Singaporean Authorities Uncover $1.3M Crypto Mining Scam

3AC Founders Vow to Donate Future EarningsThe co-founders of the Singapore-headquartered bankrupt crypto hedge fund Three Arrows Capital (3AC) have publicly committed to donating their “future earnings” to creditors who suffered losses during the fund’s dramatic collapse.Kyle Davies and Su Zhu made this groundbreaking announcement during a candid Twitter Spaces session hosted by Mario Nafwal, aiming to establish a “shadow recovery process” parallel to the ongoing liquidation proceedings.Photo by Josh Appel on UnsplashBelieving in karmaDavies explained that their intended donations would be separate from the formal recovery process, designed to supplement any reimbursements that creditors might receive through the liquidation proceedings. While acknowledging that some early creditors have already been made whole, he emphasized the founders’ unwavering belief in the concept of “karma.”They see their act of giving back as a way to balance the scales and provide an avenue for creditors to potentially recover their losses.Creditor skepticismHowever, these noble intentions expressed by Davies and Zhu have been met with skepticism from the crypto community and the very creditors they seek to assist. Teneo, the liquidator overseeing the 3AC liquidation, responded to Davies’ comments by expressing disappointment in the founders’ lack of cooperation during the ongoing process. They stressed that the founders should prioritize engaging in the court-ordered activities rather than making promises about future earnings from a new venture.Acknowledging concerns about optics, Davies addressed questions surrounding the launch of their new crypto exchange, Open Exchange (OPNX), while their previous company undergoes liquidation. He stressed the inherent connection between OPNX and the creditors, suggesting that the success of their new entrepreneurial endeavor would ultimately benefit those affected by the collapse of Three Arrows Capital.OPNX success requiredOPNX, the newly launched Dubai-based trading platform, is specifically designed to facilitate the trading of bankruptcy claims. Since its announcement in February, the platform has garnered significant attention, boasting an impressive user base of 20 million individuals holding a collective $20 billion in claims. It is worth noting that the collapse of Three Arrows Capital resulted in the loss of $2.5 billion in customer deposits, making the success of OPNX crucial for creditors seeking redress.Davies also revealed that OPNX currently records approximately $50 million in daily trading volume, showcasing promising early traction for the platform. However, the exact mechanics of the “shadow recovery process” were left unspecified.While OPNX currently only facilitates the trading of claims from lender Celsius, the platform has ambitious plans to include claims from other high-profile bankruptcies in the near future. The list of potential additions encompasses notable entities such as FTX, Genesis, BlockFi, Voyager, Hodlnaut, Mt. Gox, Vauld, Zipmex, and even Three Arrows Capital itself.When taken at face value, the founders’ pledge to donate future earnings to creditors takes on the appearance of a significant and commendable gesture. However, doubts persist within the crypto community due to the founders’ prior actions and the ongoing liquidation process. Only time will reveal the true impact of this “shadow recovery process” and whether it will genuinely alleviate the losses suffered by creditors in the wake of Three Arrows Capital’s collapse.

Korean Crypto Expert Claims NFTs and Security Tokens Shouldn’t Be a Priority for Investors YetAlthough there has been a lot of speculation recently regarding the prospects of non-fungible tokens (NFTs) and security tokens as lucrative investment opportunities, these topics should not be of concern yet, said Kim Dong-hwan, CEO of Korean crypto consulting firm Wonder Frame, at Tuesday’s 2023 FNTimes Investment Forum hosted in Seoul by the Korean Financial Times.Photo by Markus Winkler on UnsplashFrom a price-to-earnings perspective, these types of investments should not be of priority to the average investor, Kim said, stating that this argument is rooted in historical context. Bitcoin, the kingpin of cryptocurrencies, had its first breakthrough in 2012 when its price was around $13. Since then, its value has skyrocketed nearly 2,000 times. Those who profited from Bitcoin then went on to invest in Ethereum, the second-largest cryptocurrency by market capitalization. Ultimately, the money earned from Bitcoin was constantly circulating in the crypto market.Grappling for liquidityHowever, Bitcoin’s liquidity — the frequency at which assets are bought and sold, which can be deemed the most important aspect of investing in and trading cryptocurrencies — is currently down. Liquidity in the crypto market usually flows in order from Bitcoin first, to altcoins, then to NFTs, Kim explained, because investments in NFTs are made by people who hold cryptocurrencies, not Korean won. Therefore, NFTs, which have now experienced more than a 90% decline from their peak, must depend on Bitcoin’s price recovery for their own resurgence.Securing liquidity for security tokens is also difficult, considering the fact that while these assets share common characteristics with cryptocurrencies, they are subject to strict regulatory oversight by financial authorities such as the Korea Exchange. Therein lies the difficulty in forecasting the prospects for security tokens.Kim thus questioned whether there would be market makers or liquidity providers that would be willing to boldly step into the role of satisfying the market, given the close scrutiny of authorities such as Korea’s Financial Services Commission (FSC) and Financial Supervisory Service (FSS). Although crypto exchanges like Upbit act as market makers by facilitating daily trading worth trillions of won, speculation suggests that securities firms that are responsible for supplying security token liquidity may find it challenging to do the same.Weak investments and negative perceptions of DeFiAnother concern for security tokens is fractional investments, which tend to be concentrated on assets of lower value. “Security tokens are fundamentally about dividing underlying assets and then selling them. However, in many cases, these underlying assets are of lower value or have no choice but to be traded this way,” Kim said.Kim also mentioned the regulatory hurdles hindering decentralized finance (DeFi) in general, despite its reputed appeal. “DeFi is perceived by international organizations like the Financial Stability Board (FSB), the US Federal Reserve System, and the European Union (EU) as a public enemy that causes financial instability in the real world,” he said.Taking all these factors into consideration, Kim recommended against investing in security tokens or NFTs at this time, given the current situation where even Bitcoin’s liquidity is at an all-time low. He suggested that, with market interest rates approaching 5%, unless there is a specific need to invest in virtual assets, it may be better to explore investment options positioned for higher interest rates.Kim is an industry expert who has previously written articles for crypto news site CoinDesk Korea for four years and has taken on the role of Chief Business Development Officer (CBDO) at Blitz Labs, a virtual asset research firm. He founded Wonder Frame in 2022, where he currently works as a professional consultant.

Surge in Hong Kong Crypto License Applications from Mainland-Linked BrokersTwo new platforms with mainland China links are preparing to apply for retail trading licenses in Hong Kong, with several others believed to be interested in following suit.According to a report published by Nikkei Asia earlier this week, the platforms, Yax and PantherTrade, have connections to mainland online securities brokers. PantherTrade is reportedly associated with Futu, a company which in turn is backed by Chinese tech giant Tencent, one of China’s largest technology companies. Yax, an emerging player in the crypto sector, has strong links to UP Fintech Holding, a Beijing-headquartered firm more commonly known as Tiger Brokers.Photo by Kanchanara on UnsplashCapital flight concernsThese connections are significant, given the previous involvement of these brokers in helping mainland Chinese customers invest in offshore assets, primarily US stocks. The firms have previously attracted the attention of China’s financial regulators. A notice from the Chinese securities watchdog in December last year compelled them to cease their “illegal cross-border business” activities.While crypto trading is banned in mainland China, an investigative report by the Wall Street Journal in August suggested that global exchange Binance was thriving in China despite the ban. Actions taken by the Chinese authorities are demonstrative of some level of concern with regard to crypto trading and potential capital flight through crypto.VASP licensingThe move by Yax and PantherTrade signals their intention to apply for a virtual asset service platform (VASP) license in Hong Kong, which would enable them to operate cryptocurrency exchanges for retail customers.Currently, both platforms are undergoing third-party assessments, a mandatory step preceding their formal application to the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC). The timeline for their applications remains uncertain.Broader interestThe growing interest in VASP licenses is not unique to Yax and PantherTrade. At least four other exchange platforms, similarly linked to mainland China, have also sought the same license, highlighting the eagerness of various players to enter the Hong Kong market. OneDegree, the sole licensed insurer for digital assets in Asia, has observed a significant uptick in license applications, including applications from traditional financial institutions, reflecting a positive trend toward educating the mass market.The SFC’s recent decision to make license application information public is an attempt to enhance transparency, following a scandal related to Dubai-headquartered crypto exchange JPEX in which over HK$1.5 billion (approximately $190 million) in virtual assets reportedly disappeared from the exchange.Currently, only two cryptocurrency exchanges, OSL and Hashkey, have received SFC approval. Others, including online brokers, have considered applying for licenses since late last year but are awaiting greater regulatory clarity before taking the plunge.Hong Kong, under the “one country, two systems” framework, has established itself as a hub for legal retail trading of cryptocurrencies. This development may signify a shift in China’s stance on digital assets and its increasing openness to crypto initiatives, as noted recently by blockchain data provider Chainalysis.