Top

Bhutan Quietly Mining Bitcoin Since $5,000

Policy & Regulation·May 02, 2023, 1:41 AM

The tiny nation of Bhutan continues to be full of surprises recently where crypto is concerned, with the latest report suggesting that the kingdom has been mining bitcoin for a number of years already.

Bhutan buddha statue
© Pexels/Pema Gyamtsho

According to a recent report in The Bhutanese, a Bhutan-based publication led by investigative journalist, Tenzing Lamsing, the landlocked nation had been mining bitcoin over the course of a “few years” already, in an effort to diversify its sovereign portfolio.

 

Long-term investment strategy

Ujjwal Deep Dahal, CEO of Druk Holding and Investments (DHI), told the publication that the venture was part of a long-term investment strategy. DHI is the commercial arm of the Royal Government of Bhutan. It was formed pursuant to a Royal Charter in 2007 with the mandate of making investments on behalf of Bhutan while optimizing usage of resources.

The mining activity had centered on Bitcoin although there was a small provision for Ethereum-based mining when Ethereum was a mineable proof-of-work (PoW)-based blockchain network. It’s unclear of the precise timeline but the report outlines that DHI has engaged in the mining space over a number of years, and at a time in which the Bitcoin unit price was as low as $5,000.

 

Exploiting cheap hydro

Nestled in the Himalayas, Bhutan has considerable hydroelectric resources. Bitcoin mining is ordinarily an expensive exercise but in scenarios where there are plentiful energy resources with a marginally cheaper cost of production than the average, it can be an attractive and profitable enterprise. Dahal outlined that these conditions enabled DHI to reinvest profits back into additional mining equipment.

The precise time-frame of DHIs entry into Bitcoin mining is open to speculation. However, we do know that the Bitcoin unit price was last below $5,000 at the onset of the pandemic in March 2020. Prior to that, Bitcoin had risen above $5,000 in April 2019 following an acute bear market in 2018.

 

Crypto lender entanglements

Bhutan and DHI hit the crypto radar last month when it was revealed that the kingdom had made significant investments into and out of failed crypto lenders Celsius and BlockFi. Dahal has said that the royal charter-mandated firm had taken out loans with both crypto lenders and had fully repaid those loans. However, that may have been something that happened later than anticipated. The Bhutanese company had a $30 million loan from BlockFi. BlockFi liquidated the Bitcoin collateral associated with that loan in 2022 but it left a shortfall of $800,000. The failed lender subsequently sued DHI. As of an April 13 court filing, BlockFi submitted a voluntary dismissal of the lawsuit to the courts, presumably because the shortfall was subsequently paid by DHI.

In the case of Celsius, DHI had withdrawn $65 million from the lending platform prior to it declaring bankruptcy. Consequently, the matter has been the subject of speculation relative to the potential for the Celsius bankruptcy estate to pursue DHI for a clawback of the withdrawn funds.

More to Read
View All
Web3 & Enterprise·

Jan 10, 2024

KLEVA to undergo upgrade and migrate to WEMIX3.0 network

KLEVA, a decentralized finance (DeFi) service that until now has been based on the Klaytn blockchain, is set to move to Wemade’s WEMIX3.0 mainnet as a native service and undergo a new upgrade to “KLEVA omni”, according to an official Medium announcement by WEMIX on Tuesday (KST). As a result, KLEVA tokens will be issued on the WEMIX3.0 network instead of Klaytn. Existing tokens will be migrated to WEMIX3.0 as well.Photo by GuerrillaBuzz on UnsplashThe team at KLEVA revealed that it decided to move the service to WEMIX3.0 to gain access to broader inter-network connectivity. The decision also came as a result of security strengthening efforts related to custodial bridge services using the Lock and Mint method. Unveiling KLEVA omniKLEVA omni is an amalgamation of service advancements within the Trans-Chain DeFi protocol, rooted in the WEMIX Foundation's unagi initiative – a new innovative omnichain network and interoperable Web3 gaming platform. This innovative protocol integrates optimized tokenomics tailored for the omnichain ecosystem. By going beyond the limitations of single-chain DeFi and placing an emphasis on token rewards, the value of the Trans-Chain DeFi protocol is centered around the KLEVA token.  At its core, KLEVA omni is differentiated in its ability to process trans-chain transactions. It serves not only as a comprehensive solution for inter-chain yield farming but also as a bridge between service providers and users across boundaries.  Solution to variable yields and interchain risksIn addition, in the current market landscape, variations in deposit yields and loan interest rates exist for the same asset across different chains and services. KLEVA omni addresses this by sharing such information with users, streamlining their research and decision-making processes. This makes it easier for users to optimize their investment portfolios. The protocol will use una Bridge – a non-custodial omnichain bridge under the unagi initiative that mitigates the risks presented by wrapped tokens – to enable secure and efficient trading. It will also support various blockchains like Arbitrum, Optimism, Avalanche, Polygon, Ethereum, BNB and Solana.

news
Policy & Regulation·

Oct 10, 2023

HTX Hacker Returns Funds

HTX Hacker Returns FundsThe hacker responsible for the nearly 5,000 ETH exploit on the Seychelles-headquartered cryptocurrency exchange HTX (formerly known as Huobi) last month has decided to return the stolen funds.Towards the end of last month, the exchange fell victim to a hack, resulting in a loss estimated at around $8 million. According to on-chain data, the hacker has repatriated the pilfered cryptocurrency, marking a significant development in the aftermath of the cyberattack.Photo by Shubham Dhage on UnsplashHacker rewardedThe returned funds were sent back in two separate transactions, one consisting of approximately 4,000 ETH and the other totaling around 1,000 ETH. HTX advisor and Tron Founder, Justin Sun, took to X (formerly Twitter) to officially confirm the recovery. In his statement, Sun revealed that HTX had not only received all the stolen funds as promised by the hacker but had also extended a gesture of goodwill. HTX rewarded the responsible party with a “white hat bonus” amounting to 250 ETH, equivalent to a substantial $400,000.Sun expressed his satisfaction with the hacker’s decision, stating:“We have confirmed that the hacker has fully returned all funds, as promised, and we have also paid the hacker a white hat bonus of 250 ETH. The hacker made the right choice. We would like to express our gratitude to everyone in the industry for their help.”Hacker advisory messageDuring the return of the funds, the hacker conveyed a message on-chain, shedding light on the reason behind this act of restitution. The message read:“Received your message. White hat bonus to0x1Fc8674A51D6b97C968BE384337519CE7003152B. Your system hot wallet private key leak, you should change system hot wallet address and reduce the system hot wallet rate.”HTX, in response to the hacker’s decision to return the funds and in accordance with its commitment, promptly sent the white hat bonus to the specified address. The exchange also requested the hacker to provide a detailed security vulnerability analysis report to the email address htxsafe@htx-inc.com.This request aims to prevent similar incidents in the future, with assurances that the hacker’s privacy will be safeguarded.Justin Sun had confirmed the original hack in September, at the time reassuring the community that HTX had covered all losses arising from the attack and resolved associated issues satisfactorily.While acknowledging the severity of the hack, Sun pointed out that the stolen amount represented a relatively small fraction of the $3 billion in assets held by HTX’s users. To incentivize the return of the funds, HTX had even offered a reward of 5%, which equated to $400,000.However, Sun also emphasized that if the funds had not been returned within a seven-day window, the company would have been compelled to involve law enforcement authorities.Thankfully, it did not come to that, and the cryptocurrency exchange can now move forward with the confidence that its users’ assets are secure. This incident highlights the importance of cooperation and ethical choices within the crypto community, as well as the potential for resolution even in the face of cyberattacks.

news
Policy & Regulation·

Sep 19, 2023

Rising Cryptocurrency Arbitrage Transactions Raise Concerns in South Korea

Rising Cryptocurrency Arbitrage Transactions Raise Concerns in South KoreaThe number of arbitrage transactions between South Korean and foreign cryptocurrency exchanges has been experiencing a notable uptick, according to a report by local media outlet Maeil Business Newspaper.In recent developments, foreign actors engaging in price manipulation have been transferring substantial amounts of cryptocurrency assets to Korean exchanges, driving up prices. Subsequently, they transfer these tokens from Korean exchanges back to overseas platforms, capitalizing on the price discrepancies to generate profits.Photo by Maxim Hopman on UnsplashBithumb’s case in H1According to documents submitted to Kim Hee-gon, a member of the ruling political party People Power Party, on Monday, KRW 3.4 trillion ($2.6 billion) worth of tokens were moved from Bithumb, a leading Korean cryptocurrency exchange, to foreign trading platforms during the first half of this year. Although this figure marks a 40% decrease compared to H1 2022’s KRW 5.7 trillion, primarily due to the significant decline in token prices across the cryptocurrency market, it’s noteworthy that the number of transactions has seen a significant increase.Other exchangesGopax, another major exchange in the nation, recorded token outflows totaling KRW 12.3 billion. On the other hand, Upbit, Coinone, and Korbit, which are also prominent exchanges, declined to provide data due to reasons like confidentiality concerns. However, given that Upbit holds an 82.0% share of the Korean crypto market, nearly four times larger than Bithumb’s share (14.2%), it is suspected that the volume of tokens transferred from Upbit to foreign platforms would likely have followed a similar proportion.While the value of tokens sent from Bithumb to overseas operators saw a year-over-year decrease, the number of transactions surged to 231,302, nearly doubling the figure of H1 2022’s 124,048 transactions. The average transaction size was KRW 14.7 million.Even though the overall enthusiasm for cryptocurrencies might have cooled off since last year, the spike in the number of transactions suggests that there’s been a surge in arbitrage trading between Korea and foreign markets.Kimchi premiumEarlier this month, a significant transaction caught the eye of cryptocurrency market observers in South Korea. On September 1, crypto data analytics firm Arkham identified that 170,000 CyberConnect (CYBER) tokens were transferred to Bithumb from a crypto wallet thought to be owned by DWF Labs, a firm specializing in cryptocurrency trading and investment. The timing of the transaction coincides with a period during which the Kimchi premium for CYBER exceeded 100%. The Kimchi premium refers to the crypto price gap between Korean exchanges and their foreign counterparts.The complicating factor here is that DWF Labs is a foreign entity that is managed by a foreign team.The use of corporate accounts is virtually prohibited in the Korean crypto market. The Travel Rule mandates that any transfers of tokens between Korean and international exchanges must go through accounts that have been verified under Know Your Customer (KYC) guidelines. Given these regulations, there are growing suspicions within the crypto community that foreign venture capitalists may have used accounts in borrowed names to conduct sales on Korean exchanges, which are restricted to Korean citizens. However, it’s worth noting that there is currently no legal basis for taking punitive action even if borrowed-name accounts were indeed used.Lawmaker Kim commented on the limitations of current financial regulations aimed at preventing money laundering in the cryptocurrency market. Despite efforts by financial authorities, including the introduction of the Travel Rule, Kim stated that these measures have not been very effective. He emphasized the urgency of enhancing the regulatory framework to curb potential illicit activities involving cryptocurrencies, such as those exploiting market arbitrage opportunities.

news
Loading