the same footing as equities and foreign exchange. The revised tax treatment would also apply to crypto ETFs and derivatives. At present, crypto gains are treated as miscellaneous income, leaving investors subject to progressive tax rates that can climb to roughly 55% once local levies are included. Crypto market slides amid volatility As Japan maps out its long-term regulatory course, recent market activity has been volatile, tied to potential currency interventions and U.S. political uncertainty. Bitcoin briefly surged to $91,000 over the weekend, a move CoinDesk reports some traders attribute to suspected Japanese intervention in the foreign exchange market. The theory suggests a transient reversal in the yen’s recent weakness forced an unwinding of leveraged carry trades, temporarily boosting the world’s largest cryptocurrency. However, the momentum was short-lived. Bitcoin is currently trading near $87,500, down 1.45% over the previous 24 hours. Market sentiment has been dampened by fears of a U.S. government shutdown and renewed trade tensions. On the prediction market platform Polymarket, participants have priced in a 78% chance of another government shutdown by Jan. 31. Compounding investor anxiety are President Donald Trump’s tariff threats. Trump recently warned he would impose 100% tariffs on Canada should the U.S. neighbor sign a trade deal with China. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney has since announced that Ottawa has no plans to forge such an agreement, according to CNBC. Monetary policy remains a headwind for risk assets. Ahead of the Federal Reserve’s interest rate decision this week, the CME FedWatch Tool indicates traders expect the central bank to hold rates steady in the 3.5% to 3.75% range at the Jan. 28 meeting. Markets are pricing in only a 2.8% chance of a 0.5% cut. The prospect of rates remaining unchanged offers little incentive for investors to pivot aggressively toward riskier assets like crypto. Gold, silver reach record levels This risk-averse environment has funneled capital into precious metals, driving prices to record levels. Both gold and silver have hit all-time highs, surpassing $5,000 per ounce and $106 per ounce, respectively. Amid the uncertainty, retail investors in neighboring markets are showing caution. In South Korea, a weekly survey by CoinNess and Cratos of 2,000 respondents found that 43.2% of investors are holding existing crypto positions without making additional purchases. Another 22.7% said they are actively trading, while 21.4% reported having no current position and waiting for a more favorable entry point. The remaining 12.7% said they are staying out of the market entirely. 

Dispute Embroils Bitget in Legal Battle With Crypto InfluencerBitget, the crypto exchange registered in Seychelles, finds itself entangled in a legal dispute with prominent crypto influencer Evan Luthra.Photo by Tingey Injury Law Firm on UnsplashAccount freezing allegationsThe conflict stems from Luthra’s allegations of account freezing and loss of funds after a token listing incident in March. Luthra has filed a lawsuit against Bitget, accusing the exchange of withholding $200,000 in Tether (USDT) without adequate explanation, while also freezing his account.The legal drama follows Luthra’s involvement with the Reel Star project, where he served as an advisor for the platform which is aimed at creators. As compensation for his collaboration with the project, Luthra received Reel Token (REELT), the project’s utility token.Bitget alleged market manipulationUpon the listing of REELT tokens, Luthra reportedly sold 1.3 million tokens on Bitget. In response, Bitget claims it faced a manipulative attack orchestrated by a group of traders attempting to profit from market manipulation immediately after the token’s listing. This allegedly caused a significant drop in the token’s price, prompting Bitget’s decision to freeze Luthra’s account.Bitget states that it contacted Luthra seeking an explanation for the suspicious trading behavior. Luthra acknowledged the token sale but failed to provide satisfactory reasons for his actions, according to Bitget’s version of events. The exchange maintains that user protection is its foremost priority and that it takes swift action against illegal or fraudulent behaviors.$16 million damages claimLuthra refutes the allegations, asserting his innocence and citing alleged approval from Reel Star’s Co-Founder Navdeep Sharma for his token sale plans. He seeks a substantial $16 million in damages, in addition to the frozen funds. Luthra claims that Bitget unjustly deprived him of his tokens, asserting his status as a fully KYCed user entitled to access his holdings.In the aftermath of the incident, Bitget conducted an investigation and offered a compensation plan for affected clients. Gracy Chen, Bitget’s Managing Director, emphasized the exchange’s commitment to user protection and its actions against illicit activities on its platform. Addressing the matter on Twitter, Chen didn’t hold back in her commentary on Luthra, stating that he “has a history of fraudulent activities,” which she says were exposed by crypto journalist CoffeeZilla.The legal dispute has ignited debates within the crypto community. Supporters of Luthra contend that his case underscores broader issues faced by users of centralized exchanges, shedding light on the need for improved user rights and protection. On the other hand, some argue that Bitget acted appropriately to safeguard its users and the market integrity.CZ brought into the disputeThe legal battle has attracted attention from influential figures in the crypto industry. Against a backdrop of a very public airing of the dispute on Twitter, in a recent tweet Luthra invited Changpeng Zhao (CZ), the CEO of Binance, to respond to Luthra’s claim that Bitget spreads rumors about other exchanges. CZ was having none of it, writing: “You should talk to them, right? We are not a regulator for other exchanges.”The case highlights the intricate challenges surrounding market manipulation and token listings within the crypto space. As it unfolds, the outcome could potentially set a precedent for similar situations involving token listings, market manipulation, and user protection.