G20 Nations Believed to Have Agreed Upon Global Crypto Framework

Cebu Meeting of FSB Highlights Crypto RisksThe Regional Consultative Group for Asia of the Financial Stability Board (FSB) has highlighted the risks implicated by crypto assets in a series of meetings held on Thursday and Friday in Cebu, the Philippines.The FSB is an international body with a mandate to monitor the global financial system, as well as make recommendations in respect of that system. The agency was established by the G20 group of countries in April 2009, replacing its forerunner, the Financial Stability Forum.Photo by John Alvin Merin on UnsplashA regulatory framework for cryptoThe two-day event focused on non-bank financial intermediation (NBFI) in Asia and the development of an effective global regulatory framework for crypto-assets. It discussed recent developments in financial markets, together with their regional impact.In opening remarks, Philippine Central Bank Governor, Felipe Medalla, stated: “Crypto, the biggest issue there is, whether we like it or not is quite a lot, especially younger people who are actually gambling. They have huge losses, our view right now. Well, you’re there, it’s your problem and the regulation becomes strict the moment crypto meets banking.”International participants highlighted the need for the development of an effective global regulatory framework for crypto-assets. Particular concern exists with regard to the potential for systemic risk in relation to crypto and a potential overflow into the traditional financial system.Earlier this year, the FSB proposed a complete regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies, with the report having been originally submitted in October of last year. Among its key components is the imposition of tighter controls. It proposed the guiding principle of “same activity, same risk, same regulation” for crypto assets, mirroring the approach taken for traditional financial assets.Global approach to taming cryptoThis approach has proven to be problematic for people working within the digital assets space. Many of the core facets of cryptocurrencies are entirely different to anything we see in traditional finance. Trying to frame crypto within an existing approach and standard has been perceived by many to be akin to trying to fit a square peg in a round hole.It’s not the FSB's role or place to affect policy directly. That responsibility lies with policymakers and regulators in each individual country. However, the organization is seeking to influence those individuals and entities in the hope that they will employ its suggested regulatory framework.Klaas Knot, Chair of the FSB and President of the Dutch Central Bank, provided this view on crypto: “We will come up with a global regulatory framework. It also only makes sense to regulate this from a global perspective. Because, nowadays you can take a server and put it anywhere in the world and start issuing these digital assets.”From Knot’s take, it’s clear that governments and central bankers are cottoning on to the fact that individual nation-state regulation is futile to an extent where decentralized innovations like cryptocurrency are concerned. Others such as European Central Bank (ECB) President Christine Lagarde and Mark Branson, President of German financial markets regulator BaFin, similarly have called for a globally enforced regulatory approach over the course of the past year.Ongoing struggleWhile regulation can be helpful, particularly when it comes to the points at which crypto meets the traditional system, there’s no doubt that this emerging innovation will disrupt the conventional system to some degree or other. That may place an incentive before central bankers and governments to try and stymie the further development of digital assets.While a truly global approach to regulating digital assets could retard development of the sector, there is rarely total consensus among world governments on a single issue. Therefore, by its very nature, crypto, and the digital assets sector will likely continue to develop regardless. It’s more a question of how long that process takes.

United Arab Emirates (UAE)-based crypto market maker and Web3 investment firm DWF Labs has launched a $250 million fund for investment in mid to large-cap crypto projects. The company, which recently switched its administrative base from Singapore to Abu Dhabi, asserts that the fund will contribute towards the real-world adoption of Web3 technology. Photo by Towfiqu barbhuiya on UnsplashUp to $50M per projectTaking to X, DWF Labs Managing Partner Andrei Grachev announced the $250 million fund. He added:”Single ticket size ranged from 10 to 50M$ per a project. Cash + comprehensive support = Moon” In a statement published to the company’s website, DWF Labs outlined that the Liquid Fund initiative aligns with the firm’s commitment to contributing towards real growth within the broader crypto market. It stated: “The fund will provide strategic crypto venture capital and ecosystem support, ensuring sustainable growth for projects that drive real-world adoption and help promote change in the industry.” Initial dealsWork on the fund is already in motion. The company confirmed that it has already invested $11 million into promising blockchain projects as part of the initiative. Furthermore, DWF Labs confirmed that it is on the verge of signing two major investment deals with ticket values of $10 million and $25 million respectively. Beyond those deals, the firm asserts that other investment deals are in the pipeline. It clarified that the nature of the investment differs from traditional investments insofar as each deal incorporates a full-scale ecosystem growth strategy, devised specifically for the particular needs of each project. Grachev stated that the company believes “that strategic capital, coupled with hands-on ecosystem development, is the key to unlocking the next wave of growth for the industry.” Key aspects being considered by the company when formulating ecosystem growth strategies relative to targeted blockchain projects include public relations (PR) and brand amplification, a comprehensive go-to-market (GTM) strategy, lending markets development and a focus on stablecoin total value locked (TVL), with supporting liquidity and DeFi activity relative to layer-1 and layer-2 projects. Focus on ‘usability and discoverability’Grachev told Cointelegraph that emphasis will be placed on investing in blockchain projects that stand out in terms of “usability and discoverability.” He added that “good technology and utility alone isn’t sufficient,” asserting that "users first need to discover these projects, comprehend their value and develop trust." The DWF Labs managing partner suggested that strategic capital, together with hands-on ecosystem development, is paramount relative to efforts to realize the next iteration of growth within the crypto sector. Up until the end of last year, DWF Labs was headquartered in Singapore and still maintains a presence there. Besides Abu Dhabi, it also has a physical presence in Dubai. Hong Kong, Switzerland, South Korea and the British Virgin Islands (BVI) account for the locations of the remainder of its international offices. While Grachev and his firm can be assumed to have a positive broader view on the cryptocurrency sector given the launch of this latest fund, the DWF Labs managing partner recently pointed to a more immediate potentially bearish trend in the market.

Banking Difficulties Remain in Hong Kong for Crypto Start-UpsWhile Hong Kong has demonstrated a very clear crypto-friendly stance over the course of the past six months, crypto start-ups are still struggling with banking in the Chinese autonomous territory.Photo by Manson Yim on UnsplashLicensing backlogAll the signs are that Hong Kong is striving to develop itself as a regional hub for crypto and blockchain related business. Encouraged by that stance, against a background of the United States becoming openly hostile to crypto over that very same time frame, applications are streaming in from international firms to be licensed to operate their businesses in the city.In discussion with crypto start-up applicants, CoinDesk has established that the issue extends to firms that have already obtained a license to operate. To compound matters, the Hong Kong regulator, the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC), has a shortage of manpower, with just eight officials currently working on the applications of eighty crypto firms.Speaking to that backlog, Amy Yu, APAC CEO for Swiss crypto financial services company, SEBA Bank, stated: “This probably would have been a different story six or nine months ago.”A known problemIt appears that both the SFC and its regulatory peer, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) were aware of the issue and tried to get out ahead of it. Late last month, both regulators convened a meeting with bank officials and virtual asset service providers (VASPs).The objective was to try to forge a path forward such that banks could amend their approach, enabling greater facilitation and acceptance of crypto businesses such that the banks would be more inclined to approve bank account applications from those fledgling businesses.Arthur Yuen, Deputy CEO of the HKMA addressed the matter in a blog post published to the regulator’s website on April 27. Yuen was clear in calling on the banks to enable banking for VASPs:“With the implementation of the regulatory regime for VA [virtual assets] activities in Hong Kong and the strengthening of supervisory regimes in different jurisdictions according to the international standards, and as the banking industry develops a better understanding of the VA industry over time, we expect that regulated virtual asset service providers (VASPs) will be able to successfully apply for a bank account through a reasonable process.”Banker resistanceElaborating on the matter further, it’s clear that Yuen and his colleagues understand the importance of banking in enabling this nascent business sector such that the broader strategy of a pro-crypto business environment is affected in Hong Kong. “To attract businesses from new markets, it is crucial to have high quality financial services, while enhancing corporate access to bank accounts would be one of the key priorities,”he stated.An attendee at that regulator-organized round-table last month said that “It was more like a wish list from the regulator,” and that “whether the banks fully embrace it is another matter.” The issue remains as a major impediment to the ability of crypto start-up companies to operate, Some are being forced to try and work around the stumbling block, relying instead on overseas banking partners.