China Unveils Offline SIM Card Wallet for Digital Yuan Payments

Crypto Winter Halves Korean Bank Fee ProfitsLast year, Korean banks collected only half the amount in fees from crypto exchanges compared to the previous year, according to Korean news agency News1.©Pexels/PixabayDeclining bank fee profitsFiles submitted by the Korean Financial Services Commission to Yun Chang-hyun, a member of the ruling People Power Party, revealed that the five major Korean crypto exchanges paid 20.4 billion KRW (~$15.6 million) in fees to banks last year, which is a 49.4% decrease from the previous year’s 40.3 billion KRW (~$30.7 million). These exchanges (Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone, Korbit, and Gopax) have established agreements with banks to hold real-name bank accounts, which is a legal requirement for exchanges that wish to conduct trades in Korean won.Banks that have provided real-name accounts to crypto exchanges saw an increase in fee profits from 2019 to 2021. However, due to a decline in market sentiment last year, trade volume decreased, resulting in a reduction of bank fees. Last year’s crypto winter is attributable to various factors, including uncertainties in the global economy and collapses of crypto enterprises such as Terraform Labs and FTX.Fees by exchangesIn terms of fees paid to banks by exchanges last year, the largest exchange, Upbit, paid 13.9 billion KRW (~$10.6 million) in fees to Kbank, a mobile banking service provider. Bithumb and Coinone paid 4.9 billion KRW (~$3.7 million) and 989 million KRW (~$750,000) in fees to NH Bank, respectively. It is worth noting that Coinone switched its bank from NH Bank to Kakao Bank last November, paying 72 million KRW (~$55,000) to Kakao Bank in the fourth quarter. Korbit paid 486 million KRW (~$370,000) and 19 million KRW (~$14,500) to Shinhan Bank and Jeonbuk Bank, respectively. Gopax partnered with Jeonbuk Bank to obtain its real-name accounts in April last year.Lawmaker Yun said it was apparent that partnerships were being forged between only a handful of banks and crypto enterprises. Current regulations have to be reviewed to encourage more banks to participate in various blockchain businesses, he added.

DeFiance Capital Secures Interim Victory in Dispute With 3ACSingapore’s DeFiance Capital, a Web3 and crypto investment firm, has notched up a small triumph in its ongoing $140 million legal clash with failed Singaporean crypto hedge fund, Three Arrows Capital (3AC).Photo by Sasun Bughdaryan on UnsplashFavorable rulingAccording to a statement provided via a Medium blog post by DeFiance Capital Founder and CEO Arthur Cheong on Tuesday, the High Court of Singapore has delivered a favorable ruling for the firm, endorsing its preference for jurisdiction in Singapore, rather than the British Virgin Islands, which had been advocated by 3AC.The tussle between 3AC and DeFiance Capital centers around the ownership of certain assets. The liquidators appointed by the British Virgin Islands Court, from Teneo, assert that these assets essentially belong to 3AC’s creditors. However, DeFiance Capital argues vehemently that these assets must be partitioned and returned to its stakeholders.Struggle over assets and jurisdictionAt the heart of the matter are assets totaling $115 million, encompassing digital currencies and non-fungible tokens (NFTs), which currently remain under the control of DeFiance Capital. Additionally, there are 69 SAFE (simple agreement for future equity)/SAFT (simple agreement for future tokens) agreements linked to 3AC. Although Teneo places the collective worth of these assets at roughly $141 million, DeFiance Capital’s estimation is more conservative, pegging it at around $120 million.Beyond asset ownership, jurisdiction has become a pivotal point of contention in the legal discourse. DeFiance Capital has steadfastly advocated for legal proceedings to take place in Singapore, where it operates, as opposed to the British Virgin Islands. The recent ruling from the High Court of Singapore lends support to this stance, challenging Teneo’s argument.DeFiance articulated its position, asserting: “Our position was that all the important witnesses and documents are in Singapore and the dispute ought to be heard by the Singapore Courts to ensure all relevant evidence would be available.”With the court’s decision aligning with DeFiance’s jurisdictional preference, the firm hopes that this development will pave the way for more substantive engagement between the parties, rather than being embroiled in procedural wrangling. The firm believes that this will allow the focus to shift towards addressing the core issues at hand.Business riftThe genesis of this legal saga dates back to 2020 when DeFiance was established as part of the 3AC group, operating autonomously under the stewardship of its founder, Arthur Cheong. The rift escalated in February 2022, when Cheong declined 3AC’s proposal to relocate to Dubai, eventually leading to the formation of two Singapore-based firms in May of that year.Furthermore, in the same month, DeFiance extended a loan of $35 million worth of USDC to 3AC, effectively becoming a creditor. Complications arose when 3AC’s founders transferred legal rights related to DeFiance Capital, a transaction that remained incomplete as 3AC filed for bankruptcy.In light of the ongoing dispute, 3AC asserted that DeFiance’s assets should be harnessed to settle its debts. However, DeFiance firmly stood its ground, upholding its ownership claims over the assets.With liquidators advocating for resolution in the British Virgin Islands — a move that DeFiance rejected due to its Singaporean management ties with 3AC — the stage was set for the legal clash that has now taken a notable turn with this recent court ruling.

Bank of Korea Anticipated to Conduct Retail CBDC Pilot TestThe Bank of Korea (BOK), the South Korean central bank, is reportedly planning to conduct a pilot test for distributing retail central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) to the general public via commercial banks, according to a report by local news outlet IT Chosun.Photo by Zequn Gui on UnsplashBOK’s CBDC initiativesIn 2020, the BOK initiated a pilot test for CBDC issuance, establishing a platform for both online and offline payments. Last month, the BOK announced the successful completion of a CBDC simulation to ensure connectivity with commercial banks.A representative from a commercial bank stated that the BOK would recruit banks next month for a retail CBDC experiment. The pilot test for this retail CBDC is projected to take place next year.Wholesale and retailThe upcoming CBDC pilot test aims to cater to the retail needs of ordinary citizens. There are two types of CBDCs: wholesale CBDCs, which facilitate payments between financial institutions, and retail CBDCs, which are accessible to all economic entities, including the general public.The successful execution of the retail CBDC pilot test requires close collaboration between the BOK and commercial banks. A banking official highlighted that while the BOK can outline the distribution framework for wholesale CBDCs, it may not be the most suitable entity to design the intricate distribution scheme for retail CBDCs.Last year, 15 financial institutions, including five commercial banks (KB Kookmin Bank, Shinhan Bank, Hana Bank, Woori Bank, and NongHyup Bank), participated in an inter-institutional CBDC linkage experiment with the BOK. The BOK is expected to select banks from among these participants to design the distribution structure of retail CBDCs and proceed with a pilot test.Speculative timelineAn official from a commercial bank that took part in the BOK’s prior experiment said that the Korean central bank has recently maintained close communication with commercial banks and successfully completed the infrastructure linkage test for CBDCs. The official also mentioned that the retail CBDC test is expected to see its completion this year, potentially enabling the commencement of retail CBDC implementations in the private sector next year.However, a BOK official expressed a more cautious stance. The official stated that the BOK has recently expanded its digital currency research team and plans to conduct further research in the future. Specific timelines and plans for the retail CBDC test could not be disclosed at this time.Other countriesDifferent countries have adopted varying approaches to CBDC research and implementation, depending on their economic conditions. Developing nations have been promoting CBDC issuance to facilitate financial inclusion, while developed countries have prioritized the stability of their financial systems.However, as cash payments decline and private digital currencies continue to proliferate, developed countries are also turning their attention to retail CBDCs. For instance, the Bank of England collaborated with the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) to establish and experiment with retail CBDC prototype infrastructure. Similarly, the European Union (EU) has released draft legislation to introduce the digital euro as a legal tender within the Eurozone.