Busan City Aims to Cultivate Growth in Blockchain and Fintech Industries

The trustee of the failed Japanese cryptocurrency exchange Mt. Gox is preparing to initiate repayments of bitcoin (BTC) and bitcoin cash (BCH), prompting fears of a market sell-off among traders and investors.Photo by Dmytro Demidko on UnsplashConfirming repayment detailsThe crypto community on the /mtgoxsolvency subreddit disclosed that the Tokyo-based bitcoin exchange has initiated the process of verifying creditors' addresses for forthcoming repayments. Emails have been sent to creditors, confirming that their repayment details have been validated with relevant cryptocurrency exchanges. The communication from Mt. Gox appears to be staggered, with users on different platforms receiving emails at varying times. Some Bitstamp users reported receipt of the email, while several Kraken customers mentioned that they were still awaiting the confirmation. Mt. Gox, cautioning creditors, clarified that users with disabled or frozen accounts would not be able to receive repayments using the provided addresses. Additionally, the emails specifically pertain to payments in bitcoin and bitcoin cash. This recent communication follows Mt. Gox's announcement in November, where it committed to returning approximately 142,000 bitcoin, 143,000 bitcoin cash and 69 billion Japanese yen, valued at over $5.67 billion at the announcement date and approximately $6.46 billion at the present moment. During the November announcement, Mt. Gox assured creditors that repayments would commence in the following months and weeks. Creditors with payment methods deemed "effective at this time" were earmarked to receive their assets first. Towards the end of December, some creditors reported the addition of yen-denominated balances to their PayPal accounts by Mt. Gox, signaling progress in the repayment process. Market fearsThe fear among market participants of a distribution of bitcoin from the Mt. Gox estate has cast a shadow over the sector over the course of a number of years. With this latest development, it appears that the estate is finally on the cusp of executing on that distribution. If distribution is achieved in the short term, it will come at a time when bitcoin has experienced a major unit price pullback already. Since the approval of spot bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) in the United States earlier this month, it appears that another bankrupt crypto exchange, FTX, has sold $1 billion worth of Grayscale Bitcoin ETF shares into the market. That move is believed to have been responsible for a dramatic drop in bitcoin’s unit price. In tandem with that event, some commentators believe that a pullback at this point is healthy for the market. That’s the view of Charles Edwards, founder of Capriole Investments. Taking to social media, Edwards wrote:”We're still not here yet. This pullback is very overdue and lower is healthier.” At the time of writing, bitcoin has a unit price of $39,884, down from a high earlier this month of $48,494. Confirmation emails have been reported by several Reddit users, with Bitstamp confirming for most, and a few Kraken users also acknowledging receipt. Nevertheless, a significant number of Kraken users mentioned they are yet to receive the confirmation email. Mt. Gox officially closed its doors in February 2014, almost a decade ago, after succumbing to an exploit in 2011.  

South Korea: Crypto Exchange Execs Indicted on Manipulation ChargesA number of executives at Coinone, one of South Korea’s leading cryptocurrency exchanges, have been indicted on charges related to market manipulation.That’s according to a report published by South Korean news outlet, The JoongAng, on Monday. The complaint details no less than forty-six coins that are alleged to have been the subject of manipulation in some form. That represents one in four of the total number of coins that the exchange has enabled for trading on the platform.Photo by Burak The Weekender on PexelsFour executives indictedThe indictment lists four Coinone executives, Mr. Jeon, Mr. Kim, Mr. Ko, and Mr. Hwang. The four have been charged with employing illegal mechanisms to manipulate coin listings, resulting in the four executives profiting to the tune of 2.98 billion Korean Won, which amounts to $2.26 million dollars according to current fx exchange rates.The complaint specifies that these offenses were committed between December 2019 and November 2022. South Korean prosecutors further allege that prior to various projects obtaining a token listing on Coinone, company executives made them sign third-party market-making contracts. That in and of itself is not unusual.One of the key aspects of a new coin listing (and an ongoing listing for that matter), is the need to have sufficient liquidity in place to ensure that the coin can be traded without being susceptible to market manipulation. Low liquidity conditions open the door to bad actors moving the market relative to a particular token.Cross tradingThe indictment is far more specific in calling out illegal cross trading activity. It’s likely that these key Coinone employees would have been expecting such an indictment to land at their doors. Last week, it emerged that LUNA tokens associated with Terraform Labs’ failed Terra USD (TUSD) algorithmic stablecoin project, had been illegally cross traded on three South Korean crypto exchanges: Bithumb, GoPax and Coinone.Cross trading is the practice of trading an asset on an exchange without recording the transaction transparently on the exchange. Strictly speaking, the activity can be legitimate although most exchanges prohibit the practice as it can be used to affect market manipulation.A cross trade could be permitted in a scenario where the price is deemed to be competitive at the time that the trade takes place. While this can more easily be determined in conventional markets as the practice is covered by specific regulation, that’s not the case in most jurisdictions right now where digital asset trading is concerned. By extension, there’s a complete lack of transparency and a lack of reporting.As other market participants don’t have visibility of this type of trading activity, they are unaware as to whether a better price is available on the market or not. In an unregulated state, the practice undermines trust.In the case of Coinone, the executives enabled the practice in order to provide an illusion with regard to trading activity. That meant that trading volumes claimed were inaccurate, misleading ordinary traders and exchange users. Along with trading volume in these coins being artificially boosted, so too were token prices.In the indictment, prosecutors explicitly alleged that cross trading was being employed in an illegal manner:“This price manipulation causes misunderstandings about the trading volume and market price among general members of the exchange, and induces [service users] to participate in the coin transaction and buy the coin.”

Yat Siu: Hong Kong’s Crypto Adoption Sanctioned by the MainlandIn a keynote speech at the Ethereum Community Conference (EthCC) in Paris on Wednesday, Yat Siu, Co-Founder of blockchain gaming and NFT firm Animoca Brands, shed light on Hong Kong’s rapid adoption of cryptocurrencies and Web3 technology, emphasizing its connection to developments unfolding in mainland China.Photo by Serey Kim on UnsplashDriven by the Chinese authoritiesSiu argued that the current crypto trend in Hong Kong signifies more than just the actions of the Chinese autonomous area itself, pointing to a larger agenda driven by China’s aspirations.According to Siu, the Chinese government’s release of its Web3 white paper in May, which positioned Web3 as the future of the internet, carries significant weight. Notably, this announcement came only days after Hong Kong revealed plans to allow retail crypto investments. Siu highlighted that even though China’s white paper did not explicitly mention cryptocurrencies, it is key to acknowledging the country’s commitment to advancing Web3 technologies.The news of Hong Kong’s crypto developments resonated throughout China, capturing attention even on China Central Television, the national TV channel. Siu underscored the broader implications of this coverage, suggesting that the developments in Hong Kong bear the imprint of higher authorities. He made it clear that any actions taken by Hong Kong would require the approval of China.Challenging US global hegemonyBeyond Hong Kong, Siu delved into the broader significance of Web3 as a tool to challenge the United States’ technological hegemony. He expressed concerns about the security risks associated with excessive reliance on tech giants such as Google, Apple, and Facebook. Siu argued that countries like Japan, Korea, and China view Web3 as an opportunity to break free from the dominance of US-centric technologies. This motivation is especially pronounced in China, which is actively pursuing de-dollarization.Reducing dependence on the US dollar represents a key factor driving the adoption of Web3 in these countries. Siu pointed out that the global currency’s position affords the United States significant power and influence, making it crucial for China and other nations to seek alternatives. Embracing Web3 technologies serves as a potential avenue for diminishing reliance on the US dollar and challenging the current financial status quo.While mainland China banned nearly all crypto activities in 2021, the country has remained one of the largest crypto-mining hubs worldwide, despite the prohibition. The proactive stance of Hong Kong in implementing crypto-friendly regulations has sparked hope that it could pave the way for China to eventually lift its long-standing ban.However, prominent figures within the Chinese establishment, such as CPIC Investment Management CEO Chenggang Zhou, have recently reiterated the country’s anti-crypto stance.The rapid adoption of cryptocurrencies and Web3 technology in Hong Kong provides a glimpse into broader developments unfolding in mainland China. Web3 is seen as a potent instrument for challenging US technological dominance, although whether that leads to China lifting its crypto ban is something that remains to be seen.