Alibaba Cloud Partners With Avalanche to Deploy Metaverses

Fingerlabs launches Web3 solution to help partners build membership NFTsFingerlabs, a subsidiary of digital marketing company FSN, has launched its participatory Web3 membership platform dubbed “Bling” in an effort to foray into the evolving digital landscape, according to an official press release.Photo by Choong Deng Xiang on UnsplashCustomizable characters and collaborative benefitsBling is an all-in-one marketing solution that allows businesses to conveniently create and manage NFTs that offer membership benefits. Users can create customizable characters on Favorlet, Fingerlabs’ NFT wallet and customer management service, using clothing or accessories called “parts.” These parts are linked to benefits offered by Fingerlabs’ partner firms, usually in the form of coupons that can be used both online and offline — thus touting the name “parts NFTs.” This can help boost brand exposure as Fingerlabs will be able to share its customer base with its partners.“Bling will prove to be a novel attempt in demonstrating that Web3 technology is not exclusive but for everyone to use. It will significantly reduce the risks associated with directly operating NFT projects and support any brand in effortlessly utilizing Web3 technology as an all-in-one solution for development and operations,” explained Fingerlabs CEO Kim Dong-hoon.Partner firms can construct their parts NFTs through Favorlet, and users can store theirs on their Favorlet wallet. Notably, parts NFTs can also be traded on NFT is Life Evolution (NILE), a decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) and NFT platform built on blockchain gaming publisher Wemade’s WEMIX3.0 mainnet.Bringing a classic to Web3Fingerlabs also announced that it is working with the K Museum of Contemporary Art, located in Seoul, as Bling’s first official partner. Users can customize their Bling characters with Great Gatsby-themed parts in line with the museum’s newest exhibit based on the classic novel. Passes to the exhibit will also be minted as NFTs. The K Museum of Contemporary Art previously worked with Fingerlabs in August on a project where exhibit poster cards were minted as reward-yielding NFTs.

Alchemy Pay scores second money services license in United StatesAlchemy Pay, the Singaporean crypto-fiat payment services provider, is solidifying its presence in the United States, with the acquisition of a money services license in the state of Iowa.Photo by Austin Goode on UnsplashU.S. licensing driveThis expansion, announced on Thursday, aligns with the company’s strategy to navigate the U.S. regulatory landscape and enhance compliance with local requirements. This recent acquisition follows Alchemy Pay’s earlier achievement of a money transmitter license (MTL) in Arkansas in September. The company has not only completed the application process for MTL licenses in additional U.S. states but also expects responses in the coming months.Under the regulatory framework of Iowa, entities or individuals engaged in currency exchange or money transmission must obtain a money services license. In an interview with Cointelegraph, Alchemy Pay Ecosystem Lead Robert McCracken highlighted the Singaporean company’s commitment to a well-structured regulatory environment. McCraken stated:“We believe that a well-structured regulatory environment is essential for the sustainable growth and development of any industry, and that includes the fiat-crypto payment industry.”Despite the challenges posed by the evolving regulatory landscape in the U.S., McCracken affirmed the company’s dedication to seeking licenses and upholding compliance standards as it expands operations. He described this approach as “more challenging but ultimately correct” for ensuring the long-term success of the crypto payment industry.Global market expansionIn addition to its U.S. endeavors, Alchemy Pay is actively pursuing license applications and market expansion opportunities globally, including in the United Kingdom and Hong Kong. The firm operates in 173 countries already, facilitating transactions through various payment methods, including Visa, Mastercard, regional mobile wallets and domestic transfers.In April, the company secured $10 million in funding from Singaporean venture fund and market maker DWF Labs, with a view towards expanding the business in South Korea. The following month, it enabled a rupee-denominated on-ramp, integrating with India’s UPI real-time payments system. In July, it partnered with well-known payments processor Checkout.com, integrating its Visa and Mastercard channels into its on and off-ramps.ICP collaborationThe collaborations and partnerships keep coming with Alchemy Pay and with that, on Wednesday it announced a strategic partnership with the Internet Computer (ICP) smart contract platform.That collaboration will see the listing of ICP, Internet Computer’s native token, on Alchemy Pay’s fiat on-ramp. This is the latest in a line of collaborations the crypto payments gateway has made with layer one and two blockchain network projects, including Polygon, Avalanche, Algorand and Arbitrum.These latest strategic expansions align with the company’s vision to establish a strong global presence while navigating and contributing to the ongoing evolution of crypto regulatory frameworks. Currently, comprehensive regulations for the entire crypto industry in the U.S. are under consideration by regulators, reflecting the dynamic nature of this rapidly evolving sector.

The Legal Future of South Korea’s Crypto Industry: Necessary Legislation and SystemsA recent National Assembly symposium organized by South Korea’s Digital Asset Policy Forum brought experts together to discuss the challenges and prospects of the implementation of the Virtual Asset User Protection Act at the National Assembly Members’ Office Building in Seoul on Tuesday.Photo by Tingey Injury Law Firm on UnsplashInternational modelsReferences were made to global examples, such as the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) — the world’s first standalone virtual asset legislation enacted in the EU — which ensures transparency, disclosure, authorization, and supervision of crypto-asset transactions. However, unlike the capital market, MiCA does not impose regular disclosure reporting requirements or corrections on them. Firms in Japan, on the other hand, are asked to provide disclosure under autonomous regulation through the Japan Virtual and Crypto Assets Exchange Association (JVCEA).Notably, in its recent Policy Recommendations for Crypto and Digital Asset Markets Consultation Report, the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) states that it is “seeking to encourage optimal consistency in the way crypto-asset markets and securities markets are regulated within individual IOSCO jurisdictions, in accordance with the principle of ‘same activities, same risks, same regulatory outcomes’.” This principle refers to the concept that any crypto-asset activity that has a similar function and poses similar risks to those in the traditional financial system — such as operating a trading platform or providing custody services — is subject to regulation that ensures equivalent outcomes, as defined by the UK Parliament.The IOSCO report also suggests that crypto-asset service providers (CASPs) should disclose information regarding ownership and control of crypto-assets, issuer and business-related information, issuer management teams, transaction history and operational description of crypto-assets, token ownership concentration, transfer protocols, and a given CASP’s treatment of the client crypto-assets and their respective rights and entitlements during events like hard forks and airdrops.Hurdles to overcomeExperts at the forum reflected these considerations in their sentiments. Han Suh-hee, a lawyer at Barun Law Firm, emphasized that it is important to determine what kind of information should be disclosed. She argued that it is necessary to discuss to what extent information about virtual asset issuers should be disclosed and whether mandating firms to disclose their financial and business conditions is efficient.In particular, Han underlined the need to consider the differences between virtual assets and stocks when establishing a framework for the disclosure of virtual assets holdings. Unlike stocks, virtual assets possess distinctive characteristics like their borderless and decentralized nature, unclear issuer backgrounds, and the ability to conduct peer-to-peer (P2P) transactions.Lee Han-jin, a lawyer at Kim & Chang Law Firm, added that the enactment of Korea’s Virtual Asset User Protection Act was aimed at establishing a system directly targeted at regulating virtual assets and virtual asset service operators (VASPs) — a significant development from the Financial Transaction Reporting Act, which had until now been the only legal framework responsible for regulating VASPs along with other entities like casino business operators. Virtual assets are now subject to a more systematized regulatory approach.However, he said that the Virtual Asset User Protection Act still has its setbacks because it is undergoing a two-stage legislative process. Lee criticized the fact that the same definition of VASPs outlined in the Financial Transaction Reporting Act had been brought over, which limits their identity to transaction intermediaries, wallet operators, and custodians while overlooking their other roles like crypto management, crypto deposits, and crypto collective investments.Lee also pointed out another weakness: the scope of prohibition on using undisclosed information and market manipulation is broader in the Virtual Asset User Protection Act than in the Capital Markets Act. He argued that enforcement decrees should stipulate the definition of insiders and exceptional cases when deliberating on the prohibition of insider virtual asset trading.Lee thus emphasized the need for a clear definition of virtual assets in the Virtual Asset User Protection Act, as it is yet unclear whether they are objects or assets. All things considered, he believes there must be a law that can encompass blockchain-based decentralization, outline the similarities and differences between digital assets and financial products, and accommodate new services that utilize smart contracts.“We are in the process of creating a regulatory system similar to those being adopted in other countries based on their respective markets,” said Lee Seok-ran, head of the Financial Innovation Bureau at the Financial Services Commission (FSC). “Unlike the stock market, which is equipped with regulations to prevent fraudulent transactions and misconduct, virtual assets are traded on multiple exchanges, so we are considering how to interpret unfair trading activities and conduct market surveillance.”She explained that the commission is prioritizing user protection measures and subordinate regulations. “I believe we will be able to create a system for subordinate regulations on disclosure once an overall global trajectory is established. But before that happens, we are working on guidelines for defining unfair trading activities with regulators and the Digital Asset eXchange Alliance (DAXA).” Unfair trading activities associated with virtual assets include not only those conducted on exchanges but also under other circumstances.The FSC officer said that the financial authority is set to establish legal criteria to distinguish cases such as false statements in white papers of crypto projects. She added that enforcement decrees will define both the conditions for restricting deposits and withdrawals on crypto exchanges and the corresponding limits.