Mirae Asset Securities and NEAR Protocol Partner to Advance Blockchain Tech

Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Finance Lawrence Wong is slated to unveil the Singapore 2024 Budget Statement on Feb. 16. As Singapore prepares for the unveiling of its 2024 Budget, the city-state’s Web3 community is amplifying its call for crucial government backing. That’s according to a recent report by The Straits Times. The plea from Singaporean firms revolves around two pivotal areas: one, nurturing a proficient talent pool well-versed in blockchain technology; and, in addition to that, having a strength and depth in cybersecurity, so as to fortify defenses against cyber threats.Photo by David Pardo Bernal on UnsplashUrgent need for Web3 talentSome time ago, stakeholders in Singapore set out their stall in terms of the ambition of firmly establishing the city-state as a global hub for Web3 development. It’s off to a good start with many notable crypto and Web3 companies having established themselves in Singapore. However, broadening that industry hub to the fullest extent will involve overcoming the significant hurdles hindering the growth trajectory of Singapore’s Web3 sector. Top of the list is the scarcity of skilled professionals in the blockchain domain. Danny Lim, a core contributor at MarginX, a decentralized exchange, stressed the pressing demand for seasoned developers. Lim underscored the necessity of supporting Web2 developers transitioning into Web3 realms, especially those grappling with job displacement, to solidify Singapore’s status as a nucleus for groundbreaking blockchain ventures. Elaine Zhu, the general manager of the Asian division of blockchain infrastructure firm Parity Technologies, emphasized the critical need for blockchain education, expressing apprehension over the dwindling influx of new developers. In citing a recent report by crypto-focused venture capital firm Electric Capital which quantified developer activity across Web3, Zhu noted that the number of experienced developers in Singapore remains healthy. However, the report found that the number of newly qualified developers dropped by 52 percent last year. Bolstering cyber defensesAdditionally, the industry is clamoring for fortified cyber defenses to shield against the escalating threat landscape targeting digital assets. This focus on security underscores the broader challenge of ensuring the secure proliferation of Web3 technologies and digital currencies within Singapore’s technological ecosystem. A report by Singapore-based blockchain security firm Beosin last year found that exit scams are a growing concern in the crypto-sphere. At the end of last month, the Singapore Police Force, alongside the Cyber Security Agency of Singapore (CSA), issued an advisory in order to raise awareness regarding crypto-centric cyber attacks. Ong Chengyi, representing Chainalysis, hailed Web3 as pivotal for long-term growth and advocated for sustained governmental support to enhance the sector’s capability in mitigating risks using advanced technological solutions. Ong remarked:“We hope to see more public-private collaboration to bolster Singapore’s defences against crypto crime and cyber threats more generally, through the utilization of data and technology.” Angela Ang of TRM Labs echoed that sentiment, emphasizing the imperative for heightened regulatory support to nurture the expansion of digital assets. Ang stated:“To deliver clarity to businesses at scale, whether it’s through licensing decisions or implementation guidance, the Government must invest in both human capital and technology throughout the regulatory process.” 

The Need to Distinguish Between Security and Non-Security Virtual AssetsWith the recent enactment of the Virtual Asset User Protection Bill in South Korea, there is a need to lay out criteria for determining whether virtual assets qualify as securities, says Kim Ja-bong, a senior research fellow at the Korea Institute of Finance, in his report titled “The Implications of Determining Which Virtual Assets Constitute Securities and Investor Protection” released on Saturday.Photo by Shubham Dhage on UnsplashThe implications of the Virtual Asset User Protection ActThe Virtual Asset User Protection Act — which will take effect in July of next year — aims to protect customer assets, establish regulations against unfair trading practices, and enforce penalties. Notably, it will target virtual assets that are not securities, deeming it necessary for regulators to determine if virtual assets qualify as securities or not in order to enforce the bill. Assets with characteristics of securities will fall under the jurisdiction of the Capital Markets Act.Therefore, if the Virtual Asset User Protection Act does not provide sufficient investor protection, issuers may be incentivized to issue non-security assets rather than security assets to avoid the regulations of the Capital Markets Act. This further necessitates the act of distinguishing between virtual assets that are securities versus those that are not.Determining if a virtual asset is a security or notThere are two approaches to do this, according to Kim: the passive approach, which avoids considering a virtual asset as a security whenever possible, and the active approach, which treats a virtual asset as a security whenever applicable.He argues that it is better to focus on whether an investment contract qualifies as a security if it is considered an investment contract, rather than simply selecting a specific approach.Furthermore, the nature of virtual assets renders them unbound by national borders, so it is necessary to establish assessment criteria that correspond with international standards, such as those used in the US and Europe.This is especially important because if the criteria differ from international standards, there is a risk of domestic investors suffering damages due to an issuer’s pursuit of regulatory arbitrage between countries.Equitable recognition and potential for security tokensAccording to Kim, the importance of determining whether virtual assets are securities lies in ensuring that security tokens receive the same recognition and trading treatment as traditional securities such as stocks. With such a measure, security token offerings can serve as an efficient and reliable method for raising funds. Although there may be concerns that such a regulation may hinder the development of virtual assets, it may well be an opportunity for security tokens to be qualified and trusted as high-quality financial instruments just like existing securities, Kim claims.Even for virtual assets that are not considered securities, there are many types of assets that are financial in nature, such as e-money tokens — therefore, it is necessary to actively protect investors in non-security virtual assets through financial regulations such as reinforcing disclosure obligations, which is being done in the EU through the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA).Empowering regulators for enhanced investor protection and market integrityKim underscored that investor protection and healthy growth of the virtual asset market are made possible mainly through expanding regulators’ authority to protect economic interests and prevent damages. The author also suggested institutional reforms that grant regulators substantial authority, which would enhance their ability to protect investors effectively and provide compensation for damages.He added that regulators should also have the authority to enforce liability for damages or impose civil penalties for unfair trading practices conducted using classified information.

Study Places Hong Kong as Leader in Crypto ReadinessHong Kong, according to a recent study conducted by Forex Suggest, has emerged as the leading jurisdiction worldwide in terms of its readiness for cryptocurrencies. The study evaluated various factors such as the number of blockchain startups per 100,000 people and the density of crypto ATMs in relation to the population.Photo by Traxer on UnsplashZero capital gains taxThe attractiveness of Hong Kong for investors in the crypto space stems from its advantageous tax policies. The study noted that Hong Kong does not levy capital gains taxes on cryptocurrency, making it an appealing destination for crypto enthusiasts. The United States and Switzerland secured the second and third positions, respectively, in the rankings of the most crypto-ready countries.In recent times, Hong Kong has actively embraced investments from digital asset companies and is poised to implement new regulations for the industry. Effective from June 1, the city’s new rules aim to establish Hong Kong as a global hub for digital assets. These regulations permit licensed cryptocurrency trading platforms to offer services to retail investors while incorporating measures to safeguard individual traders.Global crypto firms are gearing up for that new licensing approach, carving out separate corporate entities in order to meet the regulatory requirements which the Hong Kong regulator, the Securities Futures Commission (SFC), has set. Another Hong Kong regulator, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA), is also opening up to embrace digital asset innovation through a pilot project implicating the tokenization of real world assets.Regarding the number of blockchain startups, Hong Kong boasts three startups per 100,000 individuals, securing the second position globally. Topping the list is Switzerland, with an impressive count of 12.9 blockchain startups per 100,000 residents, amounting to a total of 1,128.The study also highlighted that countries such as Hong Kong, Switzerland, Panama, Portugal, Germany, Malaysia, and Turkey impose the lowest taxes on cryptocurrencies. These nations exempt individuals from capital gains taxes on profits derived from cryptocurrency trading.Crypto ATM proliferationWhen considering the prevalence of crypto ATMs, Hong Kong ranks third globally, with two ATMs per 100,000 people, totaling 149 ATMs. The United States takes the top spot with nearly 34,000 crypto ATMs, but when normalized to the population, it has 10.1 ATMs per 100,000 individuals.Regressive measures in USIn contrast to Hong Kong’s favorable environment, regulators in the United States have intensified their efforts to tighten regulations on cryptocurrency exchanges, leading many within the industry to advocate for clearer guidelines. Consequently, several exchanges are exploring jurisdictions that offer more favorable conditions.Forex Suggest emphasized that the report’s findings were based on extensive data analysis, taking into account factors such as tax regulations, legislation, the presence of blockchain startups, and the level of interest in cryptocurrencies. Each jurisdiction received a normalized score out of 10 for each factor, and the overall rankings were determined by averaging these scores.Hong Kong’s position as the most crypto-ready jurisdiction in the world showcases its commitment to fostering innovation and becoming a global leader in the digital asset space. With its advantageous tax policies, growing number of blockchain startups, and forthcoming regulations, the autonomous Chinese territory is solidifying its position as an attractive destination for businesses and investors in the cryptocurrency space.