China Unveils Offline SIM Card Wallet for Digital Yuan Payments

Vietnamese authorities have dismantled a criminal ring that used cryptocurrency to launder illicit gambling profits, AFP reported, citing local media. The group converted local currency into digital assets such as USDT and Ethereum, routing funds to users for online betting. Operating multi-layered investment websites, the network grew to as many as 20,000 users and managed 25 million accounts, despite Vietnam’s ban on cryptocurrency. In total, the transactions involved were valued at roughly $3.8 billion. Police allege that millions of dollars were funneled into real estate, luxury cars, and cross-border cash transfers. While the money laundering probe continues, the gambling case has already produced convictions. Four Vietnamese siblings who ran the network, along with 39 other defendants, received sentences in Ho Chi Minh City ranging from a three-year suspended term to 13 years in prison. An Indian national identified as the alleged mastermind remains at large.Photo by Amanda Jones on UnsplashThai police foil crypto-themed fraudElsewhere in the region, police in neighboring Thailand busted a South Korean crime syndicate based in Pattaya that allegedly stole more than 20 billion won ($14.2 million) through fraud schemes that invoked cryptocurrency as a lure, along with other scams, the Chosun Ilbo reported. The scam ring reportedly obtained customer data from a lottery tip site and collected money from victims either by posing as agents offering membership refunds or by claiming to provide compensation for leaked personal information, which they disguised as opportunities to buy digital assets. In addition to these schemes, the syndicate ran romance scams and posed as authorities. Thai police arrested 20 members in a June resort raid. Nine more suspects, including ringleaders, remain in custody awaiting extradition. Seoul police said that, in total, 25 members have been caught, 21 of whom are now detained. Authorities believe the network may be linked to other groups in Thailand and are widening the investigation. Europe uncovers $120M crypto fraudCrypto crimes aren’t limited to Asia. In Europe, police arrested five suspects in a Eurojust-led operation that uncovered an online investment scam worth at least €100 million ($116.8 million). Operating since 2018 across 23 countries, the scheme lured victims with platforms promising high returns, then funneled deposits through Lithuanian accounts before disappearing. In a report by the Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project, Elliptic Chief Scientist Tom Robinson said such schemes often have little to do with cryptocurrency itself, instead exploiting its technical obscurity and the allure of quick gains. Beyond scams, outright theft from crypto platforms is also climbing. A Chainalysis study found that by the end of June 2025, more than $2.17 billion had been stolen from exchanges and related platforms—already surpassing the total for all of 2024. The firm projects losses could reach $4 billion by year-end. The single largest incident was the February hack of the Bybit exchange, in which thieves took $1.5 billion, roughly 69% of all funds stolen in the first half of this year. Crypto crime turns increasingly violentThe Chainalysis report also flagged a rise in physical attacks, in which criminals use violence or coercion to force individuals to hand over their crypto holdings. The firm warned that 2025 may log nearly twice as many cases as the worst year on record, noting that the attacks often rise and fall with expectations for Bitcoin’s price. In response to these threats, Chainalysis stressed the need for a multilayered approach to crypto security. It advised service providers to strengthen internal controls through regular audits and employee screening, while upgrading wallet infrastructure and other technical defenses. For individuals, the firm said, keeping holdings discreet has become as critical as technical safeguards, especially amid the rise in physical attacks. 

Abu Dhabi’s Venom Ventures Fund faces market challengesA report by The Block on Friday suggests that Abu Dhabi’s ambitious Venom Ventures Fund, heralded earlier this year with promises of $1 billion investment in Web3 startups, is facing challenges in following through on its mission.Photo by Nazar Skalatsky on UnsplashWhat is Venom?Venom is a collaboration between the Venom Foundation and Iceberg Capital, an alternative asset management company also based in Abu Dhabi. The venture was conceived by Peter Knez, former Co-Chief Investment Officer of BlackRock’s fixed income division and Mustafa Kheriba, Iceberg’s Executive Chairman.In a tweet thread published back in August, the firm described the fund as “old money meets new, the perfect platform for leading the next iteration of blockchain development.” The fund outlined that its approach incorporated venture capital, the offering of a project incubator and a specialist advisory service.Knez has set out lofty ambitions for the fund, stating:“The vision is to drive billions of users into our layer one Blockchain technology by being institutional quality and regulated, and by being such we can actually partner with the government and institutions to help them develop framework for stable coins, for cross-border payment system for tokenization of real world assets and thereby help web2 businesses and citizens move to web3.”At the time of its announcement, Venom Ventures boasted a $20 million investment in Nümi Metaverse and a $5 million strategic investment in Layer 1 blockchain Everscale.Unexpected silenceFurther details on deals struck since January have been scarce, although the fund was reported back in August to have been involved in a blockchain-based carbon credits project, backed by the United Arab Emirates (UAE) Ministry of Climate Change and Environment (MOCCAE).According to The Block, there has been an unexpected silence from the venture as its first year in business comes to a close, despite the initial buzz in the crypto community that greeted the launch of the fund.Venom Ventures positioned itself to cover the entire venture spectrum, from seed to late-stage investments, even offering grants ranging from $25,000 to $200,000. However, a closer look reveals a stark contrast between the fund’s ambitious promises and its current progress. The fund’s website lacks a portfolio section, displaying only a “coming soon” notice.Blockchain mainnet yet to launchThe venture fund has yet to launch its Venom blockchain mainnet, according to Christopher Louis Tsu, CEO of the Venom Foundation. The lack of updates and communication has raised concerns among industry observers about the fund’s overall progress and its ability to fulfill its investment commitments.The broader context of the crypto market adds to the challenges faced by Venom Ventures. Q4 2023 is expected to see a significant drop in venture funding for Web3, down to approximately $2.7 billion from the peak of $13.5 billion in Q1 2022. Market events have left VCs cautious, with notable instances of significant investments being marked down to zero.Amidst these challenges, crypto startups have turned to the Middle East for capital. However, some industry insiders caution that the perceived ease of accessing capital in the Middle East might be a mirage. With that, it remains to be seen whether the fund can revive its initial momentum and deliver on its promise to fuel the growth of Web3 startups in the ever-evolving crypto landscape.

Hong Kong court grants trademark injunction against HuobiThe Hong Kong Special Administrative Region High Court has resolved a trademark dispute between X-Spot Global Limited and Huobi Global Limited, ruling in favor of X-Spot.Back in June, X-Spot alleged that Huobi Global infringed on its trademark rights related to the “Huobi” name. In the legal process which followed, the court sided with X-Spot, compelling Huobi Global to cease using the “Huobi” trademark or any similar name or logo in Hong Kong.Photo by Tingey Injury Law Firm on UnsplashPotential confusionThe court’s official judgment highlighted concerns about potential confusion among the public and industry professionals arising from Huobi Global’s use of the “Huobi” trademarks. It emphasized that such confusion could lead people to believe that X-Spot Global, as the registered trademark owner, is actively engaged in cryptocurrency business associated with the trademark. In response, the court dismissed Huobi Global’s plea to revoke the service order and halt negotiations, also instructing the covering of X-Spot Global’s legal expenses.Post-acquisition conflictThe background to this dispute originates in the acquisition of Huobi Global last year. It’s widely believed that TRON blockchain network founder Justin Sun purchased the exchange for $1 billion although Sun has subsequently suggested that he is just an advisor to the crypto exchange business. The acquisition was made by About Capital Management, an entity associated with the controversial crypto entrepreneur.In May of this year, Sun claimed that Wei Li, a brother of Huobi founder Leon Li, had unjustly profited from the sale of Huobi’s native HT token. The disagreement escalated and as a consequence of that conflict, it became apparent that the acquisition agreement explicitly prohibited the buyer from using the “Huobi’’ trademark.Leon Li accused the cryptocurrency exchange of violating the acquisition agreement’s rules by unauthorized use of the “Huobi” trademark. This legal battle has shed light on the strained relationship between Leon Li and Justin Sun.The court’s decision adds a layer of complexity to Huobi Global’s legal challenges, intensifying existing regulatory issues. Notably, the cryptocurrency exchange is already grappling with a recent order from Malaysian authorities to cease operations in the country due to alleged illegal activities.The ruling comes at a critical juncture for Huobi Global. In September the business rebranded to HTX, signaling aspirations for global expansion amidst a shifting legal landscape. At the time, Justin Sun provided the rationale behind the rebrand. Taking to the X social media platform, he wrote:“It’s very hard for foreigners, Westerners, to pronounce ‘Huobi’… It doesn’t make any sense to them.” Sun went on to explain that the word Huobi means fire and coin in Chinese, adding, “That’s why we rebranded as HTX for international branding.”In light of this trademark infringement injunction decision, it could equally be speculated that the company was acting in advance of an unfavorable ruling in compliance with the terms of the business acquisition agreement.In reaching a decision on the matter, Judge Mimmie Chan J noted the lack of a defense mounted by Huobi against the trademark infringement action.