Top

SEC Lawsuit Stalls Binance’s Gopax Acquisition Deal in South Korea

Policy & Regulation·June 07, 2023, 11:59 PM

Nothing exists in a vacuum, and on that basis, it appears that ripples emanating from the recent lawsuit filed by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in the United States against global crypto exchange Binance have resulted in the company struggling to complete the acquisition of South Korea’s Gopax.

Photo by Daniel Bernard on Unsplash

 

Suspended pending review

The acquisition deal between Binance and South Korean crypto trading platform Gopax has hit a roadblock as a direct consequence of the lawsuit. The Financial Services Commission (FSC), the financial watchdog in South Korea, has put the acquisition on hold as it reviews the situation.

Binance had acquired a majority stake in Gopax in February, with plans to re-enter the South Korean crypto market after a two-year absence. Gopax is a top five cryptocurrency exchange in South Korea, alongside Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone, and Korbit. However, according to a report by local news media, the FSC has suspended Gopax’s executive change report filed on Tuesday in light of the SEC lawsuit. The report outlined the nomination of three Binance members, including Leon Singh Poong, as inside directors of Gopax.

The FSC cited the allegations of securities law violations against Binance and the SEC’s request to freeze Binance.US assets as the reasons for its cautious approach.

 

Gopax revival

The significance of Binance’s acquisition of Gopax goes beyond its re-entry into the South Korean market. It also aimed to revive the struggling local crypto trading platform. In November 2022, Gopax faced challenges when it suspended withdrawals of principal and interest payments from its decentralized finance service, GoFi, following the collapse of the Bahamas-based FTX crypto exchange and the bankruptcy of Genesis, a US digital assets financial services firm.

Digital Currency Group, the parent company of Genesis, was reportedly the second-largest shareholder of Gopax and a key business partner providing the GoFi product. Binance’s acquisition deal intended to inject new capital into Gopax to facilitate customer withdrawals and interest payments for GoFi.

The SEC lawsuit against Binance alleges the exchange’s commingling of customers’ funds and violations of various securities laws. The SEC has filed 13 charges against Binance, its subsidiaries, and its CEO, Changpeng Zhao.

 

Acquisition strategy

Binance appears to have been pursuing an acquisition strategy in attempting to carve out a greater market share in Asian markets. Binance entered the Japanese market via acquisition in November 2022 when it purchased local crypto platform, Sakura Exchange BitCoin. At the end of last month, Binance announced that it was rebranding the business as Binance Japan and launching it as a stand alone bespoke platform dedicated to the Japanese market.

In Thailand, the global crypto exchange has varied its approach, entering into a joint venture rather than a full acquisition. It has partnered with Gulf Innova, with the new entity, Gulf Binance, recently having been awarded a trading license by the Thai regulator.

The outcome of the SEC lawsuit and its impact on Binance’s operations in South Korea remains uncertain. The FSC’s review process will consider the allegations against Binance and the implications of the SEC’s actions before making a decision on the Gopax acquisition. The crypto industry will closely monitor the developments as they unfold, as no doubt the saga will have broader implications for Binance and its expansion plans.

More to Read
View All
Policy & Regulation·

May 15, 2024

Falcon Labs fined in settlement with CFTC

U.S. regulator, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), has fined Seychelles-headquartered crypto prime brokerage Falcon Labs as part of an overall settlement with the company.  The CFTC had found that the company had operated as an unregistered futures commission merchant (FCM) and furthermore, that it had enabled access to digital asset exchanges without the requisite registration.Photo by Joshua Hoehne on UnsplashSettlement termsIn a press release published to its website on May 13, the CFTC set out the nature of its settlement with Falcon Labs. The parties have agreed that Falcon Labs must discontinue its activities in acting as an unregistered FCM, with particular emphasis on it having provided U.S. individuals with access to digital asset derivatives trading.  Furthermore a fine of $1,179,008 has been applied in disgorgement and in addition, Falcon will have to pay a civil monetary penalty of $589,504. These penalties have been significantly reduced by comparison with the CFTCs original ask, on the basis that Falcon Labs cooperated fully with the CFTC’s Division of Enforcement over the course of the regulator’s investigative process into the activities of the company. In its statement the regulator set out its intent relative to enforcement going forward. Ian McGinley, the CFTC’s Director of Enforcement, stated:”The CFTC is taking the fight one step further by, for the first time, charging an intermediary that inappropriately facilitated access to those exchanges. Today’s action highlights that the CFTC will not hesitate to charge any entities—exchanges or intermediaries—who are providing customers access to digital asset products and services that require registration but have failed to appropriately register.” McGinley added that “the CFTC’s enforcement program has made clear it will not tolerate digital asset exchanges that fail to register with the CFTC or comply with the agency’s rules that maintain integrity in the derivatives markets.” No admission of guiltIn responding to the CFTCs original complaint, Falcon Labs tried to up the ante in terms of compliance. It moved to improve customer identification controls. As a consequence of its market position as a trading intermediary Falcon Labs enabled customer trading on a number of digital asset exchange platforms.  That activity included facilitating U.S.-based institutional customers relative to crypto derivatives trading. It allowed its own account with various digital asset trading platforms to be used, through a system of sub-accounts, by its customers, oftentimes without adequate customer information having been sought. In reaching this settlement with the CFTC Falcon Labs has not made any admission of guilt relative to the regulator’s findings. Alongside paying the agreed upon fines, it will voluntarily agree to adhere to the implementation of improved controls and to withhold its services from user groups that are deemed to be restricted, including all U.S. nationals. Taking to the X social media platform to comment on the matter, Mike Sellig, a partner at New York-based law firm Willkie Farr & Gallagher, claimed that the settlement demonstrated that the CFTC was following in the footsteps of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), establishing “a body of widely applicable precedent.”

news
Policy & Regulation·

Sep 09, 2025

South Korea to mandate disclosure of crypto funds in home purchases

South Korean authorities will require homebuyers to disclose funds originating from cryptocurrency sales, a move aimed at increasing transparency in the nation's tight real estate market. The new rule is part of a wider government effort to address housing affordability, which is particularly pronounced in Seoul, and to integrate digital assets into its regulatory framework. The change, announced on Sept. 7 as part of new housing supply measures, will alter the mandatory funding plan submitted during property transactions. Proceeds from digital assets will be listed as a distinct category, similar to funds from stocks or bonds. Officials are also expanding loan disclosure requirements to include business loans and overseas borrowing, closing potential financing loopholes.Photo by Traxer on UnsplashImpact of asset volatility on property valuesThe policy follows growing evidence that volatility in assets like cryptocurrency can spill over into the property market. A 2024 study cited by Maeil Business Newspaper highlighted that both the COVID-era stock rally and Bitcoin's 2023 price surge had a discernible impact on housing values. According to Yu Jung-suk, a professor at Dankook University, apartments in Seoul's affluent Gangnam district are particularly sensitive to fluctuations in Bitcoin and the KOSDAQ index. He noted that high-profile property acquisitions by young crypto investors, even if few in number, can significantly sway market sentiment. Professor Yu suggested that regulators may need more comprehensive tools to manage the risks connecting different asset classes. The government's new measures also seek to cool the capital's housing market, where prices have continued to rise despite a slowdown in growth. In contrast, prices in areas outside Seoul have been declining since 2022. To address the supply-demand imbalance, officials plan to begin construction of 1.35 million new homes in the Seoul metropolitan area between 2026 and 2030. Stablecoin regulation and CBDC trials advanceBeyond real estate, officials are developing a formal regulatory structure for stablecoins. The Presidential Commission on Policy Planning is reportedly considering a model where a consortium of banks and fintech firms would be granted rights to issue a won-pegged stablecoin. Supervision for this new system would fall to a proposed Financial Stability Council, a body intended to serve as a central coordinator for financial policy, comprising the finance ministry, the Bank of Korea, and other regulators. The initiative aims to combine the stability of the traditional banking sector with the innovation of non-bank financial companies. The evolving regulatory environment is attracting attention from global industry leaders. Executives from Tether, the issuer of the USDT stablecoin, met with Shinhan Financial Group CEO Jin Ok-dong in Seoul on Sept. 8. While Tether representatives stated they were monitoring the regulatory climate, they confirmed no specific business plans were discussed. Separately, the Bank of Korea is moving forward with digital currency experiments. In partnership with government agencies and six major commercial banks, the central bank will launch a pilot program to test the use of a digital currency for distributing state subsidies and vouchers. 

news
Policy & Regulation·

Sep 04, 2023

Korean Financial Authority Orders Suspension and Levies $1.4M Fine on Crypto Lender Delio

Korean Financial Authority Orders Suspension and Levies $1.4M Fine on Crypto Lender DelioDelio, a cryptocurrency lending company based in South Korea, has received a directive from the financial regulatory authority to cease its operations for a duration of three months, according to local news agency Yonhap. Additionally, the company has been levied with a fine amounting to KRW 1.896 billion ($1.4 million).Photo by Riva Ferdian on UnsplashExecutive dismissal recommendedThis announcement was made on September 1 by the Financial Intelligence Unit (KoFIU) under the South Korean Financial Services Commission. In addition to the measures mentioned above, the KoFIU advised the company to remove one of its executives.As a virtual asset service provider (VASP) registered with the financial regulatory authority, Delio offered deposit services with an annual yield reaching up to 10.7%. However, in June of this year, the company abruptly halted its withdrawal services, prompting investigations conducted by both the KoFIU and public prosecutors.Involvement with unregistered VASPsThe KoFIU saw that Delio had engaged in trading activities with unregistered VASPs and had also breached the restrictions on the trading of affiliate-issued virtual assets. These actions are prohibited under the Financial Transaction Information Act.The financial authority identified a total of 171 instances in which Delio facilitated the transfer of its customers’ virtual assets to unregistered VASPs located outside the country. Additionally, the authority also uncovered the company’s engagement in storing the virtual assets of unregistered VASPs.It was also discovered that Delio had not only neglected to assess the risks of money laundering before introducing new products or services but had also failed to fulfill Know Your Customer (KYC) obligations.

news
Loading