Galaxia Metaverse and ZIKTALK to Expand Blockchain and Web3 Initiatives

Hong Kong Web3 Companies Invest Millions in VASP LicensesWeb3 firms in Hong Kong are making significant financial investments to obtain Virtual Asset Service Provider (VASP) licenses.According to a report by Foresight News on Tuesday, the cost of these licenses is ranging between 20 million and 200 million Hong Kong dollars ($2.55 million and $25.5 million).Industry sources explained to the publication that the high costs are due to the lack of existing infrastructure in traditional financial institutions, requiring significant investments in various aspects such as products and teams. Even experienced cryptocurrency institutions find the cost of obtaining a license to be substantial.Photo by Daniam Chou on UnsplashEarly licenseesAnalysts at Foresight highlighted that several Hong Kong subsidiaries of exchanges, including OKX, BitgetX, HashKey Pro, OSL, and Gate.io, have already commenced operations. OKX, in particular, has witnessed impressive growth in Hong Kong, with 8,800 registered users and a cumulative trading volume of $150 million as of June 27.To regulate the cryptocurrency exchange industry, Hong Kong introduced new VASP licensing requirements on June 1.These requirements mandate firms to disclose user statistics and company financials to the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) of Hong Kong for regulatory approval. Exchanges that fail to comply with the requirements will be compelled to halt operations in the special administrative region (SAR) by mid-next year.Virtual asset ratingsOn the same day, the Hong Kong Virtual Asset Consortium unveiled its virtual asset index, which encompasses major cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin, as well as altcoins and privacy tokens. The consortium aims to offer ratings services and indexes to facilitate retail crypto trading in the SAR. Notably, it has received support from prominent players in the industry, including Huobi, KuCoin, Bitget, and others.The introduction of VASP licenses and the subsequent investments made by Web3 companies demonstrate the evolving regulatory landscape in Hong Kong. With the stringent licensing requirements, the industry aims to enhance transparency and accountability, ensuring the protection of investors and fostering a more secure environment for cryptocurrency trading.The involvement of established exchanges and the formation of the Hong Kong Virtual Asset Consortium further underscore the growing interest and support for cryptocurrencies in the region. These initiatives are designed to provide retail investors with reliable information.In that way, they enable them to make informed decisions while participating in the digital assets space. The consortium’s collaboration with industry leaders reflects a collective effort to promote the growth and adoption of cryptocurrencies in Hong Kong.Last week’s news of banking stalwart HSBC offering Hong Kong-based crypto exchange-traded funds (ETFs) to its banking customers has also delivered a shot in the arm to the development of crypto in the Chinese autonomous territory.As the regulatory framework continues to evolve and mature, it is expected that Hong Kong will attract more Web3 companies seeking to operate in a regulated and compliant environment.The investment in VASP licenses signals a commitment to long-term growth in establishing a base in Hong Kong. Ongoing developments in Hong Kong over the course of the past six months point to the recognition of the potential benefits that cryptocurrencies and blockchain technology can bring to the financial landscape of Hong Kong and level of the level of intent locally to progress the technology.

Bybit Denies Plans to Leave UK MarketReporting related to Dubai-based crypto exchange Bybit had suggested in recent days that the firm was leaving the UK market. However, the company has since responded to state that it has strongly reaffirmed its commitment to the UK market and its dedication to collaborate with regulators to find mutually agreeable solutions.Photo by Marcin Nowak on UnsplashCompany clarificationThat speculation had arisen in the first place on the basis of difficulties the business may experience as a consequence of the upcoming implementation of new strict marketing rules for crypto firms in the UK. Taking to social media on Thursday, the company stated:”At Bybit, we consider the UK to be a highly important market for the advancement of crypto and blockchain technologies. Our commitment to this market is unwavering, and we intend to maintain our presence in the UK for the long term. Meanwhile, we are dedicated to working collaboratively with regulators upon the new law to ensure the responsible and secure development of the industry.”The reports published earlier in the week had fueled speculation that Bybit might exit the UK market, along with other jurisdictions characterized by rigorous crypto regulations. The concerns primarily centered around the UK’s recently introduced financial promotion rules, designed to bolster customer protection and enhance understanding of crypto investments.Ben Zhou, Co-Founder and CEO of Bybit, commented on the situation, underscoring the exchange’s unwavering commitment to regulatory compliance. Zhou confirmed that ongoing discussions with UK regulators aimed to find mutually beneficial solutions, aligning the interests of all stakeholders involved. He emphasized Bybit’s commitment to keeping its community well-informed about the progress of these discussions.Regulatory changesThe recent move by Bybit is in direct response to regulatory changes introduced by the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) in June. These changes were implemented to improve transparency and enhance customer protection within the crypto sector, with a particular focus on ensuring that UK customers have a clear understanding of the risks associated with crypto investments. The FCA also outlined various pathways for asset promotion, including those involving FCA-authorized personnel or crypto companies registered with the FCA.Exchanges have been very much under the cosh in 2023 when it comes to regulatory pressures. Bybit, accompanied by MEXC Global, Bitforex, and Bitget, were all issued with a warning by the Japanese regulator, the Financial Services Agency (FSA), in April on the basis that the exchanges were running unregistered crypto asset exchange business operations within Japan. In May Binance left the Canadian market.In the months that followed, the leading global crypto exchange was forced out of markets in Germany, Belgium, The Netherlands, and Cyprus due to regulatory pushback. In May Seychelles-based Huobi was ordered to cease its business offering in Malaysia by the local regulator.Moving forwardDespite these setbacks, Bybit has been making efforts to move the business forward. In May it obtained approval from the authorities in Kazakhstan to offer its services within the country. Some weeks prior, it announced that it had chosen Dubai as the global exchange’s headquarters.The firm also introduced TradeGPT recently, an AI-powered educational tool designed to enrich traders’ engagement with the crypto market.

Korean Lawmakers Complete First Rough Draft of Virtual Asset User Protection BillKorean lawmakers have completed the first rough draft of the virtual asset user protection bill at a National Policy Committee meeting held later last month.©Pexels/Matthias ZomerAgreeing on term usage ‘virtual assets’So far, 18 bills have been proposed to regulate cryptocurrencies, and the lawmakers and the Financial Services Commission (FSC) agreed to use the term “virtual assets” to encompass similar terms such as digital assets and crypto assets.Phased enactment of billsThe bills are likely to be reviewed under the title “Virtual Asset User Protection Act.” The bipartisan group agreed to enact the bills in phases, introducing the user protection bill in the first phase and the virtual asset listing and issuance bill in the second phase.Meanwhile, there were mixed opinions on the content of the bills. In particular, there was debate over whether the bills should stipulate that the central bank digital currency (CBDC) is excluded from virtual assets, and whether the bills should include a standard for determining if a virtual asset is a security.Debate over stipulating CBDC’s statusThe stipulation of excluding CBDC from virtual assets was the most divisive topic since it would lead to defining the conditions for other assets such as non-fungible tokens. Moreover, the Act on Reporting and Using Specified Financial Transaction Information, which currently regulates virtual asset service providers (VASPs), does not contain any stipulation on CBDC. Some raised concerns that such discrepancies could later cause confusion. In the end, assembly members decided to discuss the matter again in April after consulting with the Bank of Korea and the Ministry of Government Legislation.Criteria for classifying virtual assets as securitiesRegarding whether to include criteria for classifying virtual assets as securities, the lawmakers and financial regulators took different sides.Lee Yong-woo, a member of the Democratic Party of Korea, underlined that a clear statement of the relationship between the issuer and the recipient of virtual assets in a whitepaper can determine their security status. He added that such provisions should be included in the bills.Park Min-woo, an FSC official, on the other hand, commented on a cautious note that in case virtual assets fall under the category of securities, they may not be applicable to the virtual asset act. He explained that VASPs might deal with both securities and virtual assets, and in such cases, there could be a misunderstanding that VASPs are not subject to the virtual asset act simply because they trade securities.