Further Setback for Luno With Loss of Top Exec

Asiastar Entertainment and Codus to Develop Casual P2E Game with NFT RewardsAsiastar Entertainment, a Korean company specializing in animation, food products, and toys, revealed plans last Friday to work with its business partner, software and blockchain development firm Codus, to develop a casual play-to-earn (P2E) game that rewards players with NFTs.Photo by Choong Deng Xiang on UnsplashTokenized in-game assets and coin rewardsSpecifically, multiple in-game characters and backgrounds will be tokenized as NFTs for trading. As players progress through the game, they can also earn rewards in the form of TBC — the official tradeable coin issued by TurboChain Foundation, a subsidiary of Asiastar Entertainment. These rewards can be exchanged for gift vouchers and various merchandise, the company said.The two companies plan to leverage Asiastar Entertainment’s Great Q-Bot animation model — a model originally aimed at providing animated educational content for children — to create the P2E game.Watch-to-earn, short-form videosMeanwhile, TurboChain Foundation is gearing up to launch its Turbo Playhouse platform in the latter half of the year. This watch-to-earn, short-form video platform links offline products and online videos with QR codes to allow users to receive TBCs.Asiastar Entertainment also added that it is currently focusing on expanding its business through blockchain-related ventures by taking advantage of its core competencies in this emerging field.

Singapore High Court Recognizes Cryptocurrency as Personal PropertyIn a significant ruling on July 25, Judge Philip Jeyaretnam of the High Court of Singapore declared that cryptocurrency is capable of being held in trust and should be recognized as property.The judge’s decision came in response to a case brought by Dubai-headquartered crypto exchange Bybit against its former employee, Ho Kai Xin, who was accused of transferring approximately 4.2 million Tether (USDT) from the crypto exchange to her private accounts without authorization.Photo by Tingey Injury Law Firm on UnsplashNo fundamental differenceIn his ruling, Judge Jeyaretnam emphasized that there is no fundamental difference between cryptocurrencies, fiat money, or even physical objects like shells when it comes to their status as property. He argued that as long as these objects hold value and are based on mutual faith, they can be considered property. The judge’s verdict is seen as a crucial step in establishing the legal status of digital assets within the Singaporean jurisdiction.Addressing the argument that cryptocurrencies lack physical presence and therefore cannot be considered property, Judge Jeyaretnam drew an analogy, stating: “We identify what is going on as a particular digital token, somewhat like how we give a name to a river even though the water contained within its banks is constantly changing.” By equating cryptocurrencies to named entities, the judge made it clear that physical tangibility is not a prerequisite for something to be classified as property.Cryptocurrencies have valueFurthermore, the ruling challenges the perception that cryptocurrencies have no “real” value. Judge Jeyaretnam firmly refuted this notion, highlighting that the value of any asset, whether physical or digital, is ultimately determined by collective human belief and judgment.One critical classification made by the judge is grouping cryptocurrencies under the category of “things in action” within British common law. This categorization means that cryptocurrencies are considered a form of property, over which personal rights can be claimed and enforced through legal actions, rather than requiring physical possession.The judge’s decision also referenced the Monetary Authority of Singapore’s (MAS) consultation paper, which proposes implementing segregation and custody requirements for digital payment tokens. By taking cues from the MAS’s stance on digital assets, the court emphasized the legality of holding cryptocurrencies on trust, as long as practical methods for identification and segregation are in place.Cues taken from existing lawSingapore’s legal framework for property also played a crucial role in the ruling. Judge Jeyaretnam pointed to Order 22 of Singapore’s Rules of Court 2021, which defines “movable property” to include various assets, such as cash, debts, bonds, shares, and cryptocurrency or other digital currency. This inclusion reinforces the recognition of cryptocurrencies as a valid form of property within Singaporean law.In April of this year, a Hong Kong court reached a similar conclusion, recognizing cryptocurrency as property. In the High Court of Justice in London the following month, non-fungible tokens (NFTs) were recognized as “private property.”Overall, Judge Jeyaretnam’s ruling represents a significant milestone in the legal recognition of cryptocurrencies in Singapore. By acknowledging cryptocurrencies as property, the court provides greater clarity and certainty for crypto users and investors while affirming the importance of embracing digital assets within the nation’s legal framework.

Uzbekistan Revamps Crypto Mining with New Regulatory FrameworkUzbekistan is ushering in a reset on its approach to cryptocurrency mining with the implementation of a new regulatory framework by the central Asian country’s National Agency of Perspective Projects (NAPP).Photo by Farhodjon Chinberdiev on UnsplashFocusing on solar powerThese freshly endorsed rules were announced earlier this week. They establish stringent guidelines for cryptocurrency mining operations within the country, reserving mining exclusively for registered legal entities and mandating the use of solar power.Under the sweeping regulations, individual miners are barred from participating in cryptocurrency mining activities, a move aimed at bringing structure and oversight to the expanding crypto mining sector within Uzbekistan’s borders.A key feature of the framework is the requirement for cryptocurrency miners to harness electricity generated by solar photovoltaic means. This environmentally conscious approach mirrors global endeavors to promote sustainability and clean energy sources in the crypto mining sector. Miners are also permitted to connect to the national electrical power grid, but only under specific conditions as outlined in the legislation.Safeguarding the power gridIn this respect, Uzbekistan is likely to be learning from the experiences of its northern neighbor, Kazakhstan. Following a ban on crypto mining in China in 2021, Kazakhstan suddenly became the second largest global center for Bitcoin mining. Unprepared for this eventuality, this mining activity caused major problems for the country’s power grid, resulting in blackouts and unrest.The NAPP underscores the necessity for mining operations and service providers to adhere to these newly established rules. To engage in cryptocurrency mining legally, entities must secure the requisite permits and licenses. These permits, valid for five years, come with strict reporting obligations, ensuring transparency and regulatory compliance.Moreover, cryptocurrency miners must prioritize the technical integrity of their electrical supply systems, emphasizing safety and reliability to prevent electrical accidents and maintain secure operating environments.In a bid to nurture a controlled and regulated cryptocurrency ecosystem, Uzbekistan’s crypto watchdog has already issued licenses to several entities, including a cryptocurrency exchange, a crypto depository, and ten other crypto trading platforms. Encouragingly, discussions have taken place with global exchanges like Binance, Huobi, and Bybit, signaling Uzbekistan’s ambitions to establish itself as a cryptocurrency hub.Ban on individual minersThe NAPP’s latest framework also outlaws the mining of anonymous cryptocurrencies designed to enhance transaction privacy, such as Monero (XMR). This measure aligns with international efforts to combat illicit activities linked to anonymous digital currencies.It’s worth noting that these new regulations represent the latest in a series of decrees by the Uzbek government, reiterating the ban on individual miners and the use of cryptocurrencies for domestic payments. Consequently, the full impact of these recent regulations on the nation’s cryptocurrency mining landscape remains to be seen.Uzbekistan’s decision to confine cryptocurrency mining to legal entities employing solar power reflects a growing understanding of the opportunity the activity provides to effectively exploit excess renewable power. In July, the President of eastern neighbor Kyrgyzstan put forward an ambitious project to use crypto mining to exploit the country’s hydro-electric power resources.