Thai Central Bank Collaborates With Singapore’s 2C2P on CBDC Pilot

Public Confidence in Crypto Wanes in Hong Kong Amid JPEX ScandalThe development of cryptocurrency in Hong Kong has been dented in terms of public sentiment following the JPEX cryptocurrency exchange scandal, according to a recent survey conducted by the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology’s (HKUST) business school.Photo by Alex Plesovskich on UnsplashA two-phase survey methodologyThe survey, the preliminary results of which were disclosed by the business school on Tuesday, aimed to gauge how public attitudes toward virtual assets had been affected by the JPEX scandal, which rocked the crypto community within the Chinese autonomous territory.While the survey is set to conclude on October 20, the preliminary findings have already revealed a noteworthy shift in public perception. Notably, 41% of respondents expressed a preference not to hold virtual assets, marking a 12-percentage-point increase from the earlier study conducted in May.Moreover, only 20% of respondents indicated a desire to hold virtual assets in the future, reflecting a five-percentage-point decrease compared to the previous survey. These findings suggest a growing skepticism among Hong Kong’s populace regarding the cryptocurrency industry.Post-JPEX public sentimentThe initial survey involved 5,700 participants aged 18 and above and was conducted between April 24 and May 23. Phase two of the survey commenced on September 28, approximately 11 days after the allegations against JPEX came to light. The results were compared to a similar survey conducted between April and May to assess the evolving sentiment. Between September 28 and October 5, phase two of the survey had compiled responses from 2,200 individuals.HKUST acknowledged that the second survey occurred in the “aftermath of an alleged financial fraud” involving a cryptocurrency platform but refrained from directly naming JPEX in the report.Professor Allen Huang, Associate Dean of HKUST’s business school, attributed the shift in sentiment to the recent financial scandal, which thrust the cryptocurrency industry into the spotlight. This heightened attention has led to a “more conservative investment appetite” among the public. He emphasized the need for greater educational initiatives to enhance public awareness and understanding of the risks and potential of this emerging field.HKUST’s business school stated that the survey’s primary objective was to assess the attitudes and viewpoints of Hong Kong’s residents regarding virtual asset investments, considering their experiences, intentions, and the regulatory safeguards in place.JPEX falloutThe JPEX scandal, which allegedly involved a $166 million fraud scheme, unfolded over several months before Hong Kong authorities publicly announced their investigation into the exchange. It forced local regulators to reassess the soundness of crypto trading-related regulatory measures applied within the Chinese autonomous territory.That reassessment led to regulators concluding that efforts needed to be intensified to combat unregulated platforms operating within Hong Kong. In response to the JPEX saga, the Hong Kong Police Force and the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) established a cryptocurrency-focused working group earlier this month to combat illicit activities on cryptocurrency exchanges.The evolving sentiment in Hong Kong reflects the broader challenges and concerns surrounding the cryptocurrency industry. As regulatory scrutiny increases and major incidents like the JPEX scandal come to light, it’s clear that fostering public trust and understanding is a pressing priority for crypto businesses and the broader crypto community.

Among various accounts within a bank, a demand deposit account is considered a “station” where people can temporarily store their money and easily withdraw it for future investments. These accounts are highly liquid, since users can deposit or withdraw funds at any time without having to pay a penalty to a bank.  Following the recent cryptocurrency boom, the five major banks in Korea – KB Kookmin Bank, Shinhan Bank, Hana Bank, Woori Bank and NH Nonghyup Bank – are seeing a significant influx of funds into their demand deposit accounts, according to local media outlet Money Today. This is partly attributed to an increasing number of youths who are seeking to invest in crypto assets, parking their money in these banks’ demand deposit accounts. Shinhan Bank and Nonghyup Bank have seen the highest increase in their deposits, owing to their affiliation with local crypto exchanges that have access to real-name accounts from these banks. Photo by André François McKenzie on UnsplashBTC’s surge attracting young investors to cryptoExperts say that these deposits could be potentially transferred to the crypto market by owners as Bitcoin’s value continues to climb. An insider from a crypto exchange noted that the bullish crypto market, spurred by the U.S. approval of spot bitcoin ETFs, is driving a number of young investors to turn to crypto investments, encouraging them to channel their deposits into buying crypto tokens.  Data from these five major banks shows their total demand deposits by the end of February exceeded KRW 614 trillion ($460 billion), seeing a month-over-month increase of about KRW 23.5 trillion. During the same period, the banks’ combined regular savings grew by KRW 23.6 trillion, while their combined installment savings saw a decrease of KRW 13.3 trillion. This came after the government-led savings product “Youth Hope Installment Savings” reached its maturity, which returns users their principal with relatively large interest gains.  Banks scrambling to attract crypto investors with new savings productsIn response to the potential decline in interest rates in the second half of this year, an increasing number of customers are seeking to put their money into savings products with an interest rate of as low as 3%, according to a banker. In a bid to attract more users, local banks are busy introducing new savings products.  KB Kookmin Bank launched a savings product offering a relatively high annual interest rate of up to 4%, and Shinhan Bank rolled out a savings product targeting youths with an annual interest rate of up to 3.85%.  Meanwhile, Kbank, an online-only bank, is deemed among the largest beneficiaries of the crypto boom, as the bank saw its average daily new customers triple compared to last year. Since 2020, Kbank has served as the provider of real-name accounts to Upbit, the leading crypto exchange in Korea.  Ha Joon-kyung, a professor at the Department of Economics at Hanyang University, said the sudden surge in demand deposits means that a significant portion of these funds will be invested in high-yielding but risky assets, including cryptocurrencies, stocks and real estate.  

NFTs not subject to South Korea’s Virtual Asset User Protection ActIn anticipation of the Virtual Asset User Protection Act coming into effect in July of next year, the South Korean Financial Services Commission (FSC) has issued an advance notice regarding its subordinate statutes.Photo by Ethan Brooke on UnsplashSeven specific provisionsThe subsidiary regulations under the Act detail seven specific provisions aligned with the Act’s objectives. Firstly, assets categorized as electronic securities, mobile vouchers, deposit tokens backed by the Bank of Korea’s central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) and non-fungible tokens (NFTs) will not be classified as virtual assets and hence, not regulated by this Act. However, in instances where NFTs are used as a means of payment for specific goods or services, they will be regarded as virtual assets.Secondly, banks will take responsibility for managing the deposits of users on cryptocurrency exchanges. This aligns with the Act’s requirement for virtual asset service providers (VASPs) to keep users’ funds separate from their own, either by depositing them in, or entrusting them to, reputable institutions. Under these regulations, banks are required to manage users’ assets in a manner consistent with how investors’ deposits are handled under the Capital Markets Act. This means that banks are allowed to invest VASP users’ assets only in secure instruments, such as state and local government bonds, and are also obligated to pay fees to deposit owners, taking into account the yields of these investments.80% of user assets in cold walletsThe third key aspect of the regulations is that VASPs are required to store a minimum of 80% of user assets in cold wallets, which are not connected to the internet. This is higher than the current requirement of 70%, enhancing the security measures for users of virtual assets. To calculate the total value of a virtual asset at any given time, its total supply is multiplied by its average daily price over the past year. VASPs are obligated to assess the value of virtual assets every month.The fourth regulation mandates that VASPs must enroll in an insurance plan, contribute to a rainy day fund or accumulate reserves. This is to ensure they can fulfill their compensation responsibilities in the event of incidents like security breaches or technical failures. The required preparation amount is set at a minimum of 5% of the user assets stored in hot wallets, as these are more susceptible to risks. VASPs are required to update their compensation thresholds or reserves monthly and must take any necessary actions to comply with these requirements by the next working day following the update.Information disclosure guidelinesAnother regulation addresses the issue of insider trading in the context of the virtual asset market. Under the current Capital Markets Act, information is considered disclosed when it’s made available through disclosure systems of the FSC or the Korea Exchange (KRX). However, since the cryptocurrency market lacks a similar system, the new statute provides criteria for determining when information is deemed disclosed.For instance, if a VASP, including exchanges, releases crucial information about a virtual asset on an exchange and six hours pass, that information is regarded as disclosed. This acknowledges the non-stop nature of the crypto market. Moreover, information disclosed post 6 p.m. is treated as officially disclosed after 9 a.m. the next day.Additionally, if a virtual asset issuer publishes significant information about its token on a website hosting its white paper, the information is deemed public after one day. This is conditional upon the website being publicly accessible and having consistently provided important token information for the preceding six months.These rules aim to provide clarity and fairness in information disclosure in the crypto market, adapting the principles of traditional financial markets to the unique dynamics of virtual assets.No arbitrary suspension of transactionsThe sixth regulation restricts VASPs from arbitrarily halting deposits and withdrawals of virtual assets unless there are justifiable reasons for such actions. Acceptable circumstances for suspending these transactions include situations where the VASP experiences a technical disruption in its system, where regulatory authorities instruct a VASP to cease deposits and withdrawals or where cyberattacks or similar incidents have occurred or are clearly imminent.Lastly, virtual asset exchanges are required to monitor for abnormal transactions continuously. These are transactions that show substantial shifts in the prices or trading volumes of virtual assets, particularly in response to news or rumors that could influence cryptocurrency prices. If VASPs suspect unfair trading practices, they must report to the FSC or the Financial Supervisory Service (FSS). When there is ample evidence of such activities, crypto exchanges are obligated to notify the police or the prosecutors’ office. In addition, the financial regulator has the authority to levy fines based on the prosecution’s decisions or after completing consultations with the prosecution if a year has passed since the day of the report.During the period of advance notice, which spans from Nov. 11 to Jan. 22, the FSC will seek comments from relevant organizations, experts and businesses. This process is aimed at refining the rules and regulations subordinate to the Virtual Asset User Protection Act. Moving forward, the financial authorities plan to publish a set of guidelines and Q&A materials and conduct explanatory sessions, with the goal of ensuring a smooth implementation of the Act.