Top

True Potential of Asian Crypto ETFs Yet to Be Realized

Markets·April 21, 2023, 5:54 AM

A recently published report by Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Ltd. (HKEX), the Hong Kong stock exchange, has found that crypto exchange traded funds (ETFs) have the potential to play a significant part in unlocking the next phase of digital asset expansion in Asia.

trading chart on tablet
©Pexels/Burak The Weekender

The report, titled “Crypto ETF: Key to unlocking the next phase of digital asset growth in Asia,” highlights how crypto ETFs could attract more institutional investors and lead to increased liquidity in the digital asset market. Furthermore, HKEX claims that the ETF investment mechanism can play its part in offering a more regulated and safe manner through which investors can gain exposure to digital assets.

 

Regulatory progress

While the report cites an Asian regulatory environment that is becoming increasingly more supportive of digital assets of late, it still identifies a need for further progress to be made to improve the level of regulatory clarity and to provide a truly standardized approach to digital assets. That, it says, will result in crypto ETFs becoming more accessible, offering a diversified way in which the investor can access and gain exposure to digital assets in Asia.

Nonetheless, HKEX applauds the work done thus far by regulatory authorities in Hong Kong and Singapore, where regulatory frameworks relative to crypto ETFs have been implemented. Those are measures that the Hong Kong stock exchange believes will increase investor confidence, and in turn, bring about further adoption of digital assets.

 

Modest daily trading volume

Between December 16 and February 7 the two Bitcoin ETFs and one Ether ETF listed on the Hong Kong stock exchange achieved a daily trading volume of $1.19 million. That’s rather underwhelming when compared with the $3 billion in daily volume being achieved by the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME) relative to its Bitcoin and Ether futures ETF in the United States. On the New York stock exchange ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF achieves a daily average trading volume of $196 million.

These findings are a bit counter-intuitive given the contrasting regulatory approaches in the two territories. In the US, regulators have failed to approve a physically settled Bitcoin ETF. Furthermore, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has denied the attempts of Grayscale Bitcoin Investment Trust (GBTC) to convert the Bitcoin fund into an ETF. Meanwhile, Hong Kong has much more regulatory clarity but yet trading volume in crypto-related ETFs remains minuscule by comparison with the United States.

Despite that, the report remains upbeat with regard to what can be achieved in the market with crypto-related ETFs. It makes a case for crypto ETFs as a means for traditional financial institutions to enter the digital assets market with relative ease. Similarly, it sees a role for global stock exchanges in facilitating future growth of crypto-related ETFs and in developing new ETF products that could unlock access to specific digital assets or bespoke investment strategies.

More to Read
View All
Web3 & Enterprise·

Sep 29, 2023

OKX Ventures Invests in Data Bridging Protocol

OKX Ventures Invests in Data Bridging ProtocolOKX Ventures, the investment branch of the Seychelles-headquartered cryptocurrency exchange OKX, has made a strategic investment in Singapore’s 0xScope.Knowledge graph protocolIn a press release published by GlobeNewswire on Thursday, details of the deal between the venture investor and the data intelligence platform were laid out. 0xScope has carved out a unique niche by offering a knowledge graph protocol tailored for both Web2 and Web3 data, catering to a diverse audience, including developers, traders, and blockchain protocols.At the forefront of the startup’s offering is Scopescan, a blockchain analytics platform that harnesses the potential of the firm’s knowledge graph. Scopescan provides comprehensive data on over 84 million addresses, 600,000 tokens, 1.4 million labeled addresses, and millions of exchange wallets. The platform empowers users to track and analyze on-chain activities across various blockchain networks, a vital feature for the continued growth of the Web3 ecosystem.Dora Yue, the Founder of OKX Ventures, emphasized the crucial role of data in Web3’s three core technological pillars: cross-chain integration, decentralized storage, and privacy computing. Through its knowledge graph technology, 0xScope has made strides in advancing these areas. The collaboration between OKX Ventures and 0xScope has the potential to accelerate the development of Web3.Photo by Conny Schneider on UnsplashUndisclosed investment sumWhile the exact investment amount remains undisclosed, the deal signifies OKX Ventures’ interest in supporting 0xScope’s mission of decentralizing and democratizing Web2 and Web3 data sources. Together, they aspire to create an open-source environment that facilitates seamless uploading, downloading, validation, and processing of data within the Web3 realm.OKX Ventures, as the investment arm of OKX, boasts an initial capital pool of $100 million. It actively explores promising blockchain projects worldwide and champions innovative technology solutions. The collaboration with 0xScope aligns perfectly with their mission to drive innovation and progress in the blockchain and crypto sectors.Moonbox investmentIn addition to its investment in 0xScope, OKX Ventures recently allocated $1 million to Moonbox, a Hong Kong-based startup focused on artificial intelligence and Web3 technologies. This strategic move reinforces OKX Ventures’ dedication to nurturing cutting-edge technologies and further solidifies its presence in the blockchain and crypto space.Meanwhile, 0xScope is on a mission to democratize and decentralize connectivity in Web2 and Web3 data. Their unique ability to track all associated addresses of an entity offers what the firm believes to be unparalleled insights into user behavior across different addresses and blockchain networks. This capability positions it at the forefront of the Web3 data revolution.With their combined expertise and resources, the two companies are set to drive innovation, foster inclusivity, and empower users in the evolving Web3 ecosystem. Uplifted in having secured the deal, the 0xScope team took to X (formerly Twitter), stating:“Looking forward to collaborating and contributing to the growth of the OKX ecosystem. Together, let’s drive innovation and empower the future of decentralized finance!”With 0xScope gearing up to introduce new features in the fourth quarter of 2023, there’s likely to be more news to follow from the Singaporean startup relative to the future development of Web3 data.

news
Policy & Regulation·

Aug 07, 2023

The Need to Distinguish Between Security and Non-Security Virtual Assets

The Need to Distinguish Between Security and Non-Security Virtual AssetsWith the recent enactment of the Virtual Asset User Protection Bill in South Korea, there is a need to lay out criteria for determining whether virtual assets qualify as securities, says Kim Ja-bong, a senior research fellow at the Korea Institute of Finance, in his report titled “The Implications of Determining Which Virtual Assets Constitute Securities and Investor Protection” released on Saturday.Photo by Shubham Dhage on UnsplashThe implications of the Virtual Asset User Protection ActThe Virtual Asset User Protection Act — which will take effect in July of next year — aims to protect customer assets, establish regulations against unfair trading practices, and enforce penalties. Notably, it will target virtual assets that are not securities, deeming it necessary for regulators to determine if virtual assets qualify as securities or not in order to enforce the bill. Assets with characteristics of securities will fall under the jurisdiction of the Capital Markets Act.Therefore, if the Virtual Asset User Protection Act does not provide sufficient investor protection, issuers may be incentivized to issue non-security assets rather than security assets to avoid the regulations of the Capital Markets Act. This further necessitates the act of distinguishing between virtual assets that are securities versus those that are not.Determining if a virtual asset is a security or notThere are two approaches to do this, according to Kim: the passive approach, which avoids considering a virtual asset as a security whenever possible, and the active approach, which treats a virtual asset as a security whenever applicable.He argues that it is better to focus on whether an investment contract qualifies as a security if it is considered an investment contract, rather than simply selecting a specific approach.Furthermore, the nature of virtual assets renders them unbound by national borders, so it is necessary to establish assessment criteria that correspond with international standards, such as those used in the US and Europe.This is especially important because if the criteria differ from international standards, there is a risk of domestic investors suffering damages due to an issuer’s pursuit of regulatory arbitrage between countries.Equitable recognition and potential for security tokensAccording to Kim, the importance of determining whether virtual assets are securities lies in ensuring that security tokens receive the same recognition and trading treatment as traditional securities such as stocks. With such a measure, security token offerings can serve as an efficient and reliable method for raising funds. Although there may be concerns that such a regulation may hinder the development of virtual assets, it may well be an opportunity for security tokens to be qualified and trusted as high-quality financial instruments just like existing securities, Kim claims.Even for virtual assets that are not considered securities, there are many types of assets that are financial in nature, such as e-money tokens — therefore, it is necessary to actively protect investors in non-security virtual assets through financial regulations such as reinforcing disclosure obligations, which is being done in the EU through the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA).Empowering regulators for enhanced investor protection and market integrityKim underscored that investor protection and healthy growth of the virtual asset market are made possible mainly through expanding regulators’ authority to protect economic interests and prevent damages. The author also suggested institutional reforms that grant regulators substantial authority, which would enhance their ability to protect investors effectively and provide compensation for damages.He added that regulators should also have the authority to enforce liability for damages or impose civil penalties for unfair trading practices conducted using classified information.

news
Policy & Regulation·

Apr 11, 2023

Hong Kong Setting High Bar on Crypto Rules

Hong Kong Setting High Bar on Crypto RulesLucy Gazmararian, a Fintech Advisory Group member of Hong Kong’s Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) and founder of crypto venture firm Token Bay Capital has said that the standards for Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs) in Hong Kong are incredibly high.©Pexels/Brayden LawThe Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) has established these strict guidelines as they want the crypto industry to adhere to the same compliance standards as traditional financial firms.Gazmararian made the comments in discussion with Cointelegraph on the fringes of the Hong Kong WOW Summit. Although the bar is set high, Gazmararian maintains that it is not without good reason. The SFC’s approach is to ask VASPs to apply the same standards that existing financial institutions such as huge banks and asset managers must comply with.Short term challengesAccording to a consultation paper released by the SFC on February 20th, licensed VASPs may serve retail investors, but the standard of investor protection measures imposed needs to be considered. Additionally, Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Know Your Customer (KYC) policies were also discussed.While these high standards may benefit the industry in the long run, Gazmararian believes they may pose challenges for the crypto industry in Hong Kong over the short term. She explained that many crypto businesses are in the startup phase and have funding but not huge amounts. Therefore, complying with the framework may incur significant costs. Gazmararian mentioned the need for local VASPs to have insurance, independent assessment reports, and store crypto in cold storage. It is important to note that these costs may prevent some startups from entering the market, which may have consequences on the industry’s growth in Hong Kong.The Token Bay Capital founder believes that with a solid regulatory framework in place, more well-capitalized financial firms will be willing to help promising startups get off the ground. In her opinion, the companies that receive a license will be upholding the most stringent standards.Ambitions to be global crypto hubThe SFC has encouraged individuals, corporations, and crypto firms to review the 361-page consultation paper and provide feedback. The securities regulator wants these entities to share their views and point to things that may have been missed. According to Gazmararian, the SFC is “absolutely focused” on getting everything right, so they are seeking input from a wide range of sources.Submissions for feedback on the consultation paper closed on March 31. Hong Kong has made significant strides in recent months to establish itself as the world’s next crypto hub. According to a March 20 statement by the Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury, Christian Hui, more than 80 digital asset firms have expressed interest in establishing a presence in Hong Kong over the last few months. This interest is a testament to the growing importance of the crypto industry and the favorable environment that Hong Kong is creating for its growth.

news
Loading